题名

學習障礙與一般學生學業自我概念與學業成就之比較：內外參照架構模式

并列篇名

Comparison of Academic Self-Concept and Academic Achievement of Students With and Without Learning Disabilities: Internal/External Frame of Reference Model

DOI

10.6172/BSE.202111_46(3).0003

作者

張萬烽(Wan-Feng Chang)

关键词

內／外參照架構 ； 徑路分析 ； 學習障礙學生 ； 學業成就 ； 學業自我概念 ； academic self-concept ； achievement ； internal/external frame of reference model ； learning disabilities ； path analysis

期刊名称

特殊教育研究學刊

卷期/出版年月

46卷3期（2021 / 11 / 30）

页次

57 - 86

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

以往認為學習障礙學生的學業表現低於一般學生，也連帶的將使其學業自我概念受到影響，過去曾有研究針對學障學生整體學業自我概念加以探究，但對於特定學業自我概念則較少探討。若能瞭解學障學生特定學業成就是否對其學業自我概念有所影響，與一般學生之間是否有所不同，就能作為介入上的參考。本研究以106學年度高雄市國小三到五年級一般學生791名和學障學生353名為研究對象，比較兩個群體在學業成就、學業自我概念上的差異，並且以內外參照架構模式來瞭解兩個群體之學業成就與學業自我概念間的關係。結果發現，一般學生與學障學生在國語和數學成就的差異達大效果量；再者，自我概念方面，控制學科表現後兩個群體間的國語自我概念沒有差異，數學自我概念則是學障學生優於一般學生。至於內外參照架構的結果上，不同年級的一般學生在同一科目的學業成就與自我概念間的相關均達顯著水準，顯示社會比較能力已存在。不同年級的學障學生同一科目的成就與自我概念間均未有顯著相關，不同科目學業成就與另外一科的學業自我概念間也無顯著關連，因此社會比較和向度比較能力均尚未建立。根據研究結果，提出建議以做為未來研究與實務上之參考。
英文摘要

