题名

遠東的塞拉耶佛？1919年天津租界美日衝突事件始末

并列篇名

Sarajevo of the Far East? A Research on the American-Japan Confrontation over the Tientsin Fracas in 1919

作者

應俊豪(Chun-Hao Ying)

关键词

一戰後美日對抗 ； 天津事件 ； 天津租界 ； 山東問題 ； American-Japanese confrontation after WWI ； Tientsin Fracas ； Tientsin Concession ； Shantung Problem

期刊名称

東吳歷史學報

卷期/出版年月

38期（2018 / 06 / 30）

页次

175 - 226

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

1919年3月間的天津租界美日衝突案顯然是一個相當值得深入探究的事件，適足以用來檢討一戰後美、日在華互動的新格局，同時也可以檢視在中日山東問題之爭與反日運動的刺激下，中、美、日三角間的複雜關係。本文利用美、日雙方第一手的檔案資料，深入追查事件背後所體現的重要意涵。特別是天津美日衝突事件發生的時間相當敏感，正值山東問題爭議已在巴黎和會引起中、日代表團的言語交鋒與立場對立，美國代表團在威爾遜總統的率領下，明顯較為同情中國。美國駐華官員以及民間社群，也是不太隱藏其對日本野心的猜忌與厭惡。日本外務省則開始在日本本地以及中國發動一系列的反美宣傳，以制衡美國，並為巴黎和會上的外交行動張勢。而中國的反日運動此時則仍在醞釀之中，對日本的不滿日益高漲，各地也零星出現抵制活動，但尚未爆發大規模、有組織的反日運動。換言之，此案恰巧提供一個很好的分析點，可以探究一戰後美方的對日態度，並藉此略窺在五四政治運動發生之前，美國駐華官員對於日本的觀察，以及如何看待一戰後的美、日在華互動。
英文摘要

