题名

遺址時空劇場:西安、羅馬遺址再現的比較研究

并列篇名

Heritage as Spatial-Temporal Theatre: Comparative Research on the Representation of Historic Ruins in Rome and Xi'an

作者

薛孟琪(Hsueh Meng-chi)

关键词

遺址劇場 ; 再現策略 ; 可參訪性 ; 展演文化遺產 ; heritage as theatre ; representation strategy ; visitability ; performing cultural heritage

期刊名称

民俗曲藝

卷期/出版年月

198期(2017 / 12 / 01)

页次

165 - 218

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文以實例具體分析羅馬、西安的城市遺址在空間形態上之特殊性如何影響遺址的再現,如何以虛擬科技輔助、提升遺址現場的「可參訪性」,以動人的方式增進參訪者對歷史文化的理解。迥異的遺構殘損狀態實質上促使羅馬、西安探索不同的取徑,結合虛擬與現實的再現思維、目的、方法、效果皆有所不同:羅馬藉投影破除遺跡疊壓的干擾,使其建築與城市文明得以直觀感知;西安則製造浪漫化的歷史魅影、輔以實體構築形式張揚空無的滄桑感。以「空間性」的再現設計作為閱讀分析的文本,本文比較性地探究羅馬、西安遺址再現的挑戰與突破,同時指出「空間」作為各種再現形式之整合平臺的潛力,對其他城市思考遺址活化具有實務上的借鑒意義。除了對劇場化的遺址展演策略進行反思,本文亦探索隱身於遺址劇場幕後的文化認同與集體記憶建構如何為現世利益服務。本文以「劇場」為雙關隱喻,一則探討遺址如劇場般的展演、再現設計策略,二則以舞臺作為鏡像反思的空間,主張以何觀點定位、決定遺址的再現設計本身即是認同的展演:舞臺景框如同嵌着一面明鏡,臺前的展演與再現幕後的意圖存在交互映射、現實與擬仿的鏡像關係,有助於反思遺址劇場化(從「展示」轉向「展演」)之現象背後的現實意義。

英文摘要

This research delves into the representation designs of historic ruins in Rome and Xi'an from a comparative perspective. Italian capital Rome and Chinese Xi'an are both ancient metropolises that possess more than two-thousand-year urban histories and therefore there are abundant ancient relics worthy of conservation. Historic ruins in Rome are prone to be layered vertically underground while heritage sites in Xi'an are horizontally widespread and bound to be displayed in the open fields. It has been widely accepted that "visitability" and visual legibility should be created in order to convey meanings and values of heritage sites to the public. It is especially true to those seriously ruined heritage sites which are less perceptible and intelligible by nature. Virtual reconstruction and multimedia projection techniques seem to be a feasible ways to enhance on-site heritage interpretation, contribute to the sensory representation of the archeological heritage sites, and furthermore provoke visitors' emotion. Then, how were such techniques utilized differently due to the uniqueness of heritage sites in Rome and Xi'an, namely vertically superimposed and horizontally interspersed? Based on empirical studies, this article scrutinizes their differences in mentality, motivation, and practice of employing virtually reconstructive projection designs. This article also points out the ideological shift from displaying to performing cultural heritage which represents heritage sites as spatial-temporal theatres that narrate stories. By projecting imagery on the ruined environment, the Roman design team temporarily got rid of the disturbance of the superimposed and entangled later additions to the ruins while the Xi'an design team rendered imaginative historical atmosphere or reserved the extensive emptiness deliberately. Besides considering heritage sites as tangible storytelling theatres, this article also borrows the mirror-like configuration of theatrical stage metaphorically for reflexive thinking. By looking into the backstage performance, this article analyzes how the protagonists respectively constructed, manipulated, and used the ideology of collective ownership and sponsorship regarding the archaeological discovery, conservation, and representation of the heritage sites.

