聽覺障礙中學生運用平板學習地理閱讀之行動研究

Action Research on Using Tablet PCs in Geography Reading Class for Secondary School Students with Hearing Impairments

10.6172/BSE.202011_45(3).0004

林家楠(Chia-Nan Lin)；洪儷瑜(Li-Yu Hung)

平板 ； 地理科 ； 閱讀理解策略 ； 聽覺障礙學生 ； geography ； reading comprehension strategies ； secondary students with hearing impairment ； tablet PC

特殊教育研究學刊

45卷3期（2020 / 11 / 30）

87 - 116

繁體中文

本研究旨在瞭解聽障學生運用平板學習地理閱讀的教學歷程、可能遇到的問題與解決方案。研究者在學校開設了地理閱讀班，招募了10位聽障學生，歷經了一學年33堂的教學行動方案，透過不斷地省思、修正，歸納出兩個行動階段。行動前期，研究者與行政人員對平板關心的面向不同，遇到了設備管理與借用的問題。課程進行之初，研究者錯估學生操作平板的能力，且不熟悉平板與教學的整合，加上學生主要溝通方式的差異，以致於行動前期研究者疲於解決學生的操作問題。此外，學生可能因為不理解文章內容而無法以平板學習。看到學生使用平板的挫折、訊息接收問題以及教學進度落後時，研究者選擇在課堂減少使用平板，改為讓學生回家獨立完成平板作業，學生卻開始拒絕使用平板。反思與調整教學設計後，在行動後期，研究者提供學習鷹架，銜接軟體操作至學習表現任務，並考量學生特質與能力，整合平板與科技設備，提供學生多元視覺線索，讓學生可以利用平板做為溝通輔具，從迷思概念重新學習，研究者看到平板改善了課堂樣貌，學生也接受使用平板學習。綜合行動歷程的省思與對策，漸進引導平板融入課堂、教師需整合科技教學學科知識、運用科技提供聽障學生適切的溝通輔助是運用平板於地理閱讀課的可行方式。最後，提出本研究之限制與建議，提供運用平板於聽障學生教學之參考。

Purpose: This study considered the application of content reading strategies combined with tablet PCs to a geography reading class for secondary school students with hearing impairments to reduce the students' learning difficulties. An action research design was utilized to explore the possible barriers to encounter, the learning difficulties to emerge in the class of students with hearing impairments, and the successful coping strategies for this innovative learning condition. Methods: The geography reading class was designed and taught by the first author on the basis of the student needs and geography learning in middle schools. Ten students in grade 8-12 of a special school for students with hearing impairment were selected. Their levels of hearing impairment ranged from mild to severe, and their major communication mode varied from sign language to oral language and total communication with oral and sign language. The instruction consisted of thirty-three sessions within an academic year. Two researchers worked with four teachers in the school for validating the information of this study. Results/ Findings: Two stages were concluded in this study. In the early stage of the action, different concerns about using tablets were expressed between the administrative staff and researcher, which resulted in the problems of equipment management and checkout. At the beginning of the reading course, the researcher overestimated the student competences of using a tablet. Moreover, difficulties and complexities in integrating the tablets into geography reading for students with different levels of hearing impairment and communication modes emerged. Therefore, the researcher was exhausted by helping students with tablet operation problems during the class. Moreover, students were potentially unable to learn with a tablet because they could not comprehend the geography texts. When the instruction was far behind schedule, students were frustrated with using tablets, and reading comprehension was lacking, the researcher decided to reduce the use of tablets in class and change the using tablets for homework (which students were requested to do at home). However, students refused to use the tablets for the homework. Through reflections and adjustments of the researcher, the integration of pedagogical content knowledge and technological knowledge was tried in the second stage of the action. Considering student characteristics and competences, multiple visual cues were provided, so that students could use tablets as communication aids to discover misconceptions and to relearn. Due to an improved learning condition with more visual presentation when using tablets, students accepted the tablets and showed more competence and interest in using tablets for geographic reading. Conclusions/ Implications: To use tablets in geography reading for secondary students with hearing impairments, teachers must gradually introduce the use of tablets and integrate them into learning reading strategies step by step. Crucial factors include the integration of technology knowledge, pedagogy knowledge, and content knowledge. The teacher must provide appropriate communication assistance with visual cue during the use of tablet. Additional suggestions and limitations are expressed based on the current findings.

