题名

國中生關係攻擊加害者與受害者之規範信念、同理心與因應策略

并列篇名

The Normative Beliefs, Empathy, and Interpersonal Coping Strategies of Relationally Aggressive Perpetrators and Victims in Junior High Schools

DOI

10.6778/NTTUERJ.201012.0001

作者

林苡彤(Yi-Tung Lin);程景琳(Ching-Ling Cheng)

关键词

人際衝突因應策略 ; 同理心 ; 關係攻擊 ; 關係受害 ; 關係攻擊規範信念 ; coping strategies of interpersonal conflicts ; empathy ; relational aggression ; relational victimization ; normative beliefs of relational aggression

期刊名称

臺東大學教育學報

卷期/出版年月

21卷2期(2010 / 12 / 01)

页次

1 - 28

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在探討國中生關係攻擊加害者與受害者,相較於未涉入關係攻擊者,在關係攻擊規範信念、同理心,以及人際衝突因應策略上的異同。本研究以台北縣、市4所八年級學生為研究對象,共計964人(男生498人、女生466人)。使用的研究工具包括:「關係攻擊同儕提名問卷」、「關係攻擊受害經驗量表」、「同理心量表」及「規範信念與人際衝突因應策略情境式量表」。調查所得資料以描述性統計、卡方考驗、單因子變異數分析,以及多元逐步迴歸等統計方法處理。結果發現:一、在關係攻擊規範信念,關係攻擊受害者得分高於未涉入者,加害者與未涉入者間沒有差異;二、在同理心,關係攻擊受害者的得分高於未涉入者,加害者與未涉入者間沒有差異;三、在人際衝突因應策略,關係攻擊加害者與受害者在「負面情緒與自責」及「發洩情緒」因應策略上皆高於未涉入者;受害者在「尋求社會支持」策略上高於未涉入者,在「負面情緒與自責」策略上高於關係攻擊加害者;四、國中生的關係攻擊規範信念、同理心及人際衝突因應策略,可以有效預測其關係攻擊加害及受害程度。

