题名

既非「八國」亦非「盟友」：英國在「八國聯軍」中的角色與政策

并列篇名

Britain's Policy towards ＂The Eight-Nation Alliance＂ during the Boxer Uprising in China, 1900-1901

作者

韓翔中(Hsiang-Chung Han)

关键词

八國聯軍 ； 義和團 ； 英國對華政策 ； Boxer Uprising ； Eight Nations Alliance ； British foreign policy in China

期刊名称

東吳歷史學報

卷期/出版年月

39期（2019 / 12 / 31）

页次

77 - 124

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本論文旨在探討1900年義和團事件爆發之後，英國政府對於「聯軍」所採取之政策，其中包括英國如何看待「聯軍」以及英國自身的參與情形。全文含導論、結論共分為六部分。第一節導論是一個歷史解釋與史學史的回顧，反省傳統的「八國聯軍」的概念有何問題，並解釋中、西方對此事態度之差異，最後說明本文選擇英國作為探討對象的理由；第二節探討自義和團亂事惡化以降至外國聯軍攻入北京期間，英國政府如何看待救援使館與各國出兵事宜；第三節呈現英國政府對於聯軍統帥任命事宜的態度、以及德國政府試探英國的經過，並兼論各國軍隊尚未集結華北之前英國政府採取的措施；第四節集中論述聯軍佔據北京之後，英軍在後續聯軍軍事行動中所扮演的角色，並藉由拳亂禍首懲處事宜的談判過程突顯英國政策思維；第五節闡述英國政府對於英軍留駐北京的考量，及其對於聯軍撤出北京問題的態度；第六節則就諸章節所述予以簡要的結論與評價。
英文摘要

