题名

特殊教育實習輔導教師與實習教師教學後的互動與反思

并列篇名

Interaction and Reflective Thinking of Special Education Student Teachers and Their Expert Mentors

DOI

10.6172/BSE201111.3603002

作者

胡心慈(Shin-Tzu Hu);林淑莉(Shu-Li Lin)

关键词

專家教師 ; 實習教師 ; 實習輔導教師 ; 教學反思 ; student teachers ; mentors ; expert teachers ; reflective thinking

期刊名称

特殊教育研究學刊

卷期/出版年月

36卷3期(2011 / 11 / 30)

页次

27 - 55

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究探討「專家教師」身分的特教實習輔導教師和實習教師在教育實習上的互動及教學反思過程。以觀察及參與討論的方式,蒐集數次實習輔導教師與其實習教師的教學或觀摩教學,及其後的互動與討論內容。研究發現:一、三對輔導教師與實習教師互動的關係分別呈現「同儕式」、「師徒式」及「家人式」。「同儕式」的對等關係讓輔導教師與實習教師能進行較多與理論整合的討論。二、在「同儕式」的對等討論中,較能顯出教學反思循環的歷程。三、三名輔導(專家)教師均注重目標、學生行為的意義、滿足個別化需求並多利用教學知識;一名與輔導教師呈現「同儕式」互動關係的實習教師也注重目標並多利用教學知識,另兩名實習教師則較關心學生秩序及參與度而較少運用知識。研究者鼓勵輔導教師和實習教師能對等會談,將理論和實務整合成專家知識,促進教師專業發展。