Purpose: Because of neuropsychological deficits, students with learning disabilities (LDs) often experience difficulties in reading, writing, and numeracy. In the past, students with LDs who experienced difficulties in specific areas of academic functioning could be expected to develop academic self-concepts (ASCs) that are less positive than those of their peers without LDs. Research on the self-concepts of students with LDs has focused on understanding the students' general ASCs, rather their ASCs in specific subjects. An understanding of whether the academic achievements of students with LDs in specific subjects affect their ASCs and whether their ASCs differ from those of students without LDs could be used as a reference for intervention. The internal/external frame of reference model (I/E model) emphasizes that when individuals form ASCs, they mainly do so through two comparison processes. The first is social (external) comparison, in which individuals compare themselves with their peers. For example, students use peers' comparative academic achievement in a specific subject to evaluate their own academic performance. If a student believes that their mathematics performance is inferior to others', they may develop a negative mathematics self-concept. The second comparison is dimensional (internal); students compare their own academic achievements in different subjects to form their ASCs. If an individual's achievement in mathematics is higher than that in Chinese, their mathematics self-concept may be superior. Through these joint internal and external comparison processes, the individual's self-concept in each subject is eventually formed. Whether students with LDs also compare their performance in different subjects, leading to low correlations among their subject-specific self-concepts, is worthy of discussion. In addition, if students without LDs can be used as a reference group for understanding the academic performance of students with LDs in Chinese and mathematics, the relationship between those students' academic performance levels and ASCs can be used as a reference for learning and teaching interventions. This study investigated the differences in the academic achievements and ASCs of students with and without LDs by using the I/E model to understand the relationship between their academic achievement and ASCs. Methods: This study enrolled third- through fifth-grade students with and without LDs taking courses in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, during the first semester of the 2017 academic year. Stratified sampling by level of urbanization (low, low to moderate, moderate, and high) was performed. After obtaining consent from the students' parents, this study enrolled 791 students without LDs, comprising 271 third-grade students, 266 fourth-grade students, and 254 fifth-grade students from 13 elementary schools. This study recruited 1089 third- through fifth-grade students determined to have LDs, comprising 276 third-grade students, 358 fourth-grade students, and 455 fifth-grade students. Ultimately, this study enrolled 353 students with LDs, comprising 106 third-grade students, 122 fourth-grade students, and 125 fifth-grade students. These students were recruited from special education classes in 55 elementary schools. Moreover, the test instructions provided to the schools indicated that the participating students with LDs should not receive the test in their regular classes and that the teachers of their special education classes should administer the test instead. The research tools adopted in this study included a self-developed ASC scale and academic achievement tests for Chinese and mathematics. After the surveys were conducted, descriptive statistics, t testing, one-way analysis of variance, item analysis, product-moment correlation testing, and exploratory factor analysis, were performed using SPSS 21.0 software. In addition, this study employed WINSTEP 3.66 software to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese and mathematics achievement tests. Results/ Findings: The differences in academic achievement in Chinese and mathematics between the students with and without LDs were significant. When achievement was controlled for, the two groups did not differ significantly in their total Chinese self-concept scores. However, after control math achievement, the two groups' mathematics self-concepts differed significantly: The adjusted means indicated a more positive mathematics self-concept among students in the LD group. However, the effect size for this difference was small. From the perspective of the I/E model, the third- through fifth-grade students without LDs exhibited significant and positive correlations between their achievement and ASC in a particular subject, indicating that social comparison exerted a significant effect, whereas