The military actions taken by the foreign powers in Northern China during the Boxer Uprising (1900-1901) have been interpreted by Chinese historians as an international coalition, which is traditionally called 'The Eight-Nation Alliance.' However, the whole incident was too complicated to be oversimplified into the cooperative invasion of the Western imperialism. For the Boxer Uprising was really an unforeseen accident to the Great Powers, many of them wanted to take a conservative stance under such conditions in order to maintain the ＂status quo＂. While Britain held the greatest commercial interests in China, she was especially conservative in coping with the incident. Therefore, this essay is intended to illustrate the British policy towards the international allied troops in the incident of Boxer Uprising in China, which provides an explication for international relations and the thinking of the foreign Powers at that time. The topics in this research include the attitude of British Governments towards the dispatch of relief force to Peking, the appointment of the commander-in-chief of the Allied troops, and Britain's own role during the incident. This paper is divided into six sections as follows: 1. Reflections on the historical interpretation of the 'The Eight-Nation Alliance'. 2. British Government's perspectives to the nature of the foreign relief force. 3. Britain's attitude towards the nomination of the (German) commander-in-chief of ally troops. 4. 'Checks and balances': The role of the British forces in Peking. 5. the British Government' concerns about the international occupation of Peking. 6. Conclusion.
主题分类 人文學 > 歷史學
参考文献
  1. Hansard, 4rd S., vol. 86, “Command of Allied Forces,” 16 July. 1900, cc. 60-1.
  2. BPP（British Parliamentary Papers）, China No. 3 (1900), No. 213, Whitehead to Salisbury, 28 June 1900, p. 82.
  3. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 191, Salisbury to Scott, 13 August 1900.
  4. Hansard, 4rd S., vol. 89, “Address in Answer to His Majesty's Most Gracious Speech,” 15 Feb. 1900, c. 284-286.
  5. BPP, China No. 3 (1900), No. 192, Warren to Salisbury, 26 July 1900
  6. No. 244, Scott to Salisbury, 13 July, 1900.
  7. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 143, Salisbury to Lascelles, 9 Aug. 1900. And see H. B. Morse, The International Relations of the Chinese Empire, Vol. III, pp. 309-310.
  8. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 188, Scott to Salisbury, 13 August 1900.
  9. Confidential Print, 7470/285, Whitehead to Salisbury, 24 July 1900, from BDFA, Part I, Series E, Asia, vol. 24, p. 93.
  10. E. H. Seymour, My Naval Career and Travels (New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., 1911), pp. 343-344
  11. BPP, China No. 3 (1900), No. 215, Salisbury to MacDonald, 28 July 1900.
  12. Hansard, 4rd S., vol. 87, “Command and Composition of the Allied Forces,” 30 July. 1900, cc. 16-7.
  13. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 362, Memorandum given to the Chinese Minister to be forwarded to the Chinese Government, 20 Sept. 1900.
  14. BPP, China No. 6 (1901), No. 207, Lansdowne to Loféngluh, 23 Mar. 1901.
  15. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 136, Inclosure, p. 63.
  16. No. 141, MacDonald to Salisbury, 4 August 1900.
  17. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 202, Li Hung-chang to Loféngluh, 15 August 1900.
  18. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 215, Monson to Salisbury, 17 Aug. 1900.
  19. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 111, Foreign Office to Her Majesty’s Representatives at Washington, St. Petersburgh, Paris, Berlin, Vienna, Rome, and Shanghae, 4 August 1900, p. 49.
  20. BPP, China No. 3 (1900), No.220, Charles to Salisbury, 29 June 1900.
  21. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 192, MacDonald to Salisbury, 10 August 1900.
  22. Confidential Print, 7470/279, Rumbold to Salisbury, 22 July 1900, from BDFA, Part I, Series E, Asia, vol. 24, p. 91.
  23. Confidential Print, 7470/210, Salisbury to Warren, 17 July 1900, from BDFA, Part I, Series E, Asia, vol. 24, p. 79.
  24. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 135, MacDonald to Salisbury, 7 August 1900
  25. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 128, Lascelles to Salisbury, 7 Aug. 1900; No. 184, Lascelles to Salisbury, 10 Aug. 1900.
  26. BPP, China No. 6 (1901), No. 108, Lansdowne to Scott, 19 Feb. 1901.
  27. BPP, China No. 6 (1901), No. 110, Lansdowne to Lascelles, 19 Feb. 1901.
  28. No. 254, Seymour to Admiralty, 4 July, 1900.