1. 王文科, Wen-Ke,王智弘, Chih-Hung(2010)。質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報，17，29-50。
   連結：
2. 朱惠甄, Hui-Chen,孟瑛如, Yin-Ru(2014)。資訊科技融入特殊教育現況與趨勢探討。特教論壇，17，52-71。
   連結：
3. 張筱薇, Hsiao-Wei,孟瑛如, Ying-Ru(2014)。國小特殊教育教師平板電腦之運用現況與需求調查研究。特教論壇，17，72-93。
   連結：
4. 郭孟倫, Meng-Lun,楊叔卿, Shwu-Ching(2015)。挑選平板電腦應用程式以協助英語低成就學習者之研究。教育傳播與科技研究，112，19-39。
   連結：
5. 蔡清田, Ching-Tien(2007)。課程行動研究的實踐之道。課程與教學，10(3)，75-89。
   連結：
6. 錡寶香, Pao-Hsiang(2011)。聽力損失幼童的早期讀寫萌發與支持。mpairment and the supportSpecial Education for the Elementary School，52，1-14。
   連結：
7. Baran, E.(2014).A review of research on mobile learning in teacher education.Educational Technology & Society,17(4),17-32.
8. Brown, C. L.(2007).Strategies for making social studies texts more comprehensible for English-language learners.The social studies,98(5),185-188.
9. Brush, T.,Saye, J. W.(2009).Strategies for preparing preservice social studies teachers to integrate technology effectively: models and practices.Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education,9(1),46-59.
10. Burke, J.(2009).Content area reading.New York, NY:Scholastic.
11. Chall, J. S.(1996).Stages of reading development.Orlando, FL:Harcourt Brace.
12. Clark, W., & Luckin, R. (2013). What the research says ipad in the classroom. London:Institute of Education University of London. Retrieved from https://digitalteachingandlearning.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/ipads-in-the-classroom-report-lkl.pdf
13. Dunn, J. (2012, May 5). 7 ways to keep students focused while using technology. Edudemic. Retrived from http://www.edudemic.com/7-ways-to-keep-students-focused-while-using-technology/
14. Easterbrooks, S. R.,Stephenson, B.(2006).An examination of twenty literacy, science, and mathematics practices used to educate students who are deaf or hard of hearing.American Annals of Deaf,151(4),385-397.
15. Gregg, M.,Sekeres, D. C.(2006).Supporting children’s reading of expository text in the geography classroom.The Reading Teacher,60(2),102-110.
16. Luckner, J. L.,Cooke, C.(2010).A summary of the vocabulary research with students who are deaf or hard of hearing.American Annals of the Deaf,155(1),38-67.
17. Luckner, J. L.,Handley, C. M.(2008).A summary of the reading comprehension research undertaken with students who are deaf or hard of hearing.American Annals of the Deaf,153(1),6-36.
18. Mishra, P.,Koehler, M. J.(2006).Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge.Teachers college record,108(6),1017-1054.
19. Ng, W.,Nicholas, H.(2013).A framework for sustainable mobile learning in schools.British Journal of Educational Technology,44(5),695-715.
20. Powell, S.(2014).Choosing iPad apps with a purpose: aligning skills and standards.Teaching Exceptional Children,47(1),20-26.
21. Schirmer, B. R.,McGough, S. M.(2005).Teaching reading to children who are deaf: do the conclusions of the national reading panel apply?.Review of Educational Research,75(1),83-117.
22. Sciuto, E. W.(2013).Washington University School of Medicine.
23. Shuler, C.,Levine, Z.,Ree, J.(2012).Shuler, C., Levine, Z., & Ree, J. (2012). iLearn II: an analysis of the education category of apple’s app store. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center. Retrieved from http://www.joanganzcooneycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ilearnii.pdfShuler, C., Levine, Z., & Ree, J. (2012). iLearn II: an analysis of the education category of apple’s app store. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center. Retrieved from http://www.joanganzcooneycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ilearnii.pdf,New York:The Joan Ganz Cooney Center.
24. Stauffer, E.(2017).TechTrends 2010-2015: a content analysis.TechTrends,61(2),147-154.
25. Swanson, E.,Wanzek, J.,Vaughn, S.,Roberts, G.,Fall, A.-M.(2015).Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge among middle school students with disabilities.Exceptional Children,81(4),426-442.