the students had likely not yet performed dimensional comparison. Among the students with LDs, no significant within-domain correlations were observed between students' subject-specific achievement levels and ASCs, nor was a cross-domain relationship observed, indicating that elementary students with LDs might have difficulties employing social and dimensional comparison to form ASCs. On the basis of these findings and the assumptions of the I/E model, this study determined that the elementary students without LDs were capable of social comparison but not yet capable of dimensional comparison. The students with LDs were ostensibly incapable of social or dimensional comparison. In general, although the academic achievement of students with LDs was lower than that of students without LDs, their mathematics self-concept was slightly more positive than that of students without LDs. Furthermore, according to the I/E model, the students with LDs exhibited lower self-awareness of their abilities than did the students without LDs. Conclusions/Implications: Future studies can build upon this research by accounting for the effect of temporal comparison, comparing students with LDs in different settings (for example, in general classrooms versus in resource classrooms), and comparing students with LDs with low-achieving students without LDs. In practice, teachers can help students with LDs by encouraging them to improve their understanding of themselves, setting appropriate learning goals, establishing an interpersonal support system, and providing special education services to enable students with LDs to increase the accuracy of their self-perceptions.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 張萬烽, Wan-Feng,吳裕益, Yuh-Yih(2012)。學習障礙學生在國中基測數學科上表現與試題差異功能分析。特殊教育與復健學報，26，45-70。
    連結：
  2. 趙善如, Shan-Ru,王仕圖, Shu-Twu,許坋妃, Fen-Fei,李慧玲, Hui-Ling(2012)。與政府的合作－親屬寄養照顧者的照顧經驗。臺灣社會福利學刊，10(2)，37-91。
    連結：
  3. Arens, A. K.,Preckel, F.(2018).Testing the internal/external frame of reference model with elementary school children: Extension to physical ability and intrinsic value.Contemporary Educational Psychology,54,199-211.
  4. Bear, G.,Minke, K. M.,Manning, M. A.(2002).Self-concept of students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis.School Psychology Review,31(3),405-427.
  5. Bracken B.A(Ed.)(1996).Handbook of self-concept.New York:Wiley.
  6. Chapman, J. W.(1988).Learning disabled children's self-concept.Review of Educational Research,58(3),347-371.
  7. Chen, S. K.,Yeh, Y. C.,Hwang, F. M.,Lin, Sunny S. J.(2013).The relationship between academic self-concept and achievement: A multicohort-multioccasion study.Learning and Individual Differences,23,172-178.
  8. Donohue, D.,Wise, J. C.,Romski, M.,Henrich, C. C.,Sevcik, R. A.(2010).self-concept development and measurement in children with mild intellectual disabilities.Developmental Neurorehabilitation,13(5),322-334.
  9. Dyson, L. L.(1996).The experiences of families of children with learning disabilities: Parental stress, family functioning, and sibling self-concept.Journal of Learning Disabilities,29(3),280-286.
  10. Eccles, J.,Wigfield, A.,Harold, R.,Blumenfeld, P.(1993).Age and gender differences in children’s achievement self-perceptions during the elementary school years.Child Development,64(3),830-847.
  11. Ehm, J. H.,Lindberg, S.,Hasselhorn, M.(2013).Reading, writing, and math self-concept in elementary school children: Influence of dimensional comparison processes.European Journal of Psychology of Education,29,277-294.
  12. Elbaum, B.(2002).The self-concept of students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of comparisons across different placements.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,17(4),216-226.
  13. Festinger, L.(1954).A theory of social comparison processes.Human Relations,7(2),117-140.
  14. Gans, A. M.,Kenny, M. C.,Ghany, D. L.(2003).Comparing the self-concept of students with and without learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities,36(3),287-295.
  15. Goldberg, R. J.,Higgins, E. L.,Raskind, M. H.,Herman, K. L.(2003).Predictors of success in individuals with learning disabilities: A qualitative analysis of a 20-year longitudinal study.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,18(4),222-236.
  16. Guo, J.,Marsh, H. W.,Philip, D.,Parker, P. D.,Dicke, T.(2018).Cross-cultural generalizability of social and dimensional comparison effects on reading, math, and science self-concepts for primary school students using the combined PIRLS and TIMSS data.Learning and Instruction,58,210-219.
  17. Job, J. M.,Klassen, R. M.(2012).Predicting performance on academic and non-academic tasks: A comparison of adolescents with and without learning disabilities.Contemporary Educational Psychology,37(2),162-169.
  18. Kistner, J.,Osborne, M.(1987).A longitudinal study of LD children’s self-evaluations.Learning Disability Quarterly,10(4),258-266.
