楊伯峻《春秋左傳注》考訂五則－以《左傳》文公至宣公時期為範圍

Examination & Correction of Five Phrases on Yáng Bó-jùn's ＂Chun Qiu Zuo Zhuan Zhu＂-Based on the Period of Lǔ Wén Gōng to Lǔ Xuān Gōng in Zuo Zhuan

黃聖松(Huang Sheng-Sung)

《左傳》 ； 楊伯峻 ； 《春秋左傳注》 ； 考訂 ； Zuo Zhuan ； Yáng Bó-jùn's (1909-1992) ； ＂Chun Qiu Zuo Zhuan Zhu＂ ； examination & correction

東吳中文學報

41期（2021 / 05 / 01）

125 - 147

繁體中文

本文討論《春秋左傳注》釋《左傳》文公至宣公時期待商榷字詞五則：（一）「皐陶、庭堅不祀忽諸」：「忽」有「盡」義，「諸」於《左傳》有「之乎」合音用法，置句末時具感嘆義，「忽諸」可解為「盡之乎」。「皐陶、庭堅不祀忽諸」可譯為「皐陶、庭堅不享祭祀，於此時盡之乎。」（二）「繞朝贈之以策」：《左傳》之「簡策」又分策命諸侯、卿大夫之「策書」，與「國史正策」、「竹簡」三義，皆不合「繞朝贈之以策」背景與語境，此「策」為「馬檛」為確。（三）「權不足也」：《左傳》「權」有「權勢」、「謀略」二義，公子歸生此時已是執政卿，本有權勢討伐公子宋，唯因謀略不足而陷弒君之罪，「權不足也」之「權」當釋謀略為宜。（四）「平板榦」：先秦典籍見「平」、「均」互釋之文，《左傳會箋》解「平」為平均義，「平板榦」謂平均分配板榦於工程所需之各處，扣合「量功命日」之「量功」。（五）「夭且不整」：《左傳會箋》認為「夭且不整」之「夭」與《周易．臨》下卦之兌而發，兌象少女、毀折，故《左傳》以釋年少者「短折」之「夭」。又《左傳》之「不整」皆與戰爭、師旅關聯，故「夭且不整」之「不整」亦言晉師短少先縠部隊。

This article discusses five phrases on Yáng Bó-jùn's ＂Chun Qiu Zuo Zhuan Zhu＂ which based on the period of Lǔ Wén Gōng to Lǔ Xuān Gōng in Zuo Zhuan. 1. The word ＂hū＂ has the meaning of end in the sentence of ＂Gāo Táo and Tíng Jiān bù sì hū zhū＂, and the word ＂zhū＂ is synonymous with the pronunciation arising from combination of ＂zhī＂ and ＂hū＂ sounds in Zuo Zhuan. It is an exclamation usage when the word ＂zhū＂ is at the end of a sentence. The phrase ＂hū zhū＂ means that something comes to a termination. Therefore, the sentence ＂Gāo Táo and Tíng Jiān bù sì hū zhū＂ could be interpreted as no more offer sacrifices to Gāo Táo and Tíng Jiān thus the ceremony of offering sacrifices also came to a termination then. 2. There are three kinds of ＂jiǎn cè＂ in Zhuan. They are ＂guó shǐ zhèng cè＂, ＂zhú jiǎn＂ and ＂cè shū＂ (which were the order to the appointment and removal of vassals and high rank officials). However, none of them was appropriate to the context and dialogue for the sentence ＂Rào cháo zèng zhī yǐ cè＂. For this reason, the word ＂cè＂ should be ＂mǎ zhuā＂ (horsewhip) in the sentence ＂Rào cháo zèng zhī yǐ cè＂. 3. There are two meanings of the word ＂quán＂ in the phrase ＂quán bù zú yě＂ in Zuo Zhuan. They are ＂power & influence＂ and ＂strategy＂. At that time, Gōng-zǐ Guī-shēng was the marshal of Zhèng State and he did have the power & influence to fight Gōng-zǐ Sòng, but his strategy was not good enough so that he was accused for regicide. Therefore, the word ＂quán＂ in the phrase ＂quán bù zú yě＂ should be interpreted as strategy which is much better. 4. The words ＂píng＂ and ＂jūn＂ were synonymous in the pre-Qin classics. The word ＂píng＂ means to average in Zuo Zhuan Huì Jiān, so the phrase ＂píng bǎn gàn＂ means to average ＂bǎn gàn＂ to all places needed by the project for the structure. Moreover, the number of ＂bǎn gàn＂ and the estimation must be matched. That is the meaning of the phrase ＂liàng gong＂ in the sentence ＂Liàng gong mìng rì＂. 5. In Zuo Zhuan Huì Jiān, the word ＂yāo＂ in the sentence ＂Yāo qiě bù zhěng＂ has the similar meaning to the ＂Lín guà＂ in Zhou Yì. The bottom ＂gua＂ of ＂Lín guà＂ is ＂duì＂. It is the symbol of virgins, to damage and to break. In Zhuan, the word ＂yāo＂ means teenagers die at early age. Moreover, the phrase ＂bù zhěng＂ is related to battles and troops. Thus, the phrase ＂bù zhěng＂ in the sentence ＂Yāo qiě bù zhěng＂ also means Xiān hú's unit was not in the troops of Jin State.

