明代方獻夫以博約法治《易》析論

An Analysis of Fang Xian Fu 's Yijing learning by the Method of Bojiao in the Ming Dynasty

楊自平(Yang, Tzu-ping)

方獻夫 ； 古文周易傳義約說 ； 易學 ； 明代 ； 王學 ； Fang Xian Fu ； Guwenzhouyichuanyiyueshuo ； Yijing learning ； Ming Dynasty ； Yangmingism

東吳中文學報

43期（2022 / 05 / 01）

89 - 118

繁體中文

明代方獻夫著有《古文周易傳義約說》一書。方氏曾從學於陽明，並與湛甘泉交遊，最終歸宗陽明良知學。然為官經歷及反省時風，深感王學不重讀書的不足。至於程、朱雖重讀書窮理，方氏認為不免有支離之弊。遂結合心學、理學兩家之長，而避其短，提出以博約法治經，透過深入研讀經典，凝鍊古聖智慧，接引後學。方氏鑒於程《傳》、《本義》不免有支離之弊，故折中以邵子《易》，博約眾說，輔以己意，藉由象數探求義理，以簡要文字表達見解，完成《古文周易傳義約說》這部傳注體論著，供後人讀《易》參考。唯有將這部《易》著，置於方氏整個學思脈絡，進行深入考察，方能真正見出該書的特色與價值。

In the Ming Dynasty, Fang Xian Fu authored the book on Yijing, Guwen zhouyich-uanyiyueshuo. He reflected on the shortcomings of the present doctri ne and thought that the problem lay in the obscurity of learning. so he adopt ed Daxue and Zhongyong to mark the learning of sages, corrected the over-e mphasis on the essence of conscience and conscience in Yangmingism, and ad vocated for the erudition of the text and the grimoire; he also corrected the problem of Cheng-Zhu school's detachment, and proposed the importance of int erpretation the scriptures by the method of erudition. In order to save the sho rtcomings of studying, he emphasizes the importance of studying the sages' sc riptures, but is dissatisfied with the shortcomings of Cheng-Zhu school's detac hment in Chengchuan、Benyi, so he takes Shao Yong's Yijing learning as a c ompromise, and uses the images to clarify the reasoning, and completes this b iography-style treatise in a concise text for future generations to study Yijing. If we understand the purpose of Fang's work, we can establish a correspondin g understanding through a dialogue with him with the intention against the wi ll, which may lead to a more in-depth discussion and reflection, and also reveal the characteristics and value of the book.

1. 黃敏浩(2011)。王龍溪(天泉證道紀)所衍生的問題。臺灣東亞文明研究學刊，16，237-270。
   連結：
2. (1983).大易類聚初集.臺北:新文豐圖書公司.
3. (1996).四庫全書存目叢書.濟南:齊魯書社.
4. (1986).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
5. (1998).四部備要.北京:中華書局.
6. (1994).新校本明史並附編六種.臺北:鼎文書局.
7. (1983).大易類聚初集.臺北:新文豐圖書公司.
8. (2001).四庫全書存目叢書補編.濟南:齊魯書社.
9. (1983).二程集.臺北:漢京文化事業公司.
10. (1986).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
11. （明）方獻夫,問永寧（點校）,周悅（點校）(2016).方獻夫集.上海:上海古籍出版社.
12. （明）王守仁,吳光（編校）(2006).王陽明全集.上海:上海古籍出版社.
13. （清）黃虞稷,瞿鳳起（整理）,潘景鄭（整理）(2001).千頃堂書目.上海:上海古籍出版社.
14. 尤淑君(2006).名分禮秩與皇權重塑:大禮議與嘉靖政治文化.臺北:國立政治大學歷史學系.
15. 尤淑君(2005)。臺北，國立政治大學歷史學系。
16. 朱傑人（編）(2002).朱子全書.上海:上海古籍出版社安徽教育出版社.
17. 朱傑人（編）(2002).朱子全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
18. 周悅(2013)。方獻夫易學思想研究。周易研究，2013(2)，23-32。