题名

使用手語的聽損者對中文語意不透明詞的運作與記憶表現

并列篇名

Morphological processing and memory performance of Chinese semantic opaque words among deaf signers

DOI

10.6172/BSE.202207_47(2).0002

作者

邱倚璿(Yi-Shiuan Chiu)

关键词

聽損者／聾人 ； 詞彙表徵 ； 詞素分解 ； 構詞 ； 語意透明度 ； Deaf ； Lexical representation ； Morphological decomposition ； Morphology ； Semantic transparency

期刊名称

特殊教育研究學刊

卷期/出版年月

47卷2期（2022 / 07 / 30）

页次

33 - 64

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本研究操弄語意透明度，探討有臺灣手語經驗聽損者的中文構詞與神經電位運作機制。語意透明度詞分為透明詞（如平坦）與不透明詞（如花生），透明詞是指全詞語意可從組成字（詞素）語意得知，不透明詞則較難從詞素的語意獲得全詞語意。本研究假設：若詞彙以全詞表徵運作，透明詞與不透明詞的行為與腦電波結果應不會有差異；若會進行詞素分解後彙整，由於不透明詞詞素與全詞語意不一致，會需要較多認知資源彙整；若有些詞彙偏向詞素分解，有些以全詞表徵，兩種運作平行地激發，則為雙路徑模式。受試者包含28位聽力正常的聽常者，以及28位流利使用臺灣手語的聽損者。詞彙判斷作業中，受試者需判斷是否為合理的中文詞，之後在未預期下進行記憶作業，判斷詞彙是否出現過（新詞，舊詞），並評估當下記憶判斷的信心（記得／確定、知道／不確定）。結果發現在詞彙作業中，兩族群對不透明詞有較正確、較快反應時間，但腦電波結果相反，聽損者對透明詞有較負向電位，聽常者則是不透明詞。記憶作業中，兩族群對不透明詞有較高正確率與信心評估，但聽常者對不透明詞有較高敏感度，不透明詞的新詞比舊詞有更負向腦波，聽損者這兩項未有差異。這顯示出聽常者對詞彙進行詞素分解，不透明詞需要較多認知資源彙整，但也形成更凸顯的記憶表現；聽損者對透明詞採詞素分解，不透明詞則仰賴全詞表徵，支持雙路徑模式。此結果揭示出流利使用手語的聽損者，會發展出適合中文構詞知識與運作，以達詞彙理解的目的。
英文摘要

