题名

國中學生學業自我概念發展之縱貫性分析

并列篇名

A Longitudinal Study on the Self-concept Development of Junior High School Students

DOI

10.6172/BSE.201403.3901001

作者

侯雅齡(Ya-Ling Hou)

关键词

多群體分析 ; 自我概念 ; 資優生 ; 潛在成長模式分析 ; 縱貫研究 ; multigroup ; self-concept ; gifted students ; latent growth curve model ; longitudinal study

期刊名称

特殊教育研究學刊

卷期/出版年月

39卷1期(2014 / 03 / 25)

页次

1 - 34

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究目的在了解國中生之國文、數學、英文與科學自我概念彼此的關係,以及隨時間改變,各學科自我概念發展的關聯性;同時,也比較資優生與一般生在學業及一般性自我概念之發展變化是否相同。歷時兩年,本研究取樣高雄市18所設有資優資源班的國中,共計2,242位學生,以數學、科學、國文與英文等四學科自我概念量表與一般性自我概念量表,進行重複四次的調查。在分析方法上,以多變項潛在成長模式了解各學科自我概念發展的關係,以多群體潛在成長模式比較資優生與一般生自我概念發展的差異。研究結果發現:一、數學和科學自我概念之間具中度正相關,但是,國文和英文自我概念間僅有低度正相關;二、學生的英文自我概念個別差異大;三、學生的科學自我概念最低,且降幅也最大;四、資優生與一般生在一般性自我概念上皆隨著時間呈現正向變化,但在學業自我概念,除了國文呈現持平的狀況外,其他學科皆呈現負向變化;五、兩群體在數學、科學與英文自我概念的成長模式未呈現全部恆等的現象;六、資優生的數學自我概念最高;七、一般生在科學與英文自我概念降幅大;八、男生在數學與科學自我概念高於女生,女生在國文與英文自我概念優於男生。最後,亦根據研究結果提出建議。

