题名

語音異常兒童的語音區辨及聲學調整對其聽知覺的影響

并列篇名

Speech Discrimination of Mandarin- Speaking Children with Speech Sound Disorders

DOI

10.6172/BSE.201611.4103002

作者

鄭靜宜(Jing-yi Jeng)

关键词

語音異常 ; 構音/音韻異常 ; 語音區辨 ; 聲學調整 ; 語音知覺 ; speech sound disorders ; articulatory/phonological disorders ; speech discrimination ; acoustical modification ; speech perception

期刊名称

特殊教育研究學刊

卷期/出版年月

41卷3期(2016 / 11 / 30)

页次

35 - 65

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

語音異常(speech sound disorders, SSD)兒童常有語音區辨困難,本研究之目的在探討SSD 兒童的語音對比區辨及調整聲學線索對語音區辨的影響。本研究有102 位參與者,包括31 位六足歲的SSD 兒童和31 位年齡、性別配對無SSD 的兒童為控制組;另有40 位正常成人為控制組,作為和兒童聽辨表現比較的基礎。實驗一的刺激材料是52 對具最小音素對比的華語單音節音,含13 類語音對比。實驗二的材料是將實驗一的刺激用聲學再合成調整聲學特徵性,比較聲學調整對三組聽者區辨的影響。聲學調整方式是在摩擦噪音強度、共振峰轉折帶、VOT(voice onset time)、噪音遮蔽和梅爾倒頻(MFCC)濾波等方面做強化或減弱對比的調整。結果發現SSD 兒童的語音區辨正確率顯著低於兒童控制組,兩個兒童組的區辨正確率皆顯著低於成人組;三組反應時間(RT) 亦達顯著差異,SSD 兒童組RT 顯著慢於兒童控制組和成人組,成人組RT 最短。在實驗二無論是正確率或RT,三組聽者對於強化類刺激的反應皆顯著優於減弱類刺激。SSD組對於強化類刺激,RT 顯著較快於實驗一的原始刺激,顯現增益效果,但在正確率未見提升效果;對於減弱類刺激和實驗一原始刺激相較則有顯著降低效果。語音區辨的正確率和RT 各與兒童構音測驗分數呈中度相關(r = .50,r = -.64,p < .001)。可知六歲兒童的語音區辨,無論在正確率和RT 皆不及成人,對於一些較難的語音對比區辨習得應是在六歲之後;SSD 兒童語音區辨能力較一般兒童為弱。由於聽知覺發展在學習「說」之前,推論語音區辨的困難可能是造成兒童SSD 的原因之一。

