题名

比較不同心肺復甦術暨自動體外心臟電擊去顫器教學策略之成效

并列篇名

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Instructional Strategies in Teaching Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automatic External Defibrillator

DOI

10.3966/102673012015122604001

作者

謝燿州(Yao-Chou Hsieh);謝素英(Suh-Ing Hsieh);許麗齡(Li-Ling Hsu)

关键词

心肺復甦術 ; 自動體外心臟電擊去顫器 ; 知識得分 ; 技術執行能力 ; cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) ; automated external defibrillator (AED) ; CPR and AED knowledge scores ; CPR and AED competencies

期刊名称

長庚護理

卷期/出版年月

26卷4期(2015 / 12 / 01)

页次

371 - 385

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

背景:應用錄影帶教學於急救訓練教學之學習成效不一,也少有相關研究應用階梯式分段教學法於急救訓練課程中;再者,自動體外心臟電擊去顫器逐漸在台灣各地設置,是緊急醫療到院前救護很重要的急救措施,護理人員透過不同教學模式所獲得的知識及日後執行的成效上可能將會有所不同。目的:探討護理人員接受不同CPR 暨AED 的教學策略與工具,在知識得分及技術執行能力之差異與變化情形。方法:採類實驗前後測研究設計,立意取樣自參加某醫院與中華民國急救技能推廣協會舉辦之CPR 暨AED 訓練課程的護理人員,依報名梯次分派為實驗組和控制組,先就控制組收案,之後為實驗組。控制組65 人接受CPR 暨AED 之「傳統講述教學法」,實驗組65 人則接受「錄影帶輔助分段教學法」。本研究以CPR 暨AED 之知識得分量表及技術執行能力檢核表進行施測,並採用SPSS 17.0 統計軟體進行資料處理與分析。結果:實驗組與控制組在CPR 暨AED 知識得分方面,從組間效應來看,後測得分皆優於前測(p < .001);技術執行能力方面,實驗組(mean = 2.42, SD = 0.83) 與控制組(mean = 2.22, SD= 0.89) 無顯著差異;而組間效應方面,知識得分量表為實驗組顯著高於控制組(b = 1.95, p= .002),技術執行能力則無組別之顯著差異(b = 0.11, p = .927),但技術執行能力整體表現則實驗組顯著高於控制組(b = 0.36, p = .033)。結論:錄影帶輔助分段教學可於課程中進行觀察學習與重複練習,其教學方式於知識的學習效果比傳統講述教學顯著;但技術執行能力仍須靠課後持續學習才能維持。建議發展與推廣CPR 暨AED 錄影帶,供曾學習過之對象於家中反覆模擬練習使技術保留,以維持學習者執行急救技術的專業性。

