走上回家的山徑，讓石板家屋升起煙來：由一趟臺東布農社群「尋根之旅」思考「文化資產」的認同與實踐

Bunun's Homecoming: Rethinking Ethnic Identity and the Practice of Cultural Heritage in the ＂Return to Hahaul Action＂

謝博剛(Hsieh Po-kang)

原住民認同 ； 身體經驗 ； 地景 ； 布農族 ； indigenous identity ； body experience ； landscape ； Bunun

民俗曲藝

210期（2020 / 12 / 01）

65 - 104

繁體中文

2000年以來，在第二波原運—部落主義的深化與國家政策背景下，陸續發起「傳統領域」調查，「尋根踏查」則是其中最重要的方法之一。2015年4月份起，筆者開始與臺東海端鄉布農族Isnangkuan家族重返舊部落進行尋根，並持續籌劃執行新武呂溪流域布農傳統家屋的測繪與尋根踏查的行動。發現過程中記憶敘事（narratives of the past）疊合於歷史地景（家屋、廢棄田園）的圖像，「身體」則是連結各種符碼的平臺，藉由感官經驗（例如：涼風、乾渴、徐行、痠痛……等）具體化並重組過去的記憶碎片。另一方面也在山徑之旅的當下創造出當代的共同記憶，不同的行動者在同一場域裡有其個別收穫，但也建立了彼此共融的經驗，整體強化了對於自身族群原住性（indigeneity）的認同，釐清在紛亂的後現代臺灣社會作為原住民個人與原住民族集體的位置，並進而產生後續的行動。因此筆者在本文試圖藉由一個布農社群的返鄉行動來思考下列問題：「尋根」對於當代原住民族的意義為何？透過移動人們建立了甚麼價值？又是在甚麼樣的社會脈絡裡浮現的？其中的有形與無形文化資產又如何成為時間流裡的定錨呢？又如何在持續的回返過程裡讓文化遺產動態的成為我們生命的一部分？

Against a backdrop of national policies and heightened indigenous people's (second wave) social movement since the 2000s, the indigenous communities in Taiwan have launched an investigation of their traditional territory. ＂Homecoming＂ field trips are among the most important strategies. Since April of 2015, I have been participating in the action of Bunun people of Haidun, Taidong who return to their ancestral settlements. Meanwhile I continue to conduct a project that surveys the ancestral Bunun residences and make field sketches along the Xinwulu river basin. I have uncovered a phenomenon that their narratives of the past superimpose on the historical landscape (images such as houses or overgrown fields). In addition, the ＂body＂ serves as a platform that interconnects various symbols. It revitalizes as well as reorganizes memory fragments through physical senses such as coolness of the breeze, thirst, walking, soreness, sounds, etc. On the other hand, the homecoming hikes also generate contemporary common memory. Each participant harvests respective gains in the same event while constructing a mutual-assimilating experience. On the whole, they strengthen their self-identification of ＂indigeneity,＂ their status as indigenous individuals and as members of indigenous people are further made distinct, subsequent actions are taken. The purpose of this study is to deal with the following questions. How does ＂homecoming＂ mean to contemporary indigenous people? What value(s) is built through the homecoming trips and under what social context? How do tangible and intangible cultural heritages anchor the stream of time? How does one integrate cultural heritage into daily life through continuous practice?

1. 官大偉(2013)。原住民生態知識與流域治理—以泰雅族 Mrqwang群之人河關係為例。地理學報，70，69-105。
   連結：
2. Basu, Paul(2007).Highland Homecomings-Genealogy and Heritage Tourism in the Scottish Diaspora.New York:Routledge Press.
3. Bourdieu, Pierre,Nice, Richard(Trans.)(1984).Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4. Foucault, Michel(1997).Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias.Rethinking Architecture: A Reader in Cultural Theory,London:
5. Fowles, Severin(2010).The Southwest School of Landscape Archaeology.Annual Review of Anthropology,39,453-468.
6. Fox, James(1997).Genealogy and Topogeny: Towards an Ethnography of Rotinese Ritual Place Names.The Poetic Power of Place: Comparative Perspectives on Austronesian Ideas of Locality,Canberra:
7. Gell, Alfred(1998).Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
8. Hoskins, Janet(1993).The Play of Time: Kodi Perspectives on Calendars, History, and Exchange.Berkeley:University of California Press.
9. Tilley, Christopher(2006).Introduction: Identity, Place, Landscape and Heritage.Journal of Material Culture,11(1-2),7-32.
10. Turner, Victor W.(1969).The Ritual Process: Structure and Aanti-structure.Chicago:Aldine Publishing Press.
11. Van Gennep, Arnold,Vizedom, Monika B.(Trans.),Caffee, Gabrielle L.(Trans.)(1960).The Rites of Passage.London:Routledge & Paul Press.
12. 台邦．撒沙勒（編）(2004).尋找失落的箭矢：部落主義的視野和行動.臺北:國家展望文教基金會.
13. 胡家瑜(2009)。從移動的空間到轉變的地景—對於賽夏社會變動性與穩定性的另類思考。空間與文化場域：空間之意象、實踐與社會的生產，臺北:
14. 海樹兒．犮剌拉菲(2006).布農族：部落起源及部落遷移史.臺北:行政院原住民族委員會.
15. 詹姆斯．克里弗德, James,Yotaka, Kolas（譯）,張瀠之（審譯）,林徐達（審譯）(2019).路徑：20世紀晚期的旅行與翻譯.苗栗縣三灣鄉:桂冠.
16. 詹姆斯．克里弗德, James,林徐達（譯）,梁永安（譯）(2017).復返：21 世紀成為原住民.苗栗縣三灣鄉:桂冠.
17. 臺灣總督府警務局理蕃課,中央研究院民族學研究所（編譯）(2011).高砂族調查書：蕃社概況.臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所.
18. 謝世忠(2004)。原住民運動生成與發展理論的建立—以北美與台灣為例的初步探討。族群人類學的宏觀探索：臺灣原住民論集，臺北:

1. 鄭玠甫(2022)。舊社還是asang？拉庫拉庫溪流域布農族傳統地景的考古學研究。考古人類學刊，97，1-57。
2. (2024)。從原社與卡塔文化的文化創業歷程談傳統藝術本真性之追溯與實踐。藝術學報，114，33-50。