高中和高職畢業生升讀大學後語文與數學學業成就之比較：某大學的個案研究

A comparison of Senior-high-school and Vocational-high-school Graduates' Languages and Mathematics Achievement in University: L University as a Case

10.29847/JNUU.201112.0003

李隆盛(Lung-Sheng Lee)；林佳靜(Chia-Ching Lin)；劉可德(Ko-Te Liu)；邱秀娟(Hsiu-Chuan Chiu)；林聖薇(Sheng-Wei Lin)

多元入學管道 ； 學業成就 ； 高等教育 ； multiple admission approach ； academic achievement ； higher education

聯大學報

8卷2期（2011 / 12 / 01）

39 - 64

繁體中文

臺灣目前高中生和高職生均熱衷於升學，但兩種來源畢業生升讀大學後，學業成就表現究竟有無差異？本研究以某國立大學（以下暱稱為L 大）2003 學年度入學中約全體965 名學生為對象（含高中畢業生450名和高職畢業生515名），探討兩種來源（以下簡稱兩類）畢業生進入L大學習後，在語文與數學方面的學科成績有何差異，並選取相關變項進行比較分析。結果發現：（1）高中與高職兩類畢業生入學後，語文與數學之學業成就並未達顯著差異；（2）兩類畢業生入學前後女生在語文方面的成績均優於男生，但在數學方面的性別差異縮減；（3）兩類畢業生入學後學業成就，未因公私立學校、年齡和居住地區三項背景變項而有所不同；（4）高中應屆學生入學後學業成就優於非應屆，高職畢業生則無差異；（5）不同學院和學系之兩類畢業生入學前學業成績確有顯著差異，但入學後其差異縮減；和（6）兩類學生入學時各科成績較佳者，入學後各科成績亦佳，且以高中畢業生入學前英文成績佳，以及高職畢業生入學前之英文與數學成績佳者尤為顯著。因此，本研究根據結果，針對L 大及其相近校院、教育人員及後續研究提出建議。

In Taiwan, both senior-high-school (SHS) and vocational-high-school (VHS) students are eager to go for further study in universities. Do the two groups (or tracks) of students have academic performance differences when they study in universities? This study mined and analyzed the database of almost all 965 undergraduate students (including 450 SHS graduates and 515 VHS graduates) who were admitted to a national university (henceforth called LU) in 2003. The two main purposes of this study were to investigate whether there is difference between the two groups of students' languages and mathematics achievement or not in the same learning environment, and to explore the relationship between their demographic, entrance score, environmental variables and their academic achievement in LU. Consequently, the following conclusions are drawn: (1) The significant differences between the languages and the mathematics achievement of two groups of students are not found, but the reason should have further studies. (2) The languages achievement of the female students is better than the male ones, while in math, the difference is not significant in gender. (3) Three variables (i.e. high school affiliation- ublic/private, student's age and living area) do not significantly relate to the academic achievement. (4) The achievement of the students who directly enter LU when they graduated from SHS's is better than the other graduates; however, there is no significant difference between the VHS graduates. (5) Distinction exists among the students' entrance scores of different colleges and departments in LU, but the difference decreases after they are enrolled in LU. (6) The higher entrance scores, the better academic achievement of the students in LU. The SHS graduates' English and VHS graduates' English and math scores in entrance examinations are significantly associated to their achievement in university, respectively. Based on the conclusions, suggestions are made to LU and its similar universities, faculty as well as further studies.

