中途失明成人復原力展現歷程暨運作模式之建構

The Construction of Working Models for the Capacity for Resilience in Adults with Acquired Blindness

10.6172/BSE200911.3403003

郭孟瑜(Meng-Yu Kuo)；林宏熾(Hung-Chih Lin)

中途失明 ； 復原力 ； 復原歷程 ； 復原力運作模式 ； 紮根理論 ； acquired blindness ； resilience ； stages of resilience ； working models of resilience ； grounded theory approach

特殊教育研究學刊

34卷3期（2009 / 11 / 30）

47 - 80

繁體中文

本研究的主要目的在於探討中途失明成人的復原力展現歷程，分析其展現復原力的影響因素與運作模式，以及瞭解其復原力的展現情形。本研究係採用質化研究取向的紮根理論研究法，透過合目標取樣的方式，選取16位年齡介於20歲至60歲之間，適應良好的中途失明成人為研究對象，以深度訪談做為主要的資料蒐集來源，而蒐集所得資料再藉由整合性電腦輔助質化資料分析軟體－Nudist 6.0，進行研究資料的譯碼與分析。本研究的重要研究發現歸納如下：1.中途失明成人的復原力展現歷程有其階段性任務與階段性挑戰；2.個人系統、家庭系統及社會系統的角色與功能皆會影響中途失明成人的復原力展現；3.動力因子、阻力因子、助力因子及因應方式會交互影響中途失明成人的復原力展現；4.中途失明成人的復原力展現需仰賴個體內外在資源的交互運作；5.中途失明成人的復原力展現結果是成長與回饋。

The main purposes of this study were to explore the capacity for resilience in adults with acquired blindness, to analyze the factors correlated with this resilience, to construct working models of such resilience in these adults, and to better understand their situation. To achieve these purposes, the study adopted a grounded theory approach to qualitative research. 16 well-adjusted adults with acquired blindness, aged 20 to 60 years, were selected as samples through purposive sampling. By means of in-depth interviews, the study collected the necessary data. Research data was then encoded and analyzed by Nudist 6.0. The main findings of the study were as follows: (1) there were different tasks and challenges in each of the various stages of ”resilience” for adults with acquired blindness; (2) the roles of individual, family and society had a definite impact on the resilience of these adults; (3) motivational factors, obstructive factors, helpful factors and coping strategies interactively influenced the resilience of these adults; (4) this resilience depended on the interaction between and among individuals’ internal and external resources; and (5) becoming mature and helping others were central to the final stages of resilience for adults with acquired blindness.

