台灣年輕女性性別角色特質之研究－以高中高職畢（肄）業女性為例

The Gender Role Characteristics of Young Taiwanese Women-The Case of Non-college Educated Women

10.29734/SJSW.200512.0002

劉珠利(Chu-Li Liu)

台灣女性 ； 性別角色 ； 質性研究 ； Taiwanese women ； gender roles ； qualitative research

東吳社會工作學報

13期（2005 / 12 / 01）

45 - 84

繁體中文

目前社會工作知識是以西方世界的白種人為對象，所發展出的知識為教材，因此在實務工作上經常產生落差。目前全球社會工作界已發現，發展跨文化的人類發展知識，是當今的要務。因此，本研究的目的在於探討成長於台灣民主時代、教育程度為高中高職、年輕女性的性別角色特質，補充社會工作的知識基礎。本研究以質性研究中的紮根理論取向為研究方法，以深度訪問的方式收集資料，以開放性編碼，主軸性編碼，選擇性編碼的方式分析資料，最後以文獻對照以及同儕討論的方式，來驗證研究結果。本研究共訪問20位年齡為19至21歲，成長於台灣進入民主時代、教育程度為高中高職的年輕女性。研究結果顯示，本研究的受訪者接受傳統中所賦予長女的角色，抵抗傳統女性以家人的需要置於自己的需要之前的作法，也抵抗傳統中以性別區分行為舉止的規範；自覺到女性在兩性關係中，仍舊位居弱勢的角色，自覺金錢可以為她們帶來力量，自覺維護男性在公開場合的面子仍舊重要；在接受與拒絕傳統女性角色規範，並且自覺現階段女性的地位之後，本研究的受訪者對於未來的計畫是讓自己經濟獨立，將婚姻視為是生命中的一項選擇，不是女性生命的唯一，希望過的自由自在。本研究的結果可以讓教師納入人類發展的知識基礎，擴展社會工作學生對於台灣女性性別角色的認識。除此之外，本研究也對性別在社會工作實務的運用，提出建議。根據本研究的結果，本文最後建議台灣充權的社會工作實務應該將重心轉移至社會與政治的層面。

Social work originally was stemmed from Western world and the knowledge base was also derived from the understanding and research of the Westerners. Due to the lack of understanding and research of Taiwanese people, Western theories are employed in social work education in Taiwan for years, including the knowledge of human growth and development. The links between social work knowledge and social work practice are often questioned by social work practitioners in Taiwan. To date, gender, race/ethnicity/culture, and social class become important lenses in understanding people. Therefore, Western theories should not be the bibles of social work education around the world. This study aims to explore the gender identity characteristics of Taiwanese young women, especially the case of non-college educated young women. As a result, the findings expand the understanding of women.A grounded theory research method was employed. In-depth interviews were adopted to collect data. Data collection stopped when the findings had reached the point of saturation. Twenty Taiwanese young women, aged 19 to 21, were interviewed. Open coding, axial coding, and selective coding were adopted to analyze data. Comparing the results to literature and peer debriefing served the purpose of validating the findings.The findings revealed that young Taiwanese women in this study are in compliance with some traditional prescribed norms, for example the duty of eldest daughters in the family. They resisted the prescribed norms that women should put others' needs before their own needs and sacrifice themselves. They also resisted the prescribed behavior norms for women. Young women in this study were aware that women are still disadvantaged and powerless in man-woman relationship, then, self-sufficiency becomes the means they adopted to locate power in the relationships. Helping men save faces is still prevalent in Taiwan, therefore, they complied with this prescribed norm in public and adopted a different strategy in private. Given the awareness that women are still powerless, young women in this study picture their future as self-sufficiency, thus, it brings them with choices and freedom.Implications for social work education and social work practice are addressed. The findings expand the understanding of women and can be included in the teaching materials for human growth and development. The findings also suggest that the focus of empowerment for women should be shifted to social and political levels in Taiwan.