American-Japanese conflict in the Tientsin Concession in March 1919 is an important event. Through deep investigation of this event, we can re-examine American-Japanese interaction in China after World War I, as well as the triple-complex relationship between the U.S., Japan and China in the contexts of Shantung Issue and the anti-Japanese movement in China. This paper utilizes the original archives of U.S. and Japan to trace historical implications behind the event. It shows that the event was very crucial as the controversy over the Shantung problem was initiated in the Paris Peace Conference. The dispute between the Chinese delegation and Japanese delegation drew the world's attention, and Woodrow Wilson, then the President of the U.S., showed his sympathy with the Chinese. American diplomats, military officers and civilians in China also expressed their doubt about Japan's ambition. On the other side, Japanese Government seemed to launch anti-American propaganda in China and Japan to counteract the U.S. and tried to direct public opinion as a method to express their support of the diplomatic negotiation. Meanwhile, despite that there was no large mass movement against Japan, the Chinese hatred of Japan gradually came into place as a result of the 21 Demands in 1915. To sum up, the Tientsin incident offered a good opportunity to analyze American officials' observations of Japan in China, and to evaluate how the US government weighed the American-Japan relationship in China after WWI.
主题分类 人文學 > 歷史學
参考文献
  1. 應俊豪(2018)。1921年上海虹口美日衝突事件研究。臺灣師大歷史學報，59
    連結：
  2. 應俊豪(2008)。談判桌上的海權劃分：五國海軍會議（1921-1922）與戰間期的海權思維。國立政治大學歷史學報，30，119-168。
    連結：
  3. “Official Report on Occurrence: The Movement of the Japanese Crowd in the French Concession,” Enclosure 2 of “The Japanese Consul General (Funatsu) at Tientsin to the American Consul General at Tientsin (Heinzleman),”August 4, 1919, 日本《外務省紀錄》，N-1-7-1-1_2_002。
  4. “Report of the Inspector of Police of French,”July 22, 1919, Enclosure 3 of “The Japanese Consul General (Funatsu) at Tientsin to the American Consul General at Tientsin (Heinzleman),”August 4, 1919, 日本《外務省紀錄》，N-1-7-1-1_2_002。
  5. “Compilation of Statements,” Enclosure 1 of “The Japanese Consul General (Funatsu) at Tientsin to the American Consul General at Tientsin (Heinzleman),”August 4, 1919, 日本外務省外交史料館藏，《外務省紀錄》，N-1-7-1-1_2_002；日本國立公文書館アジア歴史資料センター，レファレンスコード： B1208093100 。（ 以下簡稱日本《外務省紀錄》，N-1-7-1-1_2_002）
  6. 〈日米の国交：親善を得るの道〉，日本《神戸新聞》，1919年4月10日。
  7. 〈美政府對華問題之意見〉，《晨報》（北京），1919年3月21日第3版。
  8. “Official Report on Occurrence: Account Regarding the Meeting between Capt. Landreth and Mr Kamei,” Enclosure 2 of “The Japanese Consul General (Funatsu) at Tientsin to the American Consul General at Tientsin (Heinzleman),”August 4, 1919, 日本《外務省紀錄》，N-1-7-1-1_2_002。
  9. 〈日本外交之新方針〉，《晨報》（北京），1919年3月24日第2版。
  10. 〈日美衝突事四誌〉，《大公報》（天津），1919年3月16日第2張。
  11. 〈日美衝突事六誌〉，《大公報》（天津），1919年3月18日第2張。
  12. “Official Report on Occurrence: Account Relating to Woulded American Private,” Enclosure 2 of “The Japanese Consul General (Funatsu) at Tientsin to the American Consul General at Tientsin (Heinzleman),”August 4, 1919, 日本《外務省紀錄》，N-1-7-1-1_2_002。
  13. 〈日美警衝突續誌〉，《大公報》（天津），1919年3月15日第2張。
  14. “Official Japanese Statement on the Recent Disturbances,” The North China Star, March 18, 1919.
  15. “Official Report Made to Colonel of the 15th Infantry by Two of His Officers, Published in The North China Sar, March 21st,” Enclosure of “Paul S. Reinsch, American Minister, Peking to the Secretary of State,” March 22, 1919, RIAC, 893.00/3064.
  16. “P. S. Heintzleman American Consul General, Tientsin to Paul S. Reinsch, American Minister, Peking,” March 17, 1919, RIAC, 893.00/3064
  17. 〈日美衝突事七誌〉，《大公報》（天津），1919年3月19日第2張。
  18. 「中日新交涉之續聞」，《申報》（上海），1919年2月8日，第6版。
  19. 「收法京陸總長電」，1919年1月30日，中央研究院近代史研究所藏，《北洋政府外交檔案》，03-33/150-(1)
  20. “C. Kaneko, Police Inspector to T. Funatsu, Consul-General, Tientisn,” July 21, 1919, 日本《外務省紀錄》，N-1-7-1-1_2_002。
  21. “The Japanese Consul General (Funatsu) at Tientsin to the American Consul General at Tientsin (Heinzleman),” August 4, 1919, 日本《外務省紀錄》，N-1-7-1-1_2_002。
  22. “Paul S. Reinsch, American Minister, Peking to the Acting Secretary of State,”May 26, 1919, FRUS 1919, Vol.I, p.694.
  23. 〈字林報十四日北京電〉、〈路透社十三日北京電〉，均引自〈天津美日衝突之各消息〉，《申報》（上海），1919年3月16日第2張。
  24. 〈日警美兵大衝突〉，《大公報》（天津），1919年3月13日第1張。
  25. “Estimate of the Political Situation in the Far East and Consideration Affecting the China Expedition in Case of War: The Mission of American Troops in China,” February 17, 1921, MID, 2657-I-161.
  26. “Report of Committee of Inquiry, Tientsin,” March 28, 1919, RIAC, 893.00/3057.
  27. “Certificate of Lieutenant Colonel Charles T. Smart, 15th Infantry Provost Marshal of the United States, China Expedition, Based on Testimony of Witnesses,” March 15, 1919, RIAC, 893.00/3064.
  28. “Official Report on Occurrence: Fracas in the French Concession & Military Movement in the French Concession,” Enclosure 2 of “The Japanese Consul General (Funatsu) at Tientsin to the American Consul General at Tientsin (Heinzleman),”August 4, 1919, 日本《外務省紀錄》，N-1-7-1-1_2_002。
