資源匱乏地區發展遲緩兒童社區療育據點服務實施情形之探討

The Study of Community Based Services for Children with Developmental Delays in Low Resource Communities

10.6172/BSE.201303.3801001

林雅容(Ya-Jung Lin)

早期療育 ； 社區療育據點 ； 發展遲緩兒童 ； early intervention ； community intervention settings ； developmental delays

特殊教育研究學刊

38卷1期（2013 / 03 / 01）

1 - 29

繁體中文

本研究目的在檢視資源匱乏地區之社區療育據點服務實施概況，以2010年接受中央政府單位補助辦理據點服務之四個機構為研究對象，透過實地訪視及文件分析蒐集研究資料，輔以電話訪談釐清文件資料有疑慮之處。研究結果發現：一、機構與政府單位的協調、專業人員與服務使用者的互動，以及專業人員間的支持，有助於據點服務的推展及滿足兒童及其家庭的需求，顯見於據點設置、定點式及走動式服務規劃、專業人力協調之相關討論；二、機構與據點設置區域的社會服務單位建立合作關係，提供早療服務，從中增進家長之資源使用的近便性。囿於目前未有相關法規釐清機構間合作的權責，資源的連結及共享大多建立在機構的努力及彼此的信任和配合；三、「家長參與」此一理念對於服務成效具正向影響，但是，專業人員需顧及兒童及其家庭之特質與作息，避免造成家長的親職壓力。由於政府單位並未提供家庭支持性服務的費用，使得專業人員不易推展相關服務；而現有的服務也鮮少與區域特質有所連結；四、政府現有對據點服務的補助遠低於機構式的服務，每名兒童補助金額差距高達6,056.67元至17,390.47元。最後，研究者依據研究結果，提出五項實務工作的建議：一、政府單位應關注療育資源匱乏的地區；二、政府單位宜採納跨部門之合作方式，協助機構辦理據點服務；三、政府單位宜提供家庭支持性服務的補助經費，增強機構對於家庭的關懷；四、機構宜落實專業團隊會議，增強團隊成員對於服務內容的了解；五、機構宜關注服務使用者的個人經驗，具體呈現服務成效。此外，本研究亦對於未來研究提出兩項建議：一、宜呈現兒童及其家庭或社區居民的服務使用經驗及主觀感受；二、應呈現服務承辦機構與在地機構的合作情形。

Purpose: In Taiwan, non governmental organizations have implemented the community based services in recent years. Until 2009, the R.O.C.'s Children's Bureau Ministry of the Interior declared a trial program of home- and community-based services for children with developmental delays and provided subsidies for non profit organizations to execute services in low resource communities. This study explored current situation of community based services for the purpose of early intervention in low resource communities. Methods: Data were collected from four case management centers brought by the trial program for community based services in 2010. The data were collected through practical field observation, document analysis and telephone interview. This study recruited seven research participants, professionals within this research field, to attend practical field observation. And their speech was also recorded and analyzed. Findings: The results of this study indicate (1) the coordination between social service agencies and governments, the effective interaction between professionals and service users, and the positive cooperation between professionals were important for implementing services and satisfying the needs of children and their families. Additionally, this study also suggests that the establishment of community intervention settings, the practice of fixed point and mobile services and the collaboration between professionals are factors needed to be concerned. (2) Four centers cooperated with local social service agencies to offer early intervention services and to increase the service accessibility for families. However, community resource connecting and sharing was currently basing on the acceptance among agencies due to a lack of policy planning for interagency collaboration. (3) Even though parental participation has positive effects on service effectiveness, professionals should concern about the characteristics and daily activities of children and their families and avoid raising parental stress. Due to the shortage of government subsidies for professionals to provide family supportive services, existing services were less relative to local culture. (4) Government subsidies for community based services were found less than those for centered based services which means the difference of subsidies for each child was from NT$ 6,056.67 to 17,390.47 per year. Conclusion/Implications: The following implications for practices were suggested: governments should concern about low resource communities; to assist community intervention and to provide subsidies for family supportive services, meanwhile, co-organizers should understand services for each family through team meetings and pay attention to service using and effectiveness. Future study is needed to provide more information about the experiences and subjective perception of children, family and local residents and to discover about the cooperation between co-organizer and local agencies.