1. Abrams, L. S.(2003).Contextual Variations in Young Women`s Gender Identity Negotiations.Psychology of Women Quarterly,27,64-74.
2. Abrams, L.S.,Curran, L.(2004).Between Women: Gender and Social Work in Historical Perspective.Social Service Review,September,429-446.
3. Barns, A.(2003).Social Work, Young Women, and Femininity.AFFILIA,18(2),148-164.
4. Biddle, B. J.(1979).Role Theory Expectation, Identities, and Behaviors.New York:Academic Press, Inc..
5. Creswell, J. W.(1998).Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Among Five Traditions.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
6. Gallin, R. S.(1984).Women, family, and the political economy of Taiwan.The Journal of Peasant Studies,12(1),76-92.
7. Gates, H.(1987).Chinese Working-Class Lives Getting By in Taiwan.New York:Cornell University Press.
8. Gilligan, C.(1982).In a Different Voice, Psychological Theory and Women`s Development.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
9. Green, E.(1998)."Women Doing Friendship": an analysis of women`s leisure as a site of identity construction, empowerment and resistance.Leisure Studies,17,171-185.
10. Hall, J.(2000).It hurts to be a Girl. Growing Up Poor, White, and Female.Gender & Society,14(5),630-643.
11. Hoskins, M. L.(2002).Girls` Identity Dilemmas: Spaces Defined by Definitions of Worth.Health Care for Women International,23,231-247.
12. Imre, R. W.(1991).What Do We Need to Know for Good Practice?.Social Work,36(3),198-200.
13. Katz, P. A.(1979).The development of female identity.Sex Roles,5(2),155-178.
14. Leung, Yiu-Nam,Chang, Wei-An(1994).The folk customs of gender inequality in Taiwan.Asian Culture Quarterly,22,35-47.
15. Lincoln, Y. S.,Guba, E. G.(1985).Naturalistic Inquiry.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
16. Liu, Chu-Li(2001).Waterloo, Canada,Wilfrid Laurier University.
17. Lott, B.,Saxon, S.(2002).The Influence of Ethnicity, Social Class, and Context on Judgments about U. S. Women.The Journal of Social Psychology,142(4),481-499.
18. Lu, Hsiu-Lien,E. K. Y. Chen,J. F. Williams,J. Wong (Eds.)(1991).Taiwan, Economy, Society, and History.Hong Kong:Centre of Asian Studies Universities of Hong Kong.
19. Lu, Yu-Hsia(1983).Women`s labor-force participation and family power structure in Taiwan.Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academia Sinica,56,111-143.
20. Luttrell, W.(1989).Working-class women`s ways of knowing: effects of gender, race, and class.Sociology of Education,62,33-46.
21. McIntosh, P.(1999).A Chinese Conference on Women`s Studies.The Wellesley Centers for Women Research Report,2(2),14-15.
22. McNeill, S.,Petersen, A. C.(1985).Gender role and identity in early adolescence: reconsideration of theory.Academic Psychology Bulletin,7(Winter),299-315.
23. Munson, J. M.,Spivey, W. A.(1983).Relation between Social Class and Three Aspects of Self-concept: Actual, Ideal, and Egocentric Self.The Journal of Social Psychology,119,85-94.
24. Norman, J.,Wheeler, B.(1996).Gender-Sensitive Social Work Practice: A Model for Education.Journal of Social Work Education,32(2),203-213.
25. Ostrove, J. M.,Long, S. M.(2001).White Women`s Social Class Identity and the College, Experience.Paper presented at the 10th Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association,San Francisco:
