题名

政治哲學與敘事真實:霍布斯自然狀態中的事實與虛構

并列篇名

Political Philosophy and Narrative Truth: Fact and Fiction within Hobbes's State of Nature

DOI

10.6683/TPSR.201906_23(1).0004

作者

柯汎禧(Fen-Shi Ker)

关键词

利維坦 ; 歷史敘事 ; 歷史事實 ; 因果關係 ; 自然狀態 ; Leviathan ; historical narration ; historical truth ; causal relationship ; state of nature

期刊名称

台灣政治學刊

卷期/出版年月

23卷1期(2019 / 06 / 01)

页次

159 - 214

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本篇論文聚焦在如何整全地解決「自然狀態的事實與虛構」之爭議。我們將透過重新整理霍布斯式自然狀態在既有討論中的爭議,指出哲學虛構、歷史真實的詮釋爭議,來自於討論者多以經驗主義式的事實,理解自然狀態概念內的經驗描述,進一步來說,透過重新建構霍布斯意義下的「事實」,霍布斯的體系得以消解哲學虛構與歷史真實的對立。最後,我們意圖探討政治哲學與敘事理論的聯繫,本文的觀點是,至少在霍布斯的框架中,自然狀態概念的作用,即是把經驗現象轉化為意義之網,從而使霍布斯得以藉由一種趨近於當代敘事理論的理論性說法,擴大政治哲學的經驗範圍與現實感。

