英文摘要
|
Since the 90s, programs such as "Xiqu Dreaming Factory"and Taiwan Traditional Theater Festival (2018-) from National Center for Traditional Arts in Taiwan and the National Theatre (now an affiliate of the National Performing Arts Center established in 2014) and "Production Projects for Outdoor Opera Troupes" (2003-2012) sponsored by the National Culture and Arts Foundation since 2000, and the Spring Arts Festival Opera Series (2010-) organized by the Bureau of Cultural Affairs for Kaohsiung City Government, are all forming of "the fields of cultural production," while the "institutionalization" of modern theatre, including a fully developed industry of its professional divisions of labor, is growing into its maturity. Due to the development of the professional divisions of labor in modern theatre, Traditional Taiwanese Opera is closely related to the "national symbol." The intellectual elite, motivated by the ideology of nationalism, has carefully crafted the original works of the opera, which makes the meaning of canonization evident. It is significantly related to the process of planning (curation), review, and evaluation mechanism of the production of works, which not only directly affects the "canonization" of Traditional Taiwanese Opera but also forms a group of a distinctive class of audience, so-called experts and scholars whom the cultural bureaucrats mostly put their trust in and reliance on. In the field of Traditional Taiwanese Opera in the modern theatre (cultural field), a rather exclusive nature is created due to the specific habitus and different demands from the taste of ordinary people. Such a system of cultural production may dissolve the problems or dissipate the tension that undermines artistic autonomy because of the influence of capital power. Moreover, it has grown into a supreme artistic taste so that it could possibly blur the class differences between the traditional outdoor opera troupes and those related professionals in the cultural field (modern theatre). This article attempts to study the above-mentioned art festivals and analyze the development of their evaluation system for subsidization. Furthermore, based on the review mechanism and mobilization of resources allocated by the art festivals, I will try to demonstrate the significance and substance of the so-called contemporary Traditional Taiwanese Opera and its ecological impact.
|
参考文献
|
-
傅裕惠(2020)。九○年代以來歌仔戲「正典化」的美學現象。民俗曲藝,209,67-110。
連結:
-
謝筱玫(2007)。從精緻到胡撇—國族認同下的臺灣歌仔戲論述。民俗曲藝,155,79-110。
連結:
-
(1996).八十四年表演藝術年鑑.臺北:國立中正文化中心.
-
Bourdieu, Pierre,Adamson, Matthew(Trans.)(1990).In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
-
Bourdieu, Pierre,Nice, Richard(Trans.)(1993).The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature.New York:Columbia University Press.
-
Bourdieu, Pierre,Nice, Richard(Trans.)(1987).Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
-
Burawoy, Michael(2019).Symbolic Violence: Conversations with Bourdieu.Durham:Duke University Press.
-
Habermas, Jürgen,Burger, Thomas(Trans.),Laurence, Fredrick(Trans.)(1989).The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere.Cambridge:Polity Press.
-
Schirato, Tony,Roberts, Mary(2018).Bourdieu: A Critical Introduction.New York:Routledge.
-
王友輝(2013)。京劇元素在臺灣現代戲劇中的碰撞與融合。傳藝雙月刊,104,108-111。
-
吳正婷(編)(2015).歌仔天團•春藝尬戲—2010–2015 高雄春天藝術節歌仔戲紀錄書.高雄:高雄市政府文化局.
-
周慧玲(2004)。菁英論述與官方政策的共生與悖離:台灣現代劇場論述的跨文化挪用問題初探。正典的生成:台灣文學國際研討會,臺北:
-
林鶴宜(2018).臺灣戲劇史.臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心.
-
邱坤良(1983).現代社會的民俗曲藝.臺北:遠流出版社.
-
邱婷(1995).明華園:臺灣戲劇世家.臺北:獨家出版社.
-
施如芳(2003)。劇之本不在,戲根著何土? 從中國大陸「舞台藝術精品工程」思考本土戲曲創作。PAR 表演藝術,123,27-34。
-
國立傳統藝術中心(2021)。,臺北:財團法人辜公亮文教基金會。
-
陶維鈞(2017)。好戲上場:台灣戲曲中心開機暖身。表演藝術,297,48-49。
-
蔡欣欣(2018).臺灣歌仔戲史論:文本、展演與傳播.臺北:里仁書局.
-
蔡欣欣(2011).臺灣戲曲景觀.臺北:國家出版社.
-
鄭宜峰(2001)。十年一覺戲棚夢。PAR 表演藝術,101,80-83。
-
蘇昭英(2001)。國立藝術學院傳統藝術研究所。
|