  19. Lackaye, T. D.,Margalit, M.(2006).Comparisons of achievement, effort, and selfperceptions among students with learning disabilities and their peers from different achievement groups.Journal of Learning Disabilities,39(5),432-446.
  20. Linacre, J. M. (2008). Misfit diagnosis: Infit Outfit mean-square standardized. Winsteps Help for Rasch Analysis. http://www.winsteps.com/winman/index.htm? diagnosingmisfit.htm
  21. Lindberg, S.,Linkersdörfer, J.,Ehm, J. H.,Hasselhorn, M.,Lonnemann, J.(2013).Gender differences in children’s math self-concept in the first years of elementary school.Journal of Education and Learning,2(3),1-8.
  22. Lohbeck, A.,Möller, J.(2017).Social and dimensional comparison effects on math and reading self-concepts of elementary school children.Learning and Individual Differences,54,73-81.
  23. Makhubu, S. S.(2014).Zululand,Department of Educational Psychology and Special Education at the University of Zululand.
  24. Marsh, H. W.(1990).The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model of educational psychology.Journal of Educational Psychology,82(4),623-636.
  25. Marsh, H. W.(1986).Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model.American Educational Research Journal,23(1),129-149.
  26. Marsh, H. W.(2007).Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology.Leicester, UK:British Psychological Society.
  27. Marsh, H. W.,Abdijabbar, A. S.,Parker, P. D.,Morin, A. J. S.,Abedlfattah, M,Nagengast, B.,Möller, J.,Abu-Huilal, M. M.(2015).The internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept and achievement relations: Age-cohort and cross-cultural differences.American Educational Research Journal,52(1),168-202.
  28. Marsh, H. W.,Barnes, J.,Cairns, L.,Tidman, M.(1984).Self-Description Questionnaire: Age and sex effects in the structure and level of self-concept for preadolescent children.Journal of Educational Psychology,76(5),940-956.
  29. Marsh, H. W.,Hau, K. T.(2004).Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concept and achievements: Crosscultural generalizability of the Internal/External Frame of Reference predictions across 26 countries.Journal of Educational Psychology,96(1),56-67.
  30. Marsh, H. W.,Köller, O.(2004).Unification of theoretical models of academic self-concept/achievement relations: Reunification of east and west German school systems after the fall of the Berlin Wall.Contemporary Educational Psychology,29(3),264-282.
  31. Marsh, H. W.,Yeung, A. S.(1997).Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data.Journal of Educational Psychology,89(1),41-54.
  32. Marsh, H.W.,Ayotte, V.(2003).Do multiple dimensions of self-concept become more differentiated with age? The differential distinctiveness hypothesis.Journal of Educational Psychology,95(4),687-706.
  33. Möller, J.(2016).The Generalized Internal/External Frame of Reference Model: An Extension to Dimensional Comparison Theory.Frontline Learning Research,4(2),1-11.
  34. Möller, J.,Köller, O.(2001).Dimensional comparisons: An experimental approach to the internal/external frame of reference model.Journal of Educational Psychology,93(4),826-835.
  35. Möller, J.,Marsh, H. W.(2013).Dimensional comparison theory.Psychological Review,120(3),544-560.
  36. Möller, J.,Pohlmann, B.,Köller, O,Marsh, H. W.(2009).A meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept.Review of Educational Research,79(3),1129-1167.
  37. Möller, J.,Streblow, L.,Pohlmann, B.(2009).Achievement and self-concept of students with learning disabilities.Social Psychology of Education,12,113-122.
  38. Möller, J.,Zimmermann, F.,Köller, O.(2014).The reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model using grades and test scores.The British Journal of Educational Psychology,84(4),591-611.
  39. Mui, F. L. L.,Yeung, A. S.,Low, R.,Jin, P.(2000).Academic self-concept of talented students: Factor structure and applicability of the internal/external frame of reference model.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,23(3),343-367.
  40. Müller-Kalthoff, H.,Helm, F.,Möller, J.(2017).The big three of comparative judgment: on the effects of social, temporal, and dimensional comparisons on academic self-concept.Social Psychology of Education,20,849-873.
  41. Murray, C.,Goldstein, D. E.,Nourse, S.,Edgar, E.(2000).The postsecondary school attendance and completion rates of high school graduates with learning disabilities.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,15(3),119-127.
  42. Niepel, C.,Brunner, M.,Preckel, F.(2014).Achievement goals, academic self-concept, and school grades in mathematics: Longitudinal reciprocal relations in above average ability secondary school students.Contemporary Educational Psychology,39(4),301-313.
  43. Phye, G.(Ed.)(1997).Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment.Orlando, FL:Academic Press.
