题名

人類學與中國近代社會史:影響與前景

并列篇名

Anthropology and Modern Chinese Social History: Impact and Prospects

DOI

10.29457/SJH.200512.0002

作者

科大衛(David Faure)

关键词

地域史研究 ; 宗族 ; 傅衣凌 ; 梁方仲 ; local studies ; kinship ; Fu Yiling ; Liang Fangzhong

期刊名称

東吳歷史學報

卷期/出版年月

14期(2005 / 12 / 01)

页次

21 - 36

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文試圖從回顧近代中國社會史近五十年的發展,探討近年地域史研究的重要性。地域研究一方面回應五十年代社會控制論之不足,同時也承繼了傅衣凌、梁方仲對階級理論的批判與發展。本文旨在說明,地方研究的作用,並不局限於地方史,而是對社會不同時期性質的探討。

英文摘要

This essay reflects on the development of Modern Chinese Social History in the past fifty years to explore the importance of local studies. A focus on local studies has come about in response to the theory of social control in the 1950s and in succession to Fu Yiling and Liang Fangzhong's criticism and revision of a class theory approach to history. This essay argues that local studies should be of much greater interest to historians than a description of local conditions: they deal with questions about the nature of society at different times.

主题分类 人文學 > 歷史學
参考文献
  1. Arthur Smith(1900).Village Life in China, a Study in Sociology.Edinburgh:Oliphant, Anderson and Ferrier.
  2. Ch`en Han-sheng(1936).Agrarian Problems in Southernmost China.Shanghai:Kelly & Walsh.
  3. Chang Chung-li(1955).The Chinese Gentry: Studies on Their Role in Nineteenth-century Chinese Society.Seattle:University of Washington Press.
  4. Chang Chung-Li(1962).The Income of the Chinese Gentry.Seattle:University of Washington Press.
  5. Daniel Kulp(1925).Country Life in South China: the Sociology of Familism, Vol. I, Phenix Village, Kwangtung, China.New York:Teachers College, Columbia University.
  6. Franz Michael(1955).State and Society in Nineteenth-Century China.World Politics,7(3),419-433.
  7. Frederic Wakeman(1966).Strangers at the Gate: Social Disorder in South China, 1839-1861.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  8. G. William Skinner(1964).Marketing and social structure in rural China, Parts I, II, and III.Journal of Asian Studies,24(1),3-44.
  9. G. William Skinner(1965).Marketing and social structure in rural China, Parts I, II, and III.Journal of Asian Studies,24(3),363-399.
  10. G. William Skinner(1965).Marketing and social structure in rural China, Parts I, II, and III.Journal of Asian Studies,24(2),195-228.
  11. G. William Skinner(編)(1977).The City in Late Imperial China.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
  12. Ho Ping-ti(1962).The Ladder of Success in Imperial China.New York:Columbia University Press.
  13. Hsiao Kung-chuan(1960).Rural China: Imperial Control in the Nineteenth Century.Seattle:University of Washington Press.
  14. Lucien Bianco(1962).Classes laborieuses et classes dangereuses dans la chine imperiale au XIXe siecle.Annales:Economies, Societes, Civilisations.
  15. Maurice Freedman(1966).Chinese Lineage and Society: Fukien and Kwangtung.London:Athlone Press.
  16. Maurice Freedman(1958).Lineage Organization in Southeastern China.London:University of London, Athlone Press.
  17. Patricia Ebrey,James Watson (合編)(1986).Kinship Organization in Late Imperial China, 1000-1940.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  18. Philip Kuhn(1970).Rebellion and Its Enemies in Late Imperial China, Militarization and Social Structure, 1796-1864.Camb. Mass.:Harvard University Press.
  19. T`ien-p`ei Meng,Sidney D. Gamble(1926).Prices, wages and the standard of living in Peking, 1900-1924.Chinese Social and Political Science Review, Special Supplement.
  20. 李世瑜(1948)。現在華北秘密宗教。成都:華西協合大學中國文化研究所。
  21. 孫祚民(1956)。中國農民戰爭問題探索。上海:新知識出版社。
  22. 翁同文(1975)。康熙初葉以萬為姓集團餘黨建立天地會。Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nanyang University, Occasional papers series。
  23. 張履鸞。江蘇武進物價之研究。金陵學報,3(1),153-216。
  24. 梁方仲(1957)。明代糧長制度。上海:上海人民出版社。
  25. 莊吉發(1994)。清代秘密會黨史研究。臺北:文史哲出版社。
  26. 傅衣凌(1956)。明清時代商人及商業資本
  27. 傅衣凌(1983)。文史哲
  28. 傅衣凌(1989)。傅衣凌治史五十年文編。廈門大學出版社。
  29. 湯明檖、黃啟臣(1990)。梁方仲經濟史諭文集集遺。廣州:廣東人民。
  30. 費孝通、吳晗(1949)。皇權與紳權。上海:觀察社。
  31. 路遙編(2000)。山東大學義和團調查資料匯編。濟南市:山東大學出版社。
  32. 路遙編(1980)。山東義和團調查資料選編。濟南:齊魯書社。
  33. 劉志偉編(2004)。梁方仲文集。廣州:中山大學出版社。
  34. 鄭振滿、黃向春(2004)。文化、歷史與國家-歷史學與人類學的對話。中國社會歷史評論。
被引用次数
  1. (2024)。從史料量化到數位人文:明清社會經濟史研究中的數位方法演進。漢學研究通訊,43(1),13-21。