题名

員工主動性人格對組織公民行為和團隊績效的影響-檢測一個路徑模型

并列篇名

The Impact of Proactive Personality on Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Team Performance: Examining a Path Model

DOI

10.6147/JHRM.2009.0902.02

作者

田新民(Xin-Min Tian);解志韜(Zhi-Tao Xie);祝金龍(Jin-Long Zhu)

关键词

主動性人格 ; 領導成員交換 ; 組織公民行爲 ; 團隊績效 ; 資訊公平 ; proactive personality ; leader-member exchange ; organizational citizenship behavior ; team performance ; informational justice

期刊名称

人力資源管理學報

卷期/出版年月

9卷2期(2009 / 06 / 01)

页次

19 - 32

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

在本研究中,我們提出了一個關於主動性人格的路徑模型,並討論了該模型的邊界效力。具體而言,通過在上海、浙江等地選取研究樣本,並按配對研究的方法將領導及其對應下屬進行配對調查,最終共得到了有效的配對資料180條。據此,我們檢驗了領導-成員交換(LMX)在員工主動性人格與工作結果(組織公民行爲、團隊績效)之間的中介作用,以及組織環境變數(資訊公平)在員工主動性人格與LMX之間的調節作用。研究結果表明:一、員工主動性人格與LMX顯著相關;二、LMX在主動性人格與團隊績效的關係中起中介作用;三、LMX在主動性人格與認同組織、協助同事的關係中起中介作用;四、資訊公平在主動性人格與LMX之間起到負向的調節作用。

英文摘要

In this study, we proposed a path model of Proactive personality, and discussed the conceptual boundary of this model. Specifically, using a cross-organizational sample of 180 supervisor-subordinate dyads in Shanghai and other provinces, we examined the mediating effect of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) between proactive personality and employee work outcomes. Meanwhile, we also examined the moderating effect of transactional leadership and informational justice for the relationship between proactive personality and LMX. The results suggested that 1. Proactive personality was significantly related to LMX; 2. LMX mediated the relationship between Proactive personality and team performance; 3. LMX mediated the relationship between proactive personality and identification with company, and mediated the relationship between proactive personality and altruism toward colleagues; 4. Informational justice negatively moderated the relationship between proactive personality and LMX.

