以任務為導向之方案規劃與實踐對經濟不利與文化殊異資優低成就學生的行動歷程探究

A Research on the Planning and Practice of Task-Oriented Programs for Economically and Culturally Disadvantaged Bright Underachievers

10.6172/BSE.202011_45(3).0001

陳勇祥(Yung-Hsiang Chen)

文化殊異 ； 低成就 ； 經濟不利 ； 資優 ； bright underachievers ； culturally disadvantaged ； economically disadvantaged

特殊教育研究學刊

45卷3期（2020 / 11 / 30）

1 - 27

繁體中文

本研究先分析經濟不利與文化殊異之資優低成就學生的特質與困境，再依據其需求而規劃以任務為導向之方案，以激發學生之潛能並引導其發掘自身優勢，期能喚起學界對於此類學生之關注與重視。研究參與者為四位來自經濟不利與文化殊異家庭之資優低成就學生，年齡為18至19歲。本研究共規劃四個方案，每一方案分別於寒、暑假，各進行四週，合計二年，共有13位國小四至六年級之原住民學生全程參與。方案規劃分為：「環境生態」、「科學探究」、「文化意識」、「總體營造」等四項主題。行動實踐歷程經過「發現困境」、「找出問題」、「設計內容」、「具體實踐」、「檢討反思」等階段，發現研究參與者於行動歷程逐漸了解自我與環境關係而思考人際意義，使其理解學童感受並發現自身優勢，同時也能反思自身經驗並理解差異而檢視自我評價，進而覺察自我認同的衝突而轉化自身詮釋不同成長環境的觀點。研究參與者於行動歷程之改變為：展現信心與強化動機並持續投入，同時能循序漸進執行任務，終而理解自我的努力，可達成目標之信念。經過結果詮釋與討論，發現研究參與者雖能覺察對自我出身的感受，但甚少關注自身優勢，直到運用其專長帶領學童實踐任務的過程，漸能理解自身背景之特性與反思自我評價。因此，建議教師可從陪伴與傾聽開始，再隨情境改變，適時引導其以不同觀點去看待環境與事件，且應連結家庭與社會資源，藉此深究其內在衝突之不同組型對成就動機的影響，以找出相對應之輔導策略。

Purpose: This study first analyzed the traits and plights of economically and culturally disadvantaged bright underachievers. Then, task-oriented plans were established according to their needs to help them to reach their full potential and guide them to explore possibilities. This research is expected to arouse the attention of such students in academia. Methods: The research participants were four economically and culturally disadvantaged bright underachievers aged 18-19 years. Four programs were designed in this study. Each program was conducted for 4 weeks in winter and summer vacations for 2 years. In total, 13 aboriginal students in grades 4-6 of the primary school participated in this study. The programs were divided into four themes: Environmental Ecology, Scientific Inquiry, Cultural Awareness, and Overall Construction. Results/Findings: The course of action and practice had the stages of discovering difficulties, finding problems, designing content, concrete practice, and review and reflection. The practice process consisted of the following steps: (1) determining the relationship between self and environment to think about interpersonal meaning and promote interaction; (2) identifying children's feelings and discovering their advantages; (3) encouraging children to reflect on their own experiences and understand differences while examining past self-evaluations; (4) rethinking culture and environment to empathize with each other and examine their own views on culture to perceive conflicts of self-identity; (5) thinking about the dilemma faced and changing viewpoints to understand the importance of joint action. The changes in the practice process were as follows: (1) students demonstrating confidence and motivation to participate and to continue investment; (2) research participants performing tasks step by step; and (3) students becoming aware of their own efforts required to achieve goals. Conclusions/Implications: The researchers discussed challenges and suggested solutions according to the observation, recording, and dialogue in the action process. Although research participants perceived the disadvantages of their family background, they paid little attention to the advantages they had. They could not understand the characteristics of family background and undertake self-evaluation until they were given assistance by experts in implementing practical tasks. Therefore, teachers are recommended to start with companionship and listening, and then as the situation improves, they should guide students to view the environment and events from different perspectives. In addition, their family and social resources should be connected to continue to promote well-being. Moreover, future research should explore the effect of different forms of internal conflict on achievement motivation to determine corresponding counseling strategies.