英文摘要

Purpose: Preschool children with speech sound disorders (SSD), previously called "articulatory/phonological disorders," frequently show deficiency in speech perception, specifically in speech-sound discrimination. The purpose of this study was to investigate the speech discrimination ability of Mandarin-speaking children with SSD and to explore the effects of acoustically modified stimuli on speech discrimination. Methods: The participants consisted of 31 preschool children with SSD and two control groups. One of the control groups consisted of 31 normal preschool age-matched non-SSD children and the other control group consisted of 40 normal young adults. In Experiment I, the stimuli comprised 52 pairs of Mandarin monosyllables consisting of 13 phonetic minimal pair contrasts for speech discrimination testing. The discrimination task involved judging whether the two presented monosyllables were perceived as the same syllable sound. The children were tested individually. The speech stimuli used in Experiment II were acoustically modified from the stimuli in Experiment I. The acoustical modification involved altering the time or frequency domains of the target speech segments through resynthesis; specifically, the noise duration, VOT, and vowel transition duration were modified, and noise masking and MFCC filtering were applied. Findings: The results of Experiments I and II indicated that the SSD group exhibited significantly lower correct rates and longer reaction times (RTs) than did the child control group. Additionally, the adult group exhibited the highest correct rates and the shortest RTs. The articulation scores of the children were moderately correlated with the correct rates and RTs of the speech discrimination task (r = .50, p < .001; r = -.64, p < .001, respectively). Retroflex contrast, manner contrast at the alveolar place of articulation, and tone contrast were the three most difficult contrasts for the children with SSD. Aspiration contrast and fricative-affricate contrast were the two contrasts with the greatest differences between the two groups of children (SSD vs. normal). In Experiment II, the stimuli with acoustical enhancement significantly reduced the RTs in the SSD group, but exhibited no facilitating effect on the correct rates. For acoustically reduced stimuli, the two groups of children had lower correct rates than they did for the enhanced stimuli and original stimuli. The noise masking had a greater effect on the children with SSD. Conclusions/Implications: The results suggest that the ability of speech discrimination of the preschool children remains lower compared with that of adults, and that the development of speech perception is ongoing in preschool children. Difficulty in speech discrimination may be a crucial factor for SSD. Some acoustical modification can influence the discrimination of speech in children.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Chao, K.-Y.,Chen, L.-M.(2008).A crosslinguistic study of voice onset time in stop consonant productions.International Journal of Computational Linguistics & Chinese Language,13(2),215-231.
    連結:
  2. Lai、 Yi-Show(2013).VOT for mandarin stops and affricates produced by L1 and L2 speakers of mandarin Chinese.Kaohsiung Normal University Journal-Education and Social Sciences,35,57-78.
    連結:
  3. 林佳儒、張顯達、鍾玉梅(2013)。語音異常兒童的語音聽辨與聲韻覺識能力與不同治療方式的關係。台灣聽力語言學會雜誌,30,1-19。
    連結:
  4. 張顯達、許碧勳(2000)。國語輔音聽辨與發音能力之發展研究。中華民國聽力語言學會雜誌,15,1-10。
    連結:
  5. 曹峰銘、李菁芸、謝怡欣、邱建業(2009)。學齡前兒童塞音及聲調知覺與詞彙發展的關係。台灣聽力語言學會雜誌,24,39-57。
    連結:
  6. 劉惠美、曹峰銘、張鑑如、徐儷玲(2013)。學前到學齡兒童的語音區辨能力發展及其與詞彙理解的關係。教育心理學報,45(2),221-240。
    連結:
  7. 鄭靜宜(2009)。華語捲舌音對比的聽覺辨識與頻譜動差分析。中華心理學刊,51(2),157-173。
    連結:
  8. 鄭靜宜(2011)。學前兒童華語聲母之音韻歷程分析。特殊教育學報,34,135-169。
    連結:
  9. 鄭靜宜(2011)。學習障礙兒童對華語捲舌音特徵的聽知覺辨識。特殊教育研究學刊,36(2),27-50。
    連結:
  10. Travis, L. E., & Rasmus, B. (1931). The speech sound discrimination ability of cases with functional disorders of articulation. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 17(2), 217-226. doi: 10.1080/00335633109379803
  11. Scientific Learning Corporation.(2010). Fast For WordTM [Computer software]..
  12. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2016). Speech sound disorders: Articulation and phonological processes. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/public/speech/disorders/speechsounddisorders.htm
