建構特殊教育學系學生專業能力指標及其應用

Constructing and Applying Professional Competency Indicators for Special Education Students

10.6172/BSE.201311.3803001

胡心慈(Shin-Tzu Hu)；朱尹安(Yin-An Chu)；蔡碩穎(Shou-Ying Tsai)；林秀瑋(Hsiu-Wei Lin)

生涯發展 ； 師資培育 ； 特殊教育 ； 專業能力指標 ； 德懷術 ； career development ； teacher education ； special education ； indicators of professionalism ； Delphi technique

特殊教育研究學刊

38卷3期（2013 / 11 / 25）

1 - 27

繁體中文

本研究分兩階段進行，第一階段先建立專業能力指標，第二階段則依此指標編製自評量表，並加以實際應用。其中，第一階段之研究先經由文獻探討、兩次專家會議，再透過兩回合德懷術之專家意見調查而達成共識。指標內容分成四個向度，包括知識與認知、職能導向、個人特質，以及價值／倫理。第二階段則由此專業能力指標編製成「特殊教育學系學生專業能力指標自評量表」，並以北部某一大學之特殊教育學系學生為對象，實施全系學生之自我評量。結果發現，各年級之總平均數隨著年級的升高，大致呈增加的趨勢，且職能導向向度有年級間之差異；全體學生在個人特質以及價值／倫理向度的分數高於知識與認知、職能導向的分數。第二年之得分亦均較第一年為高，且四個年級在四個向度上之得分均有差異，顯示本量表能合理反映學生自我覺知之專業成長，表示此一專業能力指標之建構具有實用價值。研究者並對參與本研究之特教系、其他大學之特教系及未來研究提出建議。

The purpose of this study was to construct and apply the pre-service special educator professional competency indicators (PSEPCI) for special education students. This study was conducted in 2 phases. The first phase involved constructing the professional competency indicators for special education students by integrating the opinions of special education teachers and professors, and the second phase entailed developing and validating the professional competency indicator self-rating scale, based on the PSEPCI constructed at the first phase. Method: The professional competency indicators were drafted by the authors after reviewing relevant literature and collecting the opinions of special education teachers and professors during 2 meetings. These professional competency indicators were validated by conducting 2 rounds of using the Delphi technique to gather expert opinions. In the second phase, the Self-rating Scale for Assessing the Professionalism of Special Education Students, a 6-point Likert-type scale, was derived from the PSEPCI and piloted with students studying Special Education at a university in Northern Taiwan. Results: These professional competency indicators for special education students include 4 dimensions: professional knowledge, professional functioning, special behavior or attitude, and professional ethics. In general, the overall average scores of all of the students increased according to higher grade level. Furthermore, the average score of the person's special behavior or attitude of all students were higher than the average scores of the professional knowledge and the professional functioning. The students' scores in the second year were higher than in the first year. Conclusion/Implications: The professional competency indicators for the special education students included the professional competencies of special education teachers, college students, and the developmental tasks of undergraduate students. The opinions between special education teachers and professors showed no differences. These indicators, developed as a self-assessment scale, could reasonably demonstrate the professionalism growth of the students' self-recognition in professional knowledge, professional functioning, special behavior or attitude, and professional ethics. The results show that the scale is valuable for authentic practice, we can utilize this scale based on PSEPCI to help special education students self-recognition in the professionalism growth. In accordance with the results of this study, some suggestions were made to the departments of special education, and some suggestions for the future research were also given.

