题名

一個人權道德基礎理論：台灣社會死刑意向道德基礎初探

并列篇名

A Moral Foundations Theory of Human Rights: Illustrated by Taiwan's Moral Foundations for the Death Penalty

DOI

10.6683/TPSR.202212_26(2).0001

作者

陳嘉銘(Chia-Ming Chen)；周應龍(Ying-Lung Chou)

关键词

人權 ； 道德基礎理論 ； 死刑 ； 儒家 ； 東亞 ； Human Rights ； Moral Foundations Theory ； Death Penalty ； Confucianism ； East Asia

期刊名称

台灣政治學刊

卷期/出版年月

26卷2期（2022 / 12 / 01）

页次

1 - 64

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

本篇論文是一篇人權政治理論的論文，我們試著回答，我們該如何促進人們心理上對人權的實際支持。為了回答這個問題，我們建議我們需要了解人權的社會論述和個人心理機制的關係。因此我們提出一個解釋人權意向的道德基礎理論框架。這個框架結合了喬納森．海特（Jonathan Haidt）等人提出的道德基礎理論以及丹．麥亞當斯（Dan P. McAdams）的三階層人格理論。我們試圖以這個框架描繪從人權事件發生到形塑人權意向的心理機制和過程。為了進一步說明這個理論框架的用處，我們以一個特定的人權議題－死刑－為例，分析了八種死刑相關的社會論述，探討了死刑社會論述、道德基礎和死刑意向的關係。我們的理論指出我們需要特定社會的道德基礎分布，特別是道德基礎的子面向，才能知道這個社會的道德基礎和死刑意向的關係。因此我們進一步試著透過經驗資料探討我們的理論。我們以海特等人發展出來的道德基礎問卷為基礎，以台灣社會為母體，設計了一個電話調查訪問的道德基礎問卷。我們分析了電訪獲得的資料，指出台灣社會作為東亞社會的死刑社會論述和道德基礎子面向的特殊性。我們最後提供了廢死運動一些論述策略建議。
英文摘要