1. Ambrose, D.(2013).Socioeconomic inequality and giftedness: Suppression and distortion of high ability.Roeper Review,35(2),81-92.
2. Assouline, S. G.,Flanary, K.,Foley-Nicpon, M.(2015).Challenges and solutions for serving rural gifted students: Accelerative strategies.Serving gifted students in rural settings,Waco, TX:
3. Assouline, S. G.,Whiteman, C. S.(2011).Twice-exceptionality: Implications for school psychologists in the post-IDEA 2004era.Journal of Applied School Psychology,27(4),380-402.
4. Baum, S. M.,Renzulli, J. S.,Hébert, T. P.(1995).Reversing underachievement: Creative productivity as a systematic intervention.Gifted Child Quarterly,39(4),224-235.
5. Baum, S. M.,Schader, R. M.,Hébert, T. P.(2014).Through a different lens: Reflecting on a strengths-based, talent-focused approach for twice-exceptional learners.Gifted Child Quarterly,58(4),311-327.
6. Baum, S.,Owen, S.(2004).To be gifted and learning disabled: Strategies for helping bright students with LD, ADHD, and more.Mansfield Center, CT:Creative Learning.
7. Boyd, M. P.,Markarian, W. C.(2011).Dialogic teaching: Talk in service of a dialogic stance.Language and Education,25(6),515-534.
8. Carvalho, R. G.,Novo, R. F.(2012).Family socioeconomic status and student adaptation to school life: Looking beyond grades.Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology,10,1209-1222.
9. Clark, I.(2014).Equitable learning outcomes: Supporting economically and culturally disadvantaged students in ‘formative learning environments'.Improving Schools,17(1),116-126.
10. Curran, F. C.,Kellogg, A. T.(2016).Understanding science achievement gaps by race/ethnicity and gender in kindergarten and first grade.Educational Researcher,45(5),273-282.
11. Dupont, S.,Galand, B.,Nils, F.,Hospel, V.(2014).Social Context, Self-perceptions and Student Engagement: A SEM investigation of the self-system model of motivational development (SSMMD).Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology,12(1),5-32.
12. Engle, P. L.,Black, M. M.(2008).The effects of poverty on child development and educational outcomes.Annals of the New York Academy of Science,1136(1),243-256.
13. Fall, A. M.,Roberts, G.(2012).High school dropouts: Interactions between social context, self-perceptions, school engagement, and student dropout.Journal of Adolescence,35(4),787-798.
14. Foley-Nicpon, M.,Allmon, A.,Sieck, B.,Stinson, R.(2011).Empirical investigation of twice-exceptionality: Where have we been and where are we going?.Gifted Child Quarterly,55(1),3-17.
15. Ford, D. Y.(2011).Multicultural gifted education.Waco, TX:Prufrock Press.
16. Fredrickson, B. L.,Kurtz, L. E.(2011).Cultivating positive emotions to enhance human flourishing.Applied positive psychology. Improving everyday life, health, schools, work, and society,New York, NY:
17. Glanville, J. L.,Wildhagen, T.(2007).The measurement of school engagement: Assessing dimensionality and measurement invariance across race and ethnicity.Educational and Psychological Measurement,67(6),1019-1041.
18. Goings, R. B.,Ford, D. Y.(2018).Investigating the intersection of poverty and race in gifted education journals: A 15-year analysis.Gifted Child Quarterly,62(1),25-36.
19. Gong, Y. P.,Huang, J. C.,Farh, J. L.(2009).Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy.Academy of Management Journal,52(4),765-778.
20. Hallett, R. E.,Venegas, K. M.(2011).Is increased access enough? Advanced placement courses, quality, and success in low-income urban schools.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,34(3),468-487.
21. Hartson, H. R.(2003).Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design.Behaviour & Information Technology,22(5),315-338.
22. Inkelas, K. K.,Daver, Z. E.,Vogt, K. E.,Leonard, J. B.(2007).Living-learning programs and first-generation college students’ academic and social transition to college.Research in High Education,48,403-434.
23. Jen, E.,Moon, S.,Samarapungavan, A.(2015).Using Design-Based Research in Gifted Education.Gifted Child Quarterly,59(3),190-200.
24. Joe, E. M.,Davis, J. E.(2009).Parental influence, school readiness and early academic achievement of African-American boys.Journal of Negro Education,78,260-276.
25. Kettler T.,Russell, J.,Puryear, J. S.(2015).Inequitable access to gifted education: Variance in funding and staffing based on locale and contextual school variables.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,38(2),99-117.
26. Koehler, M. J.,Mishra, P.(2009).What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?.Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education,9(1),60-70.
27. Levy, D. J.,Heissel, J. A.,Richeson, J. A.,Adam, E. K.(2016).Psychological and biological responses to race-based social stress as pathways to disparities in educational outcomes.American Psychologist,71(6),455-473.
28. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
29. Lusk, E. M.,Taylor, M. J.,Nanney, J. T.,Austin, C. C.(2010).Biracial identity and its relation to self-esteem and depression in mixed black/white biracial individuals.Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work,19(2),109-126.
