學前兒童色塊測驗之編製

Development of the Token Test for Chinese-Speaking Preschoolers

10.6172/BSE200712.3204005

林月仙(Yueh-Hsien Lin)

色塊測驗 ； 學前兒童 ； 聽覺理解 ； Token test ； Preschoolers ； Auditory comprehension

特殊教育研究學刊

32卷4期（2007 / 12 / 01）

85 - 109

繁體中文

本研究旨在編製一套用來評量學前兒童聽覺理解能力的色塊測驗，並探討其信效度。研究對象包括預試樣本、常模樣本和身心障礙樣本共2,257名3至5歲兒童，其中常模樣本係根據台灣地區北、中、南、東之學前兒童人口比率，每一年齡組各取500名。本研究之主要結果如下：（1）每一年齡組色塊測驗各有29題，其中22題是共同試題，另外7題是各年齡組不同之試題；（2）學前兒童色塊測驗有良好的內部一致性和重測信度；（3）本測驗三歲組和四歲組資料與四因素模式適配度佳，五歲組資料則較適合三因素模式；（4）本測驗與「學前兒童語言能力的測驗」（張欣戊，1991）有中度相關；（5）學前兒童在不同因素試題之通過率，隨指令長度和複雜度之增加而遞減；（6）學前兒童在色塊測驗之表現會因其年齡、性別、居住地區和是否為身心障礙者，而有所差異；（7）色塊測驗所測量的聽覺理解能力，受時代變遷之影響不大。

The study was aimed at developing a test for assessing preschool children's auditory comprehension skills based on the Token Test concept originally proposed by De Renzi and Vignolo in the l960s. This test was especially designed to probe the information processing skills underlining auditory comprehension. This article reviews the procedures in establishing a national norm and also reports its reliability and validity. A total of 2,257 children aged from 3 to 5 were proportionally sampled from the four major geographical regions in Taiwan participated in the study for the use in the pilot phase, norm establishing, and validity checking. The formal test thus developed contains 29 items for each age group, including a common set of 22 items across the three age groups and another set of 7 items unique to each age group. The test was found to have good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Factor analysis revealed the good fit for the four-factor model with the 3- and 4-year-old groups, yet the three-factor model with the 5-year-old group. As for the criterion-related validity, the test was moderately correlated with an existent auditory comprehension test designed to probe the syntactic and semantic aspects of the language. In addition, the passing rate decreased with the increasing length and complexity of test items. Age, gender, residential area, and disability were critical factors accounting for the test performance. Finally, the overall abilities tapped by the revised test with the current preschooler cohort are not substantially different from the cohort sampled for a previous version almost one decade years ago, indicating that the information processing skills tapped by the test are rather immune to the cultural changes across different generations.