1. 侯雅齡(2009)。幼兒科學創造力評量方法之發展：嵌入式評量設計。教育科學研究期刊（原師大學報：教育類），54(1)，113-142。
   連結：
2. 張永進(2004)。高峰表現、高峰經驗與暢流經驗之比較。大專體育，71，153-159。
   連結：
3. 楊純青、陳祥(2006)。網路心流經驗研究中之挑戰：從效度觀點進行檢視與回顧。資訊社會研究，11，145-176。
   連結：
4. Aguilar, T. E.,J. L. Frost (Eds.),S. Sunderlin (Eds.)(1985).When children play.Weston, MD:Association for Childhood Education International.
5. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structure equations models.Academic of Marketing Science,16,76-94.
6. Barnett, L. A.(1990).Playfulness: Definition, design, and measurement.Play and Culture,3,319-336.
7. Barnett, L. A.(1991).The playful child: Measurement of a disposition to play.Play and Culture,4,51-74.
8. Barnett, L. A.,Kleiber, D. A.(1984).Playfulness and the early environment.The Journal of Genetic Psychology,144,153-164.
9. Bollen, K. A.,Curran, P. J.(2006).Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective.New York:Wiley.
10. Brooke, H.,Solomon, J.(1998).From playing to investigating: Research in an interactive science centre for primary pupils.International Journal of Science Education,20(8),959-971.
11. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1990).Flow: The psychology of optimal experience.New York:Harper & Row.
12. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1996).Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention.New York:Harper Col.
13. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1997).Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life.New York:Basic Books.
14. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1975).Beyond boredom and anxiety.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
15. Csilcszentmihalyi, M.,Larson, R.(1987).Validity and reliability of the experience sampling method.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease,175,526-536.
16. Custodero, L. A.(1998).Observing flow in young children's music learning.General Music Today,12(1),21-27.
17. Duncan, T. E.,Duncan, S. C.,Strycker, L. A.(2006).An Introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts issues and applications.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Flow online: Lessons learned and future prospects
19. Hoffman, D. L.,Novak, T. P.(1996).Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations.Journal of Marketing,60,50-68.
20. Jackson, S. A.,Csikszeutmihalyi, M.(1999).Flow in sports.Champaign:Human Kinetic.
21. Larson, R.,Csikszentmihalyi, M.,D. W. Fiske (Eds.),H. T. Reis (Eds.)(1983).Naturalistic approaches to studying social interaction.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
22. Lieberman, J. N.(1977).Playfulness: It's relationship to imagination and creativity.New York:Academic Press.
23. Lieberman, J. N.(1965).Playfulness and divergent thinking: An investigation of their relationship at the kindergarten level.Journal of Genetic Psychology,107,29-224.
24. Moneta, G. B.,Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1996).The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience.Journal of Personality,64(2),275-310.
25. Novak, T. P.,Hoffman, D. L.,Duhachek, A.(2003).The influence of goal-directed and experiential activities on online flow experiences.Journal of Consumer Psychology,13(1&2),3-16.
26. Novak, T. P.,Hoffman, D. L.,Yung, Y. F.(2000).Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach.Marketing Science,19(1),22-42.
27. Privette, G.,Bunduick, C. M.(1991).Peak experience, peak performance, and flow.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,6,169-188.
28. Rathunde, K.(1996).Family context and talented adolescents’ optimal experience in school- related activities.Journal of Research on Adolescence,6(4),605-628.
29. Rogers, C.,Meeks, A.,Impara, J.,Frary, R.(1987).Measuring playfulness: Development of the child behaviors inventory of playfulness.Paper presented at the Southwest Conference on human development,New Orleans:
30. Rubin, H. K.(1977).Play behaviors of young children.Young Children,3,16-24.
31. Rubin, H. K.(1982).Non-social play in preschooler: Necessary evil?.Children Development,53,651-657.
32. Seligman, M. P.,Csikszentmihalyi, M.(2000).Positive psychology: An introduction.American Psychologist,54,5-14.
33. Snyder, C. R. (Eds.),Lopez, S. J. (Eds.)(2005).Handbook of positive psychology.London:Oxford University Press.
34. Snyder, C. R.,Lopez, S. J.(2007).Positive psychology: The scientific and practical explorations of human strengths.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
35. 行政院國家科學委員會科教處(2003)。科學教育白皮書。台北:國科會科教處。
36. 吳靜吉(2002)。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理研究，15，17-42。
37. 林偉文(2006)。樂在其中的創意教師：國民中小學教師教學福樂經驗與創意教學之關係。國立台北教育大學學報，19(2)，111-128。
38. 邱連煌(2005)。學習之樂在浮流。國教天地，160，1-9。
39. 洪蘭譯、M.P. Seligman著(2003)。真實的快樂。台北:遠流。
40. 高宜敏、曹文力、孫春在(2008)。在遊戲情境中以沉浸經驗探討玩興對創造力的影響。2008創造力教育國際學術研討會，台北:
41. 陳美莉(2005)。國立台東大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
42. 陳淑芳、江麗莉、詹文娟、鄭秋平、簡淑真、李宜倫(2002)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(NSC-90-511-S-143-005-3)行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(NSC-90-511-S-143-005-3),未出版
43. 黃意舒(1995)。由幼兒科學教學中培養科學學習基本素養。科學教育研究與發展季刊，5，17-28。
44. 葉家華(2007)。國立臺北教育大學體育學系碩士論文（未出版）。
45. 劉秀娟(1995)。幼兒玩性與社會性遊戲之評量。台北:揚智文化。

1. 陳明鎮、柯瑞英(2013)。視障老人壓力及壓力因應。身心障礙研究，11(3)，193-209。
2. 陳明鎮、柯瑞英(2017)。視障者職涯韌性初探。身心障礙研究，15(3)，164-181。
3. 黃柏華,陳世倧,張千惠(2023)。後天視障者生涯建構與職涯發展歷程之多重個案研究。特殊教育學報，57，71-102。
4. 黃國晏(2015)。中途失明者點字學習之心理調適。人文社會學報，11(4)，281-306。
5. 簡宏生、韓福榮、鍾聖音、陳月霞、許芳瑜、張千惠、徐文豪、邱滿艷、林婉媛、貝仁貴(2010)。從傑出身心障礙者就業歷程，探討就業影響因素—伴隨著「障礙」的就業路。特殊教育研究學刊，35(3)，1-25。
6. 楊建中、徐秀琹、王惠萍(2018)。中風復原期病人復原力及其相關因素之探討。護理雜誌，65(5)，56-67。