30. Määttä, K.,Uusiautti, S.(2012).Mission impossible? A scientific comparison between the overlapping and diverging phenomena of friendship and love.International Journal of Asian Social Sciences,2,530-543.
31. MacDonald, R.(2008).Professional development for information communication technology integration: Identifying and supporting a community of practice through design-based research.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,40(4),429-445.
32. Matthews, M. S.,McBee, M. T.(2007).School factors and the underachievement of gifted students in a talent search summer program.Gifted Child Quarterly,51(2),167-181.
33. McBee, M. T.(2010).Examining the probability of identification for gifted programs for students in Georgia elementary schools: A multilevel path analysis.Gifted Child Quarterly,54(4),283-297.
34. McCall, R. B.,Beach, S. R.,Lau, S.(2000).The nature and correlates of underachievment among elementary school children in Hong Kong.Child Development,71(3),785-801.
35. Michelmore, K.,Dynarski, S.(2016).,Cambridge, MA:National Bureau of Economic Research.
36. Morales, E. E.(2014).Learning from success: How original research on academic resilience informs what college faculty can do to increase the retention of low socioeconomic status students.International Journal of Higher Education,3(3),92-102.
37. Morales, E. E.(2010).Linking strengths: Identifying and exploring the protective factor clusters in academically resilient lowsocioeconomic urban students of color.Roeper Review,32(3),164-175.
38. Netz, H.(2014).Gifted conversations: Discursive patterns in gifted classes.Gifted Child Quarterly,58(2),149-163.
39. Neuman, L. W.(1997).Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches.Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
40. Ng, C. -H. C.,Bartlett, B.,Chester, I.,Kersland, S.(2013).Improving reading performance for economically disadvantaged students: Combining strategy instruction and motivational support.Reading Psychology,34(3),257-300.
41. Pan, J.,Zaff, J. F.,Donlan, A. E.(2017).Social support and academic engagement among reconnected youth: Adverse life experiences as a moderator.Journal of Research on Adolescence,27(4),890-906.
42. Pau-San, H.(2005).The linguistic advantage of the intellectually gifted child: An empirical study of spontaneous speech.Roeper Review,27(3),178-185.
43. Phinney, J. S.,Jacoby, B.,Silva, C.(2007).Positive intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identity.International Journal of Behavioral Development,31(5),478-490.
44. Reis, S. M.,Colbert, R. D.,Hébert, T. P.(2004).Understanding resilience in diverse, talented students in an urban high school.Roeper Review,27(2),110-120.
45. Renzulli, J. S.(2002).Expanding the conception of giftedness to include co-cognitive traits and to promote social capital.Phi Delta Kappan,84(1),33-58.
46. Renzulli, J. S.,Koehler, J. L.,Fogarty, E. A.(2006).Operation Houndstooth intervention theory: Social capital in today’s schools.Gifted Child Today,29(1),14-24.
47. Ritchotte, J. A.,Matthews, M. S.,Flowers, C. P.(2014).The validity of the achievement-orientation model for gifted middle school students: An exploratory study.Gifted Child Quarterly,58(3),183-198.
48. Rubenstein, L. D.(2011).Project ATLAS: Empowering academically underachieving gifted students.Mansfield:University of Connecticut.
49. Salmela, M.,Määttä, K.(2015).Even the best have difficulties: A study of finnish straight-A graduates’ resource-oriented solutions.Gifted Child Quarterly,59(2),124-135.
50. Sarker, S.,Sarker, S.,Chatterjee, S.,Valacich, J. S.(2010).Media effects on group collaboration: An empirical examination in an ethical decision-making context.Decision Sciences,41(4),887-931.
51. Scheier, M. F.,Carver, C. S.(2003).Self-regulatory processes and responses to health threats: Effects of optimism on wellbeing.Social psychological foundations of health,Oxford, England:
52. Siegle, D.,McCoach, D. B.(2005).Motivating gifted students.Waco, TX:Prufrock Press.
53. Swanson, J. D.(2006).Breaking through assumptions about low-income, minority gifted students.Gifted Child Quarterly,50(1),11-25.
54. Tenenbaum, H. R.,Ruck, M. D.(2007).Are teachers’ expectations different for racial minority than for European American students? A meta-analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology,99(2),253-273.
55. VanTassel-Baska, J.,Bracken, B.,Feng, A.,Brown, E.(2009).A longitudinal study of enhancing critical thinking and reading comprehension in Title I classrooms.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,33(1),7-37.
56. 王櫻芬, Ying-Fen,洪宛君, Wan-Chun,曾慕恬, Mu-Tien(2017)。正向心理學於學校輔導之應用—以經濟弱勢家庭學童之小團體輔導為例。輔導季刊，53(4)，17-30。
57. 吳怡靜, Yi-Jin,林素華, Su-Hua(2010)。合作式實驗活動對七年級低成就學生科學過程技能影響之個案研究。生物科學，52(2)，71-88。
58. 吳武典, Wu-Tien(2006)。我國資優教育的發展與展望。資優教育季刊，100，3-20。
59. 陳雅鈴, Ya-Ling(2008)。二位良好表現之新移民女性子女個案研究。幼兒保育學刊，6，77-95。
60. 黃彥融, Yan-Rong,盧台華, Tai-Hwa(2009)。新移民子女就讀國民小學資優班現況調查研究—以北部三縣市為例。資優教育季刊，113，10-17。
61. 盧台華, Tai-Hwa(1996)。特殊族群資優教育。教育資料集刊，21，265-282。

1. 謝淑芳,陳柔伊,李家兆(2022)。學校以外的資優教育方案：青年投資計畫的實踐與發現。資優教育論壇，20(1)，50-62。