主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
参考文献
  1. 郭其綱、鄭泰昇(2008)。擴增實境定位技術應用於建築與城市戶外導覽之研究—以「古蹟導覽系統」與「隱形招牌」應用為例。建築學報,6,145-66。
    連結:
  2. (1977).Corpus Basilicarum Christianarum Romae: The Early Christian Basilicas of Rome (IV-IX cent).Citta del Vaticano:Pontificio Istituto di Archeologia Cristiana.
  3. (1977).Corpus Basilicarum Christianarum Romae: The Early Christian Basilicas of Rome (IV-IXcent).Citta del Vaticano:Pontificio Istituto di Archeologia Cristiana.
  4. Arena, Maria Stella,Danielle Manacorda, Paolo Delogu(2004).Museo Nazionale Romano: Crypta Balbi.Roma:Electa.
  5. Bachelard, Gaston,Jolas, Maria(trans.)(1969).The Poetics of Space.Boston:Beacon Press.
  6. Ball, Larry F.(2003).The Domus Aurea and the Roman Architectural Revolution.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  7. Bendix, Regina F.(ed.)(2012).Heritage Regime and the State.Gottingen:Universitatsverlag Gottingen.
  8. Bertacchini, Enrico(2017).Shifting the Balance of Power in the UNESCO World Heritage Committee: An Empirical Assessment.International Journal of Cultural Policy,23(3),331-51.
  9. Borghini, Stefano,Carlani, Raffaele(2008).Virtual Ara Pacis: An Example of a New Museographic Tool for Cultural Heritage.Conference on Digital Media and its Applications in Cultural Heritage,Amman, Jordan:
  10. Del Signore, Roberto(ed.),Baldassarri, Paola(ed.)(2014).The Multimedia Museum: An Original Meeting between Antiquities and Innovation in the Roman Domus of Palazzo Valentini.Conference on The Reuse of Digital Cultural Content in Education, Tourism and Leisure, Athena Plus International Conference,Greece:
  11. Dicks, Bella(2003).Culture on Display: The Production of Contemporary Visitability.Maidenhead, Berkshire, England:Open University Press.
  12. Dyson, Stephen L.(1998).Ancient Marbles to American Shores: American Academy of Rome.Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
  13. Dyson, Stephen L.(2006).In Pursuit of Ancient Pasts: A History of Classical Archaeology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  14. Fairclough, Graham(ed.)(2007).The Heritage Reader.London:Routledge.
  15. Foucault, Michel,Miskowiec, Jay(trans.)(1986).Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias.Diacritics,16(1),22-27.
  16. Fulminante, Francesca(2014).The Urbanisation of Rome and Latium Vetus: From the Bronze Age to the Archaic Era.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  17. Guidobaldi, Federico(comps.),Lawlor, Paul(comps.)(1990).The Basilica and the Archiaeological Area of San Clemente in Rome: A Guide to the Three Levels with Ground Plans.Rome:Apud S. Clementem.
  18. Hsueh, Meng-chi(2016).Horizontally Shifted and Vertically Layered Ancient Cities: The Comparative Urban Histories of Xi'an and Rome.Athens Journal of History,2(2),111-28.
  19. Hughes, Catherine(1998).Museum Theatre: Communicating with Visitors through Drama.Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
  20. Jackson, Anthony(ed.),Kidd, Jenny(ed.)(2011).Performing Heritage: Research, Practice and Innovation in Museum Theatre and Live Interpretation.Manchester:Manchester University Press.
  21. Jackson, Anthony,Kidd, Jennifer(2007).'Museum Theatre': Cultivating Audience Engagement - A Case Study.6th World Congress of International Drama/Theatre and Education Association,Hong Kong:
  22. Jokilehto, Jukka(1986).University of York.
  23. Karp, Ivan(ed.)(2006).Museum Frictions: Public Cultures/Global Transformations.Durham:Duke University Press.
  24. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara(1998).Destination Culture: Tourism, Museums, and Heritage.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  25. Kohl, Philip L.(1998).Nationlism and Archaeolog y: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past.Annual Review of Anthropology,27,223-46.
