性別、年齡、障礙、職位層級與僱用決定：雇主與職業重建人員觀點比較

A Comparison of Employers' and Vocational Rehabilitation Specialists' Preference Orders in Hiring Applicants with Disabilities

10.6172/BSE200811.3303001

王敏行(Ming-Hung Wang)

年齡 ； 刻板印象 ； 性別 ； 僱用決定 ； 障礙 ； age ； stereotypes ； gender ； employment selection ； disability

特殊教育研究學刊

33卷3期（2008 / 11 / 20）

1 - 24

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討求職者性別、年齡與障礙對雇主與職重員僱用推薦的影響，並比較不同僱用職位層級下的差異。以南部兩個職訓局區域就服中心與轄下就服站159位求才雇主，及南部職業重建相關人員109位為調查對象，在虛擬之基層與中階員工僱用情境下，要求研究對象在聯合分析法所發展出的16位「求職者履歷資料表」，依推薦意願高低填寫分數。主要研究發現為：1.雇主與職重員對於求職者性別、年齡、教育程度、工作經驗與前任雇主評價等之水準的偏好順序相當一致，僅在障礙情形有差異；2.求職者之年齡與障礙情形對僱用決定的影響程度較高，性別較小，且影響程度會因僱用職位層級或身份而有不同。

This study investigated the effects of applicants' gender, age and disability on employers' and vocational rehabilitation specialists' hiring decisions for two positions. The participants were 159 employers from two major national employment service centers and 109 vocational rehabilitation specialists from several vocational rehabilitation centers in southern Taiwan. Participants were asked to give a score for each of 16 applicants based on the applicants' resumes and the participants' hiring preferences for two hypothetical positions. An instrument was developed based on the resumes using conjoint analysis, and the results showed that: 1. With regard to hiring preference, the employers and vocational rehabilitation specialists ranked gender, age, education, work history and prior job performance in the same order, but the differed as to the ranking order of disability levels; 2. Age and disability were found to be more important than gender in participants' ranking orders; 3. The relative importance of gender, age, and disability were found to be different for two different positions and different groups of participants.

1. 許天威、蕭金土、吳訓生、林和姻、陳亭予(2002)。大專校院身心障礙學生學校適應狀況之研究。特殊教育學報，16，159-198。
   連結：
2. Babbitt, B. C.,White, C. M.(2002).R U ready? Helping students assess their readiness for postsecondary education.Teaching Exceptional Children,35(2),62-66.
3. Bessell, A.(2001).Children surviving cancer: Psychosocial adjustment, quality of life, and school experiences.Exceptional Children,67(3),345-359.
4. Bishop, M.(2005).Quality of life and psychosocial adaptation to chronic illness and disability: Preliminary analysis of a conceptual and theoretical synthesis.Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin,48(4),219-231.
5. Boyer, L.(2005).Supporting the induction of special educators program descriptions of university-school district partnerships.Teaching Exceptional Children,37(3),44-51.
6. Eide, A. H.,Roysamb, E.(2002).The relationship between level of disability, psychological problems, social activity, and social networks.Rehabilitation Psychology,47(2),1165-1183.
7. Eliott, T. R.(1994).A place for theory in the study of psychological adjustment among persons with neuromuscular disorders: A reply to Livneh and Antonak.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,9(5),231-236.
8. Eskow, K. G.,Fisher, S.(2004).Getting together in college: An inclusion program for adults with disabilities.Teaching Exceptional Children,36(2),26-32.
9. Graham-Smith, S.,Lafayette, S.(2004).Quality disability support for promotion belonging and academic success within the college community.College Student Journal,38(1),90-99.
10. Kendall, E.,Buys, N.(1998).An integrated model of psychosocial adjustment following acquired disability. Special education teacher supply and teacher quality: The problems, the solution.Journal of Rehabilitation,1,6-20.
11. Livneh, H.,Martz, E.,Wilson, L.M.(2001).Denial and perceived visibility as predictors of adaptation to disability among college students.Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation,16,227-234.
12. Livneh, H.,Wilson, L. M.(2003).Coping strategies as predictors and mediators of disability-related variables and psychosocial adaptation: An exploratory investigation.RCB,46(4),194-208.
13. Milsom, A.,Hartley, M. A.(2005).Assisting students with learning disabilities transitioning to college: What school counselors should know?.Professional School Counseling,8(5),436-441.
14. Skårbrevik, K.(2005).The quality of special education for students with special needs in ordinary classes.European Journal of Special Needs Education,20(4),387-401.
15. Wineman, N. M.(1990).Adaptation to multiple sclerosis: The role of social support, functional disability, and perceived uncertainty.Nursing Research,39(5),293-299.
16. 王振德(1998)。資源利用與公共關係－資源教室經營的兩個要項。特殊教育季刊，69，32-38。
17. 何慧玥(1992)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文（未出版）。
18. 吳武典(2002)。台灣地區中學身心障礙特殊班畢業學生生活適應之追蹤研究。特殊教育研究學刊，25，43-59。
19. 姚素卿(2003)。國立東華大學教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
20. 張文英(2003)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文（未出版）。
21. 教育部(2004)。教育部補助大專院校輔導身心障礙學生實施要點。台北:教育部。
22. 教育部(2006)。九十五年特殊教育統計年報。台北:教育部。
23. 萬明美、張照明、陳麗君(1997)。大學視覺障礙學生學校生活適應及大學同儕對其態度之研究。特殊教育學報，12，1-39。
24. 謝佳男(2000)。台北市普通高中資源班之實施。特殊教育季刊，75，15-20。

1. 王智弘、王敏行(2014)。印象管理面試技巧、面試內容覺察與脊髓損傷應徵者面試評價關係探討。特殊教育研究學刊，39(1)，35-60。
2. 周珮琪,周美田,周立偉,李德茂(2019)。視障者留日學習理療按摩與國內就業環境演變之探討。身心障礙研究季刊，17(1)，36-53。
3. 周珮琪、周美田、周立偉、李德茂(2018)。從生命教育與重建探討中途失明者從事按摩業。身心障礙研究，16(1)，31-45。