英文摘要

The main purpose of this study was to investigate how the relationally aggressive and the relationally victimized adolescents differed from their counterparts of non-relational-aggression-involvement in terms of normative beliefs, empathy, and interpersonal coping strategies. The sample consisted of 964 8th-grade students (498 boys and 466 girls) from four junior high schools in Taipei area. The instruments used in this study were Relational Aggression Questionnaire-Peer Nomination, Victimization Experiences of Relational Aggression-Self Report Scale, The Interpersonal Reactivity Inventory, and The Questionnaire of Normative Beliefs about Relational Aggression and Interpersonal Coping Strategies. The data were analyzed by Chi-square, ANOVA, and Multiple Stepwise Regression.The main findings of this study were as follows: The relational victims were different from their counterparts of non-relational-aggression-involvement in terms of their normative beliefs, empathy, and the coping strategies. The relational aggressors, in contrast with the counterparts, were only dissimilar on some of the coping strategies. Overall, the variables of normative belief, empathy, and interpersonal coping strategy could predict the extent of relational aggression and relational victimization among junior-high-school students.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 林慧姿、程景琳(2006)。國小六年級學童自尊、情緒調節與友誼之相關研究。教育心理學報,38(2),177-193。
    連結:
  2. Cheng, C. L. (2008). Relational aggression questionnaire: Peer nomination.Unpublished instrument, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  3. Bailey, C. A.,Ostrov, J. M.(2008).Differentiating forms and functions of aggression in emerging adults: Associations with hostile attribution biases and normative beliefs.Journal of Youth Adolescence,37,713-722.
  4. Bryant, B. K.(1982).An index of empathy for children and adolescents.Child Development,53,413-425.
  5. Camodeca, M.,Goossens, F. A.(2005).Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims.Journal of Child Psychology Psychiatry,46,186-197.
  6. Carlo, G.,Raffaelli, M.,Laible, D. J.,Meyer, K. A.(1999).Why are girls less physically aggressive than boys? Personality and parenting mediators of physical aggression.Sex Roles,40,711-729.
  7. Causey, D. L.,Dubow, E. F.(1992).Development of a self-report coping measure for elementary school children.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology,21,47-59.
  8. Champion, K. M.,Clay, D. L.(2000).Individual differences in responses to provocation and frequent victimization by peers.Child Psychiatry and Human Development,37,205-220.
  9. Conway, A. M.(2005).Girls aggression and emotion regulation.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,75,334-339.
  10. Coyne, S. M.,Archer, J.,Eslea, M.(2006)."We're not friends anymore: Unless...": The frequency and harmfulness of indirect, relational, and social aggression.Aggression Behavior,32,294-307.
  11. Crick, N. R.,Grotpeter, J. K.,Bigbee, M. A.(2002).Relationally and physically aggressive children's intent attributions and feelings of distress for relational and instrumental peer provocations.Child Development,73,1134-1142.
  12. Davis, M. H.(1983).Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,44,113-126.
  13. Feshbach, N. D.,Feshbach, S.(1969).The relationship between empathy and aggression in two age groups.Developmental Psychology,1,102-107.
  14. Folkman, S.,Lazarus, R. S.(1988).Coping as a mediator of emotion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54,466-475.
  15. Folkman, S.,Lazarus, R. S.(1980).An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample.Journal of Health and Social Behavior,21,219-239.
  16. Frydenberg, E.,Lewis, R.(1991).Adolescent coping: The different ways in which boys and girls cope.Journal of Adolescence,4,119-133.
  17. Gottheil, N. F.,Dubow, E. F.(2001).Tripartite beliefs models of bully and victim behavior.Journal of Emotional Abuse,2,25-47.
  18. Henry, D.,Guerra, N.,Huesmann, R.,Tolan, P.,VanAcker, R.,Eron, L.(2000).Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms.America Journal of Community Psychology,28,59-81.
  19. Hodges, E. V. E.,Boivin, M.,Vitaro, F.,Bukowski, W. M.(1999).The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization.Developmental Psychology,35,94-101.
  20. Huesmann, L. R.,Guerra, N. G.(1997).Children's normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72,408-419.
  21. Kaukiainen, A.,Björkqvist, K.,Lagerspetz, K.,Österman, K.,Salmivalli, C.,Rothberg, S.,Ahlbom, A.(1999).The relationships between social intelligence, empathy, and three types of aggression.Aggressive Behavior,25,81-89.
