题名

外交政策選擇的內因或外因探索：烏克蘭與吉爾吉斯的個案研究

并列篇名

Internal or External Factors: Ukrainian and Kyrgyzstan's Foreign Policies

DOI

10.6683/TPSR.202012_24(2).0002

作者

楊三億(San-Yi Yang)

关键词

內部因素 ； 外部因素 ； 外交政策 ； 吉爾吉斯 ； 烏克蘭 ； Internal Factors ； External Factors ； Foreign Policies ； Kyrgyzstan ； Ukraine

期刊名称

台灣政治學刊

卷期/出版年月

24卷2期（2020 / 12 / 01）

页次

67 - 103

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

過往探討一國外交政策發展，論者以為影響外交政策走向多因內部或外部因素所致，前者以為外交政策受國家內部政治發展影響甚鉅，外交政策變化和國內政權轉換過程有極大關連，多數外交決策分析研究途徑著重於此。相對於內部因素，其他研究指出外部強權才是影響國家外交政策走向的主要因素，國際權力體系格局才是主宰國家行為的關鍵所在。內部或外部因素影響這一群國家外交政策發展各有支持論調，作者在這個基礎上提出一些觀察。本文選擇烏克蘭與吉爾吉斯作為觀察外交政策走向，並以此研究內外因素主導如何影響這兩國政策路線發展，選擇這兩國主要因素是烏、吉兩國近期內部有極大的政權震盪現象，如果我們能觀察到這些國家內部發生極大變動之際又能找出其與外交政策變動關聯，那麼就能確認內部因素的重要性。反之，即便內部因素產生激烈震盪但外交政策卻無甚改變，那麼我們就必須重新思考其他因素影響外交政策走向的可能。本文研究指出烏克蘭革命與該國外交政策走向同幅，外交路線配合政權更迭而更動；吉爾吉斯革命與外交政策走向無甚關連。本文的解釋是：一、革命對烏、吉兩國外交路線變化影響甚微，外部強權擠壓或大小國家間不對稱性依賴才是影響兩國路線主因；二、外部地緣政治因素是決定兩國外交政策走向根本性因素，革命造成的政權轉移對外交路線選擇影響，僅為放大、縮小或無甚關聯方式存在。
英文摘要

