發展和應用二段式診斷工具來偵測國中一年級學生之遺傳學另有概念

Development and Application of a Two-Tier Diagnostics Instrument to Assess Seventh Grade Students' Alternative Conceptions of Genetics

10.6173/CJSE.2004.1201.05

楊坤原(Kun-Yuan Yang)；張賴妙理(Maio-Li Changlai)

二段式診斷測驗 ； 國民中學 ； 遺傳學 ； 另有概念 ； Two-Tier Diagnostic Test ； Junior High School ； Genetics ； Alternative Conceptions

科學教育學刊

12卷1期（2004 / 03 / 01）

107 - 131

繁體中文

本研究旨在發展和效化「遺傳學二段式診斷測驗」以診斷國一學生在學過國中生物之「生殖」與「遺傳」單元後所存有的另有概念。經以隨機抽取之桃園縣六所國中共1606名一年級學生爲樣本進行正式評測後得知，「遺傳學二段式診斷測驗」的平均難度爲0.45，鑑別度指數之平均值爲0.48，內部一致性信度(Cronbachα)值爲0.73。由診斷結果的分析發現，國一學生在經過教學後，仍對細胞（有絲）分裂的結果、減數分裂的過程與結果、基因控制性狀表現、顯性基因與隱性基因、同源染色體的定義與辨識、染色體、基因與DNA的關係、雙套染色體的定義與成因、後天改變的性狀之遺傳、性染色體及孟德爾遺傳定律等具另有概念。本研究所發展之診斷工具與研究結果可提供未來國中遺傳學概念之診斷、教學與課程設計的參考。

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a two-tier diagnostic instrument-Two-Tier Diagnostic Test for Genetics (TTDTG) to find seventh graders' alternative conceptions of genetics. 1606 students were sampled randomly from six junior high schools in Taoyuan County and diagnosed using the TTDTG. Results showed that the average difficulty and average index of discrimination of the TTDTG were 0.45 and 0.48 respectively. The Cronbach alpha value for internal consistency was 0.73. Even though they had received instruction in biology classrooms, seventh-grade students still had alternative conceptions about the results of mitosis, the process and results of meiosis, genes and traits, dominance and recesseiveness, the definition and recognition of homologous chromosomes, the definition and formation of diploid chromosomes, acquired inherence, existence of sex chromosomes, relationships among genes, chromosomes, and DNA, and Mendel's laws of inheritance. Findings of this study suggested that the TTDTG could be used as diagnostic test for genetics and the identification of alternative genetic conceptions can be valuable resources for diagnosis, instruction and curriculum development of genetics.