  44. Pinxten, M.,Wouters, S.,Preckel, F.,Niepel, C.,De Fraine, Bieke,Verschueren, K.(2015).The formation of academic self-concept in elementary education: A unifying model for external and internal comparisons.Contemporary Educational Psychology,41,124-132.
  45. Prout, H. T.,Marcal, S. D.,Marcal, D. C.(1992).A meta-analysis of self-reported personality characteristic of children and adolescents with learning disabilities.Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,10(1),59-64.
  46. Renick, M. J.,Harter, S.(1989).Impact of social comparisons on the developing self perceptions of learning disabled students.Journal of Educational Psychology,81(4),631-638.
  47. Schmidt, I.,Brunner, M.,Keller, L.,Scherrer, V.,Wollschlager, R.,Baudson, T. G.,Preckel, F.(2017).Profile formation of academic self-concept in elementary school students in grades 1 to 4.PLoS ONE,12(5),e0177854.
  48. Stone, C.,May, A.(2002).The accuracy of academic self-evaluations in adolescents with learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities,35(4),370-383.
  49. Strein, W.(2006).Self-concept and learning disabilities: The early childhood longitudinal study results.Annual Convention of the National Association of School Psychologists,Anaheim, CA:
  50. Strein, W.,Signor-Buhl, S.(2005).Academic self-concepts of adolescents with learning disabilities: A large-scale database study.Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association,Washington:
  51. Sze, S.,Valentin, S.(2007).Self-concept and children with disabilities.Education,127(4),552-557.
  52. Szenczi, B.,Kis, N.,Józsa, K.(2018).Academic self-concept and mastery motivation in students with learning disabilities.Journal of Psychological and Educational Research,26(2),89-113.
  53. Tabachnick, B. G.,Fidell, L. S.(2012).Using multivariate statistics.Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
  54. Vaughn, S.,Haager, D.,Hogan, A.,Kouzekanani, K.(1992).Self-concept and peer acceptance in students with learning disabilities: A four- to five-year prospective study.Journal of Educational Psychology,84(1),43-50.
  55. Williams, J. E.,Montgomery, D.(1995).Using frame of reference theory to understand the self-concept of academically able students.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,18(4),399-409.
  56. Wolff, F.,Helm, F.,Zimmermann, F.,Nagy, G.,Möller, J.(2018).On the effects of social, temporal, and dimensional comparisons on academic self-concept.Journal of Educational Psychology,110(7),1005-1025.
  57. Yvette, R.,Lindsay, T.(1999).Structural equation modeling with Lisrel: Application in tourism.Tourism Management,20(1),71-88.
  58. Zeleke, S.(2004).Self-concepts of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers: A review.European Journal of Special Needs Education,19(2),145-170.
  59. Zheng, C.,Gaumer, E. A.,Kingston, N. M.,Noonan, P. M.(2012).The relationship among self-determination, self-concept, and academic achievement for students with learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities,47(5),462-474.
  60. 何美瑩, Ming-Ying(2014)。高雄=Kaohsiung，國立高雄師範大學教育系=National Kaohsiung Normal University。
  61. 吳裕益, Yuh-Yih,侯雅齡, Ya Ling(2000).國小兒童自我概念量表.臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:心理出版社=Psychological publishing.
  62. 李靜吟, Ching-Yin(2013)。臺北=Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系在職進修碩士班=National Taiwan Normal University。
  63. 洪羿蓁, Yi-Chen(2012)。桃園=Taoyuan，國立中央大學學習與教學研究所=National Central University。
  64. 國家教育研究院（2020）：十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校數學領域。[ National Academy for Educational Research (2020). The 12-Year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines in the elementary, middle schools and general senior middle schools in the mathematics.] https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/49/pta_18524_6629744_60029.pdf
  65. 國家教育研究院（2017）：106 年協助縣市辦理學生學習能力檢測國語文二年級施測結果報告。[ National Academy for Educational Research (2017). The report in 2017 of assisted counties and cities to implement the grade 2 Chinese test results of students' learning ability.] http://oldboe.chc.edu.tw/sub/education_01/upfile/undefine1711130929.pdf
  66. 溫國珍, Kuo-Chen(2012)。彰化=Changhua，國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學碩士班=National Changhua University of Education。
  67. 詹文宏, Wen-Heng(2005)。彰化=Changhua，國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系=National Changhua University of Education。
  68. 趙曉美, Hsiao-Mei(2001)。臺北=Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所=National Taiwan Normal University。
被引用次数
  1. 張萬烽(2023)。國小學習障礙學生與一般學生自我效能、家長支持以及心理健康之縱貫研究。教育心理學報，55(1)，125-151。
  2. (2024).Effects of Academic Achievement and Academic Self-Concept on the Self-Efficacy and Mental Health of Students with Learning Disabilities.教育心理學報,56(1),101-125.
print cancel