题名

學童眼中的科學專有名詞

并列篇名

Children's Perception of Scientific Terminology

DOI

10.6173/CJSE.2001.0903.01

作者

張筱莉(Sheau-Li Chang);林陳涌(Chen-Yung Lin)

关键词

科學專有名詞 ; 兒童科學 ; 單純詞 ; 複合詞 ; Technical Terms ; Children's Science ; Compound Words ; Simple Words

期刊名称

科學教育學刊

卷期/出版年月

9卷3期(2001 / 09 / 01)

页次

219 - 234

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究目的為探索學生眼中的科學專有名詞,以台北市258 名國一學生為樣本,利用「科學專有名詞定義測驗」得知學生在學習前後對科學專有名詞的認識,並從中選取24名學生進行個別晤談,以進一步了解學生的想法。研究結果顯示,在學習前學生解釋科學專有名詞時,習慣將專有名詞視為個別的文字,再拚湊為語詞的整體意義。而學生用以解釋專有名詞的依據則包含了:橫貫事理推理、借用讀音相同文字的意義等。文字的常用語意明顯地影響學生對科學專有名詞的認識,於學習後學生對於複合詞的描述仍多停留在於學習前的相同敘述,可能是學生於學習前便由文字的字面意義得知部分專有名詞的意義,所以即使在學習後學生仍慣以此方式加以描述,未能有更進一步功能型之敘述。至於單純詞方面,多數的學生是將描寫方式轉向該專有名詞具功能性意義的部分,即是在學習後獲得較大改變。最後提出四點建議作為本文的結束。