The independence of post-communist countries following the dissolution of the Soviet Union is a crucial topic in academic research on contemporary international relations. The foreign policies and political development of these countries reveal various facets of their transitions. This paper focuses on the relationship between the regime transfer following the break up of the Union and the foreign policies of the countries in order to clarify the effects of internal/external factors on the aforementioned policies. This study examines two countries in order to clarify the relationship between regime transfer and foreign policies. Although the Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan have undergone frequent revolutions, they differ considerably in terms of their diplomatic directions. In the Ukraine, the foreign policy has changed following each revolution and the diplomatic direction has changed after each regime transfer. By contrast, the diplomatic direction of Kyrgyzstan has remained mostly unchanged despite the revolutions. In seeking to explain this difference we draw the following conclusions: (a) A revolution has only a small impact on foreign policy; it is the competition for power and asymmetric dependence that have a major impact. (b) Geopolitical divisions serve as a major factor affecting the foreign policies of the two countries. Revolutions affect foreign policy either in terms of their scope or are simply irrelevant.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 吳玉山, Yu-shan(2007)。顏色革命的許諾與侷限。臺灣民主季刊，4(2)，67-112。
    連結：
  2. 楊三億, San-yi(2018)。烏克蘭安全策略選擇：內部因素分析。問題與研究，57(1)，1-28。
    連結：
  3. 楊三億, San-yi(2017)。歐洲中小型國家安全政策：策略選擇與轉型。問題與研究，56(2)，31-66。
    連結：
  4. 趙竹成, Zhu-cheng(2007)。認同的選擇─以境外俄羅斯人為案例的分析。問題與研究，46(2)，54-81。
    連結：
  5. Allison, Roy(2004).Regionalism, regional structures and security management in Central Asia.International Affairs,80(3),468-483.
  6. Allison, Roy(2004).Strategic Reassertion in Russia’s Central Asia Policy.International Affairs,80(2),277-293.
  7. Averre, Derek(2009).Competing Rationalities: Russia, the EU and ‘Shared Neighbourhood.Europe-Asia Studies,61(10),1689-1713.
  8. Axyonov, Vera,Bossuyt, Fabienne(2016).Mapping the Substance of the EU’s Civil Society Support in Central Asia: From Neo-liberal to State-led Civil Society.Communist and Post-Communist Studies,49,207-217.
  9. Bohr, Annette(2010).Bohr, Annette. 2010. “Revolution in Kyrgyzstan-Again” Chatham House, REP Programme Paper 03/10: 1-7..
  10. Ceccarelli, Alessandra(2007).Clans, politics and organized crime in Central Asia.Trends Organ Crim,10,19-36.
  11. Cooley, Alexander(2008).US Bases and Democratization in Central Asia.Orbis,52(1),65-90.
  12. Dension, Michael(2007).Discipline and Persuade: The Origins and Uses of Central Asia’s Leadership Cults.Osteuropa,8(9),209-223.
  13. European Union(2016).EU Assistance to Ukraine.Luxembourg:Publication Office of the European Union.
  14. Fedorov, Yury E.(2013).Continuity and change in Russia’s policy toward Central and Eastern Europe.Communist and PostCommunist Studies,46(3),315-326.
  15. Foran, John(ed.)(2003).The Future of Revolutions.New York, NY:Zed Books.
  16. Fumagalli, Matteo(2007).Alignments and Realignments in Central Asia: The Rationale and Implications of Uzbekistan’s Rapprochement with Russia.International Political Science Review,28(3),253-271.
  17. Globaledge. 2018. “Kyrgyzstan: Trade Statistics.” https://globaledge.msu.edu/countries/kyrgyzstan/tradestats (November 29, 2020).
  18. Goble, Paul. 2017. “Why Does Kyrgyzstan Want a Second Russian Military Base?” https://jamestown.org/why-does-kyrgyzstan-want-a-second-russian-military-base/ (November 29, 2020).
  19. Goldstone, Jack(1980).Theories of Revolutions: The Third Generation.World Politics,32,425-453.
  20. Guasti, Petra(2016).Development of citizen participation in Central and Eastern Europe after the EU enlargement and economic crises.Communist and Post-Communist Studies,49(3),219-231.
  21. Hauner, Milan(1989).Central Asian Geopolitics in the Last Hundred Years-Acritical Survey from Gorchakov to Gorbachev.Central Asia Survey,8(1),1-20.
  22. Herd, Hraeme(2005).Russia and the Orange Revolution: Response, Rhetoric, Reality?.Connections,4(2),15-28.
