高中數理資優女生選擇進入基礎科學科系之歷程研究

The Process Research of the Choice Entering the Foundation Science Department for Math and Science Gifted Girls at the High School

10.6172/BSE200509.2901016

于曉平(Hsiao-Ping Yu)

數理資優 ； 高中女生 ； 基礎科學科系 ； class for math and science gifted ； high school's girl ； foundation science department

特殊教育研究學刊

29期（2005 / 09 / 01）

337 - 361

繁體中文

本研究透過兩年時間追蹤了解六所高中數理資優班女生就讀基礎科學科系的意願與歷程，研究發現，數理資優女生選擇進入基礎科學科系的因素十分複雜，興趣、能力、重要他人、課外學習經驗等都會影響，反而從不會進入基礎科學科系的學生可以清楚看出受就業市場需求與社會價值等因素影響，過程中高二較不確定未來的方向，然而上了高三較有自己的想法，選擇後會掙扎猶豫，但確定目標後更為篤定，甚至對未來的學習之路也有一些規劃。此外，根據研究結果提出一些研究上的建議供讀者參考。

This research tracked the girls who studied in the class for math and science gifted students at six high schools for two years and in order to know the process of choosing to enter the foundation science department. Research findings showed that it was very complicated for these girls to choose entering the foundation science department. The factors which influence their choices were interests, abilities, important others, learning experience... etc. On the contrary, we could see the influences of the need of the employment market and the social values on the students who didn’t want to enter the foundation science department. They were not sure the future development at grade eleven, but they had their own viewpoints at grade twelve. When they chose, they sometimes felt hesitant. But they felt determined when they set their goals. In addition, they also had some plans for the future learning. According to the above findings, there were some suggestions proposed for reader's reference.

1. Alien, D.(1995).Encouraging success in female students: Helping girls develop math and science skills.Gifted Child Today Magazine,18(2),44-45.
2. Berger, S.(2000).Surfing the net. Are boys really better at science and math? How can the internet be used to encourage girls to pursue science and math?.Understanding Our Gifted,12,21-26.
3. Casey, K. A.(2000).Mentors' contributions to gifted adolescents' affective, social, and vocational development.Roeper Review,22(4),227-230.
4. Fox, L. H.(1974).The mathematically precocious: Male or female?.ED 090473.
5. Fox, L. H.(1976).Gifted girls: Scientists and mathematicians of the future.ED 135598.
6. Grant, D. F.(1995).Cases of rural gifted college females: Socialization barriers and career choices.ED 387 730.
7. Hansen, R.,Neujahr, J.(1974).Career developments of males and females gifted in science.Journal of Educational Research,68(1),43-45.
8. Hollinger, C. L.(1991).Understanding the gifted adolescent: Educational, developmental, and multicultural issues.York:Teachers College Press.
9. Jacobs, J. E.,Finken, L. L.,Griffin, N. L.,Wright, J. D.(1998).The career plans of science-talented rural adolescent girls.American Educational Research Journal,35(4),681-704.
10. Johnson, S. L.(1999).Discovering the potential of gifted girls: The biological and physical science interests of gifted kindergarten girls.School Science & Mathematics,99,302-312.
11. Joyce, B. A.(2000).Young girls in science: Academic ability, perceptions and future participation in science.Roeper Review,22(4),261-262.
12. Karnes, F. A.,Stephens, K. R.(2002).Young women of achievement: A resource for girls in science, math, and technology.Amherst, NJ:Prometheus Books.
13. Keller, C.(2001).Effect of teachers' stereotyping on students' stereotyping of mathematics as a male domain.Journal of Social Psychology,141,165-173.
14. Kennedy, H. L.,Parks, J.(2000).Society cannot continue to exclude women from the fields of science and mathematics.Education,120,529-537.
15. Kerr, B.,Robinson Kurpius, S. E.(2004).Encouraging talented girls in math and science: Effects of a guidance intervention.High Ability Studies,25(1),85-102.
16. Klein, A. G.,Zehms, D.(1996).Self-concept and gifted girls: A cross sectional study of intellectually gifted females in grades….Roeper Review,29(1),30-34.
17. Makosz, J.(1993).Operation Minerva Rocky View: Mentoring young girls in science.ED 371 557.
18. Marjoram, T.(1994).Are/Should boys and girls gifted in mathematics be taught together?.Gifted Education International,9(3),152-153.
19. Oppler, S. H.(1993).Career interests of academically talented seventh graders.ED 374 033
20. Perrone, P. A.(1997).Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed.).Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
21. Prufrock Press(1996).Gifted girls and science: Revisiting the issue.Journal of Secondary Gifted Education,7,447-458.
22. Rebhorn, L. S.,Miles, D. D.(1999).High-stakes testing: Barrier to gifted girls in mathematics and science?.School Science & Mathematics,99,313-319.
23. Tirri, K.(2001).Actualizing talent in science: Case studies of Finnish Olympians.ED 452 067.
24. Watt, H. G.(1996).Students' gendered perceptions of talent at high school according to academic domain, and their effect on career aspirations.ED 429 375.
25. 王文科(1992)。資優生成年後之社會成就水準、生活適應及其他相關因素之研究。彰化巿:國立彰化師範大學特殊教育系。
26. 王文瑛(1994)。性別與資賦優異-協助女資優兒發展潛能。資優教育季刊，51，38-40。
27. 吳武典(1987)。特殊教育的理念與做法。台北巿:心理。
28. 汪金英(1994)。高中資優生與普通生之性別角色及其生涯展望之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所。
29. 林幸台(1997)。資優生生涯定位與生涯抉擇之研究。台北巿:行政院國家科學委員會。
30. 林幸台(1993)。高一資賦優異學生生涯發展歷程之研究。特殊教育學刊，9，191-214。
31. 邱金滿(1997)。談資優女性。資優教育季刊，64，20-28。
32. 洪儷瑜(1985)。資優女性的低成就及其輔導。資優教育季刊，16，26-29。
33. 曾淑容、莊佩珍(1995)。資優女性的生涯發展之探討。特殊教育學報，10，195-226。
34. 盧台華(1989)。資優生的生涯發展。資優教育季刊，33，1-7。

1. 陳勇祥(2021)。高中語文學術性向資優班潛在退班傾向學生之抉擇與生涯思考脈絡。特殊教育研究學刊，46(2)，93-123。
2. 高振耀,宋玉英(2019)。探索五位理工科女性世界中的創造力：她們對創造力的詮釋以及理工背景對其創造力的影響。教育科學研究期刊，64(3)，55-84。
3. 簡維君、謝佳男、陳若男、郭靜姿、張靖卿、胡寶玉、林美和、周佩蓉(2007)。重要他人對於高中資優班畢業女性生涯發展的影響。資優教育研究，7(2)，1-18。
4. 陸偉明、李奕瑩(2015)。單一性別或男女合班：公立高中數理資優生的學業自我概念、性別刻板印象與心理健康。教育研究與發展期刊，11(4)，79-108。
5. 熊瑞梅,彭莉惠(2011)。性別信仰對科系與職業選擇之影響：以台灣為例。社會科學論叢，5(1)，85-138。
6. (2021)。以TEPS 2001資料再探選組行為的性別差異：手足性別組成的影響。臺灣教育社會學研究，21(2)，105-149。
7. (2023)。國際奧林匹亞競賽獲獎保送大學科學相關科系之經濟不利資優學生的優勢發展與支持措施及相互反饋。特殊教育研究學刊，48(3)，99-129。