In this paper, we attempt to answer how we can facilitate people's real psychological support for human rights. To answer this question, we suggest that we need to understand the relations between human rights discourses and individuals' psychological mechanisms. Therefore, we propose a theoretical framework of moral foundations theory to explain people's human rights orientations. The framework combines Jonathan Haidt's and his colleagues' moral foundations theory and Dan P. McAdams's three-layers theory of personality. We use this framework to outline the mechanisms and processes that lead human rights events to shape people's human rights attitudes. To further explain the use of our theory, we apply the theory to a specific issue of human rights, namely, the death penalty. We analyze eight social discourses concerning the death penalty, and explore the relations among the discourses, the moral foundations and people's attitudes to the death penalty. Our theory suggests that we need to know the moral foundations of a specific society in order to learn the relations between the moral foundations and death penalty attitudes of that particular society. To illustrate, we design and undertake a survey based on Haidt's moral foundations questionnaire to find out the relations between Taiwan's moral foundations and death penalty attitudes. In the end, we offer some discursive strategies to Taiwan's abolition movement.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 陳嘉銘, Chia-ming(2014)。死刑的政治權威能否證立？。政治與社會哲學評論，50，1-57。
    連結：
  2. Abernethy, Jonathan S.(1996).The Methodology of Death: Reexamining the Deterrence Rationale.Columbia Human Rights Law Review,27(2),379-428.
  3. Altemeyer, Bob(1981).Right-Wing Authoritarianism.Winnipeg, CA:University of Manitoba Press.
  4. Altemeyer, Bob(1998).The Other ‘Authoritarian Personality.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,30,47-92.
  5. Altemeyer, Bob.(1996).The Authoritarian Specter.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  6. Barkow, Jerome H.(ed.),Cosmides, Leda(ed.),Tooby, John(ed.)(1992).The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture.Oxford, NY:Oxford University Press.
  7. Bedau, Hugo Adam(1985).Thinking of the Death Penalty as a Cruel and Unusual Punishment.University of California-Davis Law Review,18(4),873-925.
  8. Bell, Daniel A.(2008).Confucian Political Ethics.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  9. Bell, Daniel A.(ed.)(2008).Confucian Political Ethics.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  10. Bellamy, Richard(ed.)(1995).Beccaria: ‘On Crimes and Punishments’ and Other Writings.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  11. Blume, John H.,Johnson, Sheri Lynn,Marcus, Paul,Paavola, Emily(2014).A Tale of Two (and Possibly Three) Atkins: Intellectual Disability and Capital Punishment Twelve Years after The Supreme Court's Creation of a Categorical Bar.William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal,23(2),393-414.
  12. Bowring, John(ed.)(1962).The Works of Jeremy Bentham.Manchester, UK:Russell & Russell.
  13. Burton, Corey,Tewksbury, Richard(2013).How Families of Murder Victims Feel Following the Execution of Their Loved One’s Murderer: A Content Analysis of Newspaper Reports of Executions from 2006-2011.Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology,1(1),1-25.
  14. Carruthers, Peter(ed.),Laurence, Stephen(ed.),Stich, Stephen(ed.)(2007).The Innate Mind Vol. 3: Foundations and the Future.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  15. Cohen, Geoffrey L.(2003).Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85(5),808-822.
  16. Crowson, Howard Michael(2004).Human Rights Attitudes: Dimensionality and Psychological Correlates.Ethics & Behavior,14(3),235-253.
  17. Dalton, Russell(ed.),Shin, Doh C.(ed.)(2006).Citizens, Democracy, and Markets around the Pacific Rim: Congruence Theory and Political Culture.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  18. Davis, Michael(1986).Harm and Retribution.Philosophy & Public Affairs,15(3),236-266.
  19. Davis, Michael(1983).How to Make the Punishment Fit the Crime.Ethics,93(4),726-752.
  20. Dent, Christopher M.(2008).East Asian Regionalism.London, UK:Routledge.
  21. Doise, Williem,Spini, Dario,Jesuino, Jorge C.,Ng, Sik Hung(1994).Values and Perceived Conflicts in the Social Representations of Human Rights: Feasibility of a Cross-National Study.Swiss Journal of Psychology,53(4),240-251.
  22. Dolinko, David(1986).Foreword: How to Criticize the Death Penalty.Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology,77(3),546-601.
  23. Donnelly, John(2013).Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