  13. Milenkovic, P. (2005). TF32: Time frequency analysis for32bit windows [Computer software]. Madison, WI: Author..
  14. American Psychiatric Association(2013).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.Arlington, VA:American Psychiatric Publishing.
  15. Bauman-Waengler, J.(2000).Articulation and phonological impairments.Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
  16. Bernthal, J. E.,Bankson, N. W.,Flipsen, P., Jr.(2013).Articulation and phonological disorders: Speech sound disorders in children.Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
  17. Bird, J.,Bishop, D.(1992).Perception and awareness of phonemes in phonologically impaired children.International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders,27(4),289-311.
  18. Boersma, P.,Weenink, D.(2012).PRAAT, a system for doing phonetics by computer.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
  19. Borman, G. D.,Benson, J. G.,Overman, L.(2009).A randomized field trial of the fast for word language computer-based training program.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,31(1),82-106.
  20. Bradlow, A. R.,Kraus, N.(2003).Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: Sentence perception in noise.Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research,46(1),80.
  21. Bradlow, A. R.,Kraus, N.,Nicol, T. G.,McGee, T. J.,Cunningham, J.,Zecker, S. G.,Carrell, T. D.(1999).Effects of lengthened formant transition duration on discrimination and neural representation of synthetic CV syllables by normal and learning-disabled children.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,106(4),2086-2096.
  22. Cohen, W.,Hodson, A.(2005).Effects of computer-based intervention through acoustically modified speech (fast for word) in severe mixed receptive-Expressive language impairment: Outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research,48(3),715-729.
  23. Dorman, M. F.,Loizou, P. C.(1996).Relative spectral change and formant transitions as cues to labial and alveolar place of articulation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,100(6),3825-3830.
  24. Dorman, M. F.,Studdert-Kennedy, M.,Raphael, L. J.(1977).Stop-consonant recognition: Release bursts and formant transitions as functionally equivalent, context-dependent cues.Perception & Psychophysics,22(2),109-122.
  25. Edwards, J.,Fox, R. A.,Rogers, C. L.(2002).Final consonant discrimination in children: effects of phonological disorder, vocabulary size, and articulatory accuracy.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR,45(2),231-242.
  26. Eimas, R. E.,Gavin, W.,Wilson, W. R.(1979).Linguistic experience and phonemic perception in infancy: A cross-linguistic study.Child Development,50(1),14-18.
  27. Forster, K. L.,Forster, J. C.(2003).DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.Behavior Research Methods Instrument & Computers,35(1),116-124.
  28. Friel-Patti, S.,DesBarres, K.(2001).Case studies of children using fast for word.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,10(3),203.
  29. Gierut, J.(1998).Treatment efficacy: Functional phonological disorders in children.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,41(1),S85-100.
  30. Gósy, M.,Horváth, V.(2015).Speech processing in children with functional articulation disorders.Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics,29(3),185-200.
  31. Holt, R. F.,Lalonde, K.(2012).Assessing toddlers' speech-sound discrimination.International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology,76(5),680-692.
  32. Kent, R. D.,Read, C.(2002).The acoustic analysis of speech.San Diego, CA:Singular.
  33. Kenyon, E. L.,Leidenheim, S. E.,Zwillenberg, S.(1998).Speech discrimination in the sensorineural hearing loss patients: How is it affected by background noise?.Military Medicine,163,647-650.
  34. Kronvall, E.,Diehl, C.(1954).The relationship of auditory discrimination to articulatory defects of children with no known organic impairment.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders,19(3),335-338.
  35. Kuhl, P. K.(1992).Infants' perception and representation of speech: Development of a new theory.In ICSLP