26. Traxler, C.(2000).The stanford achievement test, 9th edition: national norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing studnets [Abstract].Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education,5(4),337-348.
27. Vaughn, S.,Swanson, E. A.,Roberts, G.,Wanzek, J.,Stillman-Spisak, S. J.,Solis, M.,Simmons, D.(2013).Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school.Reading Research Quarterly,48(1),77-93.
28. Waters, S.,Kenna, J.,Bruce, D.(2016).Appsolutely perfect! Apps to support common core in the history/social studies classroom.The Social Studies,107(3),115-121.
29. 吳明隆, Ming-Lung(2005)。科技於教育上的應用原則─知識建構非知識教學。正修通識教育學報，2，311-336。
30. 李映伶, Ying-Ling(2002)。臺中=Taichung，國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所=National Taichung University of Education。
31. 李淑芬, Shu-Fen(2013)。新北=New Taipei City, Taiwan，淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班=Tamkang University。
32. 林寶貴, Bou-Kuei,黃玉枝, Yu-Chih(1997)。聽障學生國語文能力及錯誤類型之分析。特殊教育研究學刊，15，109-130。
33. 侯秋玲, Chiu-Ling,蔡曉楓, Shiao-Feng(2016)。閱讀理解策略融入國中社會領域教學初探。教育研究月刊，269，60-77。
34. 柯宏達, Hong-Da(2013)。新竹=Hsinchu，國立交通大學理學院科技與數位學習學程=National Chiao Tung University。
35. 柯華葳（編）, Hwa-Wei(ed.)(2017).閱讀理解策略教學.臺中=Taichung, Taiwan:教育部國民及學前教育署=K-12 education administration, Ministry of Education.
36. 洪儷瑜, Li-Yu,劉淑貞, Shu-Chen,李珮瑜, Pei-Yu(2015).國語文補救教學教戰手冊：解構語文精進教材.臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychology.
37. 胡茵音, Yin-Yin,陳明聰, Ming-Chung(2010)。電腦輔助學習對聽障學生學習成效之探討：以近十年碩博士論文為例。雲嘉特教，12，59-68。
38. 張淑品、張蓓莉、葉宗青（2014）：臺北市聽覺障礙學生中文閱讀能力調查（未出版）。臺北：臺北市聽障教育資源中心。[Chang, Shu-Pin, Chang, Bey-Lih, & Yeh, Chung-Ching (2014). Survey of Chinese reading ability of hearing impaired students in Taipei City. Unpublished manuscript. Taipei: Taipei Resource Center for the Hearing Impaired.]
39. 張蓓莉, Bey-Lih,韓福榮, Fu-Jong,蘇芳柳, Fang-Liu(2010).短句閱讀理解能力測驗指導手冊.臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:教育部=Ministry of Education.
40. 張德銳, Der-Ray,丁一顧, Yi-Ku,簡賢昌, Hsien-Chang,高紅瑛, Hung-Ying,李建民, Chien-Ming,李俊達, Chun-Dar,林芳如, Fong-Rue,高敏麗, Min-Li,張淑娟, Shu-Chuan,鄒小蘭, Shiao-Lan,蔡美錦, Mei-Ching(2014).教學行動研究：實務手冊與理論介紹.臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Hi-Education Press.
41. 教育部（2014）：十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。國家教育研究院，取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-7944,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw。[Ministry of Education (2014). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: general guidelines. Retrieved form https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-7944,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw]
42. 陳小娟（編）, H. C.(ed.),邢敏華（編）, M. H.(ed.),Andrews, J. F.,Leigh, I. W.,Weiner, M. T.(2007).失聰者：心理、教育及社會轉變中的觀點.臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychology.
43. 陳海泓, Hai-Hon(2011)。說明文體的閱讀理解教學。教師天地，172，28-36。
44. 蔡美華（譯）, M. H.(Trans.),Mills, G. E.(2003).行動研究法.臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:學富文化=PRO-ED.
45. 課文本位閱讀理解教學研發團隊（2018）：國中閱讀教學策略與成分表。取自https://pair.nknu.edu.tw/pair_System/Search_index.aspx?PN=Reader2 [Development team of Textbook-Base Reading Comprehension Instruction (2018). Reading comprehension strategy components in junior high school. Retrieved form https://pair.nknu.edu.tw/pair_System/Search_index.aspx?PN=Reader2]
46. 蕭坤松, Kun-Sung,戴彩霞, Cai-Xia,楊嵐雅, Lan-Ya,王翠華, Tsui-Hua,呂展曄, Chan-Yeh,莊宗達, Zung-Da,黃美傳, Mei-Chuan(2013).新聞地理 2─老師應該告訴你的時事真相.新北=New Taipei City, Taiwan:遠足文化=Walkers.
47. 蕭坤松, Kun-Sung,戴彩霞, Cai-Xia,楊嵐雅, Lan-Ya,王翠華, Tsui-Hua,呂展曄, Chan-Yeh,莊宗達, Zung-Da,黃美傳, Mei-Chuan,郭靜茹, Jing-Ru(2012).新聞地理 - 完全看懂時事的 20 堂地理課.新北=New Taipei City, Taiwan:遠足文化=Walkers.
48. 魏立欣（譯）, L. H.(trans.),Roblyer, M. D.(2004).教育科技融入教學.臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Hi-Education Press.