1. 吳武典、張芝萱(2010)。資優教育師資專業標準之建構。資優教育研究，9(2)，1-41。
   連結：
2. 陳信憲、陳美華(2005)。技職校院商管學群學生財金專業能力指標建構之研究。師大學報，50(2)，121-138。
   連結：
3. 陳清溪(2006)。國中小教育階段特殊教育教師專業評鑑規準之研究。臺灣教育研究的回顧與展望研討會論文，新北=New Taipei City, Taiwan:
   連結：
4. 陳麗如、陳清溪、鐘梅菁、江麗莉(2006)。高中職教育階段特殊教育教師專業評鑑意見之研究。特殊教育與復健學報，16，25-44。
   連結：
5. 鄭英耀、葉麗貞、劉昆夏、莫慕貞(2011)。大學生基本能力指標之建構。測驗學刊，58(3)，531-558。
   連結：
6. 吳武典、楊思偉、周愚文、吳清山、高熏芳、符碧真、陳木金、方永泉、陳盛賢（2005）：師資培育政策建議書。臺北：中華民國師範教育學會。[Wu, Wu-Tien, Yang, Su-Wei, Chou, Yu-Wen, Wu, Ching-Shan, Kao, Hsun-Fang, Fu, Pi-Chen, Chen, Mu-Chin, Fang, Yung-Chuan, & Che,Sheng-Hsien (2005). A proposal on the teacher education policy. Taipei, Taiwan: Chinese Teacher Education Society.]。
7. Australian Government Department, Employment, and Workplace Relations (2011). National professional standards for teachers. Retrieved July 24, 2011, from http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/Pages/ProfessionalStandardsforTteachers.aspx
8. Hoachlander, G. (1999). Integrating academic and vocational curriculum-Why is theory so hard to practice? Center Point, 7. Retrieved August 25, 2010, from http://ncrve.berkeley.edu/CenterPoint/CP7/CP7.html
9. Raizen, S. A. (1989). Reforming education for work: A cognitive science perspective. Macomb, IL.: National Center for Research in Vocational Education Materials Distribution Service, Western Illinois University.
10. Andrade, H.(2001).The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write.Current Issues In Education,4(4)
11. Andrade, H.,Valtcbeva, A.(2009).Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment.Theory into practice,48,12-19.
12. Bailey, T.,Merritt, D.(1995).,Macomb, IL:Western Illinois University.
13. Butler, F.(1978).The concept of competency: An operational definition.Educational Technology,18,7-18.
14. Carnevale, A. P.(1991).America and the new economy: How competitive standards are radically changing American workplaces.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
15. Cheetham, G.,Chivers, G.(1996).Toward a holistic model of professional competence.Journal of European Industrial Training,20(5),20-30.
16. Choate, L. H.,Smith, S. L.,Spruill, D. A.(2005).Professional development of counselor education students: An exploratory study of professional performance indicators for assessment.International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling,27(3),383-399.
17. Garvin, P.(Ed.)(2003).Developing knowledgeable teachers: A framework for standardsbased teacher education supported by institutional collaboration.Washington, DC:AACTE.
18. Grossman, P. L.,Richert, A. E.(1988).Unacknowledged knowledge growth: A re-examination of the effects of teacher education.Teaching & Teacher Education,4(1),53-62.
19. Johns, A.(1995).Competency standards for professional accountants in Australia and New Zealand.Accounting Education,4(1),37-42.
20. Kirk, S.,Gallagher, J.(1972).Educating exceptional children.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
21. Knowles, M. S.(1970).The modern practice of adult education: A systematic approach to education.New York, NY:Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
22. Legere, C. L. J.(1978).Occupational analysis for training.Educational Technology,18(3),27-35.
23. Lilja, K. K.,Laakso, K.,Palomki, J.(2011).Using the Delphi method.Technology Management in the Energy Smart World Conference,Portland, OR:
24. Mansfield, B.,Mitchell, L.(1996).Towards a competent workforce.London, UK:Gower.
25. Middleton, R. A.,Rollins, C. W.,Sanderson, P. L.,Leung, P.,Harley, D. A.,Ebener, D.,Leal-Idrogo, A.(2000).Endorsement of professional multicultural rehabilitation cpmpetencies and standards.Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin,43(4),219-245.