  24. Equal Justice Initiative. 2019. “Death Penalty.” https://eji.org/issues/death-penalty/ (March 18, 2023).
  25. Fetzer, Joel S.,Soper, J. Christopher(2013).Confucianism, Democratization, and Human Rights in Taiwan.Lanham, MD:Lexington Books.
  26. Finnis, John(1999).Retribution: Punishment's Formative Aim.American Journal of Jurisprudence,44,91-103.
  27. Fletcher, George(1999).The Place of Victims in the Theory of Retribution.Buffalo Criminal Law Review,3(1),51-63.
  28. Ford, Richard T.(2012).Universal Rights Down to Earth.New York, NY:W. W. Norton & Company.
  29. Goldin, Paul R.(2011).Confucianism.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
  30. Gorn, R. Rosie(2018).Adequate Representation: The Difference Between Life and Death.American Criminal Law Review,55(2),463-485.
  31. Graham, Jesse,Haidt, Jonathan,Nosek, Brian A.(2009).Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,96(5),1029-1046.
  32. Graham, Jesse,Nosek, Brian A.,Haidt, Jonathan,Iyer, Ravi,Koleva, Spassena,Ditto, Peter H.(2011).Mapping the Moral Domain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,101(2),366-385.
  33. Haidt, Jonathan(2012).The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion.New York, NY:Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
  34. Haidt, Jonathan,Graham, Jesse(2007).When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize.Social Justice Research,20(1),98-116.
  35. Haidt, Jonathan,Graham, Jesse,Joseph, Craig(2009).Above and Below Left-Right: Ideological Narratives and Moral Foundations.Psychological Inquiry,20(2-3),110-119.
  36. Haidt, Jonathan,Joseph, Craig(2004).Intuitive Ethics: How Innately Prepared Intuitions Generate Culturally Variable Virtues.Daedalus,133(4),55-66.
  37. Hsu, Han-yu,Huang, Li-li,Hwang, Kwang-kuo(2019).Liberal- conservative Dimension of Moral Concerns Underlying Political Faction Formation in Taiwan.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,22(3),301-315.
  38. Huntington, Samuel P.(1998).The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order.New York, NY:Touchstone.
  39. Hwang, Kwang-kuo(1998).Two Moralities: Reinterpreting the Findings of Empirical Research on Moral Reasoning in Taiwan.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,1(3),211-238.
  40. Kim, So-young(2010).Do Asian Values Exist? Empirical Tests of the Four Dimensions of Asian Values.Journal of East Asian Studies,10(2),315-344.
  41. Kim, Sung-moon(2016).Public Reason Confucianism: Democratic Perfectionism and Constitutionalism in East Asia.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  42. Koleva, Spassena P.,Graham, Jesse,Iyer, Ravi,Ditto, Peter H.,Haidt, Jonathan(2012).Tracing the Threads: How Five Moral Concerns (especially Purity) Help Explain Culture War Attitudes.Journal of Research in Personality,46(2),184-194.
  43. Kramer, Matthew H.(2011).The Ethics of Capital Punishment: A Philosophical Investigation of Evil and its Consequences.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  44. Marcus, Gary F.(2004).The Birth of the Mind: How a Tiny Number of Genes Creates The Complexities of Human Thought.New York, NY:Basic Books.
  45. Markel, Dan(2009).Executing Retributivism: Panetti and the Future of the Eighth Amendment.Northwestern University Law Review,103(3),1163-1222.
  46. Markel, Dan(2005).State, Be Not Proud: A Retributivist Defense of the Commutation of Death Row and the Abolition of the Death Penalty.Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review,40(2),407-480.
  47. McAdams, Dan P.(1996).Personality, Modernity, and the Storied Self: A Contemporary Framework for Studying Persons.Psychological Inquiry,7(4),295-321.
  48. McAdams, Dan P.(1995).What Do We Know When We Know a Person?.Journal of Personality,63(3),365-396.
  49. McAdams, Dan P.(2001).The Psychology of Life Stories.Review of General Psychology,5(2),100-122.
  50. McAdams, Dan P.,Pals, Jennifer L.(2006).A New Big Five: Fundamental Principles for an Integrative Science of Personality.American Psychologist,61(3),204-217.
  51. McFarland, Sam,Mathews, Melissa(2005).Who Cares about Human Rights?.Political Psychology,26(3),365-385.
  52. Mental Health America. 2016. “Position Statement 54: Death Penalty and People with Mental Illnesses.” https://www.mhanational.org/issues/position-statement-54-death-penaltyand-people-mental-illnesses (March 18, 2023).
  53. Moghaddam, Fathali M.,Vuksanovic, Vuk(1990).Attitudes and Behavior toward Human Rights across Different Contexts: The Role of Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Political Ideology, and Religiosity.International Journal of Psychology,25(2),455-474.