  29. “Paul S. Reinsch, American Minister, Peking to the Acting Secretary of State,”May 22, 1919
  30. 「外交問題吃緊」，《晨報》，1919年2月7日，第3版
  31. “Tientsin Affair Settled: Apology Exchanged by American and Japanese Governments,” The New York Times, December 9, 1920
  32. 「日本對華最近之恫嚇」，《晨報》（北京），1919年2月8日，第6版
  33. “Official Report on Occurrence: Account Relating to Wounded American Private,” Enclosure 2 of “The Japanese Consul General (Funatsu) at Tientsin to the American Consul General at Tientsin (Heinzleman),”August 4,1919, 日本《外務省紀錄》，N-1-7-1-1_2_002。
  34. “P.S. Heintzleman American Consul General, Tientsin to Paul S. Reinsch, American Minister, Peking,” March 19. 1919, RIAC, 893.00/3064
  35. “American Chamber of Commerce of China to the President and the Secretary of State,”
  36. “K. Shidehara, Japanese Ambassador, Washington to Norman H. Davis, Acting Secretary of State,”December 7, 1919, 日本《外務省紀錄》，N-1-7-1-1_2_002。
  37. 〈中日融合之機〉，日本《報知新聞》
  38. “Herbert Goffe, British Consul General, Tientsin to Sir J. H. Jordan, British Minister, Peking,”March 18, & June 6,1919, FO371/3698.
  39. “Foreigner in China,” June 8, 1921, Correspondence of the Military Intelligence Division Relating to General, Political, Economic, and Military Conditions in China, 1918-1941 (RG165, hererafter referred to as MID), 2657-I-176.
  40. 〈各国ニ於ケル外交文書公表関係雑件〉，《（日本）外務省記錄》，米国ノ部第二巻，N-1-7-1，日本外務省外交史料館藏
  41. 〈東報論門羅主義〉，《大公報》（天津），1919年3月14日，第2張。
  42. 〈日美衝突事五誌〉，《大公報》（天津），1919年3月17日第2張。
  43. “Japan Should Make Public Apology,” The North China Star, March 19, 1919.
  44. 〈日美衝突之餘波〉，《大公報》（天津），1919年3月14日，第2張。
  45. “American Official Report on Japanese American Affair,” by Charles T Smart, 15th Infantry, Provost Marshal, March 14, 1919, The North China Star, March 21, 1919.
  46. “Herbert Goffe, British Consul General , Tientsin to Sir J. H. Jordan, British Minister, Peking,” March 14, 1919, FO371/3698.
  47. “P.S. Heintzleman American Consul General, Tientsin to Paul S.Reinsch, American Minister, Peking,” March 28, 1919, RIAC, 893.00/3057.
  48. 〈津埠美日衝突之別報〉，《申報》（上海），1919年3月18日，第2張。
  49. (1958).Foreign Relations of the United States: Paris Peace Conference, 1919 (FRUS:PPC).Washington D.C.:Government Printing Office.
  50. “American Report on Japanese American Affair,” The North China Star, March 21, 1919.
  51. 《益世報》，1919年3月
  52. “No Further Disturbances Between Japanese and Japanese Soldiers,” The North China Star, March 15, 1919.
  53. 〈日美衝突之餘波〉，《大公報》（天津），1919年3月14日第2張。
  54. “American Officers Make Report on Recent Japanese American Report: Lieut.-Col. Smart, Provost Marshal, and Capt. Landreth Make Reports Which Are Approved by Col. Wilder and Forwarded to American Legation,” The North China Star, March 21, 1919
  55. “Minutes of Committee on Limitation of Armament,” Fourth Meeting, December 22, 1921, 11 A.M. & “Report of the American Delegation Submitted to the President,” February 9, 1922, U. S. Naval War College, International Law Documents: Conference on the Limitation of Armament with Notes and Index, 1921 (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1923), pp. 32-33, 265
  56. “Japanese Armed Troops Enter French Concession Led by Mounted Officers and Acting Consul General,” The North China Star, March 14, 1919; See also The Peking Daily News,March 15, 1919.
  57. “Memorandum from Assistant Chinese Secretary,”March 17, 1919, RIAC, 893.00/3064.
  58. “P.S. Heintzleman American Consul General, Tientsin to Paul S. Reinsch, American Minister, Peking,”March 28, 1919, RIAC, 893.00/3057.
  59. “Paul S.Reinsch, American Minister, Peking to the Secretary of State, Washington,” March 22, 1919, RIAC, 893.00/3063.
  60. “Sir J. N. Jordan, British Minister, Peking to Earl Curzon of Kedleston, Foreign Office,“March 25, 1919, FO371/3698.
  61. 「中國代表團第十一次會議錄」，1919年2月6日，《北洋政府外交檔案》03-37/12-(2)。
  62. (United States) Department of State(1960).(United States) Department of State, Records of the Department of State Relating to the Internal Affairs of China, 1910-1929 (RIAC) (Washington: The National Archives, 1960),中央研究院近代史研究所圖書館藏,微捲檔案(Microfilm).
  63. （日本）華府會議帝國全權事務所，〈軍備制限會議總括報告〉，《（日本）外務省記錄》，2-4-3。頁45
  64. Asada, Sadao(2006).From Mahan to Pearl Harbor: American Strategic Theory and the Rise of the Imperial Japanese Navy.Annapolis:Naval Institute Press.
  65. Carl Crow, China Takes Her Place (New York: Harper & Bros., 1944), pp.113-114.
  66. Gow, Ian(ed.),Hirama, Yoichi(ed.),Chapman, Joan(ed.)(2003).The History of Anglo-Japanese Relations, 1600-2000.New York:Palgrave.
  67. Howell, Glenn F.(ed.),Nobel, Dennis L.(ed.)(2002).Gunboats on the Yangtze: The Diary of Captain Glenn F. Howell of the USS Palos, 1920-1921.Jefferson:McFarland & Company, Inc..
  68. Link, Arthur Stanley(ed.)(1966).The Papers of Woodrow Wilson (PWW).Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  69. Link, Arthur Stanley(ed.)(1966).The Papers of Woodrow Wilson (PWW).Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  70. 日本外務省編(1971)。日本外交文書。東京:外務省。
  71. 日本國際政治學會編(1989)。日中戰爭から日英米戰爭へ。東京:日本國際政治學會。
  72. 吳翎君(2012)。美國大企業與近代中國的國際化。臺北:聯經。
  73. 應俊豪(2001)。公眾輿論與北洋外交—以巴黎和會山東問題為中心的研究。臺北:國立政治大學歷史系。
print cancel