题名

營造業安全領導對勞工不安全行為及職業傷害之影響

并列篇名

Influence of Safety Leadership on Unsafe Behavior and Occupational Injuries among Construction Workers

作者

蒲永仁(Yong-Ren Pu)；傅軒筠(Shuan-Yun Fu)；李素幸(Su-Hsing Lee)

关键词

安全領導 ； 不安全行為 ； 職業傷害 ； 營造業勞工 ； Safety leadership ； Unsafe behavior ； Occupational injury ； Construction workers

期刊名称

勞工安全衛生研究季刊

卷期/出版年月

21卷4期（2013 / 12 / 01）

页次

498 - 509

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

This study aimed at construction workers to investigate the influence of safety leadership on workers' safety behavior and injury events. This study was conducted cross-sectionally, using 500 purposive selected construction workers from southern Taiwan as study subjects. A structured questionnaire was applied to collect information, including demographics, types of workplace safety leadership, safety behavior and injury events. Data analyses used statistical package SAS to perform one-way ANOVA test and logistic regression to examine association of safety leadership and unsafe behavior or injury events. The results showed that positive safety caring and safety management controlling were both correlated with reduction of unsafe behavior and yet the safety management controlling was better than safety caring (r=0.32 and 0.50, both p＜0.0001). After combined the factors of safety caring and safety management controlling into four leadership types, the results showed that those who perceived high caring/high controlling from their forefront leaders posed better safety behavior than those who perceived low caring/low controlling or high caring/low controlling (both p＜0.0001). Regarding to the association between safety leadership and lost work day injury, the results showed that lost work day injury was not significantly associated with safety caring, but significantly associated with management controlling (OR=3.88, 95%CI=1.86~12.73). Furthermore, in the four types of safety leadership, compared to high caring/high controlling types, those who perceived their forefront leaders as low caring/low controlling had significantly higher risk of lost work day injury (OR=3.75, 95%CI=1.11~12.63). This study found that safety leadership of forefront leaders was associated with subordinate workers' unsafe behavior and occupational injury and that, comparing to safety caring, safety management controlling was more effective. The best type of safety leadership is to combined with both high safety caring and high management controlling.
英文摘要

