题名

訊息陳述方式、廣告訴求對象與涉入程度對廣告效果之影響-不同產品類別之探討

并列篇名

The Impact of Message Framing, Appeal Characters and Involvement on Advertising Effectiveness: Investigation into the Different Product Classifications

DOI

10.29698/FJMR.200601.0004

作者

蔡佳靜(Chia-Ching Tsai)

关键词

訊息陳述方式 ; 廣告訴求對象 ; 涉入 ; 廣告效果 ; message framing ; appeal characters ; involvement ; advertising effectiveness

期刊名称

輔仁管理評論

卷期/出版年月

13卷1期(2006 / 01 / 01)

页次

85 - 106

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究分別採用「成人奶粉廣告」和「戒菸廣告」進行實驗,探討不同訊息陳述方式(正面/負面)、廣告訴求對象(自己/他人)與涉入程度(高涉入/低涉入)對廣告效果之影響。本研究主要的研究結果如下:(1)在成人奶粉廣告中,不論廣告訴求對象是自己或他人,在高涉入的情況下,負面訊息陳述的廣告效果顯著優於使用正面訊息陳述的廣告效果,但是在低涉入的情況下,結果是相反的。(2)在戒菸廣告中,當廣告訴求對象是自己時,在高涉入的情況下,負面訊息陳述的廣告效果顯著優於正面訊息陳述的廣告效果,但是在低涉入的情況下,結果亦是相反的;當廣告訴求對象為他人時,不論在高、低涉入的情況下使用正面或負面訊息陳述的廣告效果均無顯著差異。

英文摘要

In the study, we separately used adult milk powder and stopping smoking advertisements to investigate the impact of message framing, appeal characters and involvement on advertising effectiveness. The major findings were as followed: First, in the adult milk powder advertisement, no matter appealing to the self or others, negatively framed messages were more effective than positively framed messages under high involvement conditions, but reverse outcomes had been obtained under low involvement conditions. Secondly, in the stopping smoking advertisement, when appealing to the self, advertising effectiveness was greater when the messages were framed negatively than when they were framed positively under high involvement conditions, but reverse outcomes had been obtained under low involvement conditions, too. Besides, when appealing to the others, the advertising effectiveness wasn't significantly different no matter under high or low involvement condition.

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Block, L. G.,Keller, P. A.(1995).When to Accentuate the Negative: The Effects of Perceived Efficacy and Message Framing on Intentions to Perform a Health-Related Behavior.Journal of Marketing Research,32,192-203.
  2. Calder, B. J.,Phillips, L. W.,Tybout, A. M.(1981).Designing Research for Application.Journal of Consumer Research,8,197-207.
  3. Eagley, A. H.,Chaiken, S.(1993).The Psychology of Attitudes.Orlando, FL:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  4. Gaeth, G. J.,Levin, I. P.,Cours, D. A.,Combs, S.,Marvin E. Goldberg,Gerald Gorn,Richard W. Pollay (eds.)(1990).Advances in Consumer Research.Provo, UT:Association for Consumer Research.
  5. Hoffman, D. L.,Novak, T. P.(1996).A New Marketing Paradigm for Electronic Commerce.The Information Society,13(1),43-54.
  6. Komter, A. E.(1997).Gift giving and the Emotional Significance of Family and Friends.Journal of Marriage and the Family,59,747-757.
  7. Lavidge, R. J.,Steiner, G. A.(1961).A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness.Journal of Marketing,25(Oct.),59-62.
  8. Levin, I.,Gaeth, G. E.(1988).How Consumers are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product.Journal of Consumer Research,15(December),374-378.
  9. Maheswaran, D.,Meyer-Levy, J.(1990).The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement.Journal of Marketing Research,27,361-367.
  10. Meyerowitz, B. E.,Chaiken, S.(1987).The Effect of Message Framing on Breast Self-Examination Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,March,500-510.
  11. Mick, D. G.,DeMoss, M.(1990).Self-Gifts: Phenomenological Insights from Four Contexts.Journal of Consumer Research,17,322-332.
  12. Rothman, A. J.,Salovey, P.,Antone, C.,Keough, K.,Martin, C.D.(1993).The Influence of Message Framing on Intentions to Perform Health Behaviors.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,29,408-433.
  13. Ruth, J. A.,Otnes, C.,Brunel, F. F.(1999).Gift Receipt and the Reformulation of Interpersonal Relationships.Journal of Consumer Research,25,385-402.
  14. Sherry, J. F.(1983).Gift-Giving in Anthropological Perspective.Journal of Consumer Research,10,147-168.
  15. Smith, G. E.(1996).Framing in Advertising and the Moderating Impact of Consumer Education.Journal of Advertising Research,September/October,49-64.
  16. Zaichkowsky, J. L.(1985).Measuring the Involvement Construct.Journal of Consumer Research,12,341-352.
  17. 徐元瀚(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣科技大學企業管理研究所。
  18. 陳建翰(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立東華大學企業管理學系。
  19. 陳敏郎(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立交通大學經營管理研究所。
  20. 黃俊英(1987)。行銷研究-管理與技術。台北:華泰書局。
  21. 劉若蘭(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學企業管理學系。
被引用次数
  1. 郭幸萍、呂信億(2010)。房仲產業之廣告訴求對消費者品牌選擇影響之研究。住宅學報,19(2),1-28。
  2. 藍英綾、李婷(2010)。以產品涉入為調節變數探討介面設計對消費者學習之影響。Electronic Commerce Studies,8(1),5-36。
  3. 李晉豪(2014)。調節配適對消費者購買意圖之影響-以運動鞋產品為例。美和學報,33(1),135-148。
  4. 劉智淇,林鴻洲(2021)。食品廣告中健康宣稱的訊息框架對高齡者購買意願之影響。行銷評論,18(2),179-202。
  5. 楊亨利、王湘嵐(2012)。網路匿名訊息之意圖與架構對訊息接收者的影響。資訊管理學報,19(4),653-679。