兒童照顧政策與福利體制的路徑變遷：瑞典、德國與美國之比較

The Changing Paths of the Child Care Policy and Welfare Regimes: A Comparison among Sweden, Germany and United States

黃志隆(Chih-Lung Huang)

福利體制 ； 家計承擔者模式 ； 性別平等理念 ； 兒童照顧政策 ； 生命歷程 ； welfare regime ； breadwinner model ； the idea of gender equality ； child care policy ； life cours

東吳社會工作學報

25期（2013 / 06 / 01）

1 - 34

繁體中文

隨著經濟全球化、後工業轉型，以及就業型態的改變，女性勞動力參與率日益提高。這不僅對傳統福利資本主義體制所形塑的家計承擔者模式造成衝擊，更進一步形成人口老化與少子女化的現象，從而危及福利國家的運作。本文擬就西方福利國家體制的三個原型：社會民主體制的普涵性家計承擔者模式－瑞典、保守主義體制的男性家計承擔者模式－德國，以及自由主義體制的市場導向模式－美國，針對二次世界大戰結束後的兒童照顧政策路徑進行生命歷程的制度分析。我們試圖釐清不同改革理念對福利體制背後的家計承擔者模式所產生的影響，以及這樣的變化對於就業和兒童照顧工作之間的平衡所具有的政策意涵。

With the economic globalization, the transformation of post industrialized, and the change of employment pattern, the women's labor participation is still rising. This phenomenon not only affected the breadwinner model which were shaped by the welfare regime, but also caused the consequence of baby bust and ageing population. This article will explore the changing paths of welfare regimes which includes the social democracy-Sweden, the conservatism-Germany, and the liberal- the U.S., We try to clarify the effect of reform ideas for the changing paths of breadwinner model behind the welfare regimes, and the policy implications for the work and life balance.