Purpose: In this study, we manipulated the semantic transparency of Chinese words to investigate how deaf individuals recognize morphologically complex Chinese words. We applied a lexical decision task and an incidental memory old/new recognition task by using behavioral and event-related-potential (ERP) recordings. The semantic transparency of Chinese words includes transparent and opaque words. Transparent words are words whose meanings can be derived from their constitutive characters (e.g., 平坦, flat), whereas opaque words are words whose meanings can rarely be predicted from any character (e.g., 花生, peanut). From this perspective, the similarity between transparent and opaque words is that they encompass two independent processes of constructing morpheme meanings and whole-word meanings, while the main difference is in the process of integrating conflicting meanings between morphemes and whole words. Opaque words suffer more conflict of meanings than transparent ones. The differences between transparent and opaque words reflect the direct impact of lexical semantics. We hypothesized that if participants processed any two-character Chinese word as a whole-word unit, transparent and opaque words would elicit similar behavioral results or exhibit similar electrophysiological waves. Conversely, if participants unavoidably decomposed a Chinese two-character word into two morphemes, the opaque words would require more effort to integrate the conflicting meanings between morphemes and whole words. For transparent and opaque words, differences would be evident in behavioral or electrophysiological results. Because one-to-one mappings between the Taiwanese Sign Language (TSL) lexicon and Chinese characters are lacking, some scholars have expressed concerns that earlier knowledge of TSL might disturb Chinese word learning. This study sought to provide clear scientific evidence concerning Chinese morphological processing among deaf signers. Methods: This study recruited 28 deaf signers with fluent TSL (16 females; age range: 25 to 55 years; mean age: 35.57 years) and 28 people with hearing and without any sign language experience (18 females; age range: 21 to 51 years; mean age: 31.46 years). Deaf participants were prelingually and profoundly deaf, with a hearing loss of 85 dB or more. These deaf participants acquired TSL as their first or predominant language (age of acquisition: 1 to 18 years; mean: 8.29 years) and completed at least senior high school. On a 0 to 5 scale (0 = low proficiency, 5 = high proficiency), deaf participants rated their proficiency in TSL communication and their reading abilities in written Mandarin on average at 4.04 and 3.71, respectively. The lexical decision task consisted of 120 two-character Chinese words. One hundred twenty two-character pseudo-words were generated by rearranging Chinese characters not used in this experiment. An additional 20 participants (6 males; mean age: 20.6 years) provided ratings of transparency (0 = most opaque, 10 = most transparent). According to the transparency results, 60 transparent words (mean = 6.98) and 60 opaque words (mean = 0.97) were significantly different. The frequencies of transparent words (32.33 per million) and opaque words (32.30 per million) were statistically nonsignificant. Participants decided whether the two-character words were real Chinese words or pseudo-words. After finishing the lexical decision task, participants undertook an incidental memory task in which they had to make an ＂old or new＂ judgment and then make a ＂remember (sure) or know (not sure)＂ judgment while presenting an instruction of memory certainty. Old words referred to the 52 Chinese words previously shown in the lexical decision task, whereas new words were the 52 Chinese words not shown in the lexical task. Half of the old words were transparent words, and the other half were opaque words. The electrophysiological data were recorded from 32 Ag/AgCl electrodes mounted on an electrode cap using SynAmps amplifiers and arranged according to the extended 10-20 location system. We focused on Fz, FCz, Cz, and Pz electrodes. In the lexical decision task, the electrophysiological signals between 100 and 600 ms after stimulus onset were separated into a series of 50-ms time windows to provide details regarding the time course of activation. In the memory task, the electrophysiological signals of a series of 50-ms time windows were analyzed between 300 ms and 600 ms after stimulus onset. Results: The behavioral results of lexical decision tasks indicated that the accuracies for the transparent and opaque words were 0.86 and 0.93, respectively, among the deaf group and 0.94 