英文摘要

Purpose: The academic self-concepts that students develop strongly influence their academic achievement, educational choices, and vocational choices. Based on the characteristics of multifaceted and a hierarchical structure, academic self-concepts can be divided into various subject-specific self-concepts, such as mathematics, English, and science self-concepts. Furthermore, the formation of self-concepts gradually develops with growth experiences and interrelationships with others and the environment. Thus, one of the research objectives was to explore the development correlations among the academic self-concepts of junior high school students regarding four subjects. Generally, gifted students have the characteristic of emotional over-excitability. This has made gifted students highly sensitive to differences. Consequently, the second objective of this study was to compare the differences between gifted students and general students according to the self-concept development model. Method: The data collected included a four wave survey through repeated assessment of 2,242 students in 18 junior high schools in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. The instrument used was a Self Descript Questioners. A multivariate latent growth curve model and a latent growth curve model for multiple groups were used to analyze the data. Findings: (1) The math and science subject self-concepts exhibited moderately positive correlations. The correlation of the changes in self-concepts regarding these two subjects was high. Chinese and English subject self-concepts exhibited slightly positive correlations. The correlation of the changes in self-concepts regarding these two subjects was low; (2) The students' self-concepts regarding various subjects exhibited significant differences. Slight differences were observed among students regarding Chinese self-concepts, and there were clear differences among these participants regarding English self-concepts; (3) All participants had low science self-concepts, and this decreased the most in the 2-year learning process; (4) General self-concepts positively increased among the gifted and normal students; among the academic self-concepts, however, only Chinese self-concepts remained positive, whereas the other academic selfconcepts exhibited negative changes; (5) The math, science and English self-concepts involving group invariance in the multi-group latent growth curve model were not satisfied; (6) In comparison with the self-concepts of other subjects, the math self-concepts of the gifted students were the highest; (7) In comparison with the change of self-concepts in various subjects, the science and English self-concepts of the normal students decreased the most; (8) Boys' math and science self-concepts were higher than girls' self-concepts in these subjects, and girls' Chinese and English self-concepts were higher than boys' self-concepts in these subjects. However, no significant difference was observed between genders regarding general self-concepts. Conclusion/Implications: Based on the results, this paper proposes several suggestions for educators and future researchers: (1) Research should focus on effective education to promote students' self-concepts; (2) Teachers could help students to learn English by consistently adopting a positive attitude; (3) The multigroup latent growth curve model for boys and girls should be examined; (4) The grouping of gifted students and the gap between the number of participants should be addressed. This research can be used to classify gifted students into different groups in the future.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 余民寧、趙珮晴、陳嘉成(2010)。以社會認知生涯理論探討影響選擇數學職業意圖的因素。教育科學研究期刊,55(3),177-201。
    連結:
  2. 侯雅齡(2013)。資優生科學自我概念與科學成就之縱貫研究。教育科學研究期刊,58(2),61-87。
    連結:
  3. 侯雅齡(2010)。科學自我概念之大魚小池效應探究:資優生教育安置方式的思考。教育科學研究期刊,55(3),57-90。
    連結:
  4. 萬世鼎、曾芬蘭、宋曜廷(2010)。國中基測英語科雙峰分配探索。測驗學刊,57(1),107-137。
    連結:
  5. 薛育青、蔡典謨(2005)。國小資優生資優標記接受度與其自我概念、生活適應之相關研究。資優教育研究,5(2),1-24。
    連結:
  6. 簡晉龍、任宗浩、張淑婷(2008)。跨學科自我概念與學業成就路徑模式之檢驗─整合模式在數學和科學領域的適用性。教育心理學報,40(1),107-126。
    連結:
  7. 謝國平(2002,10 月3 日):能力分班找回放棄英文的孩子。聯合報,第15 版。[Hsieh, Kuo-Ping (2002): United Daily News A15,2002, October 3.]
  8. 身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法(2012):中華民國一百零一年九月二十八日臺參字第一O一O一七三O九二C 號令發布
  9. Bentler, P. M.,Bonett, D. G.(1980).Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin,88,588-606.
  10. Bollen, K. A.(1986).Sample size and Bentler and Bonett's nonnormed fit index.Psychometrika,51,375-377.
  11. Bong, M.(1998).Tests of the internal/external frames of reference model with subject-specific academic self-efficacy and frame-specific academic self-concepts.Journal of Educational Psychology,90,102-110.
  12. Byrne, B. M.(1996).Measuring self-concept across the life span: Issues and instrumentation.Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