主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 社會學
社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 管理學
社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. Aiken, L. S.,West, S. G.(1991).Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications, Inc..
  2. Allen, D. G.,Weeks, K. P.(2005).Turnover intentions and voluntary turnover: The moderating roles of self-monitoring, locus of control, proactive personality, and risk aversion.Journal of Applied Psychology,90(5),980-990.
  3. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6),1173-1182.
  4. Bateman, T. S.,Crant, J. M.(1993).The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates.Journal of Organizational Behavior,14(2),103-118.
  5. Bauer, T. N.,Green, S. G.(1996).Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test.Academy of Management Journal,39(6),1538-1567.
  6. Chan, D.(2006).Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes.Journal of Applied Psychology,91(2),475-481.
  7. Claes, R.,Beheydt, C.,Lemmens, B.(2005).Unidimensionality of abbreviated proactive personality scales across cultures.Applied Psychology: An International Review,54(4),476-489.
  8. Colquitt, J. A.(2001).On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure.Journal of Applied Psychology,86(3),386-400.
  9. Crant, J. M.(1995).The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents.Journal of Applied Psychology,80(4),532-537.
  10. Crant, J. M.,Bateman, T. S.(2000).Charismatic leadership viewed from above: The impact of proactive personality.Journal of Organizational Behavior,21(1),63-75.
  11. Erdogan, B.,Liden, R. C.(2006).Collectivism as a moderator of responses to organizational justice: Implications for leader-member exchange and ingratiation.Journal of Organizational Behavior,27,1-17.
  12. Farh, J.,Earley, P. C.,Lin, S.(1997).Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society.Administrative Science Quarterly,42,421-444.
  13. Gerstner, C. R,Day, D. V.(1997).Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues.Journal of Applied Psychology,82(6),827-844.
  14. Gouldner, A. W.(1960).The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement.American Sociological Review,25(2),161-178.
  15. Graen, G. B.,Scandura, T. A.(1987).Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing.Research in Organizational Behavior,9,175-208.
  16. Graen, G. B.,Uhl-Bien, M.(1995).Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective.The Leadership Quarterly,6(2),219-247.
  17. Graen, G. B.,Uhl-Bien, M.(1991).The transformation of professionals into self-managing and partially self-designing contributions: Toward a theory of leader making.Journal of Management Systems,3(3),33-48.
  18. Grant, G. M.(2000).Proactive behavior in organizations.Journal of Management,26(3),436-462.
  19. Hackett, R. D.,Farh, J. L.,Song, L. J.,Lapierre, L. M.,G. Graen (Ed.)(2003).Dealing with diversity: LMX leadership-the series.Charlotte, NC:Information Age Publishing, Inc..
  20. Kirkman, B. L.,Rosen, B.(1999).Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment.Academy of Management Journal,42(1),58-74.
  21. Liden, E. C.,Graen, G. B.(1980).Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership.Academy of Management Journal,23(3),451-465.
  22. Organ, D. W.(1988).Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome.Lexington, MA.:Lexington Books.
  23. Seibert, S. E.,Crant, J. M.,Kraimer, M. L.(1999).Proactive personality and career success.Journal of Applied Psychology,84(3),416-427.
  24. Seibert, S. E.,Kraimer, M. L.,Crant, J. M.(2001).What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success.Personnel Psychology,54(4),845-874.
  25. Spencer, L. M.,Spencer, S. M.(1993).Competence at work: Models for superior performance.New York:Wiley.
  26. Thompson, J. A.(2005).Proactive personality and job performance: A social capital perspective.Journal of Applied Psychology,90(5),1011-1017.
  27. Wang, H.,Law, K. S.,Hackett, K. S.,Wang, D.,Chen, Z.(2005).Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers' performance and organizational citizenship behavior.Academy of Management Journal,48(3),420-432.
  28. Wayne, S. J.,Shore, L. M.,Liden, K. C.(1997).Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective.Academy of Management Journal,40(1),82-111.
被引用次数
  1. 蔡毓靜,陳殷哲(2020)。情緒勞務與建言行為關係之研究-以主動性人格為調節變項。企業管理學報,45(4),33-61。
  2. 陳盈吉、陳建廷、吳朝森(2012)。大學生主動性人格、冒險遊憩與創造力關係之研究。中原體育學報,1,138-146。
  3. 黃睦芸、陸洛、張婷婷(2011)。工作負荷與工作行為之關聯:主動性人格為調節變項。臺灣管理學刊,11(2),177-195。
  4. 賴鳳儀、賴春錦、陳曉鈴、高月慈(2015)。凝聚力在主動人格與角色外行為之調節角色。臺大管理論叢,25(3),1-38。
  5. 藍依萍、吳淑鈴(2017)。教保服務人員主動性人格與組織公民行為關係之研究―情感性友誼的中介效果。學校行政,110,82-104。
  6. 陸洛、陳佳雯、許雅玉(2012)。工作要求、工作資源與員工工作態度之關聯:以勤勉審慎性及主動性人格為調節變項。Journal of Human Resource Management,12(1),23-49。
  7. 張家銘、李立良(2014)。大學體育室主任家長式領導對教師工作滿意與組織公民行為影響關係:以領導者與部屬交換關係為中介變項。台灣體育運動管理學報,14(1),115-144。
  8. 張振傑,林沂臻(2020)。以對偶關係探討認知差異對員工態度及行為的影響。弘光學報,86,37-52。
  9. (2018)。大學生緣觀信念對其性格主動程度與因應彈性的調節效果。教育與心理研究,41(4),61-86。
  10. (2024)。華人組織中的人際關係:回顧與展望。中華心理學刊,66(1),153-193。