織織不倦：烏來泰雅族服的經緯之間

Between Warp and Woof: The Invention of Ethnic Costume of Ulay Atayal

江桂珍(Chiang Kuei-chen)

烏來泰雅 ； 族服 ； 創發的傳統 ； 復振 ； 族群邊界 ； Ulay Atayal ； ethnic costume ； invented tradition ； revival ； ethnic group boundary

民俗曲藝

217期（2022 / 09 / 01）

27 - 65

繁體中文

新北市烏來區泰雅族，與漢文化接觸的時間甚早，且受到觀光產業的影響，傳統文化流失嚴重，織布技藝的傳承中斷已久。然而近年來，族群意識擡升，族人著力於我群文化的復振，尤以衣飾文化面向為最。歷經開辦織布研習班、參訪臺大人類學系民族學標本陳列室、及成立「烏來織藝工作坊」與「烏來鄉原住民編織協會」等過程，烏來織女從學習傳統地機織布、找尋泰雅屈尺群傳統織紋到重現泰雅屈尺群傳統織藝，進而配合「2020新北市烏來區泰雅編織節」的舉辦，自發性織做專屬的「族服」。服飾研究的面向豐富多元，其涉及了技術、社會結構、意識形態、認同等不同研究範疇。服飾既是具象的物質表徵，也是抽象的溝通符碼。在歷史進程中，人們往往透過服飾的生產與再製，定位自我，標誌認同，傳達族群的集體價值。然而，文化是動態的，人類亦具能動性，認同也是多重的，文化樣態不會故步自封於制式的「傳統服飾」之中。在流變時空中，不同文化的相遇、互動、協商與妥協，作為區辨身分和形塑認同的服飾元素，更可能面臨更動、挪用與重組。本文討論烏來泰雅「族服」的製作緣起、發想動機，織者對「族服」的想像與界定，「族服」對烏來泰雅的族群認同、族群邊界的建構、流動與共融、織藝復振與織女話語權，所體現的象徵意涵與集體價值；以及當代「族服」的生產，與烏來泰雅衣飾文化的再創和歷史想像的連結。

The native Atayal people of Ulay, New Taipei City, encountered Han culture at an early stage. In addition, the impact of commercial tourism caused serious loss of traditional culture. Their heritage of weaving discontinued as a result. In recent years, however, heightened ethnic awareness engenders an ethnic cultural revival, particularly in that of ethnic clothing. The Ulay Atayal people has offered courses in traditional weaving, organized visits to the Artifacts Exhibition Room in NTU Museum of Anthropology, launched ＂Ulay Weaving Workshops＂ and set up ＂Ulay Weaving Association.＂ The Ulay weavers learn how to operate a traditional loom, rediscover traditional woven patterns of the Kusshaku (Quchi) Atayal and re-present its weaving art. Furthermore, they designed and woven their exclusive ＂ethnic costume＂ to participate in the Weaving Festival of Ulay Atayal 2020. The study of costume involves various dimensions, ranging from its techniques, social structure, ideology, and identity. Clothing is both a physical representation of material culture, and also an abstract code for communication. Throughout history, people define themselves, reveal their identity, and convey collective ethnic values with the production and reproduction of clothing. However, cultural dynamics coincides with both human agency and multi-layered identities. Cultural patterns are not confined within the normal concept of ＂traditional clothing.＂ In this changing time and space, different cultures encounter, interact, negotiate, and compromise with each other. As a means to identify oneself and formulate senses of identity, elements of clothing will be changed, appropriated, and reformulated. In this paper, I analyze the production of ＂ethnic costume＂ of Ulay Atayal, its origin and motivation, how the weaver envisions and conceptualizes ＂ethnic costume,＂ the significance of ethnic costume in terms of ethnic identity, construction, fluidity and merging of ethnic boundaries. I also examine the revival of weaving arts, the discourse power of weaving women, and the symbolic meanings and collective values embodied in ethnic costume. Finally, I illustrate how the production of these contemporary ＂ethnic costume＂ is connected to the invention of Ulay Atayal clothing culture and their historical imagination.

1. Barth, Fredrick(Ed.)(1998).Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference.Illinois:Waveland Press Inc.
2. McCracken, Grant(1988).Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
3. Peoples, James,Bailey, Garrick(2012).Humanity: An Introduction to Cultural Anthropology.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Publishing.
4. Schermerhorn, Richard Alonzo(1970).Comparative Ethnic Relations: A Framework for Theory and Research.New York:Random House.
5. Turner, Terence S.(2012).The Social Skin.HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory,2(2),486-504.
6. Van den Berghe, Pierre L.,Keyes, Charles F.(1984).Introduction: Tourism and Re-Created Ethnicity.Annals of Tourism Research,11(3),343-352.
7. Weiner, Annette B.(ed.),Schneider, Jane(ed.)(1988).Cloth and Human Experience.Washington:Smithsonian Institution Press.
8. 文崇一（編）,蕭新煌（編）(1997).烏來鄉志.臺北:烏來鄉公所.
9. 方鈞瑋（編）(2008).重現泰雅：泛泰雅傳統服飾重製圖錄.臺東:國立臺灣史前文化博物館.
10. 王明珂(1997).華夏邊緣：歷史記憶與族群認同.臺北:允晨文化實業股份有限公司.
11. 王振寰（編）,瞿海源（編）(2003).社會學與臺灣社會.臺北:巨流出版社.
12. 王嵩山(2001).臺灣原住民的社會與文化.臺北:聯經出版社.
13. 瓦歷斯•諾幹,余光弘(2002).臺灣原住民史：泰雅族史篇.南投:國史館臺灣文獻館.
14. 仲摩照久編。1931。《日本地理風俗大系•第 15 卷•臺灣篇》。東京：新光社。
15. 江桂珍(2010).再現傳統的實踐：烏來泰雅族的文化圖像.臺北:國立歷史博物館.
16. 江桂珍(2021)。「經緯之間織織不倦」—烏來泰雅動人的故事。歷史文物，31(1)，49-54。
17. 艾瑞克•霍布斯邦, Eric,陳思仁（譯）(2002).被發明的傳統.臺北:貓頭鷹出版社.
18. 拉蓊•進成(2018)。國立臺東大學公共與文化事務學系南島文化研究所。
19. 馬騰嶽(2003)。國立清華大學人類學研究所。
20. 森丑之助,臨時臺灣舊慣調查會（編）(1994).臺灣蕃族圖譜.臺北:南天出版社.
21. 湯京平,王雅萍,陳文玲(2014)。政大烏來樂酷計畫。人文與社會科學簡訊，6(1)，4-7。
22. 楊舜云(2008)。輔仁大學服裝織品研究所。
23. 楊舜云,張維安,鄭靜宜(2011)。臺灣客家文化運動中客家服飾的改良與創新。客家研究，4(1)，115-150。
24. 臺灣總督府警務局（編）,陳金田（譯）(1997).日據時期原住民行政志稿•第一卷.南投:臺灣省文獻委員會.
25. 蘇珊•凱瑟, Susan B.,李宏偉（譯）(1997).服裝社會心理學.臺北:商鼎文化出版社.