and 0.97, respectively, among the hearing group. The correct reaction times for the transparent and opaque words were 656 ms and 632 ms among the deaf group and 644 ms and 622 ms among the group with hearing. Both groups exhibited higher accuracy and faster reaction times for opaque words. However, the electrophysiological results revealed increased negative waves for transparent words between 150 ms and 600 ms on the Cz and Pz among deaf individuals and between 100 ms and 550 ms on the Fz for opaque words among participants with hearing. In the memory task, deaf participants recorded scores on the transparent and opaque words of 0.60 and 0.63 in accuracy, respectively, 1.13 and 1.15 in sensitivity, respectively, and 0.68 and 0.73 in memory confidence, respectively. For participants with hearing, their scores for transparent and opaque words were 0.60 and 0.69 in accuracy, respectively, 0.85 and 1.29 in sensitivity, respectively, and 0.70 and 0.83 in memory confidence, respectively. Both groups had higher accuracy and more confidence in recognizing opaque words. Deaf participants had different old and new word ERP patterns between 300 ms and 350 ms on the FCz and between 450 ms and 600 ms on the FCz and Cz. However, deaf participants exhibited no differences in sensitivity or ERP signals between transparent and opaque words. The group with hearing demonstrated higher sensitivity for opaque words and more negative ERP signals for opaque old words than for opaque new words, with signals ranging between 450 ms and 500 ms on the Pz and between 500 ms and 600 ms on the four electrodes. Conclusion: These findings indicated that individuals with hearing consistently decomposed whole Chinese words into smaller morphemes during lexical access processing. The incongruence between opaque words' lexical and sublexical meanings became more distinct and easier to remember for people with hearing. The current study provides evidence of a dual-route view for deaf signers who decompose transparent words into smaller morphemes and process opaque words as whole-form units. The findings indicate that fluent deaf signers develop adaptive Chinese morphological knowledge and processes for lexical comprehension.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 王宣惠, H.-H.,洪儷瑜, L.-Y.,辜玉旻, Y.-M.(2012)。小學中年級學童詞素覺識與閱讀理解之相關研究。當代教育研究季刊，20(1)，123-164。
    連結：
  2. 張苾含, P.-H.,胡潔芳, C.-F.,陳俊光, Fred J.-G.(2013)。英漢雙語學童聲韻覺識及構詞覺識與英漢認字能力之相關研究。教育心理學報，45(2)，201-219。
    連結：
  3. 廖晨惠, C.-H.,吳靜芬, C.-F.(2011)。閱讀困難兒童與一般兒童詞素覺識能力之研究。測驗統計年刊，19，13-28。
    連結：
  4. 劉秀丹, H.-T.,曾進興, C.-H.(2007)。文法手語構詞語句法特性對聾生詞義與句義理解的影響。特殊教育研究學刊，32(1)，77-92。
    連結：
  5. 劉秀丹, H.-T.,曾進興, C.-H.,張勝成, S.-C.(2006)。啟聰學校學生文法手語、自然手語及書面語故事理解能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，30，113-133。
    連結：
  6. 劉秀丹, H.-T.,曾進興, C.-H.,劉俊榮, C.-J.(2009)。自然手語與文法手語的詞彙記憶廣度比較。特殊教育研究學刊，34(3)，25-45。
    連結：
  7. Andin, J.,Orfanidou, E.,Cardin, V.,Holmer, E.,Capek, C. M.,Woll, B.,Rönnberg, J.,Rudner, M.(2013).Similar digit-based working memory in deaf signers and hearing non-signers despite digit span differences.Frontiers in Psychology,4,942.
  8. Andrew, K. N.,Hoshooley, J.,Joanisse, M. F.(2014).Sign language ability in young deaf signers predicts comprehension of written sentences in English.PLoS One,9(2),e89994.
  9. Baayen, R. H.,Dijkstra, T.,Schreuder, R.(1997).Singulars and plurals in dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model.Journal of Memory and Language,37(1),94-117.
  10. Bavelier, D.,Newman, A. J.,Mukherjee, M.,Hauser, P.,Kemeny, S.,Braun, A.,Boutla, M.(2008).Encoding, rehearsal, and recall in signers and speakers: Shared network but differential engagement.Cerebral Cortex,18(10),2263-2274.
  11. Bavelier, D.,Newport, E. L.,Hall, M.,Supalla, T.,Boutla, M.(2008).Ordered short-term memory differs in signers and speakers: Implications for models of short-term memory.Cognition,107(2),433-459.
  12. Bellugi, U.,Tzeng, O.,Klima, E. S.,Fok, A.(1989).Dyslexia: Perspectives from sign and script.From reading to neurons. Issues in the biology of language and cognition
  13. Berninger, V. W.,Abbott, R. D.,Nagy, W.,Carlisle, J.(2010).Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,39(2),141-163.
  14. Berthiaume, R.,Daigle, D.(2014).Morphological processing and learning to read: The case of deaf children.Deafness and Education International,16(4),185-203.
  15. Bowers, L.,McCarthy, J. H.,Schwarz, I.,Dostal, H.,Wolbers, K.(2014).Examination of the spelling skills of middle school students who are deaf and hard of hearing.The Volta Review,114(1),29-54.
  16. Breadmore, H. L.,Krott, A.,Olson, A. C.(2014).Agreeing to disagree: Deaf and hearing children's awareness of subject–verb number agreement.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,67(3),474-498.