  36. Kuhl, P. K.(1991).Human adults and human infants show a "perceptual magnet effect" for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not.Perception & Psychophysics,50(2),93-107.
  37. Lehiste, I.,Peterson, G. E.(1961).Transitions, glides, and diphthongs.Journal of Acoustical Society of America,33(3),268-277.
  38. Lisker, L.,Abramson, A. S.(1970).The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics.Proceedings of the sixth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences,Prague:
  39. Loeb, D. F.,Gillam, R. B.,Hoffman, L.,Brandel, J.,Marquis, J.(2009).The effects of Fast ForWord language on the phonemic awareness and reading skills of school-age children with language impairments and poor reading skills.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,18(4),376-387.
  40. McAllister Byun, T.(2015).Perceptual discrimination across contexts and contrasts in preschool-aged children.Lingua,160,38-53.
  41. Miller, G. A.,Nicely, P.(1955).The analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,27,338-352.
  42. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders(1994).National strategic research plan.Bethesda, MD:Department of Health and Human Services.
  43. Nijland, L.(2009).Speech perception in children with speech output disorders.Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics,23(3),222-239.
  44. Repp, B. H.,Liberman, A. M.,Eccardt, T.,Pesetsky, D.(1978).Perceptual integration of acoustic cues for stop, fricative, and affricate manner.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,4(4),621-637.
  45. Rvachew, S.(2007).Phonological processing and reading in children with speech sound disorders.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,16(3),260-270.
  46. Rvachew, S.(1994).Speech perception training can facilitate sound production learning.Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research,37(2),347-357.
  47. Sherman, D.,Geith, A.(1967).Speech Sound and discrimination and articulation skill.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,10(2),277-280.
  48. Stevens, K. N.,Blumstein, S. E.(1978).Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,64(5),1358-1368.
  49. Tallal, P.(1980).Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children.Brain and Language,9(2),182-198.
  50. Tallal, P.,Miller, S. L.,Bedi, G.,Byma, G.,Wang, X.,Nagarajan, S. S.,Schreiner, C.,Jenkins, W. M.,Merzenich, M. M.(1996).Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech.Science,271(5245),81-84.
  51. Tallal, P.,Miller, S.,Jenkins, B.,Merzenich, M.(1997).The role of temporal processing in developmental language-based learning disorders: Research and clinical implications.Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia,Hillsdale, NJ:
  52. Waldman, F. R.,Singh, S.,Hayden, M. E.(1978).A comparison of speech-sound production and discrimination in children with functional articulation disorders.Language & Speech,21(3),205-220.
  53. Walley, A. C.,Carrell, T. D.(1983).Onset spectra and formant transitions in the adult's and child's perception of place of articulation in stop consonants.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,73(3),1011-1022.
  54. Werker, J. F.,Tees, R. C.(2002).Crosslanguage speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life.Infant Behavior and Development,25(1),121-133.
  55. 王小川(2007)。語音信號處理。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:全華=Chuan Hwa。
  56. 林寶貴(1984)。我國四至十五歲兒童語言障礙出現率調查研究。國立台灣教育學院學報,9,119-158。
  57. 陳達德、蔡素娟、洪振耀(1998)。國語聲母音長之聲學基礎研究與臨床意義。聽語會刊,13,138-149。
  58. 鄭靜宜(2003)。兒童國語構音測驗。臺南=Tainan, Taiwan:國立臺南大學特殊教育系=Department of Special Education, National Tainan University。
  59. 鄭靜宜(2005)。不同言語速度、發語單位和發語位置對國語音段時長的影響。南大學報,39,161-185。
  60. 謝國平(1986)。語言學概論。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:三民=San Min Book。
被引用次数
  1. 陳漪真、佘永吉(2018)。直接教學法結合繪本教材對提升國中學習障礙學生英語字彙學習之成效。身心障礙研究,16(3&4),201-219。
  2. 黃國祐,馬紫晴(2023)。聲學處理對華語單純語音異常及聽力障礙兒童的治療成效。台灣聽力語言學會雜誌,48,27-42。
  3. 簡欣瑜,劉惠美(2021)。語音異常兒童語音知覺、音韻覺識與語音產出之相關。教育心理學報,52(4),909-933。
  4. 劉惠美,許慧瑛(2022)。語音異常幼兒語音錯誤情形與早期讀寫能力之相關研究。特殊教育研究學刊,47(1),93-126。
  5. 鄭靜宜(2017)。華語學前兒童語音的習得。華語文教學研究,14(3),109-136。
  6. 鄭靜宜(2017)。影響語音異常兒童非詞複誦表現因素之探討。特殊教育學報,46,55-84。
  7. 鄭宇翔、劉惠美(2018)。學前單純語音異常兒童與伴隨語言發展異常之語音異常兒童的語音錯誤表現。特殊教育研究學刊,43(2),93-120。