以作業基礎成本制度建構校務基金收入之個案研究

A Case Study of Activity-Based Costing System for Construct the Revenue Model of School Funds

10.29847/JNUU.201006.0010

林聖薇(Sheng-Wei Lin)；林煜超(Yu-Chao Lin)

校務基金 ； 作業基礎成本制度 ； School founds ； Activity-Based Costing system

聯大學報

7卷1期（2010 / 06 / 01）

203 - 218

繁體中文

教育部實施校務基金制度，增加大學對經費自主運用的彈性，提昇高等教育資源使用效率，減輕政府財政負擔。大學如何運用其財務自主權，發揮經營效率，收支估測是籌編校務基金預算過程的起步。本研究採個案研究，應用作業基礎成本制度的動因概念，以個案大學的歷史資料，找出影響校務基金分項與總額收入的動因，建構估測模式，並檢測模式的準確度。研究結果發現分項與總額收入模式均有良好的預測能力，亦找出學生人數是各項收入的最主要動因。本研究之模式可適用於其它教學型大學的收入估測。總額收入估測模式可提供高階主管作決策，而分項收入估測模式則可供作業階層人員使用。

Carried out by the Ministry of Education, school funds system can enhance the flexibility for universities or colleges themselves independently to manage annual budget, make efficient use of the resources for higher education and alleviategovernment financial burden. The three essential prerequisites for drawing up the school funds budget are the way how university applies its own financial autonomy, maximizing its operation efficiency and total revenue estimation annually. Case study is adopted in this research with applying the concept of drivers of Activity-BasedCosting, as well as the historical data of selected universities to dig out the drivers influencing individual and total of revenue accounts within school funds, to form prediction models respectively, and to testify the accuracy of the models. The results revels that individual and total revenue models both possess excellent prediction powers. Also, the number of pupils is the most crucial driver for each revenue account. The models of this research can also be suitable to predict the revenue of other teaching intensive universities. The total of revenue model could offer high-level administrators to use in decision making as well as the individual revenue model for those general operators.

1. Acton, Daniel D.,Cotton, William D. J.(1997).Activity-Based Costing in a University Setting.Journal of Cost Management,11(2),32-38.
2. Boons, Arnick N.A.M.(1998).Product costing for complex manufacturing systems.International Journal of Production Economics,55,241-255.
3. Brimsom, James A.(1991).Activity Accounting-An Activity-Based Costing Approach.New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
4. Cooper, R.,Kaplan, R. S.(1988).The Rise of Activity-based Costing-part One: What's an Activity-based Cost System?.Journal of Cost Management,2,45-54.
5. Cox, Kelline S.,Downey, Ronald G.,Smith, Laurinda G.(1999).ABC's of Higher Education. Getting Back to the Basics: An Activity-Based Costing Approach to Planning and Financial Decision Making..Association for Institutional Research 39th Annual Forum,Seattle, Washington:
6. Drake, A. R.,Haka, S. F.(2001).An ABC simulation focusing on incentives and innovation.Issues in Accounting Education,6,443-447.
7. Ferranti, J. C.(1999).Activity Base Costing.Computerworld,August,33-65.
8. Hilton, R. W.(2002).Managerial Accounting.New York:McGraw-Hill.
9. Howell, Robert A.,Stephen, Soucy R.(1987).The New Manufacturing Environment: Major Trends for Management Accounting.Management Accounting,65,21-27.
10. Trussel, J. M.,Bitner, L. N.(1996).As Easy as ABC, Re-engineering the Cost Accounting System.NACUBO Business Officer,29(12),34-39.
11. Turney, B. B.(1991).Comments on Activity-Based Costing: The Performance Breakthrough.Hillsboro, Oregon:Cost Technology inc..
12. 王棣、楊淑蘭(2007)。國立大學校院校務基金實施成效及相關財務問題之探討。主計月刊，614，44-50。
13. 林蕙眞、李宗黎(2008)。成本與管理會計學新論（上）。台北:證業。
14. 邱皓政(2000)。量化研究與統計分析─SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北:五南圖書公司。
15. 柯承恩(1998)。大學校務基金之問題與發展。主計月報，85(一)，24-28。
16. 柯承恩、劉順仁(1997)。走向自給自足之路—國立大學校務基金會計問題面面觀。會計研究月刊，134，51-58。
17. 胡益芬(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹，國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系。
18. 教育部(1998)。國立大學校院校務基金會計制度宣傳手冊問答彙編。
19. 教育部(2000)。國立大學校院校務基金問答彙編。
20. 陳麗惠、高弘濱(2004)。大學成本控制績效評量系統之建立。教育政策論壇，7(2)，85-106。
21. 湯堯、成群豪(2004)。高等教育經營。台北:高教。
22. 劉中鍵(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立臺灣大學管理學院會計研究所。
23. 蘇彩足(1996)。政府預算之研究。台北:華泰書局。