题名

Analyzing Poverty Risk in Taiwan: From 1995 to 2005

DOI

10.29734/SJSW.200906.0001

作者

張菁芬(Chin-Fen Chang);王紹樺(Shao-Hua Wang)

关键词

貧窮 ; 台灣 ; 社會安全 ; 風險 ; Poverty ; Taiwan ; Social Security ; Risk

期刊名称

東吳社會工作學報

卷期/出版年月

20期(2009 / 06 / 01)

页次

1 - 32

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

越來越多的研究及資料顯示,台灣社會的貧富差距拉大,新貧現象的產生,在在引起了本研究對於貧窮風險議題的興趣。本研究目的有二:首先探討誰面臨了貧窮風險?再而,試圖針對政策介入對於因應貧窮風險有產生效果嗎?本研究所使用的原始資料為中央研究院調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫所釋出的「台灣地區社會變遷基本調查計畫」第三期第一次、第四期第一次及第五期第一次的資料,問卷調查時間分別為1995年、2000年及2005年。研究發現貧窮者所面臨最糟的狀況不僅是所得不足的問題,低儲蓄率以及高消費支出更使得低所得者面臨著更高的貧窮風險。最後,透過研究中有關十年來面臨貧窮風險人口群的改變,提醒政府重新思考傳統社會福利給付在對抗貧窮風險的可能;以及應再檢視目前被社會安全制度所排除的人口群。

英文摘要

Those debates on the gap of rich and poor, the phenomena of new poverty encouraged this study to find out in what ways Taiwan faces poverty risk. This paper analyzed database of the 'Taiwan Social Change Survey' in the index years of 1995, 2000, and 2005. The findings of this study remind us that the worst conditions for poor people are not only that they do not have enough income, but also low savings and high consumption expenditures all impact the low-income group to suffer a higher risk of poverty. Finally, the changing trends of the target group that suffers from poverty also remind the state to rethink the traditional ways of welfare provision and to reexamine who has been excluded by contemporary social security system.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 社會學
社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. Atkinson, A.B.(2002).Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  2. Social (Research) 097-005
  3. Chow, W.C.(2005).The Impact of Labor Policy under Unemployment, New Poverty and Income Distribution.Paper presented at the Conference of Labor Policy: Contents, Impact and Prospect,Taipei:
  4. Multi-Employment Program
  5. Deacon, B.(1997).Global Social Policy: International Organisations and the Future of Welfare.London:Sage.
  6. Report of 2005 Human Power and Resource Survey
  7. Report of 2007 Human Power and Resource Survey
  8. ESCAP(2000).Economic and Social Survey of Asia and the Pacific 2000.
  9. Esping-Anderson, G.(1996).Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies.London:Sage.
  10. Income poverty in the European Union
  11. Guo, Y. L.(2003).109 Million New Poor.Journal of Business,108
  12. Houng, S.C.(2003).New Poverty and Social Welfare Policy.Journal of National Policy,2(4),84-124.
  13. Jesuit, D.,T. Smeeding(2002).Poverty and Income Distribution.Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper, No.293.
  14. Li, S.R.,L.Y. Lai(2004).Survey Analysis and Strategies on Disadvantaged Family.Research Report.
  15. The Statistics of Social Assistance 2005
  16. What is 'at risk of poverty'?
  17. Ohmae, K.,Chiang, Y.J.(Translator)(2006).The Impact of Rising Lower-Middle Class Population in Japan.Taipei:Shieng-Chou.
  18. Room, G.(1995).Beyond The Threshold.Bristol:Policy Press.
  19. Shu, C.(2000).Social Problem.Taipei:Shiou-Fu Press.
  20. Smeeding, T.M.,R. Lee,G. Burtless,Danziger, S.H. (Editor) R.H. Haveman (Editor)(2002).Understanding Poverty.New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
  21. Poverty Risk Factors and Counter Measures
  22. Poverty, Risk, and Human Capital in the Rural North-West Frontier Province, Pakistan
  23. Wan, Y. W.(2000).Social Welfare Services: Theory and Implementation.Taipei:San-Min Press.