地方意象的認知與詮釋－應用灰結構模型與灰關聯法探討學生之設計學習

The Cognition and the Interpretation of Local Image: Explore Students' Design Learning By Grey Relational Analysis and Grey Structure Model

葉麗美(Lei-Mei Yeh)；蔡清斌(Ching-Pin Tsai)

設計能力 ； 學習模式 ； 灰關聯公式 ； 灰結構模型 ； 地方意象 ； Design Abilities ； Local Image ； GRA ； GSM ； Learning Mode

聯大學報

10卷1期（2013 / 06 / 01）

179 - 200

繁體中文

建築設計課程常以主題操作方式，累積學生之設計經驗，培養學生整合專業知識，發展設計能力。建築內涵之認知與設計能力密切相關，學生的學習能力，因不同的經驗背景與心智特性，應有不同的學習模式。研究由17位學生自評地方意象設計案，四個屬性構面，共24個設計因子之設計能力，建立灰學生問題表（Grey Student-Problem Chart），透過灰關聯公式（Grey Relational Analysis），計算學生不同屬性之設計能力與排序，再以灰結構模型（Grey Structural Model）工具，分析學生於不同屬性之設計能力階層與分佈，結果顯示，設計因子影響學生之設計能力與模式，依學生不同之能力與智慧優勢，研究建議八種不同的學習模式與適應群組。本研究不只建立深入個案設計能力的評量方法，同時綜合學生之設計過程，透過地方意象詮釋結構模型，探討學生於不同階段的設計能力與地方意象詮釋問題，有助於建築設計教學的檢討與提升。

Project-based learning is generally used in architectural design course to accumulate students' design experience, to cultivate their integrated profession, and to train their design capabilities. Students with different experiences and mental characteristics shoule have different types of learning modes, and only pragmatic assessment helps the understanding of individual situations. Datas were collected from 17 students' self-assessments of Local Image design project. Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) methods was applied to analyze the design abilities of 24 local image design components, Grey Student-Problem Chart(GSP) and Grey Structure Model(GSM) were then used to analyze the design learning status. Based on the students' image design abilities, eight groups of different learning modes were suggested. Through the review of the design content and the context, the research not only established the assessment method in-depth but also explored the high-end network of design thinking that contributed to the improvement of the design learning program.