  17. Butterworth, B.(Ed.)(1983).Language production (Vol. II): Development, writing and other language processes.Academic Press.
  18. Castles, A.,Rastle, K.,Nation, K.(2018).Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert.Psychological Science in the Public Interest,19(1),5-51.
  19. Ceccagno, A.,Basciano, B.(2007).Compound headedness in Chinese: An analysis of neologisms.Morphology,17(2),207-231.
  20. Ching, B. H.-H.,Nunes, T.(2015).Concurrent correlates of Chinese word recognition in deaf and hard-of-hearing children.Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education,20(2),172-190.
  21. Chung, W.-L.,Hu, C.-F.(2007).Morphological awareness and learning to read Chinese.Reading and Writing,20(5),441-461.
  22. Clahsen, H.,Felser, C.,Neubauer, K.,Sato, M.,Silva, R.(2010).Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing.Language Learning,60(1),21-43.
  23. Clark, M.,Gilbert, G.,Anderson, M.(2011).Morphological knowledge and decoding skills of deaf readers.Psychology,2(2),109-116.
  24. Cooper, R. L.(1967).The ability of deaf and hearing children to apply morphological rules.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,10(1),77-86.
  25. Cuetos, F.,Barbón, A.(2006).Word naming in Spanish.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,18(3),415-436.
  26. Curran, T.(2004).Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity.Neuropsychologia,42(8),1088-1106.
  27. Deacon, S. H.,Kirby, J. R.(2004).Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development.Applied Psycholinguistics,25(2),223-238.
  28. Diependaele, K.,Duñabeitia, J. A.,Morris, J.,Keuleers, E.(2011).Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition.Journal of Memory and Language,64(4),344-358.
  29. Düzel, E.,Yonelinas, A. P.,Mangun, G. R.,Heinze, H.-J.,Tulving, E.(1997).Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awarenessinmemory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,94(11),5973-5978.
  30. Fiorentino, R.,Naito-Billen, Y.,Bost, J.,Fund-Reznicek, E.(2014).Electrophysiological evidence for the morpheme-based combinatoric processing of English compounds.Cognitive Neuropsychology,31(1-2),123-146.
  31. Fiorentino, R.,Poeppel, D.(2007).Compound words and structure in the lexicon.Language and Cognitive Processes,22(7),953-1000.
  32. Fracasso, L. E.,Bangs, K.,Binder, K. S.(2016).The contributions of phonological and morphological awareness to literacy skills in the adult basic education population.Journal of Learning Disabilities,49(2),140-151.
  33. Friederici, A. D.,Kotz, S. A.,Werheid, K.,Hein, G.,von Cramon, D. Y.(2003).Syntactic comprehension in Parkinson's disease: Investigating early automatic and late integrational processes using event-related brain potentials.Neuropsychology,17(1),133-142.
  34. Frisson, S.,Niswander-Klement, E.,Pollatsek, A.(2008).The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words.British Journal of Psychology,99(1),87-107.
  35. Gao, F.,Wang, J.,Zhao, C. G.,Yuan, Z.(2021).Word or morpheme? Investigating the representation units of L1 and L2 Chinese compound words in mental lexicon using a repetition priming paradigm.International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,1-15.
  36. Gaustad, M. G.,Kelly, R. R.(2004).The relationship between reading achievement and morphological word analysis in deaf and hearing students matched for reading level.Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education,9(3),269-285.
  37. Gaustad, M. G.,Kelly, R. R.,Payne, J.-A.,Lylak, E.(2002).Deaf and hearing students' morphological knowledge applied to printed English.American Annals of the Deaf,147(5),5-21.
  38. Geraci, C.,Gozzi, M.,Papagno, C.,Cecchetto, C.(2008).How grammar can cope with limited short-term memory: Simultaneity and seriality in sign languages.Cognition,106(2),780-804.
  39. Goldin-Meadow, S.,Mayberry, R. I.(2001).How do profoundly deaf children learn to read?.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,16(4),222-229.
  40. Grainger, J.,Holcomb, P. J.(2009).Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition.Language and Linguistics Compass,3(1),128-156.
  41. Guo, L.-Y.,Spencer, L. J.,Tomblin, J. B.(2013).Acquisition of tense marking in English-speaking children with cochlear implants: A longitudinal study.Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education,18(2),187-205.
  42. Han, Y.-J.,Huang, S.-c.,Lee, C.-Y.,Kuo, W.-J.,Cheng, S.-k.(2014).The modulation of semantic transparency on the recognition memory for two-character Chinese words.Memory and Cognition,42(8),1315-1324.