  29. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 49, Foreign Office to India Office, 17 July 1900.
  30. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 108, Salisbury to Choate, 3 August 1900, p. 48.
  31. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 32, Salisbury to Whitehead, 13 July 1900, p. 13.
  32. BPP, China No. 6 (1901), No. 126, Satow to Lansdowne, 23 Feb. 1901.
  33. Hansard, 4rd S., vol. 84, “China―Anti-foreign Disturbances,” 18 June 1900, c. 259.
  34. No. 377, MacDonald to Salisbury, 24 Nov. 1900.
  35. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 139, Scott to Salisbury, 8 August 1900; No. 244, Scott to Salisbury, 13 July, 1900.
  36. Hansard, 4rd S., vol. 87, “China—Anti-Foreign Outbreak: Advance of The Allies on Pekin,” 31 July 1900, c. 162.
  37. China No. 1 (1901), No. 8, Foreign Office to Her Majesty’s Representatives at Paris, Rome, Berlin, Vienna, St. Petersburg, Washington, and Tokio, 5 July 1900.
  38. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 342, Warren to Salisbury, 14 Sept. 1900.
  39. BPP, China No. 3 (1900), No. 188, Salisbury to Scott, 25 June 1900, p. 75.
  40. BPP, China No. 6 (1901), No. 226, Lansdowne to Satow, 30 Mar. 1901.
  41. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 120, 4 August 1900, p. 55
  42. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 183, Verbal communication to Chinese Minister, 12 August 1900.
  43. Confidential Print, 7470/262, Monson to Salisbury, 22 July 1900, from BDFA, Part I, Series E, Asia, vol. 24, p. 89.
  44. Confidential Print, 7470/268, statement in House of Commons by Brodrick, 23 July 1900, from BDFA, Part I, Series E, Asia, vol. 24, p. 91.
  45. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 188, Satow to Lansdowne, 30 Nov. 1900.
  46. Hansard, 4rd S., vol. 87, “Class II”, 2 Aug. 1900, cc. 485.
  47. Hosea Ballou Morse, The International Relations of the Chinese Empire, Vol. III (London: Longmans, 1910), pp. 264-265.
  48. BPP, China No. 5 (1901), No. 206, Lansdowne to Satow, 9 Dec. 1900.
  49. No. 245, Seymour to Admiralty, 30 June, 1900
  50. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 138, Scott to Salisbury, 8 Aug. 1900
  51. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 35, Salisbury to Consul Scott, 14 July 1900.
  52. BPP, China No. 3 (1900), No. 198, Salisbury to MacDonald, 26 June, 1900.
  53. Confidential Print, 7470/253, Warren to Salisbury, 22 July 1900, from BDFA, Part I, Series E, Asia, vol. 24, p. 85.
  54. BPP, China No. 6 (1901), No. 234, Satow to Lansdowne, 2 Apr. 1901.
  55. No. 235, Lansdowne to Satow, 4 Apr. 1901.
  56. BPP, China No. 5 (1901), No. 105, Salisbury to Satow, 30 Oct. 1900.
  57. BPP, China No. 6 (1901), No. 100, Gaselee to Hamilton, 19 Feb. 1901.
  58. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 168, Memorandum communicated by Japanese Minister, 11 August 1900.
  59. BPP, China No. 5 (1901), No. 220, Satow to Lansdowne, 12 Dec. 1900.
  60. BPP, China No. 5 (1901), No. 225, Lansdowne to Satow, 14 Dec.1900.
  61. BPP, China No. 3 (1900), No. 231, Inclosure, Bruce to Admiralty, 1 July, 1900
  62. Confidential Print, 7470/247, Monson to Salisbury, 21 July 1900, from BDFA, Part I, Series E, Asia, vol. 24, p. 84.
  63. Hansard, 4rd S., vol. 88, “Address in Answer to Her Majesty's Most Gracious Speech,” 6 Dec. 1900, c. 32.
  64. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 176, MacDonald to Salisbury, 8 August 1900, received at 12 August.
  65. BPP, China No. 3 (1900), No. 195 & 196, Loféngluh to Salisbury, 26 July, 1900.
  66. BPP, China No. 3 (1900), No.232, Gough to Salisbury, 2 July 1900.
  67. BPP, China No. 6 (1901), No. 51, Lansdowne to Satow, 22 Jan. 1901
  68. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 105, Salisbury to Satow, 30 Oct. 1900.
  69. BPP, China No. 6 (1902), No. 29, Indian Office to Gaselee, 19 Apr. 1901.
  70. BPP, China No. 3 (1900), No. 205, Salisbury to Loféngluh, 27 June 1900.
  71. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 224, Lascelles to Salisbury, 18 August.
  72. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 53 & 54, Salisbury to Scott, 20 July 1900.
  73. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 204, 15 August 1900, pp. 90-91.
  74. BPP, China No. 3 (1900), No. 233, Gough to Salisbury, 2 July 1900.
  75. BPP, China No. 5 (1901), No. 243, Lansdowne to Herbert, also to Currie, Gough, Plunkett, Scott, 21 Dec. 1900
  76. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 360, Salisbury to MacDonald, 19 Sept. 1900
  77. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 69, Salisbury to MacDonald, 24 July 1900, p. 28.