  22. Lovett, B. J.,Sheffield, R. A.(2007).Affective empathy deficits in aggressive children and adolescents: A critical review.Clinical Psychology Review,27,1-13.
  23. Marini, Z. A.,Dane, A. V.,Bosacki, S. L.(2006).Direct and indirect bully-victims: Differential psychosocial risk factors associated with adolescents involved in bullying and victimization.Aggressive Behavior,32,551-569.
  24. Mayberry, M. L.,Espelage, D. L.(2007).Associations among empathy, social competence and reactive proactive aggression subtypes.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,36,787-798.
  25. Mckay, C. A.(2003).Relational aggression in children.The Camping Magazine,76,24-29.
  26. Miller, P. A.,Eisenberg, N.(1988).The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior.Psychological Bulletin,103,324-344.
  27. Mullin-Rindler, N.(2003).New fixes for relational aggression.The Education Digest,69,9-11.
  28. Musher-Eizenman, D. R.,Boxer, P.,Danner, S.,Dubow, E. F.,Goldstein, S. E.,Heretick, D. M. L.(2004).Social-cognitive mediators of the relation of environmental and emotion regulation factors to children's aggression.Aggressive Behavior,30,389-408.
  29. Phelps, C. E. R.(2001).Children's responses to overt and relational aggression.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology,30,240-252.
  30. Remillard, A. M.,Lamb, S.(2005).Adolescent girls' coping with relational aggression.Sex Roles,53,221-229.
  31. Richardson, D. R.,Hammock, G. S.,Smith, S. M.,Gardner, W.,Signo, M.(1994).Empathy as a cognitive inhibitor of interpersonal aggression.Aggressive Behavior,20,275-289.
  32. Shechtman, Z.,Basheer, O.(2005).Normative beliefs supporting aggression of Arab children in an intergroup conflict.Aggressive Behavior,31,324-335.
  33. Sukhodolsky, D. G.,Ruchkn, V. V.(2004).Association of normative beliefs and anger with aggression and antisocial behavior in Russian male juvenile offenders and high school students.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,32,225-236.
  34. Tiedens, L. Z.(2001).The effect of anger on the hostile inferences of aggressive and nonaggressive people: Specific emotions, cognitive processing, and chronic accessibility.Motivation and Emotion,25,233-251.
  35. Vail, K.(2002).Relational aggression in girls.The Education Digest,68,7-14.
  36. Verona, E.,Reed, A.,Curtin, J. J.,Pole, M.(2007).Gender differences in emotional and overt/covert aggressive responses to stress.Aggressive Behavior,33,261-271.
  37. Warden, D.,Mackinnon, S.(2003).Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social problem-solving strategies.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,21,367-385.
  38. Werner, N. E.,Nixon, C. L.(2005).Normative beliefs and relational aggression: An investigation of the cognitive bases of adolescent aggressive behavior.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,34,229-243.
  39. 李雅婷(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系。
  40. 林君徽(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系。
  41. 林淑菁(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中市,國立臺中師範學院諮商與教育心理研究所。
  42. 莊季靜(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
  43. 陳玫靜(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,臺北市立教育大學心理與諮商學系。
  44. 程景琳、廖小雯、林苡彤、粘絢雯(2009)。國中生關係攻擊受害經驗量表之編製。「2009年中國測驗學會年會暨心理與教育測驗」學術研討會,台北市:
  45. 蔡慧苓(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹市,國立新竹教育大學教育心理與諮商學系輔導教學碩士班。
  46. 戴淑梅(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
  47. 藍珮君(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 程景琳、張玉姍(2014)。小團體輔導對遭遇關係攻擊之國中女生的輔導成效。中等教育,65(2),63-85。
  2. 鄧文章,陳亦鳳,杜淑芬(2021)。國中輔導教師介入關係霸凌事件的輔導困境與策略。教育心理學報,53(1),223-249。
  3. 簡嘉盈、程景琳(2012)。同儕對高中生之利社會行為的影響:檢視同理心與友誼特性之調節角色。教育科學期刊,11(1),105-123。
  4. 賴怡君,程景琳(2020)。國小學童同理心與霸凌旁觀者行為傾向之關係:以道德疏離為中介變項。人類發展與家庭學報,21,28-56。
  5. 廖小雯、程景琳(2012)。國中生關係受害經驗與心理孤寂感之關聯及調節因子之檢驗。健康促進與衛生教育學報,38,1-25。
  6. 廖小雯、程景琳(2013)。「同理反應情境式量表」之編製與信效度檢驗。健康促進與衛生教育學報,40,69-95。
  7. 劉聿翎,李俜怡(2016)。校園中關係霸凌參與者之團體動力。諮商與輔導,362,45-48+20。
  8. 蕭偉智(2011)。從影片《自然捲》談青少女關係攻擊。中等教育,62(4),136-144。
  9. 詹雨臻,陳學志,張益慈(2021)。繁體中文版「簡式暗黑四特質量表」之發展與信效度考驗。測驗學刊,68(4),287-316。
  10. 張芳全、于文灝(2016)。國中生家庭社經地位、關係攻擊、同儕接納與自然科學習動機之縱貫性研究。彰化師大教育學報,28/29,53-80。
  11. 趙敏安,程景琳(2022)。青少年於新冠肺炎疫情期間維持社交距離之動機與行為的相關探討:以同理心為中介變項。台灣公共衛生雜誌,41(5),500-511。
  12. (2024)。高中職普通生霸凌行為之研究。教育科學研究期刊,69(1),165-206。
  13. (2024)。高中職身障生校園受凌之研究──與普通生做比較。教育心理學報,56(1),127-158。
  14. (2024)。以團隊導向學習提升軍校學生同理心之教學實踐研究。通識學刊:理念與實務,12(1),137-184。