1. 柯秋雪(2009)。早期療育到宅服務實施之研究─以臺北縣為例。特殊教育研究學刊，34(3)，1-24。
   連結：
2. 唐紀絜、林宏熾、林金定、林美專、簡璽如、蔡桂芳、簡言軒(2007)。臺灣地區發展遲緩兒童家庭生活衝擊預測因子之研究。身心障礙研究季刊，5(3)，150-163。
   連結：
3. 曾淑賢、王文伶(2007)。影響早期療育機構間合作的因素之探討。特殊教育研究學刊，32(1)，57-76。
   連結：
4. 特殊教育通報網（2011）：各教育階段特教班設置情形。2011 年4 月16 日，取自http://www.set.edu.tw/static/clslist.asp 。 [Special Education Transmit Net (2011).Special education classes at every educational stage. Retrieved April 16, 2011, from http://www.set.edu.tw/static/clslist.asp]
5. 中華民國發展遲緩兒童早期療育協會（2011）：推動弱勢家庭兒童/發展遲緩兒童之社區照顧 服務計畫。2011 年1 月17 日，取自http://www.caeip.org.tw/html/child-communityfoothold/index04.html。[Chinese Association of Early Intervention Profession (2011).Community care service program for children in disadvantage families or with developmental delays. Retrieved January 17, 2011,from http://www.caeip.org.tw/html/childcommunity-foothold/index04.html]
6. 臺北縣政府（2007a）：臺北縣發展遲緩兒童早期療育推動委員會第5 屆第1 次會議紀錄。2011 年8 月1 日， 取自 http://www.sw.ntpc.gov.tw/web/Press?command=showDetail&postId=183865 。[New Taipei City Government (2007a). The official records of the 1st session of the 5th New Taipei Early Intervention Commission. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://www. sw.ntpc.gov.tw/web/Press?command=showDetail&postId=183865]
7. Early Head Start National Resource Center (2009).Quality early head services: A summary of research based practices that support children, families and expectant parents. Retrieved November 24, 2010, from http://www.ehsnrc.org.
8. 早期療育服務網（2011a）：早期療育資源一覽表。2011 年4 月16 日，取自http://soc.miaoli.gov.tw/web/early/7-1.php 。[Web Based Information Platform for Early Intervention (2011a). Early intervention resources. Retrieved April 16, 2011, from http://soc.miaoli.gov.tw/web/early/7-1.php]
9. 臺北縣政府（2008a）：臺北縣發展遲緩兒童早期療育推動委員會第6 屆第3 次會議紀錄。2011 年8 月1 日，取自http://www. sw.ntpc.gov.tw/web/Press?command=showDetail&postId=207226 。[New Taipei City Government (2008a). The official records of the 3rd intersessional meeting of the 6th New Taipei early intervention commission. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://www.sw. ntpc.gov.tw/web/Press?command=showDetail&postId=219074]
10. 行政院（2011）：內政部兒童局一百年度推展兒童及少年福利服務補助作業要點部分規定修正規定。行政院公報，17（1），10- 24 。[Executive Yuan (2011). A revision stipulation of 2011 regulations subsidizing welfare services for children and youth, Child Welfare Bureau, Ministry of Interior. Executive Yuan Report, 17(1), 10-24.]
11. 內政部（2009）：發展遲緩兒童到宅服務及社區療育據點試辦計畫。中華民國九十八年十月十四日臺內童字第○九八○八四○四 二七號函頒布。[Ministry of the Interior(2009). A trial program of home-and community-based services for children with developmental delays, approved October 14,2009.]。
12. BC First Nations Head Start (2011). Head Start program delivery models. Retrieved July 26,2011, from http://www.bcfnhs.org/pages/about/delivery.cfm.
13. 蘋果幼教網（2011）：公立、私立幼稚園及托兒所政府立案合格名單。2011 年4 月16 日，取自http://apple36.com.tw/apple36/ap8350. jsp?citycode=122&postcode=625 。[Apple36(2011). The list of qualified public and private kindergartens. Retrieved April 16, 2011, from http://apple36.com.tw/apple36/ap8350.jsp?citycode=122&postcode=625]