1. 李俊豪(2010)。解釋學生基測成績差異之個人因素與地區因素。地理學報，60，67-102。
   連結：
2. 駱明慶(2001)。教育成就的省籍與性別差異。經濟論文叢刊，29，117-152。
   連結：
3. 邱瓊平（2007）。96 基測登記分發錄取低標分。2008 年1月13日，取自： http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/monkey_014148/article?mid=31730&prev=32055&next=31701&l=f&fid=6。
4. 教育部統計處（2011）。中華民國教育統計（民國2011 年版）。2011年4月13日，取自：http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15423&CtNode=3635&mp=4。
5. Catsambis, S.(1994).The path to math: gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school.Sociology of Education,67,199-215.
6. Coleman, J.,Hoffer, T.,Kilgore, S.(1982).High school achievement: Public, catholic, and private schools compared.New York:Basic Books.
7. Diseth, A.,Kobbeltvedt, T.(2010).A mediation analysis of achievement motives, goals, learning strategies, and academic achievement.British Journal of Educational Psychology,80(4),671-687.
8. Downey, D.,Hippel, P.,Broh, B.(2004).Are schools the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year.American Sociological Review,69,613-635.
9. Entwisle, D. R.,Alexander, K. L.,Olson, L. S.(1994).The gender gap in math: Its possible origins in neighborhood effects.American Sociological Review,59,822-838.
10. Felson, R. B.,Trudeau, L.(1991).Gender differences in mathematics performance.Social Psychology Quarterly,54,113-116.
11. Gagne, R. M.(1985).The conditions of learning and theory of instruction.New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
12. Heneveld, W.,Craig, H.(1996).Schools count: World bank project designs and the quality of primary education in sub-Saharan Africa.Washington, DC:The World Bank.
13. Israel, G. D.,Beaulieu, L. J.,Hartless, G.(2001).The influence of family and community social capital on educational achievement.Rural Sociology,66(1),43-68.
14. Kinard, E. M.,Reinherz, H.(1986).Birthdate effects on school performance and adjustment: A longitudinal study.Journal of Educational Research,79(6),366-372.
15. Lee, V. E.,Bryk, A. S.(1989).A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement.Sociology of Education,62,172-192.
16. Litmanen, T.,Hirsto, L.,Lonka, K.(2010).Personal goals and academic achievement among theology students.Studies in Higher Education,35(2),195-208.
17. Marjoribanks, K.(1991).The foundation of students' learning.Oxford:Pergamon.
18. McCall, B. P.(1993).Identifying state dependence in duration models with time-varying regressions.Minnesota:Industrial Relations Center Press.
19. McGilly, K.(ed)(1994).Guided Discovery in A Community of Learners.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
20. Pinxten, M.,Fraine, B. D.,Damme, J. V.,D''Haenens, E.(2010).Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Effects of type of achievement measure.British Journal of Educational Psychology,80(4),689-709.
21. Raudenbush, S. W.,Bryk, A. S.(1986).A hierarchical model for studying school effects.Sociology of Education,59(1),1-17.
22. Stickney, B. D.,Fitzpatrick, J.(1987).Coloman's inequality twenty years later: The origins, the issues and the implications.Colorado:American Educational Research Association.
23. Täht, K.,Must, O.(2010).Are the links between academic achievement and earning motivation similar in five neighbouring countries?.A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences (TRAMES),14(3),271-281.
24. Tasi, S. L.,Walberg, H. J.(1983).Mathematics achievement and attitude productivity in high school.Journal of Educational Research,76(5),265-272.
25. Tsai, S. L.,Gates, H.,Chiu, H. Y.(1994).Schooling Taiwan's women: Educational attainment in the mid-20th century.Sociology of Education,67,243-263.
26. Wigfield, A.(1994).Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation: A Developmental Perspective.Educational Psychology Review,6,49-78.
27. Zhang, B.,Wang, M.,Li, J.,Yu, G.,Bi, Y.(2011).The effects of concealing academic achievement information on adolescents' self-concept.Psychological Record,61(1),21-39.
28. Zhang, B.,Zhao, J.,Yu, G.(2009).The influence of concealing academic achievement on the self-esteem of adolescents with low achievement.Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal,37(6),805-810.
29. 大學入學考試中心編(1999)。各國大學入學制度介紹─學校篇。臺北:大學入學考試中心。
30. 大學入學考試中心編(1999)。各國大學入學制度介紹─國家篇。臺北:大學入學考試中心。
31. 田芳華、傅祖壇(2003)。數位落差與大學生學習─大學生數位落差相關因素與其對學業成就影響之探究。國立臺灣大學校慶祝創校七十五週年─提昇高等教育競爭力二十一世紀大學教育發展國際學術研討會，臺北:
32. 余秋芬(2004)。台北，中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所。
33. 吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北:五南。
34. 李宇宙(1998)。人工代母與現代醫學倫理。應用倫理研究通訊，5，33-36。
35. 林尚平、游萬來、翁萬德、陳重臣、林晏瑜、曾惠玉(2002)。技專校院入學測驗中心委託研究技專校院入學測驗中心委託研究,雲林縣:國立雲林科技大學。
36. 洪儒(2009)。台北，銘傳大學教育研究所碩士在職專班。
37. 張秀英(2003)。台中，逢甲大學統計與精算研究所。
38. 張春興(2006)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北:東華。
39. 陳怡君(1994)。臺北，國立政治大學教育研究所。
40. 陳燕萍(2002)。臺北，國立政治大學教育學系研究所。
41. 黃銘惠、黃燕飛(2001)。臺北科技大學四技多元入學學生學業成就之比較研究。技職教育新意涵國際學術研討會論文集，臺北:
42. 溫侑柯(2006)。嘉義，南華大學資訊管理學研究所。
43. 葉和滿(2002)。彰化，彰化師範大學教育研究所。
44. 蔡宜芳(2003)。高雄，國立高雄師範大學教育學研究所。
45. 鄭秋霞(2002)。嘉義，南華大學公共行政與政策研究所。
46. 蕭次融、姚霞玲(1997)。大學招生多元發展。大考中心通訊，38
47. 謝亞恆(2004)。嘉義，南華大學教育社會學研究所。