  13. Cheung, G. W.,Rensvold, R. B.(2002).Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling,9(2),233-255.
  14. Chiu, M. S.(2012).The internal/external frame of reference model, big-fish-little-pond effect, and combined model for mathematics and science.Journal of Educational Psychology,104,87-107.
  15. Clark, B.(2002).Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  16. Dabrowski, K.(1964).Positive disintegration.Boston, MA:Little, Brown.
  17. Davis, G. A.,Rimm, S. B.(1994).Education of the gifted and talented.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  18. De Fraine, B.,Van Landeghem, G.,Van Damme, J.,Onghena, P.(2005).An analysis of wellbeing in secondary school with multilevel growth curve models and multilevel models.Quality and Quantity,39(3),297-316.
  19. Duncan, T. E.,Duncan, S. C.,Strycker, L. A.(2006).An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  20. Eccles, J. S.(2009).Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivations of action.Educational Psychologist,44(2),78-89.
  21. Fraine, B. D.,Van Damme, J.,Onghena, P.(2007).A longitudinal analysis of gender differences in academic self-concept and language achievement: A multivariate latent growth approach.Contemporary Educational Psychology,32(1),132-150.
  22. Greenspon, T. S.(2000)."Healthy perfectionism" is an oxymoron!: Reflections on the psychology of perfectionism and the sociology of science.Prufrock Journal,11(4),197-208.
  23. Hoelter, J. W.(1983).The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices.Sociological Methods and Research,11,325-344.
  24. Jacobs, J. E.,Lanza, S.,Osgood, D. W.,Eccles, J. S.,Wigfield, A.(2002).Changes in children's self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve.Child Development,73(2),509-527.
  25. Jöreskog, K.,Sörbom, D.(1993).Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language.Chicago, IL:Scientific Software International.
  26. Kelly, G.(1991).A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs.New York, NY:Routhledge.
  27. Kline, R. B.(2005).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York, NY:Guilford.
  28. Kong, Y.,Zhu, H.(2005).A decade comparison: Self-concept of gifted and non-gifted adolescents.International Education Journal,6(2),224-231.
  29. Little, T. D.(1997).Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues.Multivariate Behavioral Research,32,53-76.
  30. Luthans, F.,Youssef, C. M.(2004).Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage.Organizational Dynamics,33,143-160.
  31. Marsh, H. W.(1989).Age and sex effects in multiple dimension of self-concept: Preadolescence to adulthood.Journal of Educational Psychology,81(3),417-430.
  32. Marsh, H. W.(1992).Content specificity of relations between academic achievement and academic self-concept.Journal of Educational Psychology,84(1),35-42.
  33. Marsh, H. W.(1992).Self description questionnaire (SDQ) III: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of late adolescent self-concept.Macarthur, New South Wales, Australia:University of Western Sydney, Faculty of Education.
  34. Marsh, H. W.(1992).Self description questionnaire (SDQ) I: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept.Macarthur, New South Wales, Australia:University of Western Sydney, Faculty of Education.
  35. Marsh, H. W.(1986).Verbal and mathematics self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model.American Educational Research Journal,23(1),129-149.
  36. Marsh, H. W.(1992).Self description questionnaire (SDQ) II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of adolescent self-concept.Macarthur, New South Wales, Australia:University of Western Sydney, Faculty of Education.
  37. Marsh, H. W.(2005).Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: Cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary generalizability.Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Educational Research,Parramatta, Australia:
  38. Marsh, H. W.(Ed.),Craven, R. G.(Ed.),McInerney, D. M.(Ed.)(2008).Self-processes, learning, and enabling human potential: Dynamic new approaches.Charlotte, NC:Information Age.
  39. Marsh, H. W.,Hau, K. T.(2004).Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalizability of the internal/external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries.Journal of Educational Psychology,96,56-67.
  40. Marsh, H. W.,Kong, C. K.,Hau, K. T.(2001).Extension of the internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept formation: Importance of native and nonnative languages for Chinese students.Journal of Educational Psychology,93(3),543-553.
  41. Marsh, H. W.,Parker, J.,Barnes, J.(1985).Multidimensional adolescent self-concepts: Their relationship to age, sex and academic measures.American Educational Research Journal,22,422-444.