英文摘要

This thesis aims to completely resolve the controversy which refers to the state of nature between truth and fiction. By going through disputes related to Hobbes's concept of the state of nature, we attempt to point out that the foundation of interpretive controversy is derived from most interpreters applying thoughts on empiricism to understand empirical descriptions within the state of nature. Furthermore, Hobbes's system could resolve the opposition between philosophical fiction and historical truth within the state of nature through reconstructing the "fact" from the perspective of Hobbes's context. Finally, the major purpose of this thesis is to clarify the relationship between political philosophy and narrative theory. In my opinion, the function of the state of nature is to transform empirical phenomena into a web of meaning. Hobbes consequently enlarged the empirical range and practical sense within political philosophy with narrative theory approaching a contemporary theoretical perspective.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 曾國祥, Kuo-Shiang(2002)。現代歷史理論的自然主義假設:一個批判性的回顧。歐美研究,32(3),567-620。
    連結:
  2. 曾國祥, Kuo-Shiang(2009)。原因與理由:霍布斯公民哲學的二元體系。政治與社會哲學評論,30,61-116。
    連結:
  3. Abbott, Philip(1991).Story-telling and Political Theory.Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal,74(3/4),369-397.
  4. Ashcraft, Richard(1969).Locke's State of Nature: Historical Fact or Moral Fiction.The American Political Science Review,62(3),898-915.
  5. Ashcraft, Richard(1988).Political Theory and Practical Action: A Reconsideration of Hobbes's State of Nature.Hobbes Studies,1(1),163-188.
  6. Bottici, Chiara(2014).Imaginal Politics: Images Beyond Imagination and the Imaginary.New York, NY:Columbia University Press.
  7. Boucher, David(1998).Political Theories of International Relations: From Thucydides to the Present.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  8. Collingwood, R. G.(1994).The Idea of History.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  9. Dienstag, Joshua(1997).Dancing in Chains: Narrative and Memory in Political Theory.Redwood City, CA:Stanford University Press.
  10. Evrigenis, Ioannis D.(2014).Images of Anarchy: The Rhetoric and Science in Hobbes's State of Nature.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  11. Gorham, Geoffrey(2014).Hobbes on the Reality of Time.Hobbes Studies,27(1),80-103.
  12. Hamilton, James J.(2013).The Origins of Hobbes's State of Nature.Hobbes Studies,26(2),152-170.
  13. Hance A.S.(1991).Prudence and Providence: On Hobbes's Theory of Practical Reason.Man and World,24,155-167.
  14. Hirschman, Albert(2013).The Passion and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  15. Hobbes, Thomas,Gaskin, J. C. A.(ed.)(1998).Leviathan.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  16. Hobbes, Thomas,Tonnies, Ferdinand(ed.)(1969).The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic.New York, NY:Barnes and Noble.
  17. Hood, F. C.(1964).The Divine Politics of Thomas Hobbes: An Interpretation of Leviathan.Philosophical Review,75(2),258-260.
  18. Jahn, B.(1999).IR and the State of Nature: The Cultural Origins of a Ruling Ideology.Review of International Studies,25(3),411-434.
  19. Klosko, George,Rice, Daryl(1985).Thucydides and Hobbes's State of Nature.History of Political Thought,6(3),405-410.
  20. Kraynak, Robert(2003).The Fragility of Civilization in Hobbes's Historical Writings.Filozofski vestnik,2,37-58.
  21. Lund, William R.(1987).Tragedy and Education in the State of Nature: Hobbes on Time and the Will.Journal of the History of Ideas,48(3),393-410.
  22. Lund, William R.(1992).The Use and Abuse of the Past: Hobbes on the Study of History.Hobbes Studies,5(1),3-22.
  23. Macpherson, C. B.(2011).The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism:Hobbes to Locke.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  24. Malcolm, Noel(1981).Hobbes, Sandys and the Virginia Company.The Historical Journal,24(3),297-321.
  25. Martel, James R.(2007).Subverting the Leviathan Reading Thomas Hobbes as a Radical Democrat.New York, NY:Columbia University Press.
  26. Martens, Stephanie B.(2016).The Americas in Early Modern Political Theory States of Nature and Aboriginality.London, UK:Palgrave Macmillan.
  27. Mersel, G. Spector(2010).Narrative Research: Time for a Paradigm.Narrative Inquiry,20(1),204-224.
  28. Mill, Charles W.(1994).The Racial Contract.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
  29. Moloney, Pat(2011).Hobbes, Savagery, and International Anarchy.The American Political Science Review,105(1),189-204.
  30. Nichols, Robert Lee(2005).Realizing the Social Contract: The Case of Colonialism and Indigenous Peoples.Contemporary Political Theory,4(1),42-62.
  31. Patterson, Molly,Monroe, Kristen Renwick(1998).Narrative in Political Science.Annual Review of Political Science,1,315-331.
  32. Pennock, J. Roland(1960).Hobbes's Confusing ‘Clarity’–The Case of ‘Liberty’.The American Political Science Review,54(2),428-436.
  33. Plattner, Marc F.(1979).State of Nature: An Interpretation of the Discourse on Inequality.DeKalb, IL:Northern Illinois University Press.
  34. Raphael, D. D.(1977).Hobbes: Morals and Politics.London, UK:Routledge.
  35. Roecklein, Robert J.(2014).Politicized Physics in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy: Essays on Bacon, Descartes, Hobbes, and Spinoza.Lanham, MD:Lexington Books.
  36. Rogers, G. A. J.(ed.),Ryan, Alan(ed.)(1998).Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  37. Schmitt, Carl(2006).The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum.New York, NY:Telos Press.
  38. Schuhmann, Karl(2000).Hobbes and History.London, UK:Routledge.
  39. Seth, Vanita(2010).Europe's Indians: Producing Racial Difference, 1500-1900 (Politics, History, and Culture).Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
  40. Shapin, Steven,Schaffer, Simon(1985).Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  41. Snyder, Henry M.(ed.)(1972).Wild man Within.Pittsburgh, PA:University of Pittsburgh.
  42. Somers, Margaret(1993).Reclaiming the Epistemological Other: Narrative and the Social Constitution of Identity.Oxford, UK:Blackwell's.
  43. Spence, Donald P.(1984).Narrative Truth and Historical Truth: Meaning and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis.New York, NY:Norton & Company.
  44. Strauss, Leo(1963).The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  45. Suganami, Hidemi(2008).Narrative Explanation and International Relations: Back to Basics.Millennium: Journal of International Studies,37(2),327-356.
  46. Thucydides、謝德風(譯), Te-Feng(trans.)(2000).伯羅奔尼撒戰爭史:雅典斯巴達戰爭史.臺北=Taipei:臺灣商務=The Commercial Press.
  47. Valls, Andrew(ed.)(2005).Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
  48. Vaughan, Geoffrey(2007).Behemoth Teaches Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Political Education.Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc..
  49. Warrender, Howard(1957).The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  50. Wolin, Sheldon S.(1969).Political Theory as a Vocation.The American Political Science Review,63(4),1062-1082.
  51. Wolin, Sheldon S.(ed.),Xenos, Nicholas(ed.)(2016).Fugitive Democracy: And Other Essays.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  52. 方志強, Jyh-Chyang(2002)。「歷史事實」—「事實」與「解釋」的互動。新史學,13(3),149-191。
  53. 周樑楷, Liang-Kai(2006)。歷史意識是種思維的方法。思想,2,125-162。