英文摘要

This paper presents an investigation of how children perceive scientific terminology. The Scientific Terminology Definition Test was administered to 258 Grade 7 students in Taipei. Twenty-four of the students were selected for follow-up interviews. The research found that students, before learning, usually comprehended biological terms by use of transductive reasoning and homophone. The idiomatic usage of words often affected children's understanding of scientific terms. After learning, most students described the compound words almost the same as before learning, with limited further understanding. However, for simple words, most students turned the meaning into functional conception, indicating that they acquired more after learning.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Barnett, J.(1992).Language in the science classroom: some issues for teachers.The Australian Science Teachers Journal,38(4),8-13.
  2. Barrass, R.(1979).Vocabulary for introductory courses in biology: necessary, unnecessary and misleading terms.Journal of biological education,13(3),179-191.
  3. Bell, B. F.(1981).When is an animal, not an animal?.Journal of biological education,15(3),213-218.
  4. Bell, B.,Freyberg, P.(1985).Language in the science classroom.Learning in science: the implication of children’s science,NZ:
  5. Bishop, R.(1970).Big words bother me.Education Research,13(1),75.
  6. Cachapuz, A. F. C.(1987).Detecting changes with learning in the organization of knowledge: use of word association tests to follow the learning of collision theory.International Journal of Science Education,9(4),491-504.
  7. Driver, R.,Asoko, H.,Leach, J.,Mortimer, E.,Scott, p.(1994).Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom.Education Research,23(7),5-12.
  8. Duran, B. J.(1998).Language minority students in high school: the role of language in learning biology concepts.Science Education,82(3),311-331.
  9. Evans, J., D.(1978).Putting names to concepts in biology.Journal of biological education,12(4),261-266.
  10. Gallagher, J. J.(1991).Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science.Science Education,75(1),121-133.
  11. Garaway, G. B.(1994).Language, culture, and attitude in mathematics and science learning: A review of the literature.The Journal of Research and Development in Education,27(2),102-111.
  12. Gilbert, J. K.,Osborn, R. J.,Fensham, P. J.(1982).Children’s science and its consequences for teaching.Science Education,66(4),623-633.
  13. Gruber, H. E.,Voneche, J.(1977).The essential Piaget.New York:Basic Books, Inc..
  14. Halliday, M. A. K.(1991).On the language of physical science.Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic features,London:
  15. Keys, C. W.(1999).Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science.Science Education,83(2),115-130.
  16. Kulkarni, V. G.(1988).Role of language in science education.Development and dilemmas in science education,Lewes:
  17. Lemke, J. L.(1990).Talking science: lnaguage, learing, and values.New Jersey:Ablex.
  18. Lynch, P. P.,Benjamin, P.,Chapman, T.,Holmes, R.,Mccammon, R.,Smith, A.,Symmons, R.(1979).Scientific language and the high school pupil.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,16(4),351-357.
  19. Marek, E. A.(1986).Understandings and misunderstandings of biology concepts.The American Biology Teacher,48(1),37-40.
  20. Marks, C. B.,Doctorow, M. J.,Wittrock, M. C.(1974).Word frequency and reading comprehension.The Journal of Educational Research,67(6),259-262.
  21. Munby, A. H.(1976).Some implication of language in science education.Science Education,60(1),115-124.
  22. Nussbaum, J.,Novak, J. D.(1976).An assessment of children’s concepts of the earth utilizing structured interviews.Science Education,60(4),535-550.
  23. O’toole, M.(1996).Science, schools, children and books: exploring the classroom interface between science and language.Studies in Science Education,28,113-143.
  24. Osborn, R. J.,Bell, B. F.(1983).Science teaching and children’s views of the world.European Journal of Science Education,5(1),1-14.
  25. Schollum, B.,Osborn, R. J.(1985).Relating the new to the familiar.Learning in science: the implication of children’s science,NZ:
  26. Shepardson, D. P.(1997).Of butterflies and beetles: first grader‘s ways of seeing and talking about insect life cycles.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,34,873-889.
  27. Solomon, J.(1983).Learning about energy: How pupils think in two domains.European Journal of Science Education,5(1),49-59.
  28. Sutton, C. R.(1992).Words, Science and Learning.Buckingham:Open University Press.
  29. Vygotsky, L. S.(1962).Thought and language.Cambridge MA:MIT Press.
  30. Warner, J.,Wallace, J.(1994).Creative writing and students’ science learning in a science and technology context.The Australian Science Teachers Journal,40(4),71-75.
  31. 汪克仁,耿正屏(1993)。國中學生植物運輸概念的發展。科學教育,4,237-260。
  32. 張敬宜,熊召弟(1993)。我國國小學童生態平衡概念發展之研究。臺北師院學報,8,321-376。
  33. 舒光(1986).維根斯坦哲學.台北市:水牛出版社.
  34. 黃宣範(1983).語言哲學.台北市:文鶴出版社.
  35. 黃瑞琴(1993).幼兒的語文經驗.台北市:五南圖書出版社.
  36. 甯自強(1993)。「建構式教學法」之教學觀—由根本建構主義的觀點來看。國教學報,5,33-41。
  37. 葉蜚聲,徐通鏘(1993).語言學綱要.台北市:書林出版社.
  38. 鄭昭明(1993).認知心理學.台北市:桂冠出版社.
被引用次数
  1. 蔣佳玲、廖斌吟、楊文金、史偉郁(2014)。國小科學文本「或」的邏輯語義分析。教科書研究,7(1),1-30。
  2. 賴容瑩、陳秉沛、林坤誼、李隆盛(2014)。高職校長對高職課程專有名詞的看重與理解程度分析。科技與人力教育季刊,1(2),53-83。
  3. 劉君毅,彭致翎(2019)。科學術語複合詞構詞形式及其對學習影響之探討。課程與教學,22(4),197-220。
  4. 劉燿誠、林素華(2010)。國中學生「恆定性」的另有概念之探討。科學教育學刊,18(1),25-41。
  5. 徐毓慧、林陳涌(2002)。國一學生對血糖恆定性的先前概念。科學教育學刊,10(4),373-387。
  6. 楊惠茹、丁志音(2014)。民眾如何理解接連而來的新興流感?。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,33(2),185-196。
  7. 楊坤原、張賴妙理(2004)。發展和應用二段式診斷工具來偵測國中一年級學生之遺傳學另有概念。科學教育學刊,12(1),107-131。
  8. 楊坤原、張賴妙理(2004)。遺傳學迷思概念之文獻探討及其在敎學上的啓示。科學教育學刊,12(3),365-398。
  9. (2010)。「酵素與酶」譯名之科學尋根及其對中學科學教學之啟示。教育研究與發展期刊,6(1),123-144。