低碳生活實踐模式之研究－建構負碳商品與個人碳交易商業模式

The Study of Low Carbon Living Practice - The Case of Negative Emissions Product and Personal Carbon Trading

10.3966/102596272019120444002

李堅明(Chien-Ming Lee)；洪悅容(Yue-Rong Hong)；謝亞廷(Ya-Ting Hsieh)；陳贊宇(Chen-Yi Chen)

負碳商品 ； 碳中和 ； 個人碳交易 ； 問卷調查 ； 鶯歌陶藝品 ； Carbon negative product ； Carbon neutral ； Person carbon trading ； Questionnaire ； Yingge pottery

企業管理學報

44卷4期（2019 / 12 / 01）

27 - 56

繁體中文

低碳生活已成為全球因應氣候變遷最重要的策略，碳中和消費模式則是民眾落實低碳生活的最佳作法。建構負碳商品（以碳權抵銷碳足跡）與個人碳交易制度，則是激勵民眾實踐碳中和消費誘因機制。本研究建立兩部門（代表性個人與廠商）個人碳交易理論模型，並以臺灣鶯歌陶藝品為例，建構全球首例負碳商品與個人碳交易商業模式。本研究問卷調查新北市三峽區民眾，回收411份有效樣本，獲得民眾對負碳商品購買偏好與願付價格如後：（1）54%受訪民眾願意支付較高價格，購買附有碳權標籤商品；（2）53%受訪民眾願意多付5%價格，購買附有碳權標籤商品；（3）58%受訪民眾願意購買「負碳商品」，並取得碳權。顯示，民眾實踐低碳生活的積極性與可行性。

Countries around the world are adopting low carbon lifestyles as a key strategy to address climate change. A good practice toward adopting a low carbon lifestyle is carbon-neutral consumption. Carbon-negative products and personal carbon trading serve as incentives to stimulate carbon-neutral consumption among the public. This study develops two part theoretical model and a new business model using Yingge pottery as a case study. In addition, it surveys the preferences and willingness to pay for carbon-negative products of 411 residents from Sanxia District in New Taipei City. The key findings are as follows: 54% of respondents are willing to pay a higher price to purchase carbon-negative products, 53% are willing to pay a 5% higher price to purchase carbon-negative products, and 58% are willing to obtain carbon credit in exchange for their purchases of carbon-negative products. These results demonstrate the feasibility of low carbon activities.

1. Bristow, A.L.,Zanni, A.M.,Wardman, M.,Chintakayala, P.K.,U.K.(2008).Personal Ca ERC Research ReportPersonal Ca ERC Research Report,未出版
2. Fawcett, T.(2010).Personal carbon trading in different national contexts.Climate Policy,10(4),339-352.
3. Fawcett, T.,Parag, Y.(2011).An introduction to personal carbon trading.Climate Policy,10(4),329-338.
4. Fleming, D.(2005).,The Lean Economy Connection.
5. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
6. Harwatt, H.(2008).Reducing Carbon Emissions from Personal Road Transport through the Application of a Tradable Carbon Permit Scheme: Empirical Findings and Policy Implications from the UK.International Transport Forum,Leipzig:
7. Howell, R.(2007).Edinburgh,University of Edinburgh.
8. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC.(2014).AR5 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2014 (IPCC Pubblication).
9. IPPR.(2008).IPPR. (2008). IPPR says Public More Receptive to Personal Carbon Trading than Policy-makers Believe. Institute for Public Policy Research..
10. Johnson M.,Harfoot M.,Musser C.,Wiley T.,Pollitt H.,Chewpreecha, U.,Tarafdar, J.(2008).A report to Comhar SDC Sustainable Development CouncilA report to Comhar SDC Sustainable Development Council,Ireland:.
11. Keay-Bright, S.(ed.)(2009).,London:UK Energy Research Centre.
12. Low, R.(2005).,Edinburgh:Edinburgh University.
13. Satoh, I.(2014).IT-enabled Personal-level Carbon Emission Allowance.Procedia Computer Science,32,665-672.
14. Starkey, R.,Anderson, K.(2005).,Norwich, UK:Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
15. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change(2012).,未出版
16. United Nations of Environment Program(2017).The Emissions Gap Report 2017: A UN Environment Synthesis Report.Nairobi:United Nations of Environment Program=UNEP.