This study aimed at construction workers to investigate the influence of safety leadership on workers' safety behavior and injury events. This study was conducted cross-sectionally, using 500 purposive selected construction workers from southern Taiwan as study subjects. A structured questionnaire was applied to collect information, including demographics, types of workplace safety leadership, safety behavior and injury events. Data analyses used statistical package SAS to perform one-way ANOVA test and logistic regression to examine association of safety leadership and unsafe behavior or injury events. The results showed that positive safety caring and safety management controlling were both correlated with reduction of unsafe behavior and yet the safety management controlling was better than safety caring (r=0.32 and 0.50, both p＜0.0001). After combined the factors of safety caring and safety management controlling into four leadership types, the results showed that those who perceived high caring/high controlling from their forefront leaders posed better safety behavior than those who perceived low caring/low controlling or high caring/low controlling (both p＜0.0001). Regarding to the association between safety leadership and lost work day injury, the results showed that lost work day injury was not significantly associated with safety caring, but significantly associated with management controlling (OR=3.88, 95%CI=1.86~12.73). Furthermore, in the four types of safety leadership, compared to high caring/high controlling types, those who perceived their forefront leaders as low caring/low controlling had significantly higher risk of lost work day injury (OR=3.75, 95%CI=1.11~12.63). This study found that safety leadership of forefront leaders was associated with subordinate workers' unsafe behavior and occupational injury and that, comparing to safety caring, safety management controlling was more effective. The best type of safety leadership is to combined with both high safety caring and high management controlling.
主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 行政院勞工委員會。勞工安全衛生組織管理及自動檢查辦法。台北：勞委會；2011。行政院勞工委員會：http://www.cla.gov.tw/。
  2. Stodgill RM. Personal factors associated with leadership: a survey of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology 1948; 25: 35-71.
  3. Clarke, S,Ward, K.(2006).The role of leader influence tactics and safety climate in engaging employees' safety participation.Risk Analysis,26,1175-85.
  4. Cooper, MD.(1998).Improving safety culture: a practical guide.England:John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Fleishman, EA(1989).Leadership opinion questionnaire.Chicago:London House.
  6. Fleishman, EA.(1953).The description of supervisory behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology,37,1-6.
  7. Fleishman, EA,Harris, EF.(1962).Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee grievances and turnover.Personnel Psychology,15,43-56.
  8. Flin, R,Yule, S.(2004).Leadership for safety: industrial experience.Quality and Safety in Health Care,13,45-51.
  9. Geller, ES.(2000).10 leadership qualities for a total safety culture: safety management is not enough.Professional Safety,45,38-41.
  10. Geller, ES.(2008).People-based leadership: enriching a work culture world-class safety.Professional Safety,53,29-36.
  11. Greenwood, JM,McNamara, WJ.(1969).Leadership styles of initiating structure and consideration and managerial effectiveness.Personnel Psychology,22,141-2.
  12. Halpin, AW.(1957).Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire.Columbus (OH):Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University.
  13. Halprin, AW,Winer, BJ.(1952).The leadership behavior of the airplane commander.Columbus (OH):The Ohio State University Research Foundation.
  14. Heinrich, HW,Peterson, D,Roos, N.(1980).Industrial accident prevention.New York:Mcgraw Hill.
  15. Huang, GG.(1995).Knowledge and action: interpretation of sociology psychology from traditional Chinese culture perspective.Taipei:Psychology Publishing Company.
  16. Judge, TA,Piccolo, RF,Ilies, R.(2004).The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research.Journal of Applied Psychology,89,36-51.
  17. Kang, TL,Su, GJ,Jang, SS,Sheu, SC.(2001).The development of leadership behavior scale for directors of technical and vocational schools in Taiwan.Human Resource Management,1,43-57.
  18. Keller, RT.(2006).Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: a longitudinal study of research and development project team performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,91,202-10.
  19. Korman, AK.(1966)."Consideration," "Initiating Structure," and organizational criteria-a review.Personnel Psychology,19,349-61.
  20. Krause, TR,Weekley, T.(2005).Safety leadership: A four-factor model for establishing a high-functioning organization.Professional Safety,11,34-40.
  21. Maurino, D,Reason, J,Johnson, N,Lee, R.(1995).Beyond aviation human factors.Aldershot:Ashgate.
  22. Mickey, RM,Greenland, S.(1989).The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation.American Journal of Epidemiology,129,125-37.
  23. O''Dea, A,Flin, R.(2001).Site managers and safety leadership in the offshore oil and gas industry.Safety Science,37,39-57.
  24. Schriesheim, C,Kerr, S.(1974).Psychometric properties of the Ohio State Leadership Scales.Psychological Bulletin,81,756-65.
  25. Simard, M,Marchand, A.(1994).The behaviour of first-line supervisors in accident prevention and effectiveness in occupational safety.Safety Science,17,169-85.
  26. Stodgill, RM(ed.),Coons, AE(ed.)(1957).Leader behavior: its description and measurement.Columbus (OH):Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University.
  27. Stodgill, RM.(1974).Handbook of leadership.New York:Free Press.
  28. Williams, JH.(2002).Improving safety leadership: using industrial/organizational psychology to enhance safety performance.Professional Safety,47,43-7.
  29. Wu, TC.(2008).Safety leadership in the teaching laboratories of electrical and electronic engineering departments at Taiwanese universities.Journal of Safety Research,39,599-607.
  30. Wu, TC.(2005).The validity and reliability of safety leadership scale in universities of Taiwan.International Journal of Technology and Engineering Education,2,27-42.
  31. Wu, TC,Chen, CH,Li, CC.(2008).A correlation among safety leadership, safety climate and safety performance.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,21,307-18.
  32. Zohar, D.(2002).The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups.Journal of Organizational Behavior,23,75-92.
  33. 行政院勞工委員會(2012)。100年勞動檢查年報。台北:勞工委員會。
  34. 李佳偉(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班。
  35. 李明穎(2008).南台科技大學技職教育與人力資源發展研究所.
  36. 傅光黛(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。長榮大學職業安全與衛生學系。
被引用次数
  1. 黃盈樺,陳維東,王肇偉(2019)。領導行為及安全文化對營建安全績效之影響－SEM之應用。中國土木水利工程學刊，31(2)，183-191。
  2. 鄭慶武、陳冠華、林楨中(2017)。從安全管理問題探討行為安全介入營造業管理模式之初探。勞動及職業安全衛生研究季刊，25(2)，79-93。
  3. 鄭智文,劉一中,陳銘雄(2021)。營造工程的風險評估－以中部某大樓新建工程為例。工業安全衛生，383，31-41。
print cancel