题名

決定民營化企業績效提升因素之分析

并列篇名

Determinants of the Performance in Post-privatization

DOI

10.29698/FJMR.200805.0001

作者

江淑貞(Sue-Jane Chiang)；吳桂燕(Kuei-Yen Wu)

关键词

民營化 ； 績效提升 ； 政府 ； 第二大股東 ； partial privatization ； ownership ； control right ； corporate governance

期刊名称

輔仁管理評論

卷期/出版年月

15卷2期（2008 / 05 / 01）

页次

1 - 22

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

公營事業民營化後經營績效真的有不同嗎？是變好還是變差？本文以台灣至2005年爲止，20家已經完成民營化的公司爲研究對象，討論決定民營化後經營績效的因素爲何。根據本文的實證發現：經營績效並未因爲民營化而提升；一般文獻認爲董監事與外資的持股對績效的正面效應也沒有在民營化企業發現，反而是政府與第二大股東產生顯著影響。政府「持股減少、董事席次增加但不指派董事長」以及第二大股東「掌握的董事席次比例越高」，都有助於績效提昇，亦即民營化後，政府除了將股權釋出、退出公司經營外，最重要的還需要適當引進新的經營團隊，在未適當引進新的經營團隊前，公司的經營、監督，仍有賴政府的參與。除此之外，實證結果也指出公司治理機制的確對民營化後的經營績效有所影響，公司治理越差（偏離度越大）對經營績效的提升越不利。民營化時程呈現負向影響，代表公司績效並未隨著民營化經過時間越長的而更加提升，反而有衰退的隱憂。最後，民營化後金融業的績效呈現相對成長的現象，這可能是因爲這段期間金融業恰好面對金融自由化、銀行合併，金融市場競爭提高所致。
英文摘要

This paper examines the effect of partial privatization on firm performance and analyzes the determinants of firm performance by ownership structure and control right. This study uses 20 share-issued privatization firms to analyze the corporate governance of partial privatization in Taiwan. The empirical results show that state ownership has negative impact on firm performance and the state control right has positive impact on firm performance. The reason may be due to the fact that the firms in partial privatization need to be supervised by the government under the process of diffusing private ownership. In addition, improvement in performance is associated with certain aspects of corporate governance. The improvement in performance is better for those firms which have second largest shareholder with more seats on board of directors. Besides, the more the deviation from the corporate governance is, the worse the firm performance is. The key to the improvement in performance is not only with the transferring of the shareholdings, but also with the induction of new management team which is the second largest shareholder with more shareholding.
主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 陳美華、洪世炳(2005)。公司治理、股權結構與公司績效關係之實證研究。企業管理學報，65，129-153。
    連結：
  2. Baltagii, B.H.(2001).Econometric Analysis of Panel Data.England:John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
  3. Bortolotti, B.(2004).ECGI Working Paper.Torino university.
  4. Boubakri, N.,Cosset, J.C.(1998).The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly-privatized Firms: Evidence from Developing Countries.Journal of Finance,53,1081-1110.
  5. D`Souza, J.,Megginson, W. L.(1999).The Financial and Operating Performance of Privatized Firms during the 1990s.The Journal of Finance,LIV(4),1397-1438.
  6. Domberger, S.,Piggott, J.(1986).Privatization Policies and Public Enterprise: A Survey.The Economic Record,145-162.
  7. Eckel, C.,Eckel, D.,Singal, V.(1997).Privatization and Efficiency: Industry Effects of the British Airways.Journal of Financial Economics,43,257-298.
  8. Gupta, N.(2005).Partial Privatization and Firm Performance.Journal of Finance,60,987-1015.
  9. Hanousek, J.(2004).Working Paper.Unverisity of Michigan Business School.
  10. Hansen, Nico A.(1997).Privatization, Technology Choice and Aggregate Outcomes.Journal of Public Economics,64,425-442.
  11. Harris, M,A. Ravis(1988).Corporate Governance: Voting rights and Majority Rules.Journal of Financial Economics,20,203-235.
  12. Hausman, J.A.(1978).Specification Tests in Econometrics.Econometrica,46,1251-1271.
  13. Jensen, M.C.,W.H. Meckling(1976).Theory of the firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure.Journal of Financial Economics,3,305-360.
  14. Jones, S.L.,Megginson, W. L.,Netter, J.M.(1999).Share Issue Privatizations as Financial Means to Political and Economics Ends.Journal of Financial Economics,53,217-253.
  15. Kaiser, H.F.(1960).The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis.Educational and Psychological Measurement,20,141-151.
  16. La Porta, R.,F. Lopez-de-Silanes,A. Shleifer(1999).Corporate Ownership around the World.Journal of Finance,54,471-517.
  17. Megginson, W. L.,Nash, R.C.,M.V. Randenborgh(1994).The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: An International Empirical Analysis.The Journal of Finance,XLIX(2),403-452.
  18. Megginson, W.L.,Netter, J.(2001).From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization.Journal of Economic Literature,39,321-389.
  19. Shaprio, C.,R. Willig(1990).Olin Program Discussion Paper.Woodrow Wilso School, Princeton University.
  20. Shleifer, A.,R. Vishny(1986).Large Shareholders and Corporate Control.Journal of Political Economy,94,461-488.
  21. Stulz, R. M.(1988).Managerial Control of Voting Right: Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Control.Journal of Financial Economics,20,25-54.
  22. Vickers, J.,Yarrow, G.(1988).Privatization: An Economic Analysis.Cambridge:MIT Press.
  23. Vickers, J.,Yarrow, G.(1998).Economic Perspectives on Privatization.Journal of Economic Perspectives,2,111-132.
  24. 王毓香(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中山大學財管所。
  25. 吳壽山(1998)。國家科學委員會研究報告國家科學委員會研究報告,台北市:。
  26. 林承樺(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。交通大學經管所。
  27. 高秋蓉(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中山大學財管所。
  28. 張玉山、江淑貞(1999)。民營化對事業單位經營績效之影響。證券市場發展季刊，11(2)，105-128。
  29. 張淑芬(1993)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。東海大學公行所。
  30. 陳建宏(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。文化大學會研所。
  31. 黃慶堂、林建宏(1996)。公營事業民營化經營績效之實證研究。台灣銀行季刊，47(3)，86-109。
  32. 葉銀華、何憲章、邱顯比(1997)。利益輸送代理問題和股權結構之理論與實證研究。中國財務學刊，47-73。
  33. 謝宗憲(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。東吳大學國貿所。
被引用次数
  1. 謝俊吉、盧正宗、祝道松(2014)。策略性績效評估系統對銀行債權管理績效影響之探討：以權益公平認知與目標一致性為中介影響變數。當代會計，15(1)，27-62。
  2. (2022)。經營策略對上市、櫃銀行經營績效的影響。樹德科技大學學報，24(1)，179-217。
print cancel