英文摘要

Background: Video-aided instruction has been applied in a number of first-aid training sessions, with mixed results, and very few studies have addressed the issue of effectiveness of step-by-step first-aid instructional strategies. Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are now becoming readily available in public places all over Taiwan as an essential tool for first-aid care before ambulance arrival. Different instructional strategies might make different impact on knowledge and competency acquisition of nurses. Purpose: This study aims to investigate the impact of different forms of educational intervention on nurses’ knowledge and competencies in CPR and AED. Methods: A quasi-experimental pre-test post-test design was adopted. A purposive sample of nurses receiving CPR and AED training jointly organized by a hospital in Taiwan and the Society of Resuscitation Medicine Taiwan was recruited, and assigned to the experimental or control group depending on when they had signed up for the training. The control group received the educational intervention before the experimental group did. Sixty-five nurses in the control group received a traditional lecture on CPR and AED, while another 65 nurses in the experimental group were given step-by-step video-aided instructions on CPR and AED. Data were collected using “CPR and AED Knowledge Scale” and “CPR and AED Competencies Checklist,” and then processed and analyzed using the SPSS statistical software package for Microsoft Windows (version 17.0). Results: The within-subjects effects indicated increases in CPR and AED knowledge from pre-test to post-test (p < .001) in both groups. However, no significant differences in CPR and AED competencies between the experimental group (mean = 2.42, SD = 0.83) and the control group (mean = 2.22, SD = 0.89) were observed. The between-subjects effects indicated that the experimental group had significantly higher CPR and AED knowledge scores (b = 1.95, p = .002). No significant differences in CPR and AED competencies (b = 0.11, p = .927) were observed, but the experimental group was found to have significantly greater overall competencies in CPR and AED than the control group (b = 0.36, p = .033). Conclusion: Video-aided, step-by-step instruction is useful in classroom teaching because learners can observe and practice repeatedly. It was found to be a more effective means of knowledge acquisition than traditional lecture. However, it is still important for nurses to practice constantly after the intervention to maintain a high level of competencies. Video-aided instruction should be widely applied in CPR and AED training as a way of facilitating repeated practice to maintain a level of competencies appropriate for conducting first aid medicine.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 馬玲玲、曾月霞(2003)。高中職學生接受心肺復甦術課程之學習成效。學校衛生,43,42-55。
    連結:
  2. American Heart Association(2010).2010 American Heart Association guideline for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardio-vascular care.Dallas, TX:American Heart Association.
  3. American Heart Association(2006).BLS for healthcare providers.Dallas, TX:American Heart Association.
  4. American Heart Association(2005).American Heart Association guideline for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care.Dallas, TX:American Heart Association.
  5. Assar, D.,Chamberlain, D.,Colquhoun, M.,Donnelly, P.,Handley, A. J.,Leaves, S.,Kern, K. B.(2000).Randomized controlled trials of staged teaching for basic life support. 1. Skill acquisition at bronze stage.Resuscitation,45(1),7-15.
  6. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychology Review,84,191-215.
  7. Chamberlain, D. A.,Hazinski, M. F.(2003).Education in resuscitation: An ILCOR symposium.Circulation,108(20),2575-2594.
  8. Chamberlain, D.,Smith, A.,Woollard, M.,Colquhoun, M.,Handley, A. J.,Leaves, S.,Kern, K. B.(2002).Trials of teaching methods in basic life support (3): Comparison of simulated CPR performance after first training and at 6 months, with a note on the value of re-training.Resuscitation,53(2),179-187.
  9. Deakin, C. D.,O'Neill, J. F.,Tabor, T.(2007).Does compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation generate adequate passive ventilation during cardiac arrest?.Resuscitation,75(1),53-59.
  10. Einspruch, E. L.,Lembach, J.,Lynch, B.,Lee, W.,Harper, R.,Fleischman, R. J.(2011).Basic life support instructor training: Comparison of instructor-led and self-guided training.Journal for Nurses in Staff Development,27(3),E4-E9.
