活動技術水準與空間使用型態對大安森林公園直排輪參與者間的遊憩衝突之影響

The Influences of Skill Level and Space Use Type on Recreation Conflict among Roller Skaters in Da-An Forestry Park

10.6267/JTLS.2005.11(3)1

王正平(Cheng-Ping Wang)

直排輪活動 ； 內團體衝突 ； 技術水準 ； 空間使用型態 ； 大安森林公園 ； roller skating ； in-group conflict ； skill level ； space use type ； Da-An Forestry Park

觀光研究學報

11卷3期（2005 / 09 / 01）

189 - 208

繁體中文

遊憩衝突按衝突來源可區分為不同活動參與者間的外團體衝突，以及同一活動參與者間的內團體衝突。本研究以大安森林公園為個案，探討遊客的活動技術水準及空間使用型態對直排輪內團體衝突之影響。本研究之內團體衝突是調查受訪者在遭遇各類直排輪活動參與者時之態度，以及受訪者針對16項直排輪內團體衝突項目所知覺到的衝突程度；活動技術水準是調查受訪者根據直排輪協會所擬訂之進階課程內容評估個人的技術水準；空間使用型態乃調查受訪者從事直排輪活動時空間使用的主要型態，包含線性及平面空間兩類型。研究結果顯示直排輪內團體衝突包含「空間干擾」、「他團體干擾」及「方向性干擾」等三個構面。線性空間使用者較不喜歡遭遇花式及輪刀舞直排輪者，且知覺到的空間干擾較高；而平面空間使用者較不喜歡競速直排輪者，且知覺到的他團體干擾較高。對於線性空間使用者而言，活動技術水準不同對競速直排輪者之態度及他團體干擾的知覺具顯著差異；而對於平面空間使用者而言，活動技術水準不同對花式直排輪者之態度及方向性干擾的知覺具顯著差異。透過本研究之證實，結果不但支持現有將平面場地及線性滑道作區隔的規劃外，重建議經營管理單位透過宣導教育及活動規範來建立活動參與者的正確觀念和行為準則，以降低內團體遊憩衝突的程度，進而提昇休閒遊憩的品質。

Recreation conflict was divided into ”out-group conflict” among different recreational activities and ”in-group conflict” within a certain recreational activity. The purposes of this study were to explore the influences of skill level and space use type on recreation conflict among roller skaters in Da-An Forestry Park. The in-group conflict among roller skaters was investigated with responders' attitudes toward various types of roller skaters encountered and their perceived conflict in terms of the 16 interference items; skill level was investigated with self-reported skill level based on the course contents posted on the website by the Chinese Roller Skate Association; space use types include linear space and plane space. The study results indicated in-group conflict of the roller skaters was composed of three dimensions, including ”Space Interference”, ”Other Group Interference”, and ”Direction Interference”. The linear space users perceived more Space Interference and more disliked those skaters participating in artistic skating and dance skating; the plane space users perceived more Other Group Interference and more disliked those skaters participating in speed skating. For the linear space users, participants with different skill levels had different attitudes on the skaters participating in speed skating and perceived differently in Other Group Interference; for the plane space users, participants with different skill levels had different attitudes on the skaters participating in artistic skating and perceived differently in Direction Interference. The study results not only indicated the plane and linear spaces should be separated, but also suggested resource managers could reduce the conflict through the strategies of education and activity codes.