  26. Kohl, Philip L.(ed.),Fawcett, Clare(ed.)(1995).Nationalism, Politics, and the Practice of Archaeology.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  27. Lowenthal, David(1985).The Past is a Foreign Country.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  28. Macdonald, Sharon(2003).Museums, National, Postnational and Transcultural Identities.Museum and Society,1(1),1-16.
  29. Macdonald, Sharon(ed.),Fyfe, Gordon(ed.)(1996).Theorizing Museums: Representing Identity and Diversity in a Changing World.London:Blackwell Publishers.
  30. Manacorda, Daniele(1982).Archeologia urbana a Roma: Il Progetto della Crypt Balbi.Firenze:Edizioni all'Insegna del Giglio.
  31. McFeaters, Andrew P.(2007).The Past Is How We Present It: Nationalism and Archaeology in Italy from Unification to WWII.Nebraska Anthropologist,22,49-62.
  32. Napolin, Luisa,Baldassarri, Paola(2015).Palazzo Valentini: Archaeological Discoveries and Redevelopment Projects.Frontiers of Architectural Research,4,91-99.
  33. Potteiger, Matthew,Purinton, Jamie(1998).Landscape Narratives: Design Practice for Telling Stories.New York:J. Wiley.
  34. Provincia di Roma(2007).Palazzo Valentini: Archaeological Discoveries and the New Multimedia Space.Roma:Provincia di Roma.
  35. Rossini, Orietta(2010).I Colori dell'Ara Pacis. Storia di un Esperimento.Archeomatica,3,20-25.
  36. Smith, Laurajane(2006).The Uses of Heritage.London:Routledge.
  37. Smithsonian Institute(1965).The Smithsonian Institution Foreign Currency Program in Archaeology and Related Disciplines.American Journal of Archaeology,69(4),365.
  38. Stinson, Philip(2011).Perspective Systems in Roman Second Style Wall Painting.American Journal of Archaeology,115(3),403-26.
  39. Strazzulla, Maria Jose(2009).War and Peace: Housing the Ara Pacis in the Eternal City.American Journal of Archaeology Online Museum Review,113(2),1-10.
  40. Thayer, Robert L.(1994).Gray World, Green Heart: Technology, Nature, and Sustainable Landscape.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  41. Tilly, Christopher(1989).Excavation as Theatre.Antiquity,63,275-80.
  42. Wu, Hung(2012).A Story of Ruins: Presence and Absence in Chinese Art and Visual Culture.London:Reaktion Books.
  43. Zukin, Sharon(1995).The Cultures of Cities.Cambridge:Blackwell.
  44. Zukin, Sharon(2010).Naked City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places.New York:Oxford University Press.
  45. 王汎森(1993)。歷史記憶與歷史:中國近代史事為例。當代,91,40-49。
  46. 王明珂(1996)。台灣與中國的歷史記憶與失憶。歷史,105,34-40。
  47. 王明珂(2001)。華夏邊緣—歷史記憶與族群認同。臺北:允晨文化。
  48. 王理中、董淩雲、劉飛(2012)。大明宮國家遺址公園:御道廣場露骨料透水混凝土應用歷程回顧。建築創作,1,162-67。
  49. 王學理(2011)。以訛傳訛「咸陽宮」 一掃蒙塵顯「冀闕」—對秦都咸陽1號宮殿遺址定性的匡正。文博,2,24-29。
  50. 卡特琳•古特、黃金菊譯(2009)。重返風景:當代藝術的地景再現。臺北:遠流出版社。
  51. 朱小地(2009)。「界面」:西安唐大明宮國家遺址公園御道廣場設計。建築創作,6,32-38。
  52. 周冰(2009)。灼熱的大遺址—制文化權時代的人類文明制高點。北京:人民出版社。
  53. 芮樂偉.韓森、李志鴻譯(2015)。絲路新史:一個已經逝去但曾經兼容並蓄的世界。臺北:麥田出版社。
  54. 科塞、邱澎生譯(1993)。阿伯瓦克與集體記憶。當代,91,20-29。
  55. 夏鑄九(2016)。再思考建築遺產的保存(保護)與再利用:南京高球場的個案。異質地方之營造:理論與歷史,臺北:
  56. 班納迪克.安德森、吳叡人譯(1999)。想像的共同體:民族主義的起源與散布。臺北:時報文化。
  57. 耿鳳英(2005)。展示學在博物館中的知識建構:以日本博物館展示為例。博物館、知識建構與現代性,臺中:
  58. 張朝枝(2008)。原真性理解:旅遊與遺產保護視角的演變與差異。旅遊科學,22(1),1-8+28。
  59. 張朝枝、鄭艷芬(2011)。文化遺產保護與利用關係的國際規則演變。旅遊學刊,26(1),81-88。
  60. 莫艾提、鄭克魯譯(1996)。羅馬考古:永恆之城重現。臺北:時報文化。
  61. 陳平原編、王德威編、陳學超編(2009)。西安:都市想像與文化記憶。北京:北京大學出版社。
  62. 陸地(2006)。羅馬大鬥獸場:一個建築,一部濃縮的建築保護與修復史。建築師,8,29-33。
  63. 馮峰(2010)。時間中的宮殿—大明宮國家遺址公園中軸線標識性建築宣政殿、紫宸殿設計方案。美術學報,4,70-79。
  64. 劉婉珍(2005)。透視博物館劇場。博物館、知識建構與現代性,臺中:
  65. 薛孟琪(2013)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 林淑慧(2022)。寰宇之旅:吳濁流《談西說東》的跨文化論述。成大中文學報,78,155-184。