英文摘要

Purpose: Reflective thinking is considered an important factor in the professional development of teachers; therefore, peer interaction and professional dialogue are effective approaches to promote reflective thinking. This study explores the interaction and reflective thinking of special education student teachers and their expert mentors on practicum. Methods: Three special education student teachers and 3 expert mentors participated in this study. The expert mentors were selected according to certain criteria including graduating from teacher colleges or normal universities, more than 7 years teaching experience, obtaining recognition from the staff of their school, and obtaining a government award. Data were collected through field observations, interviews, and some documents on practicum from participants in three schools. Participants of the same school were observed when they taught a minimum of 4 times, after which the dialogue after teaching was recorded and translated into a manuscript. Findings: The interacting model of special education student teachers and their expert mentors included 3 models: the peer model, the mentor-apprenticeship model, and the family model. Teachers of the peer model possessed mutual respect and discussed equally. Teachers of the mentor apprenticeship model did not discuss equally and the mentor rendered direct instruction to the student teacher. The mentor of the family model did not discuss equally with the student teacher, nor rendered direct instruction to the student teacher, but interacted similar to a mother-daughter relationship. Both teachers in the peer model obtained enhanced professional development, and exhibited progress in reflective thinking. The reflective thinking process includes planning, teaching action, self-criticism, and constructing in structional knowledge. Teachers in the mentor apprenticeship model and the family model achieved less development than teachers in the peer model. The 3 expert mentors esteemed educational goals, understanding student behaviors, students’ special needs, and used more instructional knowledge; the student teacher in the peer model esteemed educational goals and used more instructional knowledge. The other 2 student teachers esteemed student routines and participation. Conclusions/Implications: Based on the findings, the authors encourage student teachers and their expert mentors to provide equal emphasis to professional dialogue to promote professional development. Expert mentors can encourage young student teachers to talk more and inspire them to think more. Student teachers should respectfully consult their senior mentors, but still express their reflective thinking. The authors encourage expert mentors and young student teachers to continue to integrate theory and practice.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 朱苑瑜、葉玉珠(2003)。實習教師信念改變的影響因素之探討。師大學報,48(1),41-48。
    連結:
  2. 吳武典、張芝萱(2009)。資優教育師資專業標準之建構。資優教育研究,9(2),103-143。
    連結:
  3. 洪志成、賴秀芬(2004)。一位國中英語專家教師之實務知識。教育學刊,22,89-107。
    連結:
  4. 胡心慈(2008)。特殊教育實習輔導教師輔導歷程之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,33(2),1-24。
    連結:
  5. 胡心慈(2005)。特殊教育實習教師專業社會化歷程研究。特殊教育與復健學報,13,69-89。
    連結:
  6. Bauer, A. M.,Johnson, L. J.,Sapona, R. H.(2004).Reflections on 20 years of preparing special education teachers.Exceptionlity,12(4),239-246.
  7. Berliner, D. C.(1988).The development of expertise in pedagogy.Washington, DC:American Association of College for Teacher Education.
  8. Birman, B. F.,Desimone, L.,Porter, A. C.,Garet, M. S.(2000).Designing professional development that works.Educational Leadership,57(8),28-33.
  9. Bogdan, R. C.、Biklen, S. K.、李奉儒譯、高淑清譯、鄭瑞隆譯、林麗菊譯、吳芝儀譯、洪志成譯、蔡清田譯(2001)。質性教育研究。嘉義=Chiayi:濤石=Waterstone。
  10. Brownell, M. T.,Ross, D. R.,Colon, E. P.,McCallum, C. L.(2003).Critical features of specal education teacher preparation: Executive summary.Gainesville, FL:Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education.
  11. Bullough, R. V. J.,Young, J. R.,Hall, K. M.,Drapper, R. J.,Smith, L. K.(2008).Cognitive complexity, the first year of teaching, and mentoring.Teaching and Teacher Education,24,1846-1858.
  12. Carlson, E.,Lee, H.,Schroll, K.(2004).Identifying attributes of high quality special education teachers.Teacher Education and Special Education,27(4),350-359.
  13. Cochran-Smith, C. C.,Lytle, S. L.(1999).The teacher researcher movement: a decade later.Educational Research,28(7),15-25.
  14. Conderman, G.,Johnston, R.(2009).Beginning teachers' views of their collarborative roles.Prevent School Failure,53(4),235-244.
  15. Conderman, G.,Morin, T.,Stephens, J. T.(2005).Special education student teaching practices.Preventing School Failure,49(3),5-10.
  16. Conderman, G.,Stephens, J. T.(2000).Reflections from beginning special educators.Teaching Exceptional Children,33,16-21.
  17. deBettencourt, L. U.,Howard, L.(2004).Alternatively licensing career changes to be teachers in the field of special education: Their first-year reflections.Exceptionality,12(4),225-238.
  18. Englert, C. S.,Rozendal, M. S.(2004).A model of professional development in special education.Teacher Education and Special Education,27(1),24-46.
  19. Gerstern, R.,Chard, D.,Bakery, S.(2000).Factors enchancing sustained use of research-based instructional practices.Journal of Learning Disabilities,33,445-457.
  20. Goodman, J.(1995).Change without difference: School restracturing in historical perspective.Harvard Educational Review,65(1),1-29.
  21. Greenwood, C.,Maheady, L.(2001).Are future teachers aware of the gap between research and practice and what they should know?.Teacher Education and Special Education,24,333-347.
  22. Harvard, G. R.(ed.),Hodkinson, P.(ed.)(1994).Action and reflection in teacher education.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
  23. Hatton, N.,Smith, D.(1995).Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation.Teaching & Teacher Education,11(1),33-49.
  24. Kagan, D. M.,Tippins, D. J.(1991).How student teachers describe their pupils.Teaching and Teacher Education,7,455-466.
  25. Kilgore, K.,Griffin, C.(1998).Beginning special educators: Problems of practice and the influence of school context.Teacher Education and Special Education,21,155-173.