26. Rauch, J. B.(1978).Gender as a factor in practice.Social Work,September,388-395.
27. Rubinstein, M. A.(1999).Returning to Roots and Redefining Traditions: Patterns of Religious Development on Taiwan Since the Lifting of Martial Law.Paper presented in International Conference on the Transformation of An Authoritarian Regime: Taiwan in the post-Martial Law era,Taiwan:
28. Spencer, M. S.(1998).Reducing Racism in Schools: Moving beyond Rhetoric.Social Work in Education,20(1),25-37.
29. Steedman, C.(1986).Landscape for a good woman.New York:Rutgers University Press.
30. Steward, A. J.,Ostrove, J. M.(1993).Social Class, Social Change, and Gender.Psychology of Women Quarterly,17,475-497.
31. Strauss, A.,Corbin, J.(1990).Basic of Qualitative Research, Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.Newbury Park:Sage Publication, Inc..
32. Surrey, J. L.(Eds.),J. V. Jordan,A. G, Kaplan,J. B. Miller,I. P. Miller(1991).Women`s Growth in connection Writing from the Stone Center.New York:The Guildford Press.
33. Unger, R. K.,R. Hare-Mustin,J. Marecek (Eds.)(1990).Making a Different Psychology and the Construction of Gender.U.S.A.:Yale University.
34. Wang, Yi-Chun(1998).The Dark Side of the Moon: A Preliminary Study of "Modernized Homosexuality.Paper presented in the Fourth Annual North America Taiwan Studies Conference,U. S. A.:
35. Way, N.(1995)."Can`t You See the Courage, the Strength that I have?" Listening to Urban Adolescent Girls Speak about their Relationships.Psychology of Women Quarterly,19,107-128.
36. Wolf, M.(1972).Women and the Family in Rural Taiwan.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
37. Yang, Wenyi(1999).Heteroglossia of contemporary Taiwan art in the post-Martial Law era.Tendency Quarterly,12,169-180.
38. Yip, Kam-shing(2004).The Empowerment Model: A Critical Reflection of Empowerment in Chinese Culture.Social Work,49(3),479-487.
39. Zelvin, E.(1999).Applying Relational Theory to the Treatment of Women`s Addictions.AFFILIA,14(1),9-23.
40. 江文瑜、邱貴芬(1997)。查某儂嘛要抓狂－當代台灣流行女歌的後殖民女性主義詮釋與批判。中外文學，26(2)，23-48。
41. 呂秀蓮(1990)。新女性主義。台北:前衛出版社。
42. 李美枝(1985)。社會變遷中中國女性角色及性格的改變。婦女在國家發展過程中的角色研討會論文集，台北:
43. 李美枝(1996)。性別與性別角色論。本土心理研究，6，260-299。
44. 李藹慈(1992)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，台灣，師範大學社會教育學系。
45. 周芬伶(1998)。憤怒的白鴿。台北:元尊文化企業股份有限公司。
46. 周彥君(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化，台灣，彰化師範大學輔導與諮商系。
47. 林鶴玲、李潔香(1999)。台灣閩，客，外省族群家庭中性別資源配置。人文及社會集刊，11(4)，475-528。
48. 程瓊瑩(1989)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，台灣，台灣大學社會學研究所。
49. 黃菁瑩(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台東，台灣，台東師範學院國民教育研究所。
50. 楊雅慧(1996)。阮的心內話：十位女性的生命告白。台北:台北縣立文化中心。
51. 楊雅慧(1993)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹，台灣，清華大學。
52. 鄒金鳳(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮，台灣，花蓮師範學院多元文化所。
53. 廖福村(2000)。解嚴後台灣青少年偏差行為之變遷。台灣文獻，51(2)，197-207。
54. 熊賢關(1998)。儒家傳統中的婦女觀。哲學雜誌，24，100-117。
55. 劉珠利(2001)。依賴－一個該被貶低的特質？。社會工作學刊，7，77-100。
56. 劉毓秀主編(1995)。台灣婦女處境白皮書。台北:時報文化出版公司。
57. 羅敏綺(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，台灣，台灣大學農業推廣學研究所。

1. 賀倫惠,陳濘宏,曹麗英,林梅香,李秀芳,李兆蕙(2015)。阻塞性睡眠呼吸中止症婦女之生活經驗。護理雜誌，62(6)，48-56。
2. (2020)。高中生及其角色夥伴對高中學生理想與實際角色知覺之探討。教育政策論壇，23(1)，123-159。