  23. Hoffmann, Katharina(2010).The EU in Central Asia: Successful Good Governance Promotion?.Third World Quarterly,31(1),87-103.
  24. Huntington, Samuel(1968).Political Order in Changing Societies.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
  25. Juraev, Shairbek(2008).Kyrgyz democracy? The Tulip Revolution and beyond.Central Asian Survey,27(3-4),253-264.
  26. Karpyak, Oleg. 2013. “Ukraine’s two different revolutions” BBC News Ukrainian, or see https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-25210230 (November 29, 2020).
  27. Kuzio, Taras(2015).Ukraine: Democratization, Corruption, and the New Russian Imperialism.Santa Barbara, CA:Praeger.
  28. Kuzio, Taras(2010).Nationalism, identity and civil society in Ukraine: Understanding the Orange Revolution.Communist and Post-Communist Studies,43(3),285-296.
  29. Kuzio, Taras(2005).Regime Type and Politics in Ukraine under Kuchma.Communist and Post-Communist Studies,38(2),167-190.
  30. Kuzio, Taras(2016).The Orange and Euromaidan Revolutions: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives.Kyiv-Mohyla Law & Politics Journal,2,91-115.
  31. Kuzio, Taras(2012).Russianization of Ukrainian National Security Policy Under Viktor Yanukovych.The Journal of Slavic Military Studies,25(4),558-581.
  32. Kyiv Post, 2013, “Yanukovych happy with results of Ukrainian-EU summit”. February 25.
  33. Lewis, David(2008).The Dynamics of Regime Change.Central Asian Survey,3,265-277.
  34. Megoran, Nick(2017).Nationalism in Central Asia: A Biography of the Uzbekistan-Kyrgyzstan Boundary.Pittsburgh, PA:Pittsburgh University Press.
  35. Menon, Rajan(2003).The New Great Game in Central Asia.Survival,45(2),187-204.
  36. Olcott, Martha Brill(2005).Central Asia’s Second Chance.Washington, DC:Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  37. Onuch, Olga(2014).Who were the protesters?.Journal of Democracy,25(3),44-51.
  38. Otunnu, Ogenga(2017).Crisis of Legitimacy and Political Violence in Uganda, 1979 to 2016.Chicago, IL:Palgrave Macmillan.
  39. Potemkin, V. ed. 1941. Istoria Diplomatii (History of diplomacy), vol. I. Moscow, RUS: OGIZ.
  40. Putz, Catherine. 2017. “Checking in With Moscow: New Kyrgyz President Makes First International Trip to Russia” The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2017/11/checking-in-with-moscow-new-kyrgyz-president-makes-first-international-trip-to-russia/ (November 29, 2020).
  41. Radnitz, Scott(2006).What Really Happened in Kyrgyzstan?.Journal of Democracy,17(2),132-146.
  42. Sageman, Marc(2017).Turning to Political Violence: The Emergence of Terrorism.Philadelphia, PA:University of Pennsylvania Press.
  43. Sari, Yaşar(2012).Foreign Policy of Kyrgyzstan under Askar Akayev and Kurmanbek Bakiyev.Perceptions,17(3),131-150.
  44. Schatz, Edward(2006).Access by Accident: Legitimacy Claims and Democracy Promotion in Authoritarian Central Asia.International Political Science Review,27(3),263-284.
  45. Skocpol, Theda(1979).States and Social Revolutions.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  46. Temirkulov, Azamat(2010).Kyrgyz "revolutions" in 2005 and 2010: Comparative analysis of mass mobilization.Nationalities Papers,38(5),589-600.
  47. Tokmakov, Alexander. 2015. “Kyrgyzstan: Two revolutions, but still no prosperity,” Deutsche Welle. https://www.dw.com/en/kyrgyzstan-two-revolutions-but-still-no-prosperity/a-18352547 (March 31, 2020).
  48. Tursunov, Bakhrom,Pikulin, Marina(1999).Severe Lessons of Batken.Camberley, UK:The Conflict Studies Research Centre.
  49. Van Antwerp, Alanna C.,Brown, Nathan J.(2018).The Electoral Model without Elections? The Arab Upsprings of 2011 and the Color Revolutions in Comparative Perspectives.Demokratizatsiya,26(2),195-226.
  50. Viceré, Maria Giulia Amadio(2018).The High Representative and EU Foreign Policy Integration: A Comparative Study of Kosovo and Ukraine.Cham, CH:Springer Nature.
  51. Wolczuk, Kataryna(2008).Ukraine and its relations with the EU in the context of the European Neighbourhood Policy.Ukraine: Quo Vadis?,Paris, FR:
  52. 洪美蘭, Mei-lan(2014)。烏克蘭事件及其意涵。戰略安全研析，108，4-13。
  53. 連弘宜, Hong-yi(2014)。克里米亞事件探討俄羅斯的對外政策。戰略安全研析，110，28-36。
  54. 趙竹成, Zhu-cheng(2017)。徘徊在歸附與自決之間——烏克蘭東部與克里米亞的選擇。當代歐洲民族運動：從蘇格蘭獨立公投到克里米亞危機，台北=Taipei:
print cancel