  43. Hanson, V. L.(1993).Productive use of derivational morphology by deaf college students.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,31(1),63-65.
  44. Heathcote, A.,Ditton, E.,Mitchell, K.(2006).Word frequency and word likeness mirror effects in episodic recognition memory.Memory and Cognition,34(4),826-838.
  45. Hoffmeister, R. J.,Caldwell-Harris, C. L.(2014).Acquiring English as a second language via print: The task for deaf children.Cognition,132(2),229-242.
  46. Holcomb, P. J.,Grainger, J.(2006).On the time course of visual word recognition: An event-related potential investigation using masked repetition priming.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,18(10),1631-1643.
  47. Katz, L.,Frost, R.(1992).The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis.Advances in Psychology,94,67-84.
  48. Kersten, A. W.,Earles, J. L.(2004).Semantic context influences memory for verbs more than memory for nouns.Memory and Cognition,32(2),198-211.
  49. Khanna, M. M.,Cortese, M. J.(2021).How well imageability, concreteness, perceptual strength, and action strength predict recognition memory, lexical decision, and reading aloud performance.Memory,29(5),622-636.
  50. Kim, Y.-S. G.,Guo, Q.,Liu, Y.,Peng, Y.,Yang, L.(2020).Multiple pathways by which compounding morphological awareness is related to reading comprehension: Evidence from Chinese second graders.Reading Research Quarterly,55(2),193-212.
  51. Koester, D.,Gunter, T. C.,Wagner, S.(2007).The morphosyntactic decomposition and semantic composition of German compound words investigated by ERPs.Brain and Language,102(1),64-79.
  52. Ku, Y.-M.,Anderson, R. C.(2003).Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English.Reading and Writing,16(5),399-422.
  53. Kutas, M.,Federmeier, K. D.(2011).Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related brain potential (ERP).Annual Review of Psychology,62,621-647.
  54. Kutas, M.,Hillyard, S. A.(1980).Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words.Biological Psychology,11(2),99-116.
  55. Kyle, F. E.,Harris, M.(2010).Predictors of reading development in deaf children: A 3-year longitudinal study.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,107(3),229-243.
  56. Lavric, A.,Clapp, A.,Rastle, K.(2007).ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,19(5),866-877.
  57. Lavric, A.,Elchlepp, H.,Rastle, K.(2012).Tracking hierarchical processing in morphological decomposition with brain potentials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,38(4),811-816.
  58. Lemhöfer, K.,Dijkstra, T.,Schriefers, H.,Baayen, R. H.,Grainger, J.,Zwitserlood, P.(2008).Native language influences on word recognition in a second language: A megastudy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,34(1),12-31.
  59. Li, H.,Shu, H.,McBride Chang, C.,Liu, H.,Peng, H.(2012).Chinese children's character recognition: Visuo orthographic, phonological processing and morphological skills.Journal of Research in Reading,35(3),287-307.
  60. Li, W.,Anderson, R. C.,Nagy, W.,Zhang, H.(2002).Facets of metalinguistic awareness that contribute to Chinese literacy.Chinese children's reading acquisition: Teoretical and pedagogical issues
  61. Libben, G.(1998).Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequences for representation, processing, and impairment.Brain and Language,61(1),30-44.
  62. Libben, G.,Gibson, M.,Yoon, Y. B.,Sandra, D.(2003).Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness.Brain and Language,84(1),50-64.
  63. MacGregor, L. J.,Shtyrov, Y.(2013).Multiple routes for compound word processing in the brain: Evidence from EEG.Brain and Language,126(2),217-229.
  64. Marslen-Wilson, W.,Tyler, L. K.,Waksler, R.,Older, L.(1994).Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon.Psychological Review,101(1),3-33.
  65. McBride-Chang, C.,Wagner, R. K.,Muse, A.,Chow, B. W.-Y.,Shu, H.(2005).The role of morphological awareness in children's vocabulary acquisition in English.Applied Psycholinguistics,26(3),415-435.
  66. McDonald, J. L.(2006).Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners.Journal of Memory and Language,55(3),381-401.
  67. Morris, J.,Frank, T.,Grainger, J.,Holcomb, P. J.(2007).Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: An ERP investigation.Psychophysiology,44(4),506-521.
  68. Nagy, W. E.,Carlisle, J. F.,Goodwin, A. P.(2014).Morphological knowledge and literlcy acquisition.Journal of Learning Disabilities,47(1),3-12.
  69. Nagy, W. E.,Kuo-Kealoha, A.,Wu, X.,Li, W.,Anderson, R. C.,Chen, X.(2002).Chinese children's reading acquisition.Chinese Children's Reading Acquisition: Theoretical and Pedagogical Issues
