生態旅遊多重屬性之模式建構及其價值探討：以花蓮慕谷慕魚為例

Establishing the Framework of Ecotourism Multiple Attributes and Estimating the Value: A Case of Meqmegi in Hualien

10.6267/JTLS.2017.23(1)1

林政德(Cheng-Te Lin)；李俊鴻(Chun-Hung Lee)；何宇睿(Yu-Jui Ho)

生態旅遊地 ； 遊客偏好 ； 效用 ； 旅遊管理 ； ecotourism site ； visitor's preference ； utility ； tourism management

觀光休閒學報

23卷1期（2017 / 04 / 01）

1 - 31

繁體中文

本研究利用選擇試驗建構生態旅遊地的隨機效用模型，並將遊憩(體驗活動)、環境(環境設施品質)、制度(遊客人數管制、導覽制度)及經濟(導覽基金)的觀點納入評估模型，以台灣具有代表性的慕谷慕魚自然人文生態景觀區進行驗證。實證結果發現：(1)管制遊客人數每日400人、執行專業導覽人員陪同制度、提升環境設施品質、額外增加體驗活動及低的專業導覽基金花費將能提昇受訪遊客前往慕谷慕魚旅遊的整體效用，而在條件邏輯特與隨機參數邏輯特的評估結果皆相似；(2)潛在分類模型的分析結果顯示，生態旅遊將有明顯的市場區隔，遊客的社經背景、旅遊經歷與偏好亦呈現出其異質性，在生態旅遊屬性的願付價值有顯著差異。

This study used a choice experiment to build a random utility model. By incorporating views of recreation (activities and experiences), environment (facilities quality), institutions (visitors entry cap control and guided tour system), and economy (guide fund) into the model, this study examined the case of ＂Meqmegi＂, which is the Natural Humanity Ecological Scenic Spot in Taiwan and a representative ecotourism site. The empirical results showed that: (1) Limiting the number of visitors to 400 per day, implementing a guided tour institution, improving the environment quality, increasing experience activities, and lowering the expenses in tour guide fund will increase the entire utility of tourists visiting Meqmegi. Moreover, both conditional logit and random parameter logit models found similar results. (2) The result of latent class model indicated the heterogeneity preference among a variety of tourists' social background, travel experiences, and willingness to pay, which implied market segmentation.

1. 花蓮縣秀林鄉公所，(2013)，慕谷慕魚自然人文生態景觀區經營管理計畫草案，花蓮：花蓮縣秀林鄉公所。【Sioulin Township, Hualien County. (2013). The draft management program of Natural Humanity Ecological Scenic spots, Meqmegi. Hualien, Taiwan: Sioulin Township, Hualien.】。
2. World Travel and Tourism Council. (2015). Benchmarking travel and tourism: Trade summary. Retrieved October 29, 2015, from http://www.wttc.org/-/media/files/reports/benchmark%20reports/trade%20summary%202015.pdf
3. Boo, E.(1990).Ecotourism: The potentials and pitfalls.Washington, DC:World Wildlife Fund.
4. Cerda, C.,Ponce, A.,Zappi, M.(2013).Using choice experiments to understand public demand for the conservation of nature: A case study in a protected area of Chile.Journal for Nature Conservation,21(3),143-153.
5. Chaminuka, P.,Groeneveld, R. A.,Selomane A. O.,Ierland, E. C. V.(2012).Tourist preferences for ecotourism in rural communities adjacent to Kruger National Park: A choice experiment approach.Tourism Management,33(1),168-176.
6. Chen, C.-F.,Chen, P.-C.(2013).Estimating recreational cyclists' preferences for bicycle routes - Evidence from Taiwan.Transport Policy,26,23-30.
7. Deshazo, J. R.,Fermo, G.(2002).Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: The effects of complexity on choice consistency.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,44(1),123-143.
8. Hanley, N.,Mourato, S.,Wright, R. E.(2001).Choice modelling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuation.Journal of Economic Survey,15(3),435-462.
9. Hearne, R. R.,Salinas, Z. M.(2002).The use of choice experiments in the analysis of tourist preferences for ecotourism development in Costa Rica.Journal of Environmental Management,65(2),153-163.
10. Hearne, R. R.,Santos, C. A.(2005).Tourists' and locals' preferences toward ecotourism development in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala.Environment, Development and Sustainability,7(3),303-318.
11. Juutinen, A.,Mitani, Y.,Mäntymaa, E.,Shoji, Y.,Siikamäki, P.,Svento, R.(2011).Combining ecological and recreational aspects in national park management: A choice experiment application.Ecological Economics,70(6),1231-1239.
12. Kinghorn, N.,Willis, K.(2008).Valuing the components of an archaeological site: An application of choice experiment to Vindolanda, Hadrian's Wall.Journal of Cultural Heritage,9(2),117-224.
13. Lin, P.-S.,Chang, C.-Y.(2011).Towards sustainable community-based natural resource management in the indigenous Meqmegi community in Taiwan: Rethinking impacts of local participation.Natural Resources Forum,35(2),134-144.
14. Louviere, J. J.,Hensher, D. A.,Swait, J. D.(2000).Stated choice methods: Analysis and application.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University.
15. Mazzanti, M.(2003).Valuing cultural heritage in a multi-attribute framework microeconomic perspectives and policy implications.Journal of Socio-Economics,32(5),549-569.
16. McFadden, D.,Train, K.(2000).Mixed MNL models of discrete response.Journal of Applied Econometrics,15(5),447-470.
17. Pedersen, A.(2002).Managing tourism at world heritage sites: A practical manual for world heritage site managers.Paris:UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
18. Sekar, N.,Weiss, J. M.,Dobson, A. P.(2014).Willingness-to-pay and the perfect safari: Valuation and cultural evaluation of safari package attributes in the Serengeti and Tanzanian Northern Circui.Ecological Economics,97,34-41.
19. Semeniuk, C. A. D.,Haider, W.,Beardmore, B.,Rothley, K. D.(2009).A multi-attribute trade-off approach for advancing the management of marine wildlife tourism: A quantitative assessment of heterogeneous visitor preferences.Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems,19(2),194-208.
20. Stem, C. J.(2003).Community participation in ecotourism benefits: The link to conservation practices and perspectives.Society and Natural Resources,16(5),387-413.
21. Train, K. E.(2009).Discrete choice methods with simulation.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University.
22. 行政院永續發展委員會(2005)。生態旅遊白皮書。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:行政院永續發展委員會=National Council for Sustainable Development, MOTC。
23. 林鴻桂(2004)。Keelung, Taiwan，國立台灣海洋大學環境生物與漁業科學學系=National Taiwan Ocean University。

1. 陳均龍(2019)。以選擇試驗法評估望海巷潮境資源保育區之生態旅遊管理策略。農業經濟叢刊，25(2)，37-81。
2. 陳雅惠、陳郁蕙、林羿杏、李俊鴻(2017)。國人對冷凍年菜之消費行為與願付價格研究。應用經濟論叢，102，69-114。