  26. Knowles, M.(1990).The adult learner: A neglected species.Houston, TX:Gulf.
  27. Leicester, J.(1990).Denver, CO,University of Colorado.
  28. Lesar, S.,Benner, S. M.,Habel, J.,Coleman, L.(1997).Preparing general education teachers for inclusive settings: A constructivist teacher education program.Teacher Education and Special Education,20,204-220.
  29. Little, J. W.(1982).Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success.American Educational Research Journal,19,325-340.
  30. Lofstrom, E.,Eisenshmidt, E.(2009).Novice teacher perspectives on mentoring: The case of Estonian induction year..Teaching and Teacher Education,25,1-9.
  31. McAlpine, L.,Weston, C.(2000).Reflection: Issues related to improving professors' teaching and students' learning.Instructional Science,28,363-385.
  32. McLeskey, J.,Waldron, N.(2002).Professional development and inclusive schools: Reflections on effective practice.Teacher Education,37(3),159-172.
  33. Merriam, S. B.(1998).Qualitative research and case study applications in education.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
  34. Miles, M. B.、Huberman, A. M.、張芬芬譯(2005)。質性研究資料分析。臺北=Taipei:雙葉=Yehyeh Book Gallery。
  35. Nettle, E. B.(1998).Stability and change in the beliefs of student teachers during practice teaching.Teaching & Teacher Education,14(2),193-204.
  36. Orland-Barak, L.(2002).What's in a case? What mentors' cases reveal about the practice of mentoring.Journal of Curriculum Studies,34(4),451-468.
  37. Orland-Barak, L.,Klein, S.(2005).The expressed and the realize: Mentors' representations of a mentoring conversation and its realization in practice.Teaching and Teacher Education,21,379-402.
  38. Roberson, L.,Woolsey, M. L.,Seabrooks, J.,Williams, G.(2004).An ecobehavioral assessment of the teaching behaviors of teacher candidates during their special education internship experiences..Teacher Education and Special Education,27(3),264-275.
  39. Schempp, P. G.,Woorons, S.(2006).Learning to see: Development the perception of an expert teacher.Journal of Physical Education,77(6),29-33.
  40. Schiller, E.,Malouf, D. B.(1995).Practice and research in special education.Exceptional Children,61(5),414-424.
  41. Schon, D. A.(1987).Education the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teacher and learning professions.San Francisco CA:Jossey-Bass.
  42. Seidman, J.(2006).Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researcher in education and the social science.New York:Teachers College Press.
  43. Shulman, L. S.(1987).Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-22.
  44. Stanulis, R. N.,Russell, D.(2000)."Jump in": Trust and communication in mentoring student teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education,16,65-80.
  45. Sternberg, R. J.,Horvath, J. A.(1995).A prototype view of expert teaching.Education Researcher,24(6),9-17.
  46. Stuart, C.,Thurlow, D.(2000).Making it their own: Preservice teachers' experiences, beliefs and classroom practice.Journal of Teacher Education,51(2),113-121.
  47. Synder, L.,Garriott, P.,Aylor, M. W.(2001).Inclusion confusion: Putting the pieces together.Teacher Education and Special Education,24,198-207.
  48. Tachon, F. V.(1990).Novice/expert teachers' time epistemology.meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators,Boston:
  49. Talvitie, U.,Peltokallio, L.,Mannisto, P.(2000).Student teachers' views about their relationships with university supervisors, cooperating teachers and peer student teachers.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,44(1),79-88.
  50. Timperley, H.(2001).Mentoring conversations designed to promote student teacher learning.Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,29(2),111-123.
  51. Turnbull, A.,Turnbull, R.,Wehmeyer, M. L.(2007).Exceptional lives: Special educational in today's schools.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  52. Wang, J.(2000).Contexts of mentoring and opportunities for learning to teach: A comparative study of mentoring practice.Teacher and Teacher Education,17,51-73.
  53. Westerman, D. A.(1991).Expert and novice teacher decision making.Journal of Teacher Education,42(4),292-305.
  54. Whitaker, S. D.(2000).Mentoring beginning special education teachers and the relationship to attrition.Exceptional Children,66,546-566.
  55. White, M.,Mason, C. Y.(2006).Components of a successful mentoring program for beginning special education teachers: Perspectives from new teachers and mentors.Teacher Education and Special Education,29,191-201.
  56. Wideen, M. F.(ed.),Andrews, I.(ed.)(1987).Staff development for school improvement: A focus on the teacher.New York:The Falmer Press.
  57. Wodlinger, M. G.(1990).April: A case study in the use of guided reflection.Alberta Journal of Educational Research,36,115-132.
  58. Yost, D. S.,Sentner, S. M.,Forlenza-Bailey, A.(2000).An examination of the construct of critical reflection: Implication for teacher education programming in the 21st century.Journal of Teacher Education,51(1),39-49.
  59. 王文科、王智泓(2009)。教育研究法(增訂第十三版)。臺北=Taipei:五南=Wu-Nan。
  60. 王麗君(2009)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系=National Taiwan Normal University。
  61. 周新富(2007)。教育研究法。臺北=Taipei:五南=Wu-Nan。
  62. 胡心慈(2009)。專業成長的好夥伴─實習老師與實習輔導老師。中華民國特殊教育學會2009 年刊,2009,51-68。
  63. 高勳芳、陳美娟(2002)。專家教師專業知能形成歷程研究。國立臺北師範學院院報,15,527-556。
  64. 陳利玲(2000)。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所=National Pingtung University of Education。
  65. 歐用生(1996)。教師專業成長。臺北=Taipei:師大書苑=Lucky Bookstore。
  66. 潘淑滿(2008)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北=Taipei:心理=Psychology。
  67. 蔡雅玲(2003)。臺北市立教育大學國民教育研究所=Taipei Municipal University of Education。
  68. 謝寶梅(1996)。專家教師與實習教師的教學思考及教學行動之比較研究。臺北=Taipei:五南=Wu-Nan。
  69. 魏俊華、高彩珍(2003)。國小特教班實習教師實務知識發展之研究。東臺灣特殊教育學報,5,163-205。
  70. 羅綸新(2003)。師資培育發展教師反思教學能力之途徑。國民教育研究學報,8,205-224。
  71. 饒見維(1996)。教師專業發展─理論與實務。臺北=Taipei:五南=Wu-Nan。
被引用次数
  1. 謝瑩慧,陳君米(2019)。成為華德福教師:教學實務知識之敘說探究。生命敘說與心理傳記學,7,171-202。
  2. 楊雅惠(2021)。特殊教育師資生在聽障教育實習運用手語教學的專業成長研究。特殊教育學報,53,31-59。
  3. 張育琳,胡心慈(2019)。攜手同行:建構特教初任教師導入方案之旅。教育科學研究期刊,64(1),53-80。