1. (1986).景印摛藻堂四庫全書薈要.臺北:世界書局.
2. （三國吳）韋昭（註）(1974).國語韋昭註.臺北:藝文印書館.
3. （三國魏）王弼,（晉）韓康伯（注）,（唐）孔穎達（正義）(1993).周易注疏.臺北:藝文印書館.
4. （周）荀況,（清）王先謙（集解）,沈嘯寰（點校）,王星賢（點校）(1997).荀子集解.北京:中華書局.
5. （周）莊周,（清）郭慶藩（集釋）(1991).莊子集釋.臺北:貫雅文化事業有限公司.
6. （南朝宋）范曄,（唐）李賢（注）(1984).後漢書.臺北:宏業書局.
7. （南朝梁）劉勰,王更生（注譯）(1988).文心雕龍讀本.臺北:文史哲出版社.
8. （晉）杜預（集解）,（唐）孔穎達（正義）(1993).春秋左傳注疏.臺北:藝文印書館.
9. （晉）郭璞（注）,（宋）邢昺（疏）(1993).爾雅注疏.臺北:藝文印書館.
10. （清）王念孫(2000).讀書雜志.南京:江蘇古籍出版社.
11. （清）顧棟高（輯）,吳樹平（點校）,李解民（點校）(1993).春秋大事表.北京:中華書局.
12. （漢）孔安國（傳）,（唐）孔穎達（正義）(1993).尚書注疏.臺北:藝文印書館.
13. （漢）毛亨（傳）,（漢）鄭玄（注）,（唐）孔穎達（正義）(1993).毛詩注疏.臺北:藝文印書館.
14. （漢）司馬遷,（南朝宋）裴駰（集解）,（唐）司馬貞（索隱）,（唐）張守節（正義）,瀧川龜太郎（考證）(1991).史記會注考證.高雄:復文圖書有限公司.
15. （漢）班固,（唐）顏師古（注）(1996).漢書.臺北:宏業書局.
16. （漢）許慎,（清）段玉裁（注）(1994).說文解字注.臺北:黎明文化事業股份有限公司.
17. （漢）鄭玄（注）,（唐）孔穎達（正義）(1993).禮記注疏.臺北:藝文印書館.
18. （漢）鄭玄（注）,（唐）賈公彥（疏）(1993).周禮注疏.臺北:藝文印書館.
19. 任繼愈（編）,傅璇琮（編）(2005).文津閣四庫全書.北京:商務印書館.
20. 竹添光鴻（箋）(1998).左傳會箋.臺北:天工書局.
21. 何樂士(2004).《左傳》虛詞研究（修訂本）.北京:商務印書館.
22. 李宗侗（註譯）,葉慶炳（校訂）(1993).春秋左傳今註今譯.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
23. 李索(2011).左傳正宗.北京:華夏出版社.
24. 沈玉成（譯）(1995).左傳譯文.臺北:洪葉文化事業有限公司.
25. 郁賢皓（注譯）,周福昌（注譯）,姚曼波（注譯）,傅武光（校閱）(2016).新譯左傳讀本.臺北:三民書局.
26. 徐德明（編）,吳平主（編）(2005).清代學術筆記叢刊.北京:學苑出版社.
27. 高本漢, Klas Bernhard Johannes,陳舜政（譯）(1972).高本漢左傳注釋.臺北:國立編譯館中華叢書編審委員會.
28. 郜同麟(2014)。《春秋左傳注》指瑕。古籍研究，2014(01)，82-86。
29. 張雨(2017)。楊伯峻《春秋左傳注》勘正。邢臺學院學報，32(1)，127-128+137。
30. 許子濱(2017).楊伯峻《春秋左傳注》禮說斠正.香港:中華書局（香港）.
31. 郭錫良（編）(1986).漢字古音手冊.北京:北京大學出版社.
32. 陳克炯(2004).左傳詳解詞典.鄭州:中州古籍出版社.
33. 章炳麟(1984).春秋左傳讀.臺北:學海出版社.
34. 黃聖松(2021)。楊伯峻《春秋左傳注》考訂四則——以《左傳》成公二年為範圍。人文中國學報，32，1-24。
35. 楊伯峻(1987).春秋左傳詞典.臺北縣:漢京文化事業有限公司.
36. 楊伯峻（編）(2009).春秋左傳注（修訂本）.北京:中華書局.
37. 趙生群(2013).《左傳》疑義新證.北京:人民文學出版社.
38. 劉曉興(2018)。楊伯峻《春秋左傳注》獻疑。古籍整理研究學刊，2018(4)，88-92。
39. 魯毅(2009).左傳考釋.武漢:湖北人民出版社.

1. 陳炫瑋(2022)。考古材料斠訂楊伯峻《春秋左傳注》文詞四則。淡江中文學報，46，71-111。
2. 黃聖松(2022)。楊伯峻《春秋左傳注》考訂五則－以《左傳》襄公時期為範圍。中正漢學研究，39，1-27。