1. 張世雄(2001)。西方社會福利思想的四個傳承：當代社會救助政策思想脈絡的探索。社會政策與社會工作學刊，5(1)，99-144。
   連結：
2. 黃志隆(2012)。臺灣家庭政策的形成：家計承擔與兒童照顧的整合。人文及社會科學集刊，24(3)，331-366。
   連結：
3. Statistics Sweden (2012). Women and men in Sweden: Facts and figures 2012. SCB-Tryck, Örebero: Statistics Sweden.
4. Hong, Y., & Corman, D. (2005). Women's return to work after first birth in Sweden during 1980-2000. Retrieved April 2, 2011, from http://www.framtidsstudier.se/filebank/files/20051121$105501$fil$SR38b3z86M9GsF26hXbo.pdf
5. OECD (2011). CO2.2: Child poverty. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2012, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/52/43/41929552.pdf
6. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (2012). Graph: Labor force participation rate for women in Sweden. Retrieved Dec 1, 2012, from http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?s[1][id]=SWELFPWNA
7. OECD (2012). Country statistical profiles. Retrieved Nov. 15, 2012, from http://stats.oecd.org/
8. Anxo, D.,Fagan, C.,Cebrian, I.,Moreno, G.(2007).Patterns of labour market integration in Europe-a life course perspective on time policies.Socio-Economic Review,5,233-260.
9. Berggren, H.(2008).US family-leave policy: The legacy of "separate spheres".International Journal of Social Welfare,17,321-323.
10. Blyth, M.(2002).Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
11. Bogenschneider, K.(2000).Has family policy come of age? A decade review of the state of U.S. family policy in the 1990s.Journal of Marriage and Family,62(4),1136-1159.
12. Borchorst, A.,Siim, B.(2008).Woman-friendly policies and state feminism.Feminist Theory,9(2),207-224.
13. Crompton, R.(Ed.)(1999).Restructuring gender relations and employment: The decline of the male breadwinner.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
14. Esping-Andersen, G.(2009).The incomplete revolution: Adapting to women's new roles.Cambridge, England:Polity Press.
15. Esping-Andersen, G.(1991).The three worlds of welfare capitalism.Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
16. Försäkringskassan(2008).,未出版
17. Fraser, N.(1994).After the family wage: Gender equity and the welfare state.Political Theory,22(4),591-618.
18. Hagemann, K.(2006).Between ideology and economy: The 'time politics' of child care and public education in the two Germanys.Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society,13(2),217-260.
19. Hall, P.(1993).Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain.Comparative Politics,25(3),275-296.
20. Hall, P.,Taylor, C.(1996).Political science and the three new institutionalisms.Political science and the three new institutionalisms,44(5),936-957.
21. Henninger, A.,Wimbauer, C.,Dombrowski, R.(2008).Demography as a push toward gender equality? current reforms of german family policy.Social Politics,15(3),287-314.
22. Honekamp, I.(2008).Family policy in Germany: Appraisal and assessment.Journal of Family History,33(4),452-464.
23. Juhn, C.,Potter, S.(2006).Changes in labor force participation in the United States.Journal of Economic Perspectives,20(3),27-46.
24. Kamerman S.,Kahn, A.(2001).Child and family policies in the United States at the opening of the twenty-first century.Social Policy & Administration,35(1),69-84.
25. Kolberg, J.(1991).The gender dimension of the welfare state.International Journal of Sociology,21(2),119-148.
26. Lewis, J.(2001).The decline of the male breadwinner model: Implications for work and care.Social Politics,8(2),152-169.
27. Lewis, J.(1997).Gender and welfare regimes: Further thought.Social Politics,4(2),160-177.
28. Lundqvist, Å.(2011).Family policy paradoxes: Gender equality and labour market regulation in Sweden, 1930-2010.Bristol:The Policy Press.
29. Mätzke, M.,Ostner, I.(2010).The role of old ideas in the new german family policy agenda.German Policy Studies,6(3),119-162.
30. Melby, K.,Ravn, A.,Wetterberg, C.(2008).Gender equality and welfare politics in scandinavia: The limits of political ambition?.Bristol:The Policy Press.
31. Mortimer, J. T.(Ed.),Shanahan, M. J.(Ed.)(2003).Handbook of the life course.New York:Kluwer.
32. Official Statistics of Sweden(2009).Children, pupils and staff national level: Sweden's official statistics on pre-school activities, school-age child care, schools and adult education, part 2..Stockholm, Sweden:Skolverket.
33. Orloff, A.(1993).Gender and the social rights of citizenship state policies and gender relations in comparative research.American sociological review,58(3),303-328.
34. Ostner, I.(2010).Farewell to the family as we know it: Family policy change in Germany.German Policy Studies,6(1),211-244.
35. Rønsen, M.,Sundström, M.(2002).Family policy and after-birth employment among new mothers- A comparison of Finland, Norway and Sweden.European Journal of Population,18,121-152.
36. Room, G.(2000).Commodification and decommodification: A developmental critique.Policy & Politics,28(3),331-351.
37. Room, G.(Ed.)(1991).Towards a european welfare state.Bristol:SAUS.
38. Rosenfeld, R.,Trappe, H.,Gornick, J.(2004).Gender and working in Germany: Before and after reunification.Annual Review of Sociology,30,103-124.
39. Sainsbury, D.(Ed.)(1999).Gender and welfare regimes.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
40. Sanisbury, D.(Ed.)(1994).Gendering welfare states.London:Sage.
41. Schaufeli, W.,Bakker, A.(2004).Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study.Journal of Organizational Behavior,25(3),293-315.
42. Schmidt, V.(2008).Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse.The Annual Review of Political Science,11,303-326.
43. Stier, H.,Lewin-Epstein, N.,Braun, M.(2001).Welfare regime, family-supportive policies, and women's employment along the life-course.American Journal of Sociology,106(6),1731-1760.
44. Sundström, M.,Stafford, F.(1992).Female labour force participation, fertility, and public policy in Sweden.European Journal of Population,8,199-215.
45. Swedish Social Insurance Agency(2011).Social Insurance ReportSocial Insurance Report,Swedish Social Insurance Agency.
46. Trzcinski, E.(2000).Family policy in Germany: A feminist dilemma?.Feminist Economics,6(1),21-44.
47. 詹火生、林玉潔、王芯婷(2002)。國政研究報告國政研究報告,台北:財團法人國家政策研究基金會。

1. 利澤銘,古允文(2022)。不同的家庭主義模型？臺灣和澳門友善家庭政策比較初探。臺灣社會福利學刊，18(2)，45-93。
2. 葉崇揚,楊佑萱,周怡君(2020)。家庭主義的分歧？台灣民眾對兒童及老人照顧的福利態度分析。臺大社會工作學刊，41，1-56。