14. 臺北縣政府（2007b）：臺北縣發展遲緩兒童早期療育推動委員會第5 屆第2 次會議紀錄。2011 年8 月1 日，取自http://www.sw. ntpc.gov.tw/web/News?command=showDetail&postId=183866&groupId=12484 。[New Taipei City Government (2007b). The official records of the 2nd session of the 5th New Taipei Early Intervention Commission. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://www. sw.ntpc.gov.tw/web/News?command=showDetail&postId=183866&groupId=12484]
15. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2007). Head Start Act, As Amended December 12, 2007. Retrieved November 24, 2010, from http://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/hslc/Head%20Start%20Program/Program%20Design%20and%20Management/Head%20Start%20Requirements/Head%20Start%20Act.
16. 早期療育服務網（2011b）：托育機構收托發展遲緩兒童實施計畫。2011 年4 月16 日，取自http://soc.miaoli.gov.tw/web/early/7- 2.php。[Web Based Information Platform for Early Intervention (2011b). Child care service program for children with developmental delays. Retrieved April 16, 2011, from http://soc.miaoli.gov.tw/web/early/7-2.php]
17. Health Canada (2006). Best practices: Early intervention,outreach and community linkages for women with substance use problems. Retrieved January 29, 2011, from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/pubs/adp-apd/earlyintervention-precoce/index-eng.php.
18. 邱淑梅（2010）：許臺灣之心一個陽光的未來：水沙連兒童及家庭社區據點之回顧。早期療育協會電子報。2011 年1 月17 日，取 自http://epaper.caeip.org.tw/archives/255。[Chiu, Shu-Mei (2010). Bright future in Taiwanese mind: the retrospection of community based services for children and their families in Shuishalian. E-paper of Chinese Association of Early Intervention Profession. Retrieved January 17, 2011, from http://epaper.caeip.org.tw/archives/255]
19. 臺北縣政府（2008b）：臺北縣發展遲緩兒童早期療育推動委員會第6 屆第4 次會議紀錄。2011 年8 月1 日，取自http://www. sw.ntpc.gov.tw/web/Press?command=showDetail&postId=219074 。[New Taipei City Government (2008b). The official records of the 4th session of the 6th New Taipei Early Intervention Commission. Retrieved August 1,2011, from http://www.sw.ntpc.gov.tw/web/ Press?command=showDetail&postId=219074]
20. York Support Service Network Staff (2007). Support and services for persons with a dual diagnosis. Retrieved July 15, 2011, from http://yssn.ca/images/clientupload/DDx2008.pdf.
21. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2010). Home and community based services. Retrieved November 24, 2010, from http://medicaidprovider.hhs.mt.gov/pdf/hcbs.pdf.
22. 內政部兒童局（2007）：歷史與發展。2011 年7 月30 日，取自http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI _2/internet/main/index.aspx。[Child Welfare Bureau, Ministry of Interior (2007). History and development for early intervention. Retrieved July 30, 2011, from http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/internet/main/index.aspx]
23. 臺北縣政府（2005）：臺北縣政府社會局94年度「愛心工程」方案彙整表。2011 年8月1 日，取自http://www.sw.ntpc.gov.tw/ web66/_file/1588/upload/sw/Love_Engineering/94_year.pdf。[New Taipei City Government (2005). 2005 charitable service programs of Department of Social Welfare, New Taipei City Government. Retrieved August 1,2011, from http://www.sw.ntpc.gov.tw/web66/ _file/1588/upload/sw/Love_Engineering/94_year. pdf]
24. 立法院（2006）：立法院第6 屆第3 會期衛生環境及社會福利委員會第24 次全體委員會議紀錄。立法院公報，95（34），276- 312。[The Legislative Yuan (2006). The official records of the 3rd session of the 6th Legislative Yuan Environmental Health and Social Welfare Commission. The Legislative Yuan Report, 95(34), 276-312.]