  11. Eisenburger, P.,Safar, P.(1999).Life supporting first aid training of the public-review and recommendations.Resuscitations,41,3-18.
  12. Hamilton, R.(2005).Nurses' knowledge and skill retention following cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: A review of the literature.Journal of Advanced Nursing,51(3),288-297.
  13. Handley, J. A.,Handley, A. J.(1998).Four-step CPR-improving skill retention.Resuscitation,36(1),3-8.
  14. Kidd, T.,Kendall, S.(2006).Review of effective advanced cardiac life support training using experiential learning.Journal of Clinical Nursing,16,58-66.
  15. Kononowicz, A. A.,Krawczyk, P.,Cebula, G.,Dembkowska, M.,Drab, E.,Fraczek, B.,Andres, J.(2012).Effects of introducing a voluntary virtual patient module to a basic life support with an automated external defibrillator course: A randomised trial.BMC Medical Education,12(1),41.
  16. Lee, Y. G.(2013).Lee, Y. G. (2013, June). The change package for improving in-hospital cardiac arrest emergency care quality. Taiwan Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation: 2013 Breakthrough Series- To improve in-hospital cardiac arrest emergency care quality. Taipei, Taiwan: Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation..
  17. Liao, S. S.(2013).Liao, S. S. (2013, June). Introduction of breakthrough series model. Taiwan Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation: 2013 Breakthrough Series-To improve in-hospital cardiac arrest emergency care quality. Taipei, Taiwan: Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation..
  18. Moser, K.,Coleman, S.(1992).Recommendations for improving cardiopul-monary resuscitation skills retention.Heart and Lung,21(4),372-380.
  19. Mpotos, N.,Yde, L.,Calle, P.,Deschepper, E.,Valcke, M.,Peersman, W.,Monsieurs, K.(2013).Retraining basic life support skills using video, voice feedback or both: A randomized controlled trial.Resuscitation,84(1),72-77.
  20. Polit, A. F.,Beck, C. T.,Owen, S. V.(2007).Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content Validity? Appraisal and recommendations.Research in Nursing & Health,30,459-467.
  21. Sternberg R. J.、鄭昭明譯、陳億貞譯(2006)。普通心理學。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:雙葉=Yeh Yeh Book Gallery。
  22. Todd, K. H.,Heron, S. L.,Thompson, M.,Dennis, R.,O'connor, J.,Kellermann, A. L.(1999).Simple CPR: A randomized, controlled trail of video self-instructional cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in an African American Church Congregation.Annals of emergency medicine,34(6),730-737.
  23. Weerts, S.(2005).Use of films to teach critical thinking.Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior,37(2),100-101.
  24. Wineburg, S.,Mosborg, S.,Porat, D.,Duncan, A.(2007).Common belief and the cultural curriculum: An intergenerational study of historical consciousness.American Educational Research Journal,44(1),40-76.
  25. 王宗倫(2012)。臺灣急救指引。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:中華民國急救加護醫學會=Society of Emergency & Critical Care Medicine, Taiwan, R.O.C.。
  26. 李宜恭、莊欽翔、黃俊卿、楊忠憲、施中岳(2005)。使用錄影帶輔助學習心室顫動處置之有效性評估:一個隨機分派單盲研究。台灣急診醫學會雜誌,7(3),154-162。
  27. 李賢發(2006)。Taipei, Taiwan,國立臺北護理健康大學醫護教育研究所=National Taipei College of Nursing Graduate Institute of Health Allied Education。
  28. 社團法人中華緊急救護技術員協會(2014,5月20日)‧CPR+AED‧取自http://www.emt.org.tw/course.aspx?siteid=&ver=&usid=&mnuid=1348&modid=10&mode=&coursecat=56&cid=96[Taiwan Emergency Medical Technician Association (2014, May 20). CPR+AED. Retrieved from http://www.emt.org.tw/course.aspx?siteid=&ver=&usid=&mnuid=1348&modid=10&mode=&coursecat=56&cid=96]
  29. 施美秀、桑潁潁、胡勝川(2006)。2005 年版美國心臟學會之心肺復甦術重大改變。榮總護理,23(1),103-108。
  30. 胡勝川、高偉峰、顏鴻章、張新、楊久滕、黃彥達、施美秀(2010)。ACLS 精華。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:金名=Kingdom。
  31. 唐景俠、陳建良、張志然(2004)。南區某護專學生執行成人心肺復甦術之分析與探討。長庚護理,15(2),165-174。
  32. 張進富、蔡天賜、阮祺文、周志中(2001)。2000國際ECC & CPR急救準則重大改變。臺灣醫界,44(6),31-32。
  33. 陳學凌(2003)。CPR 教學及複習課程對高中生知識、技術及行為意向的影響。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌,23,115-128。
  34. 潘慧蓉、周燕燕、周瑛、童建菁、裴桂芹(2010)。兩種培訓模式對醫務人員心肺復甦培訓的效果評價。解放軍護理雜誌,27,1604-1606。
  35. 衛生福利部(2013,12月30日)‧公共場所AED急救資訊網‧取自http://tw-aed.mohw.gov.tw/index.jsp [Ministry of Health and Welfare(2013, Dec. 30). Taiwan Public AED Registry. Retrieved from http://tw-aed.mohw.gov.tw/index.jsp]
  36. 賴伶蜜、沈姍姍、江承曉(2000)。嬰幼兒急救教育介入效果與課程評價之研究。嘉南學報,26,299-312。
被引用次数
  1. 詹怡佳、辜美安、彭淑敏、林欣薇(2019)。身心科急性病房護理團隊於急救小組到達前之急救流程改善方案。榮總護理,36(2),152-161。