1. 陳筱莉、林陳涌(2001)。學童眼中的科學專有名詞。科學教育學刊，9(3)，219-234。
   連結：
2. 楊坤原、鄭湧涇(1997)。高一學生遺傳學解題表現與解題策略之研究。科學教育學刊，5(4)，529-555。
   連結：
3. Albaladejo, C.,Lucas, A. M.(1988).Pupil`s meanings for `mutation`.Journal of Biological Education,22(4),304-309.
4. Amir, R.,Frankl, D. R.,Tamir, P.(1987).Paper presented at the Second International Seminar: Misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics.Ithaca, NY:
5. Ausubel, D. P.(1968).Educational psychology: A cognitive view.New York:Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
6. Ausubel, D. P.(1963).The psychology of meaningful verbal learning.New York:Grune and Stratton.
7. Bahar, M. B.,Johnstone, A. H.,Hanesell, M. H.(1999).Revisiting learning difficulties in biology.Journal of Biological Education,33(2),84-86.
8. Campbell, N. A.,Reece, J. B.,Mitchell, L. G.(1999).Biology.New York:Addison-Wesley.
9. Cavallo, A. M. L.(1996).Meaningful learning, reasoning ability, and students` understanding and problem solving of topics in genetics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,33(6),625-656.
10. Chandler, P.,Sweller, J.(1991).Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction.Cognition and Instruction,8(4),293-332.
11. Chi, M. T. H.,Slotta, J. D.(1993).The ontological coherence of intuitive physics.Cognition and Instruction,10(2&3),249-260.
12. Cho, H. H.,Kahle, J. B.,Nordland, F. H.(1985).An investigation of high school biology textbooks as sources of misconceptions and difficulties in genetics and some suggestions for teaching genetics.Science Education,69(5),707-719.
13. Clough, E. E.,Robinson, C.(1985).Children`s understanding of inherence.Journal of Biological Education.,19,304-310.
14. Deadman, J. A.,Kelly, P. J.(1978).What do secondary school boys understand about evolution and heredity before they are taught the topics.Journal of Biological Education,12(1),7-15.
15. Donovan, M. P.(1997).The vocabulary of biology and the problem of semantics.Journal of College Science Teaching,26(6),381-382.
16. Driver, R.(1983).The pupil as scientist.Philadelphia:Open University Press.
17. Duit, R.,S. M. Glynn,R. H. Teany,B. K. Britton (Eds.)(1991).The psychology of learning science.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
18. Duit, R.,Treagust, D. F.,B. J. Fraser,H. J. Walberg (Eds.)(1995).Improving science education.Chicago:The National Society for the Study of Education.
19. Ebel, R. L.,Frisbie, D. A.(1991).Essentials of educational measurement.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
20. Eylon, B. S.,Linn, M. C.(1988).Learning and instruction: an examination of four research perspectives in science education.Review of Educational Research,58(3),251-301.
21. Finley, F. N.,Stewart, J. H.,Yarroch, W. L.(1982).Teachers` perceptions of important and difficult science content.Science Education,66(3),531-538.
22. Fisher, K. M.,Moody, D. E.,J. H. Wandersee (Eds.)(2000).Mapping biology knowledge.Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
23. Gilbert, J. K.(1977).The study of misunderstandings in the physical sciences.Research in Svience Education,7,165-171.
24. Glynn, S. M.,Duit, R.(1995).Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
25. Hackling, M.(1982).An examination of secondary students` understanding of inheritance concepts.The Australian Science Teachers Journal,28(1),13-20.
26. Hackling, M. W.,Treagust, D.(1984).Research data necessary for meaningful review of grade ten high school genetics curriculum.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,21(2),197-209.
27. Hackling, M. W.,Treagust, D. F.(1982).What lower secondary students should understand about the mechanisms of inheritance and what they do understand following instruction.Research in Science Education,12,78-88.
28. Haslam, F.,Treagust, D. F.(1987).Diagnosing secondary students` misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument.Journal of Biological Education,21(3),203-211.
29. Herron, J. D.,Cantu, L. L.,Ward, R.,Srinivasan, V.(1977).Problems associated with concept analysis.Science Education,61(2),185-199.
30. Hickman, F. M.,Kennedy, M. H.,McInerney, J. D.(1978).Human genetics education: Results of BSCS needs assessment survey.The American Biology Teacher,39(2),285-303.
31. Ipple, M. J.,P. L. Dann,S. H. Irvine,J. H. Collis (Eds.)(1991).Advances in computer-based human assessment.Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
32. Kargob, D. B.,Hobbs, E. D.,Erickson, G. L.(1980).Children`s beliefs about inherited characteristics.Journal of Biological Education,14(2),137-146.
33. Kindfield, A. C. H.(1991).Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Fontana, WI.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
34. Kindfield, A. C. H.(1994).Assessing understanding of biological process: Elucidating students` models of meiosis.The American Biology Teacher,56(6),367-371.
35. Kindfield, A. C. H.(1991).Confusing chromosome number and structure: A common student error.Journal of Biological Education,25(3),193-200.
36. Lawson, A.,Thompson, L. D.(1988).Formal reasoning ability and misconceptions concerning genetics and natural selection.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,25(9),733-746.
37. Lazarowitz, R.,Penso, S.(1992).High school students` difficulties in learning biology concepts.Journal of Biological Education,26(3),215-223.
38. Lewis, J.,Wood-Robinson, C.(2000).Genes, chromosome, cell division and inheritance-Do students see any relationship.International Journal of Science Education,22(2),177-195.
