瑞典與新加坡創新政策之比較研究：國家創新系統觀點

A Comparative Study of Innovation Policy in Sweden and Singapore: National Innovation System Perspective

陳意文(Yi-Wen Chen)；王美雅(Mei-Ya Wang)

國家創新系統 ； 創新政策 ； 創新活動 ； 政策規劃 ； National innovation system ； Innovation policy ； Innovation activities ； Policy-planning

企業管理學報

105期（2015 / 06 / 01）

1 - 29

繁體中文

全球競爭壓力下，各國已將「創新」從科技與產業政策配角視為各國施政主軸；而學界對創新的理解更已從崇尚科學與技術推動的第一代線性創新，演變至強調整合與連結的第五代創新系統；故創新不僅是新發明或新技術，而是研發、生產到行銷等活動與外部環境互動及回饋的結果。而勾勒創新政策亦應從單向的技術發展轉為開放創新平台，亦即透過國內各種制度與組織間交流，進而促使創新正向發展。本研究以2014年全球創新指數（Global Innovation Index，簡稱GII）的迴歸分析為基礎，採用國家創新系統觀點，以瑞典與新加坡作為分析的標竿國家。研究發現，發展「需求導向」與「區域型」計畫、設計彈性及透明的制度，並成立專責創新機構而建立回饋機制等，皆有助於建構並強化創新系統。

＂Innovation＂ has been changed from a supporting character to a main role in technology and industry policy planning. However, the concept of innovation has evolved from the first generation, which was linear and science-oriented, to the fifth generation that emphasizing on integration and connection. Therefore, innovation is not only inventions or introducing new technologies; it should be a result of the interaction and feedback from the environment with R&D, production and marketing in firms. Thus, the planning for innovation policy should not merely focus on technology development but also emphasize on the open innovation platform, which means that innovation will be facilitated by interacting with national institutions and organizations. This study is based on the regression analysis of the Global Innovation Index, choosing Sweden and Singapore as the benchmark of innovation policy from the perspective of national innovation system. Results show that developing a demand-oriented and regional master plan, designing a flexible and transparency institutional system, establishing a dedicated agency and setting up a feedback mechanism will contribute to construct and enhance national innovation system.