25. 內政部（2011）：發展遲緩兒童社區療育據點服務實施計畫。2012 年7 月31 日，取自http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/internet/main/i ndex.aspx。[Ministry of the Interior (2011).Community based service program for children with developmental delays. Retrieved July 31, 2011, from http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/internet/main/index.aspx]
26. Aronson, R. E.,Wallis, A. B.,O''Campo, P. J.,Whitehead, T. L.,Schafer, P.(2007).Ethnographically informed community evaluation:A framework and approach for evaluating community based initiatives.Maternal Child Health Journal,11,97-109.
27. Azzi-Lessing, L.(2011).Home visitation programs: Critical issues and future directions.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,26,387-398.
28. Berry, J. O.(1995).Families and deinstitutionalization: An application of Bronfenbrenner's social ecology model.Journal of Counseling & Development,73,379-383.
29. Boavida, J.,Espe-Sherwindt, M.,Borges, L.(2000).Community-based early intervention: The Coimbra Project (Portugal).Child: Care, Health and Development,26(5),343-354.
30. Brewer, E. J.,McPherson, M.,Magrab, P. R.,Hutchins, V. L.(1989).Family-centered,community-based, coordinated care for children with special health care needs.Pediatrics,83(6),1055-1060.
31. Bromley, B. E.(2003).Free at last: One family's journey of deinstitutionalization.Journal of Child and Family Studies,12(12),125-134.
32. Brookes, S. J.,Summers, J. A.,Thornburg, K. R.,Ispa, J. M.,Lane, V. J.(2006).Building successful home visitor-mother relationships and reaching program goals in two Early Head Start programs: A qualitative look at contributing factors.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,21,25-45.
33. Chang, Y. E.,Huston, A.,Crosby, D. A.,Gennetian,L. A.(2007).The effects of welfare and employment programs on children's participation in Head Start.Economics of Education Review,26,17-32.
34. Dunst, C.,Trivette, C.,Cornwell, J.,Davis, M.(1998).Enabling and empowering families of children with health impairments.Children's Health Care,17,71-81.
35. Gallagher, J. J.(Ed.),Fullager, P. K.(Ed.)(1992).The coordination of health and other services for infants and toddlers with disabilities: The conundrum of parallel service systems.Chapel Hill, NC:Carolina Inst. for Child and Family Policy.
36. Green, L. W.,Kreuter, M. W.(1999).Health promotion planning: An educational and ecological approach (3rd ed.).Mountain View, CA:Mayfield.
37. Harden, B. J.,Denmark, N.,Saul, D.(2010).Understanding the needs of staff in Head Start programs: The characteristics, perceptions, and experiences of home visitors.Children and Youth Services Review,32,371-379.
38. Hatfield, P. M.,Staresinic, A. G.,Sorkness, C. A.,Peterson, N. M.,Schirmer, J.,Katcher, M. L.(2006).Validating self reported home safety practices in a culturally diverse noninner city population.Injury Prevention,12(1),52-57.
39. Hooste, A. V.,Maes, B.(2003).Family factors in the early development of children with down syndrome.Journal of Early Intervention,25(4),296-309.
40. Johnson, C. P.,Kastner, T. A.(2005).Helping families raise children with special health care needs at home.Pediatrics,115(2),507-511.