39. Lohman, D. F.,Ipple, M. J.,N. Fredriksen,R. J. Mislevy,I. Bejar (Eds.)(1993).Test theory for a new generation of tests.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Merrill, M. D.,Tennyson, R. D.,Posey, L. O.(1992).Teaching concepts: An instructional design guide.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology Publications.
41. Mertens, T. R.,Walker, J. O.(1992).A paper-&-pencil strategy for teaching mitosis & meiosis, diagnosing learning problems & predicting examination performance.The American Biology Teacher,54(8),470-475.
42. Moll, M. B.,Allen, R. D.(1987).Student difficulties with Mendelian genetics problems.The American Biology Teacher,49,229-233.
43. Nichols, P. D.(1994).A framework for developing cognitively diagnostic assessments.Review of Educational Research,64(4),575-603.
44. Odom, A. L.,Barrow, L. H.(1995).Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students` understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,32(1),45-61.
45. Pashley, M.(1994).A-level students: Their problems with gene and allele.Journal of Biological Education,28(2),120-126.
46. Pearson, J. T.,Hughes, W. J.(1988).Problems with the use of terminology in genetics education: A literature review and classification scheme.Journal of Biological Education,22(3),178-182.
47. Peterson, R. F.,Treagust, D. F.,Garnett, P.(1989).Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate grade-11 and-12 students` concepts of covalent bonding and structure following a course of instruction.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,26(4),301-314.
48. Radford, A.,Bird-Stewart, J. A.(1982).Teaching genetics in schools.Journal of Biological Education,16(3),177-180.
49. Ramorogo, G.,Wood-Robinson, C.(1995).Batswana children`s understanding of biological inheritance.Journal of Biological Education,29(1),60-71.
50. Simmons, P. E.(1987).Misconceptions of experts and novices during a genetics computer simulation.Paper presented at the Second International Seminar: Misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics
51. Slack, S. J.,Stewart, J.(1990).High school students` problem-solving performance on realistic genetics problems.Journal of Research in Science Research in Science Teaching,30(2),153-173.
52. Smith, M. U.(1991).Teaching cell division: student difficulties and teaching recommendations.Journal of College Science Teaching,41(1),28-33.
53. Snow, R. E.,Lohman, D. F.,R. L. Linn (Ed.)(1989).Educational measurement.New York:Macmillan.
54. Springer, K.,Keil, F. C.(1989).On the development of biologically specific beliefs: The case of inheritance.Child Development,60,637-648.
55. SPSS(1999).SPSS for Windows [Computer Software].Chicago:SPSS.
56. Stewart, J.(1983).Student problem solving in high school genetics.Science Education,67(4),523-540.
57. Stewart, J. H.(1982).Difficulties experienced by high school students when learning basic Mendelian genetics.The American Biology Teacher,44(2),80-84.
58. Stewart, J.,Dale, M.(1989).High school students` understanding of chromosome/gene behavior during meiosis.Science Education,73(4),501-521.
59. Stewart, J.,Dale, M.(1981).Solutions to genetics problems: Are they the same as correct answers.The Australian Science Teachers Journal,27(3),59-64.
60. Stewart, J.,Hafner, R.,Dale, M.(1990).Student`s alternative views of meiosis.The American Biology Teacher,52(4),228-232.
61. Tamarin, R.(1991).Principles of genetics.Dubuque, IA:Wm. C. Brown Publishers.
62. Tan, K. C. D.,Goh, N. K.,Chia, L. S.,Treagust, D. F.(2002).Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students` understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39(4),283-301.
63. Tolman, R. R.(1982).Difficulties in genetics problem solving.The American Biology Teacher,44(9),525-527.
64. Treagust, D. F.(1997).Paper presented at the 1997 International workshop on student`s concept development, understanding diagnosis and teaching.Taipei:
65. Treagust, D. F.(1988).Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students` misconceptions in science.International Journal of Science Education,10(2),159-169.
66. Treagust, D. F.(2000).Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans.
67. Tyson, L. M.,Venville, G. J.,Harrison, A. G.,Treagust, D. F.(1997).A multidimensional framework for interpretating conceptual change events in the classroom.Science Education,81,384-404.
68. Wandersee, J. H.,Mintzes, J. J.,Novak, J. D.,D. L. Gabel (Ed.)(1994).Handbook of research on science teaching and learning.New York:Macmillan Publishing Company.
69. Wood-Robinson, C.(1994).Young people`s ideas about inheritance and evolution.Studies in Science Education,24,29-47.
70. Wood-Robinson, C.,S. M. Glynn,E. Duit (Eds.)(1995).Learning science in schools: Research reforming practice.Mahwah, NJ:LEA.
71. 王作仁(1991)。醫學遺傳學。台北市:聯經出版社。
72. 國立編譯館(2001)。國民中學生物教科書。台北市:國立編譯館。
73. 湯清二(1990)。迷思概念與科學教學改進研究(I)「以遺傳學爲例」。彰化師範大學學報，1，367-397。
74. 湯清二(1993)。我國學生生物細胞概念發展研究－迷思概念之晤談與概念圖。彰化師範大學學報，4，141-169。
75. 湯清二(1991)。我國學生自然科概念發展與診斷教學之研究：生物細胞概念發展（一）。彰化師範大學學報，2，489-515。
76. 黃台珠(1993)。中學生遺傳學習的現況及問題。高雄師大學報，4，269-300。
77. 黃台珠(1990)。中學生遺傳相關概念錯誤類型的探討。科學教育月刊，133，34-53。
78. 黃桂君、吳裕益、中國測驗學會主編(1999)。新世紀測驗學術發展趨勢。台北市:心理出版社。
79. 楊坤原、陳進利(1990)。中學生認知能力與遺傳學概念學習之相關研究。科學教育，1，61-75。
80. 薛靜瑩(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學生物研究所。

1. 蔡顯麞、陳秀溶、王國華(2018)。教科書章節編排順序對國中生學習成效的影響－以生殖、遺傳章節為例。中等教育，69(3)，111-127。
2. 劉燿誠、林素華(2010)。國中學生「恆定性」的另有概念之探討。科學教育學刊，18(1)，25-41。
3. 盧秀琴、宋家驥(2010)。高中奈米科技課程的專家概念與情境式問卷之建構。教育實踐與研究，23(1)，85-114。
4. 唐文華,邱文彬,李易儒,王姿陵(2023)。結合擴增實境與虛擬實境遺傳學學習系統對國中學生在遺傳學概念理解、學習投入程度及探究能力的影響。科學教育學刊，31(2)，167-192。
5. 唐文華,邱文彬,李易儒,王姿陵(2023)。探討結合虛擬實境與擴增實境細胞分裂學習系統對學生概念理解與科學學習動機的影響。科學教育學刊，31(1)，1-25。
6. 溫媺純、李明玲(2017)。教科書中科學知識架構之內容分析—以生殖與遺傳單元為例。科學教育學刊，25(3)，219-243。