题名

助詞における母音弱化―「が」、「と」、「で」の母音a, o, e 弱化研究

并列篇名

Vowel Reduction in Japanese Particles the Reduction of the vowels in Particles "ga", "de", and "to"

DOI

10.29736/DWRYJYSB.200901.0005

作者

白井勢津子(Shirai Setsuko)

关键词

元音弱化 ; 持續時間 ; 虛詞 ; 共振峰 ; 中心化 ; 助詞 ; 普遍語法 ; 共振峰遷移 ; 縮短化 ; 日語 ; Vowel Reduction ; duration ; function words ; formants ; centralization ; Universal Grammar ; shortening ; Japanese

期刊名称

東吳日語教育學報

卷期/出版年月

32期(2009 / 01 / 01)

页次

111 - 140

内容语文

日文

中文摘要

所謂的元音弱化指的是在會話中,機能語的元音的持續時間以及子音的共振峰遷移的縮短化的現象。此現象利用強弱重音的語言來觀測。在此論文,將會報告在高低重音的日語是否會發生元音弱化的研究結果。 根據前面所上述的持續時間的縮短化及共振峰遷移的縮短化有兩種現象。首先,關於持續時間方面,機能語的「が」與「と」在統計上比內容語短。第二,關於共振峰遷移方面,可以看到「が」的共振峰遷移縮短化。 日語雖然是高低重音語言,但也會觀察出和強弱重音語言一樣有元音弱化的情況發生。因此我認為,元音弱化是擔任普遍語法的一部分。 日語雖屬於高低重音語言,但也跟強弱重音語言一樣會有元音弱化的情況發生。因此我認為,元音弱化也是普遍語法的一部分。

英文摘要

Vowel reduction is the phenomena, in which the duration and the formant transition of vowels in function words shorten in conversations. The phenomena have been observed in stress-accent languages. In this paper, I will report the results of the research whether or not vowel reduction occurred in a pitch accent language, Japanese. As I mentioned before, vowel reduction has two phenomena: shortening of duration and shortening of formant transition. Firstly, the durations of function vowels (”ga” and ”to”) were shorter than content vowels. Secondly, ”a” in the particle ”ga” was more centralized than the corresponding ”a.” Thus, vowel reduction occurs in the Japanese language although the Japanese language was the pitch accent language. Therefore, the vowel reduction is the part of universal grammar.

主题分类 人文學 > 語言學
参考文献
  1. 白井勢津子(2007)。機能語の继続時間。明道日本語教育,1,67-89。
    連結:
  2. Beckman, M.E,Edwards, J.(1990).Paper in Laboratory Phonology 1: Between the grammar and physics of speech.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bolinger, D,Sears, D.(1981).Aspects of Language.New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  4. Campbell, N.(1999).Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure.Tokyo:Ohmsha.
  5. Crystal, D.(1991).A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics.Cambridge:Blackwell.
  6. Cutler, A,Otake, T.(1999).Phonemic effects in spoken-word recognition in Japanese.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,106
  7. Han, M.(1964).Acoustic Manifestation of Morn Timing in Japanese.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,96,73-81.
  8. Hunnicut, S.(1985).Intelligibility vs. redundancy-conditions of dependency.Language and Speech,48,47-56.
  9. Kaiki, N.,Takeda, K.,Sagisaka, Y.(1990).The control of segmental duration in speech synthesis using linguistic properties.Proceedings of ESCA Tutorial workshop on Speech Synthesis.
  10. Keating, P,Huffman, M.(1984).Vowel Variation in Japanese.Phonetica,41,191-207.
  11. Kirk, R. E.(1999).Statistics: An Introduction.Fort Worth:Harcourt Brace College.
  12. Klatt, D. H.(1976).Linguistics Uses of Segmental Duration in English-Acoustic and Perceptual Evidence.Journal of Acoustical Society of America,59,1208-1221.
  13. Liberman, P.(1963).Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech.Language and Speech,6,172-187.
  14. Lindblom, B.(1963).Spectrographic Study of Vowel Reduction.Journal of Acoustical Society of America,35,1773-1781.
  15. Lindblom, B.,W. J Hardcastle (eds.),A. Marchal (eds.)(1990).Speech Production and Speech Modeling.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic.
  16. Maddieson,V Fromkin (Ed.)(1985).Phonetic Linguistics.Orlando:Academic Press.
  17. Martin, S.(1988).A Reference Grammar of Japanese.Rutland, VT:C. E. Tuttle Co..
  18. Masataka, N.(2002).Pitch modification when interacting with elders: Japanese women with and without experience with infants.Journal of Child Language,29,939-951.
  19. Moon, S,Lindblom, B.(1994).Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels.Journal of Acoustical Society of America,96,40-55.
  20. Pinker, S(1964).Language Instinct: How the mind creates languages.
  21. Port, R.(1981).Linguistic Timing Factors in Combination.Acoustical Society of America,69,262-274.
  22. Port, R.,Dalby, J,O''Dell, M.(1987).Evidence for morn timing in Japanese.Acoustical Society of America,81
  23. Shirai, S.(2005).Lexical Effects in Japanese Vowel Reduction Unpublished Dissertation.Seattle:University of Washington.
  24. Shirai, S.(2002).The Duration of Function Word in Japanese.UW Working Papers in Linguistics,21,70-92.
  25. Shirai, S.(2004).Spectral Vowel Reduction in Japanese.UW Working Papers in Linguistics,23,228-243.
  26. Slujiter, A. M. C,Van Heuven, V.J.(1995).Effects of focus distribution, pitch accent and lexical stress on the temporal organization of syllables in Dutch.Phonetica,52,71-89.
  27. Sugito, M.,Matsuya, F(1977).Correlation between Japanese Accent-From and Duration of Segments and Beats.The Phonetic Society of Japan,156,7-11.
  28. University of California Working Papers in Phonetics
  29. Van Bergem, D. R.(1993).Acoustical reduction as a function of sentence accent, word stress, and word class.Speech Communication,12,1-23.
  30. Van Son, H,Pols, L. C. W.(1992).Formant movements of Dutch vowels in a text, read at normal and fast rate.Acoustical Society of America,92,121.
  31. Wright, R.,John Local (edited),Richard Ogden,Rosiland Temple(2003).Phonetic Interpretation: Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.