41. King, S.,Teplicky, R.,King, G.,Rosenbaum, P.(2004).Family-centered service for children with cerebral palsy and their families: A review of the literature.Seminar Pediatric Neurology,11,78-86.
42. Lambert, R. G.,Abbott-Shim, M.,Oxford-Wright, C.(2001).Staff perceptions of research in the context of specific strategies for collaboration with Head Start programs.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,16,19-34.
43. Maulik, P. K.,Darmstadt, G. L.(2009).Community-based interventions to optimize early childhood development in low resource settings.Journal of Perinatology,29,531-542.
44. Neidell, M.,Waldfogel, J.(2009).Program participation of immigrant children: Evidence from the local availability of Head Start.Economics of Education Review,28,704-715.
45. Office on Child Abuse and Neglect(2009).Final Synthesis Report, Volume IFinal Synthesis Report, Volume I,未出版
46. Pamela, J. W.,Elizabeth, R. C.,McWilliams, P. J.(1996).Practical strategies for familycentered early intervention.San Diego, CA:Singular.
47. Roberts, R. N.,Wasik, B. H.(1994).Home visiting options within Head Start: Current practice and future directions.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,9,311-325.
48. Roggman, L. A.,Boyce, L. K.,Cook, G. A.,Jump, V. K.(2001).Inside home visits: A collaborative look at process and quality.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,16,53-71.
49. Sharma, N.,Lalinde, P. S.,Brosco, J. P.(2006).What do residents learn by meeting with families of children with disabilities? A qualitative analysis of an experiential learning module.Pediatric Rehabilitation,9(3),185-189.
50. Stille, C. J.,Antonelli, R. C.(2004).Coordination of care for children with special health care needs.Current Opinion in Pediatrics,16,700-705.
51. Trickett, E.,Espino, S. R.,Hawe, P.(2011).How are community interventions conceptualized and conducted? An analysis of published accounts.Journal of Community Psychology,39(5),576-591.
52. U.K. Department for Children, Schools and Families(2008).Piloting the social work practice model: A prospectus.
53. Ursprung, A. W.(1984).Family crisis related to the deinstitutionalization of a mentally retarded child.Journal of Rehabilitation,50(4),19-23.
54. 朱鳳英(2007)。臺北市早期療育服務社區照顧經驗。護理雜誌，54(5)，18-23。
55. 林雅容、傅秀媚、黃香慈(2011)。社區療育據點的操作原則：規範與實作的綜融。兒童及少年福利期刊，18，135-152。
56. 林雅惠(2010)。東吳大學社會工作學系=Soochow University。
57. 柯秋雪(2008)。美國早期療育到宅服務之發展概述。國小特殊教育，46，44-53。
58. 張芳全(2004)。教育政策分析。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological。
59. 陳武雄(2003)。兒童及少年福利法之剖析。社區發展季刊，102，131-143。
60. 黃志雄、楊在珍(2002)。身心障礙兒童家庭支持的實施與成效─以班級為本位之行動研究。「國立臺東師範學院九十一年度特殊教育學術研討會」論文集，臺東=Taitung, Taiwan:
61. 黃靄雯、謝中君、鄭素芳(2005)。高危險群嬰幼兒之到宅服務策略。物理治療，30(6)，348-354。
62. 臺北縣政府社會局(2009)。臺北縣社會福利政策白皮書。
63. 潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究：理論與應用。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological。

1. 連穎、張靜薇、柯平順(2014)。旗山偏鄉早療中心資源連結合作之困境與策略。臺灣社會工作學刊，14，157-190。
2. 林雅容(2023)。是社區服務，還是以社區為基礎服務？早期療育之文獻分析。身心障礙研究季刊，21(1)，16-33。
3. 童小珠、陳亮諭、陳永全(2017)。偏鄉社區療育據點早療宣導及培力方案成效研究。蘭陽學報，16，42-49。
4. 鄭茹謙,朱思穎(2021)。臺灣以家庭為中心早期療育服務之文獻回顧。身心障礙研究季刊，19(3&4)，199-210。
5. (2022)。從「去社區工作」到「與社區一起工作」－在新北市貢寮和雙溪開展早期療育服務之經驗回顧。社區發展季刊，179，80-92。
6. (2024)。循環音韻治療法應用遠距科技復健模式於偏遠地區重度語音異常兒童之成效。台灣聽力語言學會雜誌，50，11-41。