  70. Nagy, W.,Berninger, V. W.,Abbott, R. D.(2006).Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students.Journal of Educational Psychology,98(1),134-147.
  71. Packard, J.,Chen, X.,Li, W.,Wu, X.,Gaffney, J.,Li, H.,Anderson, R.(2006).Explicit instruction in orthographic structure and word morphology helps Chinese children learn to write characters.Reading and Writing,19(5),457-487.
  72. Paller, K. A.,Voss, J. L.,Boehm, S. G.(2007).Validating neural correlates of familiarity.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,11(6),243-250.
  73. Rugg, M. D.,Curran, T.(2007).Event-related potentials and recognition memory.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,11(6),251-257.
  74. Rugg, M. D.,Mark, R. E.,Walla, P.,Schloerscheidt, A. M.,Birch, C. S.,Allan, K.(1998).Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory.Nature,392,595-598.
  75. Shu, H.,Anderson, R. C.(1997).Role of radical awareness in the character and word acquisition of Chinese children.Reading Research Quarterly,32(1),78-89.
  76. Smith, W. H.,Ting, L. F.(1984).Shou Neng Sheng Chyau [Your hands can become a bridge]: Sign language manual.Deaf Sign Language Research Association of the Republic of China.
  77. Taft, M.(2004).Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A,57(4),745-765.
  78. Taft, M.(1981).Prefix stripping revisited.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,20(3),289-297.
  79. Tai, J. H.-Y.,Tsay, J.(2015).Taiwan Sign Language: History, structure, and adaptation.Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics
  80. Tai, J. H.-Y.,Tsay, J.(2015).Taiwan Sign Language.Sign languages of the world
  81. Tighe, E.,Binder, K. S.(2013).An investigation of morphologicalawareness and processing in adults with low literacy.Applied Psycholinguistics,36(2),245-273.
  82. To, N. L.,Tighe, E.,Binder, K. S.(2014).Investigating morphological awareness and the processing of transparent and opaque words in adults with low literacy skills and in skilled readers.Journal of Research in Reading,39(2),171-188.
  83. Tong, X.,McBride-Chang, C.,Shu, H.,Wong, A. M. Y.(2009).Morphological awareness, orthographic knowledge, and spelling errors: Keys to understanding early Chinese literacy acquisition.Scientific Studies of Reading,13(5),426-452.
  84. Traxler, C. B.(2000).The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition: National norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students.Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education,5,337-348.
  85. Trussell, J. W.,Easterbrooks, S. R.(2015).Effects of morphographic instruction on the morphographic analysis skills of deaf and hard-of-hearing students.Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education,20(3),229-241.
  86. Ullman, M. T.(2005).A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model.Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory and practice
  87. Ullman, M. T.(2004).Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model.Cognition,92(1),231-270.
  88. Van Hoogmoed, A. H.,Verhoeven, L.,Schreuder, R.,Knoors, H.(2011).Morphological sensitivity in deaf readers of Dutch.Applied Psycholinguistics,32(3),619-634.
  89. Wang, M.,Koda, K.,Perfetti, C. A.(2003).Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: A comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners.Cognition,87(2),129-149.
  90. Wang, Y.,Cui, L.,Wang, H.,Tian, S.,Zhang, X.(2004).The sequential processing of visual feature conjunction mismatches in the human brain.Psychophysiology,41(1),21-29.
  91. Wong, M.,Rotello, C. M.(2010).Semantic transparency affects memory conjunction errors.Memory and Cognition,38(1),47-56.
  92. Wu, X.,Anderson, R. C.,Li, W.,Wu, X.,Li, H.,Zhang, J.,Zheng, Q.,Zhu, J.,Shu, H.,Jiang, W.,Chen, X.,Wang, Q.,Yin, L.,He, Y.,Packard, J.,Gaffney, J. S.(2009).Morphological awareness and Chinese children's literacy development: An intervention study.Scientific Studies of Reading,13(1),26-52.
  93. Zhang, H.(2015).Morphological awareness in vocabulary acquisition among Chinese children: Testing partial mediation via lexical inference ability.Reading Research Quarterly,50(1),129-142.
  94. 中文詞知識庫小組（2001）：中央研究院平衡語料庫詞集及詞頻統計 3.1。中央研究院資訊科學研究所。[Chinese Knowledge Information Processing Group (2001). Word list with accumulated word frequency in Sinica Corpus 3.1. Institute of Information Science, Academic Sinica.]
  95. 李佳穎, C.-Y.(1995)。國立中正大學=National Chung Cheng University。
  96. 李培榮, P.-J.(2007)。國立政治大學=National Chenchi University。
  97. 林幸君, S.-J.(2013)。國立臺中教育大學=National Taichung University of Education。
  98. 林寶貴, B.-G.(2001)。手語意見調查研究。手語教學與應用研討會論文集
  99. 梁美雅, M.-Y.(1992)。國立清華大學=National Tsing Hua University。
print cancel