1. 王正平(2004)。登山健行遊客與登山自行車使用者遊憩衝突之研究。戶外遊憩研究，17(4)，71-91。
   連結：
2. 顏家芝、薛雅菁、徐慧蓉、趙又萱、廖梨棉(2002)。都會公園單車活動與直排輪活動／散步者之遊憩衝突研究。戶外遊憩研究，15(1)，1-16。
   連結：
3. Block, P. H.,Black, W. C.,Lichtenstein, D.(1989).Involvement with the equipment component of sport: Links to recreational commitment.Leisure Sciences,11(3),187-200.
4. Bryan, H.(1977).Leisure value systems and recreational specialization: The case of trout fishermen.Journal of Leisure Research,9(3),174-187.
5. Cordell, H. K.,Barnett, L. (Ed.)(1995).Research about Leisure: Past, Present, and Future.Champaign, IL:Sagamore.
6. Ewert, A.(1985).Why people climb: The relationship of participant motives and experience level to mountaineering.Journal of Leisure Research,17(3),241-250.
7. Ewert, A.,Hollenhorst, S.(1989).Testing the adventure model: Empirical support for a model of risk recreation participation.Journal of Leisure Research,21(2),124-139.
8. Jacob, G. R.,Schreyer, R.(1980).Conflict in outdoor recreation: A theoretical perspective.Journal of Leisure Research,12(4),368-380.
9. Kuentzel, W. F.,McDonald, C. D.(1992).Differential effects of past experience, commitment, and lifestyle dimensions on river use specialization.Journal of Leisure Research,24(3),269-287.
10. Lindsay, J.(1980).Proceedings of the National Outdoor Recreation Trends Symposium.Broomall, PA:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.
11. McIntyre, N.(1992).Involvement in risk recreation: A comparison of objective and subjective measures of engagement.Journal of Leisure Research,24(1),64-71.
12. Moore, R. L.,Scott, D.,Graefe, A. R.(1998).The effects of activity differences on recreation experiences along a suburban greenway trail.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration,16(2),35-53.
13. Owens, P.(1985).Conflict as a social interaction process in environment and behaviour research: The example of leisure and recreation research.Journal of Environmental Psychology,5(3),243-259.
14. Ramthun, R.(1995).Factor in user group conflict between hikers and mountain bikers.Leisure Sciences,17(3),159-169.
15. Schuett, M.(1993).Refining measure of adventure recreation involvement.Leisure Sciences,15(3),205-216.
16. Simonds, J. O.(1998).Landscape Architecture: A Manual of Site Planning and Design.NY:The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc..
17. Thapa, B.,Graefe, A. R.(2003).Level of skill and its relationship to recreation conflict and tolerance among adult skiers and snowboarders.World Leisure Journal,45(1),15-27.
18. Todd, S.,Graefe, A.(1989).Proceedings of the 1989 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium.Broomall, PA:U.S. Department of Agriculture.
19. Vaske, J. J.,Carothers, P.,Donnelly, M. P.,Baird, B.(2000).Recreation conflict among skiers and snowboarders.Leisure Sciences,22(4),297-313.
20. Vaske, J.,Dyar, R.,Timmons, N.(2004).Skill level and recreation conflict among skiers and snowboarders.Leisure Sciences,26(2),215-225.
21. Wang, C.(2001).College of Environmental Science and Forestry.Syracuse, New York:State University of New York.
22. Wang, C.,Dawson, C.(2000).Proceedings of the 2000 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium.Newton Square, PA:U.S. Department of Agriculture.
23. Watson, A. E.,Niccolucci, M. J.,Williams, D. R.(1994).The nature of conflict between hikers and recreational stock users in the John Muir Wilderness.Journal of Leisure Research,26(4),372-385.
24. 王小文、林晏州(1998)。大屯自然公園戶外遊憩者之遊憩衝突研究。戶外遊憩研究，11(1)，65-84。
25. 王正平、楊萃萍(2004)。直排輪活動參與者內團體衝突之研究。造園學報，10(2)，17-37。
26. 李素馨(1994)。典型相關分析－專業程度、遊憩動機和基地屬性認知關係之探討。戶外遊憩研究，7(3)，39-62。
27. 侯錦雄、郭彰仁(1998)。香客與戶外遊憩者之遊憩衝突探討－以松柏嶺宗教觀光區為例。戶外遊憩研究，11(2)，1-18。
28. 趙騏佑、簡健晃(2000)。直排輪Happy晝。臺北市:書泉出版社。
29. 鍾文玲、林晏州(1993)。釣魚者遊憩衝突認知之研究。戶外遊憩研究，6(1/2)，55-79。

1. (2013)。陽明山國家公園遊客對寵物狗衝突知覺之研究。國家公園學報，23(3)，59-67。