26. Schunk, D.(2003).Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal-setting, and self-evaluation.Reading & Writing Quarterly,19,159-172.
27. Shulman, L. S.(1987).Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-22.
28. Tymms, P. B.,Fitz-Gibbon, C. T.(1995).Students at the front: Using performance indicators for professional development.Educational Research,37(2),107-122.
29. Ysseldyke, J. E.,Algozzine, B.,Thurlow, M. L.(2000).Critical issues in special education.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
30. 中華民國師範教育學會編(2006)。教師評鑑與專業成長。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological.。
31. 中華民國特殊教育學會編(1997)。特殊教育法的落實與展望。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:中華民國特殊教育學會=Special Education Association of the Republic of China。
32. 中華民國特殊教育學會編(2007)。特殊教育的資源與支援。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:中華民國特殊教育學會=Special Education Association of the Republic of China。
33. 羊憶蓉、成露茜(1997)。邁向二十一世紀新新教育─從澳洲「關鍵能力」教育計劃試探臺灣的教改前景。社教雙月刊，178，13-16。
34. 行政院青年輔導委員會(2006)。,臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:作者=Author。
35. 吳清山(2004)。提昇教師素質之探究。教育研究月刊，127，5-17。
36. 呂欣怡(2003)。國立臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系=Department of Human Development and Family Studies, National Taiwan Normal University。
37. 李大偉(1983)。能力本位教學與職業教育。家政教育，9(1)，56-58。
38. 李隆盛(1999)。能力分析方法與蝶勘（DACUM）法。職場導向能力及課程發展研討會手冊，臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:
39. 沈宜純(2007)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系=Department of Special Education, National Taiwan Normal University。
40. 洪榮昭(1997)。能力轉換，滾石生苔否？。就業與訓練，15(2)，56-63。
41. 徐超聖(1999)。九年一貫課程品質管理機制─淺談「學力指標」之意義。教育研究與資料，26，33-39。
42. 教育部(2010)。第八次全國教育會議大會手冊。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:作者=Author。
43. 莊世清(2009)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系=Department of Special Education, National Taiwan Normal University。
44. 郭美滿(1999)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系=Department of Special Education, National Changhua University of Education。
45. 陳建州、陳清檳、李玲梅、劉松益、陳宏興(2003)。行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局委託研究專案報告行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局委託研究專案報告,臺北=Taipai, Taiwan:行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局=Bureau of Employment and Vocational Training, Council of Labor Affairs Executive Yuan。
46. 彭森明(2008)。將學生學習成果納入大學評鑑指標項目之必要性與可行性。評鑑雙月刊，20，46-48。
47. 游家政(1996)。德懷術及其在課程研究上的應用。花蓮師院學報，16，1-24。
48. 黃政傑、李隆盛(1996)。技職教育概論。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:師大書苑=Lucky bookstore。
49. 黃國榮(1991)。德爾菲啟智教學基本能力之研究。特殊教育學報，6，225-246。
50. 甄曉蘭、陳淑敏、宋明娟、黃家凱、張菡穎(2009)。「各系所學生專業能力指標應用」說明會會議手冊。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心=Center for Educational Research and Education, National Taiwan Normal University。
51. 甄曉蘭、黃姿霓、許宛琪、邱于真(2011)。,臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:國立臺灣師範大學教育學系教育專業發展中心=Department of Education, National Taiwan Normal University。
52. 蔡崇建(1994)。特殊教育教師專業智能發展的需求評估。特殊教育研究學刊，10，103-118。
53. 蕭吉男(2003)。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系=Department of Industrial Education, National Taiwan Normal University。
54. 蕭金土、陳瑋婷(2007)。啟智學校教師對「特殊教育教師專業標準」意見之調查研究。東臺灣特殊教育學報，9，219-236。

1. 陳偉仁,陳明聰,吳雅萍(2019)。特殊教育類科師資生職前特殊教育專業表現水準之調查研究。特殊教育研究學刊，44(1)，1-30。
2. 葛惠敏、李隆盛、王玫婷(2017)。普通大學校訂基本素養與學生養成能力之契合度分析。課程與教學，20(1)，73-104。
3. 劉益蓉,張恒豪,柯秋雪,邱春瑜(2020)。家成、業就？擔任特教老師的非障礙手足之邊界跨越經驗探究。特殊教育研究學刊，45(3)，29-51。
4. 杞昭安(2018)。海峽兩岸特殊教育學系學生專業能力之研究。特殊教育學報，48，35-52。