1. VINNOVA (2012). Retrieved December, 2012, from http://www.vinnova.se/en/.
2. Chaminade, C., Zabala, J.M. & Treccani, A. (2010). The Swedish National Innovation System and its Relevance for the Emergence of Global Innovation Networks. CIRCLE working paper, LUND University. December, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.circle.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/201009_Chaminade_Zabala_Treccani.pdf
3. The Global Innovation Index (2014). Retrieved March, 2015, from http://www.globalinnovationindex.org/content.aspx?page=gii-full-report-2014
4. Ministry of Education and Research (2012). The Government's Research and Innovation Bill. Retrieved December, 2012, from http://www.government.se/sb/d/16288
5. 科技部統計資料庫(2014)。科學技術統計要覽(2014 年版)。線上檢索日期：2015 年3 月。取自：https://ap0512.most.gov.tw/WAS2/technology/AsTechnologyDataIndex.aspx
6. Acs, Z.,Desai, S.,Klapper, L. F.(2008).What does "entrepreneurship" data really show?.Small Business Economics,31(3),265-281.
7. Anderson, T.(2010).,Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean=ECLAC.
8. Astrom, T.,Mattsson, P.(2007).,未出版
9. Borras, S.,Edquist, C.(2013).The choice of innovation policy instruments.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,80(8),1513-1522.
10. Carlsson, B.(2006).Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature.Research Policy,35(1),56-67.
11. Chesbrough, H.(2003).Open Innovation.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
12. Dolfsma, W.,Seo, D.(2013).Government policy and technological innovation-A suggested typology.Technovation,33(6),173-179.
13. Edquist, C.(2011).Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: Identification of systemic problems (or failures).Industrial and Corporate Change,20(6),1725-1753.
14. Edquist, C.(ed.),Hommen, L.(ed.)(2008).Small Country Innovation Systems: Globalization, Change and Policy in Asia and Europe.Cheltenham, England:Edward Elgar.
15. Edquist, C.,Hommen, I.(1999).Systems of innovation: theory and policy for the demand side.Technology in Society,21(1),63-79.
16. Edquist, C.,Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M.(2015).Pre-commercial procurement: A demand or supply policy instrument in relation to innovation?.R&D Management,45(2),147-160.
17. Eisenhardt, K. M.(1989).Building theories from case study research.Academy of Management Review,14(4),532-550.
18. Flanagan, K.,Uyarra, E.,Laranja, M.(2011).Reconceptualising the 'policy mix' for innovation.Research Policy,40(5),702-713.
19. Freeman, C.(1987).Technology Policy and Economic Performance. Lessons from Japan.London:Pinter.
20. Georghiou, L.(2006).Report for the Prime Minister's Office of FinlandReport for the Prime Minister's Office of Finland,未出版
21. Hage, J.(ed.),Meeus, M.(ed.)(2006).Innovation, Science and Institutional Change. A Research Handbook.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
22. Jong, J.,Kalvet, T.,Vanhaverbeke, W.(2010).Exploring a theoretical framework to structure the public policy implications of open innovation.Technology Analysis and Strategy Management,22(8),877-896.
23. Koh, W.,Wong, P. K.(2005).Competing at the frontier: the changing role of technology policy in Singapore's economic strategy.Technology Forecasting and Social Change,72(3),255-285.
24. Lall, S.(ed.),Urata, S.(ed.)(2003).Competitiveness, FDI and Technological Activity in East Asia.Cheltenham, England:Edward Elgar.
25. Lundvall, B. A.(1992).National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning.London:Pinter.
26. Melin, G.,Hakansson, A.,Thorell, N.(2011).,未出版
27. Nelson, R. R.(1993).National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
28. Niosi, J.(2011).Building innovation systems: An introduction to the special section.Industrial and Corporate Change,20(6),1637-1643.
29. OCED(1997).National Innovation Systems.Paris:OCED.
30. Paasi, M.(2005).Collective benchmarking of policies: an instrument for policy learning in adaptive research and innovation policy.Science and Public Policy,32(1),17-27.
31. Porter, M.E.(1990).The Competitive Advantage of Nations.New York:Free Press.
32. Rothwell, R.(1994).Towards the fifth-generation innovation process.International Marketing Review,11(1),7-31.
33. Shyu, J. Z.,Chiu, Y. C.(2002).Innovation policy for developing Taiwan's competitive advantages.R&D Management,32(4),369-374.
34. Wang, Y.,Vanhaverbeke, W.,Roijakkers, N.(2012).Exploring the impact of open innovation on national systems of innovation-A theoretical analysis.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,79(3),419-428.
35. Wong, P. K.,Ho, Y. P.,Autio, E.(2005).Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data.Small Business Economics,24(3),335-350.
36. Yin, R. K.(1994).Case Study Research: Design and Method.CA:Sage.
37. 王文娟(2005)。新加坡科技政策概況。國際經濟情勢雙週報，1575，1-9。
38. 王美雅、陳意文(2012)。財團法人中國生產力中心委託之研究計畫財團法人中國生產力中心委託之研究計畫,臺北市:財團法人中國生產力中心。
39. 吳亦泰(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立交通大學科技管理研究所。
40. 李宗榮、施奕任(2008)。發展型國家與市場統理網絡的轉型：臺灣與新加坡的比較。2008 亞太區域研究成果發表會
41. 杜英儀(2010)。新加坡服務業創新獎勵－機制設計與啓示。經濟前瞻，129，20-24。
42. 林欣吾(2006)。從創新政策循環角度看創新政策的評估。科技發展政策報導，SR9510，1142-1153。
43. 洪世章、林于婷(2003)。國家創新系統：概念、成因與效果。研考雙月刊，27(4)，24-33。
44. 國科會(2007)。中華民國科學技術白皮書。臺北市:國科會。
45. 游常山(2002)。新加坡變了─他們如何努力放輕鬆、拼第一？。天下雜誌，258
46. 溫肇東、吳思華、顏如妙(2002)。從產業政策、科技政策到創新政策─從歷屆全國科技會議及歐盟創新政策的觀察。政大公共政策論壇「全球化與臺灣」研討會，臺北市:
47. 葉乃菁(2006)。節點型科技決策分工模式－丹麥、瑞典、德國與瑞士。科技發展政策報導，SR9509，979-1003。
48. 羅於陵、張書豪(2011)。我國導入開放式國家創新系統之策略規劃與配套措施。研考雙月刊，35(5)，93-109。

1. Wang, Shi-Xiao,Lu, Wen-Min,Hung, Shiu-Wan,Hsiao, Rong-Ji,Hou, Chen-En(2017).Constructing The Technology Acquisition Strategy for Followers of CSSC Industry.企業管理學報,114,69-87.
2. 樊學良,徐聯恩(2018)。組織創新活力量表：量表編製及其複核效度之驗證。企業管理學報，117，21-47。