《太平御覽》引《山海經》相關問題考述

Examining the issues concerning the citations of Shan Hai Jing in Taiping Yulan

鹿憶鹿(Lu, Yi Lu)

《山海經》 ； 《太平御覽》 ； 李昉 ； 尤袤 ； 曹善 ； Shan Hai Jing ； Taiping Yulan ； Li Fang ； You Mao ； Cao Shan

東吳中文學報

44期（2022 / 11 / 01）

1 - 32

繁體中文;英文

北宋太平興國年間，李昉等人奉敕進行大型類書《太平御覽》編纂，內容凡一千卷，分五十五門，五千四百餘類，收錄的書籍有一千六百多種。《御覽》對《山海經》經文、注文的徵引非常全面，共有六百餘次。《御覽》成書近兩百年，南宋尤袤池陽郡齋本《山海經》刊刻問世，《御覽》引用的《山海經》條目，有許多與池陽郡齋刊本經文、注文有出入，應來自不同的本子。《御覽》保存大量的《山海經》異文，既可以對校後世《山海經》傳本的經文、注文，又可以補尤本《山海經》無《圖贊》的缺憾。明清以來的《山海經》研究者，僅郝懿行特別注意到《御覽》等類書對《山海經》的引用，並以此參校《箋疏》所據的版本。然而，值得注意的是，由於時代限制，郝懿行在撰述《箋疏》之際，似乎未見到宋版《御覽》，引用的應是明清的版本，與現今流傳的宋版差異極多。本文以《御覽》對《山海經》的徵引為中心，參照南宋尤袤本、元代曹善手抄本，以及唐代的《初學記》、《藝文類聚》等書，同時也徵引不同典籍注疏中的《山海經》引文，依序對照經文、注文、《圖贊》，經過多重比對，釐清《山海經》的諸多相關問題。

During Taiping Xingguo in Northern Song dynasty, scholars such as Li Fang coordinated and compiled the great leishu, Taiping Yulan, due to the edict of the emperor. There were 1000 volumes which were divided into 55 sections, about 5400 categories, including more than 1600 kinds of books. In Yulan, it quoted the text of Shan Hai Jing and notes 600 times, which was very comprehensive. Over 2 centuries after the publication of Yulan, You Mao's Chiyang county version, which was the earliest known version of Shan Hai Jing was carved and published in Southern Song dynasty. The quotations of Shan Hai Jing in Yulan was pretty different from the ones in You Mao's version. Their sources might be different. Yulan preserved an enormous amount of variants in Shan Hai Jing. It not only could be used to proofread other editions of Shan Hai Jing in later generations, but also could complement the lack of poetry in You's version Shan Hai Jing. Among those who had studied Shan Hai Jing since Ming and Qing dynasties, Hao Yi-xing was the only one who particularly noticed the citations of Shan Hai Jing in leisu such as Yulan and referred to them when editing the version of Qianshu. However, it's worth noting that due to temporal limitation, Hao did not seem to come across the Yulan from Song dynasty when editing Qianshu. The versions Hao cited might be the versions from Ming and Qing dynasties and differ from the version from Song dynasty which is circulating today. This paper centers on the citations of "Shan Hai Jing" in Yulan and refers to the hand-written copies of "Shan Hai Jing" authored by You Mao from Southern Song dynasty and Chao Shan from Yuan dynasty, as well as books such as Chu Xue Ji and Yi Wen Lei Ju. It also refers to the quotations of Shan Hai Jing noted in various classic books and compares texts, footnotes, and Tu Zan sequentially, determining the better version through sorting and multiple comparisons.

1. 鹿憶鹿(2021)。《山海經箋疏》引唐代類書考。東吳中文學報，41，64-102。
   連結：
2. 鹿憶鹿(2021)。《山海經》的再發現－曹善抄本的文獻價值考述。故宮學術季刊，39(1)，81-122。
   連結：
3. (2019).山海經珍本文獻集成.成都:巴蜀書社.
4. (2019).山海經珍本文獻集成.成都:巴蜀書社.
5. (1982).二十五史.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
6. (2019).山海經珍本文獻集成.成都:巴蜀書社.
7. (2019).山海經珍本文獻集成.成都:巴蜀書社.
8. (1986).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
9. (2019).山海經珍本文獻集成.成都:巴蜀書社.
10. (2001).古籍叢殘彙編.北京:北京圖書館出版社.
11. （宋）李昉（編）(1997).太平御覽.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
12. 〔宋〕李昉等編：《太平御覽》(明隆慶間(1567-1572)閩人饒氏等活字本，藏國家圖書館)。
13. （宋）李昉（編）(2012).太平御覽.上海:上海古籍出版社.
14. 〔宋〕李昉等編：《太平御覽》(明萬曆元年(1573)倪炳刊本，藏國家圖書館)。
15. （宋）陳振孫(1987).直齋書錄解題.上海:上海古籍出版社.
16. 〔宋〕劉辰翁評，閻光表校：《山海經》(明刊本)。
17. （明）解縉（編）(1986).永樂大典.北京:中華書局.
18. （明）解縉（編）(1960).永樂大典.北京:中華書局.
19. （明）解縉（編）(1962).景印永樂大典存本并前編附編.臺北:世界書局.
20. （唐）白居易(1979).白居易集.北京:中華書局.
21. 〔唐〕白居易著，〔宋〕孔傳續：《白孔六帖》(版本不詳，藏早稻田大學圖書館)。
22. （唐）徐堅（編）(2012).初學記.上海:古籍出版社.
23. （唐）歐陽詢（編）(2013).藝文類聚.上海:上海古籍出版社.
24. 〔晉〕郭璞注：《山海經》(元曹善抄本，藏臺北國立故宮博物院)。
25. 〔晉〕郭璞注：《山海經》(南宋尤袤池陽郡齋刻本，藏中國國家圖書館)。
26. （梁）蕭統（編）,（唐）李善（注）(1971).文選.臺北:藝文印書館.
27. （清）余省（繪）,（清）張為邦（繪）(2014).獸譜.北京:紫禁城出版社.
28. （清）陳夢雷（編）(1977).古今圖書集成.臺北:鼎文書局.
29. 周生杰(2008).《太平御覽》研究.成都:巴蜀書社.
30. 松田稔(2020)。「山海經」の文献的研究。東京:笠間書院。
31. 柯睿, Paul W.,童嶺（譯）(2020).中古中國的文學與文化史.上海:中西書局.
32. 張宗祥（編校）(1958).足本山海經圖贊.上海:古典文學出版社.
33. 許建平(2010)。敦煌本《修文殿御覽》錄校補正。敦煌研究，2010(1)，92-95。
34. 傅增湘(1983).藏園群書經眼錄.北京:中華書局.
35. 黃維忠,鄭炳林(1995)。敦煌本《修文殿御覽》殘卷考釋。敦煌學輯刊，1995(1)，36-48。
36. 劉全波(2014)。《修文殿御覽》編纂考。敦煌學輯刊，2014(1)，31-45。

1. (2024)。晚明《山海經》圖像的南傳－以《謨區查抄本》為例。中國學術年刊，46(1)，49-77。
2. (2024)。現存《永樂大典》引《山海經》圖像考述。故宮學術季刊，41(4)，34-87。