  78. BPP, China No. 3 (1900), No. 257, Salisbury to Warren, 5 July 1900
  79. BPP, China No. 6 (1901), No. 120, Lansdowne to Lascelles, 21 Feb. 1901.
  80. Confidential Print, 7470/289, Rumbold to Salisbury, 22 July 1900, from BDFA (British Documents on Foreign Affairs), Part I, Series E, Asia, vol. 24, p. 94.
  81. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 346, Salisbury to Warren 15 Sept. 1900, p. 155.
  82. Confidential Print, 7470/187, Scott to Salisbury, 11 July 1900, from BDFA, Part I, Series E, Asia, vol. 24, p. 74.
  83. Feng Djen Djang, The Diplomatic Relations between China and Germany since 1898 (Shanghai: The Commercial Press, 1936), p. 109.
  84. Hansard, 4rd S., vol. 85, “Command of Allied Forces,” 13 July 1900, c. 1451.
  85. Confidential Print, 7487/67, Whitehead to Salisbury, 26 June 1900, from BDFA, Part I, Series E, Asia, vol. 24, p. 135.
  86. Hansard, 4rd S., vol. 92, “China—Present Position and Policy,” 28 Mar. 1901, cc. 15-6.
  87. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 247, Pauncefote to Salisbury, 16 August, 1900
  88. China No. 6 (1901), No. 91, Satow to Lansdowne, 24 Dec. 1900.
  89. Confidential Print, 7470/110(i), Speech by Wilhelm II, 2 July 1900, from BDFA, Part I, Series E, Asia, vol. 24, p. 55.
  90. BPP, China No. 1 (1901), No. 90, Li Hung-chang to Loféngluh, 30 July 1900; No. 99, Choate to Salisbury, 2 August 1900.
  91. H. Whates, The Third Salisbury Administration, 1895-1900 (Westminster: Vacher & Sons, 1900), p. 145.
  92. The Times, 20 June 1900, a speech at a celebration of the bi-centenary of the Society for Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts, London, p. 10.
  93. Clyde, Paul Hibbert(ed.)(1964).United States Policy toward China: Diplomatic and Public Documents, 1839-1939.New York:Russell & Russell.
  94. Kennedy, G.(ed.),Neilson, K.(ed.)(2002).Incidents and International Relations: People, Power, and Personalities.Westport, Conn.:
  95. Langer, William L.(1956).The Diplomacy of Imperialism: 1890-1902.New York:Knopf.
  96. Lowe, C. J.(2002).The Reluctant Imperialists: British Foreign Policy 1878-1902, vol. I.London:Routledge.
  97. Malozemoff, Andrew(1958).Russian Far Eastern Policy, 1881-1904.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  98. Monger, G. W.(1963).The End of Isolation: British foreign policy, 1900-1907.London:Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd.
  99. Nish, I. H.(1961).Japan's Indecision During the Boxer Disturbances.The Journal of Asian Studies,20(4),450.
  100. Nish, Ian(1977).Japanese Foreign Policy: Kasumigaseki to Miyakezaka, 1869-1942.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  101. Otte, T. G.(2006).The China Question: Great Power Rivalry and British Isolation, 1894-1905.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  102. Park, Joseph Hendershot(1950).British Prime Ministers of the Nineteenth Century: Policies and Speeches.New York:New York University Press.
  103. Purcell, Victor(1963).The Boxer Uprising: A Background Study.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  104. Sharf, Frederic A.,Harrington, Peter,顧明（譯注）(2010).1900 年：西方人的敘述─義和團運動親歷者的書信、日記和照片.天津:天津人民出版社.
  105. Sontag, Raymond James(1961).European Diplomatic History, 1871-1932.New York:Appleton Century Crofts.
  106. Steele, David(1999).Lord Salisbury: A Political Biography.London:UCL Press.
  107. Steiner, Zara S.(1959).Great Britain and the Creation of the Anglo-Japanese Alliance.The Journal of Modern History,31(1),27-36.
  108. Young, L. K.(1970).British Policy in China, 1895-1902.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  109. 中國義和團研究會（編）(2012)。義和團運動 110 周年國際學術討論會論文集，濟南:
  110. 中華文化復興運動推行委員會（編）(1986).中國近代現代史論集（十三）.台北:臺灣商務印書館.
  111. 王曾才(1979).中英外交史論集.台北:聯經出版.
  112. 瓦德西, Alfred Graf von,王光祈（譯）(2009).瓦德西拳亂筆記.北京:中華書局.
  113. 李國祁(1970).張之洞的外交政策.台北:中研院近代史研究所.
  114. 李德征(1987).義和團運動史.台北:漢京文化事業有限公司.
  115. 周錫瑞,張俊義（譯）,王棟（譯）(2005).義和團運動的起源.南京:江蘇人民出版社.
  116. 林世明(1980).義和團事變期間東南互保運動之研究.台北:臺灣商務印書館.
  117. 故宮博物院明清檔案部（編）(1978).義和團檔案史料.北京:中華書局.
  118. 相藍欣(2003).義和團戰爭的起源.上海:華東師範大學出版社.
  119. 孫瑞芹（譯）(1960).德國外交文件有關中國交涉史料選譯（二）.北京:商務印書館.
  120. 徐中約(2001).中國近代史.香港:中文大學出版社.
  121. 張寄謙（編）(2011).中德關係史研究論集.北京:北京大學.
  122. 張蓉初（譯）(1957).紅檔雜誌有關中國交涉史料選譯.北京:三聯書店.
  123. 張麗(2009)。論義和團運動時期維特處理對華關係之對策。史學集刊，2009(6)，59-60。
  124. 郭廷以(1994).近代中國史綱（上）.台北:曉園出版社.
  125. 陳志奇(1993).中國近代外交史（下）.台北:南天書局.
  126. 費正清（編）,劉廣京（編）(2007).劍橋中國晚清史：1800-1911 年（下）.北京:中國社會科學出版社.
  127. 雷斌(2002)。成都，西南交通大學。
  128. 戴玄之(2010).義和團研究.北京:北京大學出版社.
  129. 戴海斌(2011)。外國駐滬領事與“東南互保”—側重英、日、美三國。史林，2011(4)，108。
  130. 蘇位智（編）,劉天路（編）(2000).義和團研究一百年.濟南:齊魯書社.
print cancel