1. 王天苗(2005)。嬰幼兒綜合發展測驗之預測效度研究。特殊教育研究學刊，29，1-24。
   連結：
2. 李俊仁、柯華葳(2007)。中文閱讀弱讀者的認知功能缺陷：視覺處理或是聲韻處理。特殊教育研究學刊，32(4)，1-18。
   連結：
3. 陳心怡、楊宗仁、朱建軍、張本聖(2002)。WISC-III簡式「多重版本－多重樣本－多重方法」之智商估計效度研究。測驗年刊，49(2)，155-182。
   連結：
4. Aaron, P. G.,Joshi, R. M.(1992).Reading problems: Consultation and remediation.New York:Guilford.
5. American Psychiatric Association(1994).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.Washington D. C.:American Psychiatric Association.
6. Bahr, M. W.,Fuchs, D.(1991).Are teachers' perceptions of difficult-to-teach students racially biased?.School Psychology Review,20,599-608.
7. Bishop, D. V. M.,Snowling, M. J.(2004).Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different?.Psychological Bulletin,130,858-886.
8. Catts, H. W.,Hogan, T. P.,Fey, M. E.(2003).Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading related abilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities,36,151-164.
9. Catts, H. W.,Kamhi, A. G.,H. W. Catts(Eds.),A. G. Kamhi (Eds.)(1999).Language and reading disabilities.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
10. Chall, J.(1996).Stages of reading development.Orlando, FL:Harcourt Brace & Com.
11. Gerber, M.,Semmel, M.(1984).Teacher as imperfect test: reconceptualizing the referral process.Educational Psychologist,19(3),137-148.
12. Gough, P. B.,Tunmer, W. E.(1986).Decoding, reading and reading disability.Remedial and Special Education,7(1),6-10.
13. Hoover, W. A.,Gough, P. B.(1990).The simple viewof reading.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,2,127-160.
14. Hu, C. F.,Catts, H. W.(1998).The role of phonological processing in early reading ability: What we can learn from Chinese.Scientific Study of Reading,2,55-79.
15. Huang, H. S.,Hanley, J. R.(1997).A longitudinal study of phonological awarness, visual skills, and Chinese reading acquisisiton among first-graders in Taiwan.International Journal of Behavioral Development,20,249-268.
16. Nation, K.(2005).Why reading comprehension failed: Insights from developmental disorder.Topics in Language Disorder,25,21-32.
17. O''Connor, R. E.,Jenkins, J. R.(1999).Prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade.Scientific Study of Reading,3,159-197.
18. Salvia, J.,Ysseldyke, J.(1995).Assessment.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
19. Shinn, M. R.,Tindal, G. A.,Spira, D. A.(1987).Special education referral as an index teacher tolerance: Are teacher imperfect test.Exceptional Children,54,32-40.
20. Snow, C. E.,Burns, M. S.,Griffin, P.(1998).Preventing reading difficulties in young children.Washington D. C.:National Academy Press.
21. Speece, D.(2005).Hitting the moving target known as reading development: Some thoughts on screening children for secondary intervention.Journal of Learning Disabilities,38,487-493.
22. Stanovich, K. E.(1988).Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: the phonological-core variable-difference model.Journal of Learning Disabilities,21,590-604.
23. Vellutino, F. R.,Fletcher, J. M.,Snowling, M.(2004).Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past decades?.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,45(1),2-40.
24. 王振德(1999)。簡易個別智力量表之編製。特殊教育研究學刊，17，1-12。
25. 林清山(1995)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華。
26. 林寶貴、錡寶香(2000)。兒童口語理解測驗之編製。特殊教育研究學刊，19，105-126。
27. 林寶貴、錡寶香(2000)。中文閱讀理解測驗之編製。特殊教育研究學刊，19，79-104。
28. 柯華葳主編(2006)。中文閱讀診斷測驗編製報告。台北:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
29. 柯華葳、李俊仁(1997)。國小低年級學生聲韻覺識和認字能力的發展：一個縱貫的研究。國立中正大學學報，7，29-47。
30. 柯華葳、詹益綾(2007)。國民小學閱讀理解篩選測驗指導手冊。台北:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
31. 洪碧霞、邱上真(1998)。K-3學童記憶力測驗發展之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，16，65-86。
32. 洪儷瑜(2005)。學習障礙鑑定工作檢討與建議－由「各縣市實施學習障礙學生鑑定工作調查表」談起。台北:教育部。
33. 自由時報(2003/11/23)
34. 洪儷瑜(1998)。特殊需求學生轉介表100R使用說明。
35. 洪儷瑜(2005)。特殊需求轉介表C125使用說明。
36. 洪儷瑜、王瓊珠、張郁雯、陳秀芬(2007)。識字量估計測驗指導手冊。台北:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
37. 洪儷瑜、王瓊珠、張郁雯、陳秀芬(2007)。常見字流暢性測驗指導手冊。台北:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
38. 陳美芳(2007)。圖畫式聽覺理解測驗指導手冊。台北:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
39. 陳美芳(2003)。語文理解能力測驗之發展與效度分析。特殊教育研究學刊，24，1-14。
40. 陳美芳(2007)。聽覺理解測驗指導手冊。台北:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
41. 陳榮華(1997)。魏氏兒童智力量表第三版指導手冊。台北:中國行為科學社。
42. 陳慶順(2001)。識字困難學生與普通學生識字認知成分之比較研究。特殊教育研究學刊，21，215-237。
43. 曾世杰(1995)。閱讀低成就及一般學生的閱讀歷程成分分析研究。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
44. 曾世杰、陳淑麗、謝燕嬌(2006)。聲韻覺識測驗工具。台北:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
45. 曾世杰、簡淑真、張媛婷、周蘭芳、連芸伶(2005)。以早期唸名速度及聲韻覺識預測中文閱讀與認字：一個追蹤四年的相關研究。特殊教育研究學刊，28，123-144。
46. 葉靖雲(2000)。以文章寫作和造句測驗評估國小學生作文能力之效度研究。特殊教育研究學刊，18，157-172。

1. 曾進興、林月仙(2018)。中文色塊測驗應用於成人之信效度研究。臺灣聽力語言學會雜誌，38，1-23。
2. 曾進興、林月仙、吳裕益(2011)。「中文色塊測驗」之Rasch模式分析。測驗學刊，58(2)，343-365。
3. 楊麗詩、王秋鈴(2016)。就學與否對隔代教養學前兒童語言能力之影響探討。特殊教育學報，44，69-94。
4. (2013)。中文色塊測驗認知成分分析：LLTM與SEM取向。教育與心理研究，36(2)，113-144。