  54. Moyn, Samuel(2010).The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  55. Nussbaum, Martha Craven(2016).Anger and Forgiveness: Resentment, Generosity, Justice.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  56. Oldstone-Moore, Jennifer(2003).Understanding Confucianism: Origins, Beliefs, Practices, Holy Texts, Sacred Places.London, UK:Duncan Baird Publishers.
  57. Pope Francis. 2015. “Letter of His Holiness Pope Francis to the President of the International Commission against the Death Penalty.” https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/letters/2015/documents/papa-francesco_20150320_letterapena-morte.html (March 18, 2023).
  58. Pratto, Felicia(1999).The Puzzle of Continuing Group Inequality: Piecing Together Psychological, Social, and Cultural Forces in Social Dominance Theory.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,31,191-263.
  59. Pratto, Felicia,Sidanius, Jim,Stallworth, Lisa M.,Malle, Bertram F.(1994).Social Dominance Orientation: A Personality Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67(4),741-763.
  60. Pratto, Felicia,Stallworth, Lisa M.,Conway-Lanz, Sahr(1998).Social Dominance Orientation and the Ideological Legitimization of Social Policy.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,28(20),1853-1875.
  61. Robson, John M.(ed.),Kinzer, Bruce L.(ed.)(1988).Collected Works of John Stuart Mill: Public and Parliamentary Speeches. November 1850-November 1868.Toronto, CA:University of Toronto Press.
  62. Rokeach, Milton(1973).The Nature of Human Values.New York, NY:Free Press.
  63. Schwartz, Shalom H.(1992).Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,25,1-65.
  64. Sharma, Arvind(ed.)(1993).Our Religions: The Seven World Religions Introduced by Preeminent Scholars from Each Tradition.San Francisco, CA:HarperOne.
  65. Sher, George(1987).Desert.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  66. Shin, Doh Chull(2012).Confucianism and Democratization in East Asia.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  67. Sidanius, Jim,Pratto, Felicia(1999).Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  68. Slote, Walter H.(ed.),De Vos, George A.(ed.)(1998).Confucianism and the Family.Albany, NY:State University of New York Press.
  69. Sorell, Tom(1987).Moral Theory and Capital Punishment.Oxford, UK:B. Blackwell Publisher.
  70. Spini, Dario,Doise, Willem(1998).Organizing Principles of Involvement in Human Rights and Their Social Anchoring in Value Priorities.European Journal of Social Psychology,28(4),603-622.
  71. Steiker, Carol S.,Steiker, Jordan M.(2005).The Seduction of Innocence: The Attraction and Limitations of the Focus on Innocence in Capital Punishment Law and Advocacy.Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology,95(2),587-624.
  72. Stellmacher, Jost,Sommer, Gert,Brahler, Elmar(2005).The Cognitive Representation of Human Rights: Knowledge, Importance and Commitment.Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology,11(3),267-292.
  73. Stigler, James W.(ed.),Shweder, Richard A.(ed.),Herdt, Gilbert(ed.)(1990).Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  74. Sunstein, Cass R.,Vermeule, Adrian(2005).Deterring Murder: A Reply.Stanford Law Review,58(3),847-857.
  75. Sunstein, Cass R.,Vermeule, Adrian(2005).Is Capital Punishment Morally Required? Acts, Omissions, and Life-Life Tradeoffs.Stanford Law Review,58(3),703-750.
  76. Tu, Wei-ming(1989).Confucianism in a Historical Perspective.Queenstown, SG:Institute of East Asian Philosophies.
  77. Tu, Wei-ming(2000).Implications of the Rise of ‘Confucian’ East Asia.Daedalus,129(1),195-218.
  78. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. 1989. “Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Aiming at the Abolition of the Death Penalty.” https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/second-optional-protocol-international-covenant-civil-and (March 18, 2023).
  79. Van den Haag, Ernest(1989).Why Capital Punishment?.Albany Law Review,54,501-514.
  80. Yao, Xin-zhong(2000).An Introduction to Confucianism.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  81. 李仰桓, Yang-huan(2005)。台灣廢除死刑運動的發展概況。司法改革雜誌，58，54-61。
  82. 葉素萍 ， 2 0 1 2 ， 〈 死刑議題李登輝 ： 由社會討論〉，h t t p s: / / t w. n e w s. y a h o o . c o m / % E 6 % A D %B B % E 5 % 8 8 % 9 1 % E 8 % A D % B 0 % E 9 % A 1 % 8 C -%E6%9D%8E%E7%99%BB%E8%BC%9D-%E7%94%B1%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E8%A8%8E%E8%AB%96-044624576.html，查閱時間：2023/03/18。Ye, Su-ping. 2012. “Sixing yiti Li deng hui: You shehui taolun” [The Issue of Death Penalty. Lee Teng-hui: Let the Society Discuss].(Accessed on March 18, 2023).
  83. 瞿海源, Hei-yuan(2006)。遏止犯罪、生命價值與死刑：台灣民眾對廢除死刑的態度。台灣社會學刊，37，133-167。
  84. 瞿海源, Hei-yuan(2019).廢除死刑正反意見：台灣實證.台北=Taipei:台灣廢除死刑推動聯盟=Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty.
print cancel