  42. Marsh, H. W.,Yeung, A. S.(1997).Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data.Journal of Educational Psychology,89,41-54.
  43. Marsh, H. W.,Yeung, A. S.(2001).An extension of the internal/external frame of reference model: A response to Bong (1998).Multivariate Behavioral Research,36(3),389-420.
  44. Martin, M. O.,Mullis, I. V. S.,Foy, P.,Stanco, G. M.(2012).TIMSS 2011 international results in science.Chestnut Hill, MA:TIMSS International Study Centre.
  45. McCoach, D. B.,Siegle, D.(2003).The school attitude assessment survey-revised: A new instrument to identify academically able students who underachieve.Educational and Psychological Measurement,63,414-429.
  46. Möller, J.,Pohlmann, B.,Köller, O.,Marsh, H. W.(2009).A meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept.Review of Educational Research,79,1129-1167.
  47. Möller, J.,Streblow, L.,Pohlmann, B.,Köller, O.(2006).An extension to the internal/external frame of reference model to two verbal and numerical domains.European Journal of Psychology of Education,21(4),467-487.
  48. Offer, D.,Ostrov, E.,Howard, K. L.,Atkinson, R.(1988).The teenage world: Adolescents' self-image in ten countries.New York, NY:Plenum.
  49. Phye, G.(Ed.)(1997).Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
  50. Raudenbush, S. W.,Bryk, A. S.(2001).Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  51. Rodgers, F. G.(1979).Ultrastructure of legionella pneumophila.Journal of Clinical Pathology,32(12),1195-1202.
  52. Seaton, M.,Marsh, H. W.,Craven, R. G.(2009).Earning its place as a pan-human theory: Universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect across 41 culturally and economically diverse countries.Journal of Educational Psychology,101(2),403-419.
  53. Shavelson, R. J.,Hubner, J. J.,Stanton, G. C.(1976).Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations.Review of Educational Research,46(3),407-441.
  54. Silverman, L. K.(1994).The moral sensitivity of gifted children and the evolution of society.Roeper Review,17(2),110-116.
  55. Silverman, L. K.(1991).Leta Hollingworth's educational principles for the gifted. Satorian.Nebraska Association for Gifted Children Journal,6(4),11-17.
  56. Singer, J. D.,Willett, J. B.(2003).Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence.London, England:Oxford University Press.
  57. Torrance, E. P.(1968).A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity.Gifted Child Quarterly,12(4),195-199.
  58. Tucker, L. R.,Lewis, C.(1973).A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika,38,1-10.
  59. Valentine, J. C.,DuBois, D. L.,Cooper, H.(2004).The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review.Educational Psychologist,39,111-133.
  60. Van de gaer, E.,De Fraine, B.,Pustjens, H.,Van Damme, J.,De Munter, A.,Onghena, P.(2009).School effects on the development of motivation toward learning tasks and the development of academic self-concept in secondary education: a multivariate latent growth curve approach.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,20(2),235-253.
  61. Watt, H. M.(2004).Development of adolescents' self-perceptions, values, and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th through 11th grade Australian students.Child Development,75(5),1556-1574.
  62. Wigfield, A.,Eccles, J. S.(2000).Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25(1),68-81.
  63. Wylie, R. C.(1989).Measures of self-concept.Lincoln, NE:University of Nebraska Press.
  64. Zanobini, M.,Usai, M. C.(2002).Domainspecific self-concept and achievement motivation in the transition from primary to low middle school.Educational Psychology,22(2),203-217.
  65. 王郁琮(2008)。戲說三國:「尋找機制與過程:長期追蹤研究的功用」回應文。αβγ量化研究學刊,2(1),34-36。
  66. 吳齊殷、張明宜、陳怡蒨(2008)。尋找機制與過程:長期追蹤研究的功用。αβγ 量化研究學刊,2(1),1-26。
  67. 李穎、施建農(2005)。大魚小池效應。心理科學進展,13(5),623-628。
  68. 周祝瑛(2008)。台灣下一代教育的未來在哪裡?─從教育的「貧」與「弱」到「富」而「強」。教育研究月刊,168,126-136。
  69. 邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式:LISREL 的理論、技術與應用。臺北=Taipei:雙葉=yehyeh。
  70. 邱皓政(2008)。潛在類別模式:原理與技術。臺北=Taipei:五南=Wunan。
  71. 洪若和(1995)。國小兒童自我概念之相關研究。臺東師院學報,6,91-134。
  72. 張武昌(2002)。國中基本學力測驗英語科雙峰現象形成原因之探討。國民中學學生基本學力測驗推動工作委員會通訊,16
  73. 張武昌、周中天、陳純音、葉錫南、林正昌(2003)。,臺北=Taipei:教育部=Ministry of Education。
  74. 趙曉美(2010)。自我概念之發展與改變策略。臺灣教育發展論壇,1,31-53。
  75. 蔡淑君、段曉林(2004)。論科學與數學之統整。科學教育月刊,275,6-19。
  76. 謝凱蒂譯、Robinson, K.、Aronica, L.(2011)。讓天賦自由。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:天下文化=Commonwealth Publishing。
  77. 羅如帆、肖文、蘇彥捷(2008)。11-13 歲超常兒童自我概念的發展。中國特殊教育,2008(6),18-23。
被引用次数
  1. 陳俐君、張芳全(2018)。國中生家庭社經地位、文化資本、自然科學習興趣對自然科學習動機影響之縱貫性研究。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,32(2),1-33。
  2. 侯雅齡(2022)。國中資優生學業自我概念與學習投入關係:恆毅力之中介效果之探討。特殊教育發展期刊,73,1-12。
  3. 侯雅齡(2023)。國中及高中數理資優學生學習投入之縱貫研究。特殊教育學報,57,37-69。
  4. 鄭瑞洲,楊敏(2021)。轉化科學研究為國高中生非制式科學實作課程之探討。科技博物,25(1),27-56。
  5. (2015)。千里之行,始於足下-國中生的數學習得無助感與終止數學低成就的可能路徑。教育與心理研究,38(4),35-65。