1. 何慧群(2012)。運用詮釋結構模式分析教育哲學課程設計提案研究─以哲學部分設計為例。測驗統計年刊，20，115-150。
   連結：
2. 邱文彬(2007)。典範信念量表的發展與效度考驗：後皮亞傑學派取向。國立高雄師範大學教育學系教育學刊，29，73-101。
   連結：
3. 施植明、姜建宇、陳林蔚(2009)。擬仿的地域主義─黃聲遠的宜蘭經驗。設計學報，41(1)，1-18。
   連結：
4. Nagai, M.T., (2010), Handouts of Graduate Institute of Educational Measurement and Statistic at NTCU (unpublished)..
5. Baloglu, S.,McCleary, K.W.(1999).A model of destination image formation.Annals of Tourism Research,26(4),868-897.
6. Basseches, M.(1984).Dialectical thinking and adult development.NJ:Ablex.
7. Boulding, K. E.(1961).The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society.MI:University of Michigan Press.
8. Chen, D.J.,Lai, A.F.,Liu, I.C.(2005).The Design and Implementation of a Diagnostic Test System based on the Enhanced S-P Model.Journal of Information Science and Engineering,21,1007-1030.
9. Clifford, J.(1997).Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century.MA:Harvard University Press.
10. Dinero, T.E.,Blixt, S.L.(1988).Information about Tests from Sato's S-PChart.College Teaching,36(3),123-128.
11. Gardner, H(1983).Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences.NY:Basic Books.
12. Gardner, H(1999).Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligence for the 21st century.NY:Basic Books.
13. Gulick, J.(1963).Images of an Arab City.Journal of the American Institute of Planners,29(3),179-198.
14. Harrison, J.D.,Howard, W.A.(1972).The Role of Meaning in the Urban Image.Environment and Behavior,4(4),389-411.
15. Heylighen, A.,Bouwen, J. E.,Neuckermans, H.(1999).Walking on a Thin Line: Between Passive Knowledge and Active Knowing of Components and Concepts in Architectural Design.Design Studies,20(2),211-235.
16. Howes, D.(1996).Cross-Cultural Consumption: Global Markets, Local Realities.London:Routledge.
17. Kosslyn, S.M.(1981).The medium and the message in mental imagery.Psychological Review,88,46-66.
18. Labouvie-Vief, G.(1982).Dynamic development and mature autonomy: A theoretical prologue.Human Development,25,161-196.
19. Lin, Y.H.,Chen, S.M.(2006).The Investigation of S-P Chart Analysis on the Test Evaluations of Equality Axiom Concepts for Sixth Graders.Proceedings of the 2nd WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Educational Technologies
20. Lin, Y.H.,Chen, S.M.(2006).The Integrated Analysis of S-P Chart and Ordering Theory on Equality Axiom Concepts Test for Sixth Graders.WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON MATHEMATICS,5(12),1303-1308.
21. Lynch, K.(1960).The Image of the City.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
22. Norberg-Schulz, C.(1980).Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture.New York:Rizzoli.
23. Paivio, A.(1979).Imagery and verbal processes.NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Relph, E.(1976).Place and Placelessness.London:Pion.
25. Rofe, M.(2003).I Want to be Global': Theorising the Gentrifying Class as an Emergent Elite Global Community.Urban Studies,40,2511-2526.
26. Sato, T.,Kurata, M.(1977).Basic S-P Score Table Characteristics.NEC Research and Development,47,64-71.
27. Sheu, T.W.,Wang, B.T.,Liang, J.C.,Tzeng, J.W.,Nagai M.T.(2010).Applying grey S-P chart to analyze the English listening performances among college students.The 15th Conference on Grey System Theory and Applications
28. Snodgrass, J.G.(1984).Concepts and their surface representations.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23,3-22.
29. Stroebe, W.(Ed.),Hewstone, M.(Ed.)(1999).European review of social psychology.UK:Wiley.
30. Tuan, Y.F.(1974).Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values.NJ:Prentice-Hall.
31. Tversky, A.,Kahneman, D.(1974).Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Science,185(4157),1124-1131.
32. Warfield, J.N.(1982).Interpretive Structural Modelling in Group Planning and Problem Solving Techniques in Engineering.New York:John Wiley.
33. Yamaguchi, D.,Li, G.D.,Nagai, M.T.(2005).New Grey Relational Analysis for Finding the Invariable Structure and Its Applications.Journal of Grey System,8(2),167-178.
34. Yamaguchi, D.S.,Li, G.D.,Akabane, K. M.,Nagai, M.T.,Kitaoka, M.(2007).A Realization Algorithm of Grey Structural Modeling.Journal of Grey System,10(1),33-40.
35. Yamaguchi, D.S.,Li, G.D.,Nagai, M.T.(2007).Verification of Effectiveness for Grey Relational Analysis Models.Journal of Grey System,10(3),169-182.
36. Yeh, L.M.,Hsu, H.L.(2012).Evaluation of Local Image Designs Based on GRA and ISM.Journal of Taiwan Kansei Information,3(2),121-134.
37. Yeh, L.M.,Liang, J.C.,Lee, Y.J.,Nagai, M.T.(2012).Evaluating learning Difficulties of the content of the local image project in architectural design.International Symposium on Education and Psychology
38. Yih, J.M.,Lin, Y.H.(2010).Concept structure based on response pattern detection of S-P chart with application in algebra learning.WSEAS Transactions on Computers,9(8),847-856.
39. 何英奇(1989)。精熟學習策略配合微電腦化S-P表分析診斷對學生學習效果的實驗研究。教育心理學報，22，191-214。
40. 余民寧(1995)。成就測驗的編製原理。台北:心理出版社。
41. 余民寧(2002)。教育測驗與評量─成就測驗與教學評量。台北:心理出版社。
42. 高宣揚(1998)。當代社會理論。台北:五南。
43. 高宣揚(1998)。當代社會理論。台北:五南。
44. 張紹勳(2004)。研究方法。台中:滄海。
45. 游森期、余民寧(2006)。知識結構診斷評量與s-p表之關聯性研究。教育與心理研究，29(1)，183-208。
46. 黃希庭譯、Solso, R.L.(1992)。認知心理學。台北:五南。
47. 楊德睿譯、Geertz, C.(2002)。地方知識。臺北:麥田。
48. 溫坤禮、張簡士坤、葉鎮愷、王建文、林慧珊(2006)。MATLAB在灰色系統理論的應用。台北:全華科技圖書。
49. 魏光莒(2005)。地域主義思想與綠建築。環境與藝術學刊，3，13-22。