题名

國小高年級學童分數概念量表之設計研究

并列篇名

The Design of "The Rating Scale of Fraction for 5(superscript th) and 6(superscript th) Graders"

DOI

10.6173/CJSE.2004.1202.05

作者

詹婉華(Wan-Hua Chan)；呂玉琴(Yuh-Chyn Leu)

关键词

分數概念 ； 分數概念量表 ； 共同因素分析 ； 高年級學童 ； Fraction ； 5(superscript th) and 6(superscript th) Graders ； Common Factor Analysis ； The Rating Scale of Fraction

期刊名称

科學教育學刊

卷期/出版年月

12卷2期（2004 / 06 / 01）

页次

241 - 263

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

在國小數學課程中，分數概念與小數、百分率、比、除法等概念關係密切，而這些概念也都是國小學童必須學習的重要概念。雖然國內有關國小學童分數概念的研究不少，然而，國內缺乏具有良好信效度的分數概念評量工具。本研究的研究目的在編製一份有良好信度與效度之「國小高年級學童分數概念量表」。本研究是以筆測試題爲研究工具，以多階段抽樣抽取全台灣的研究樣本，並以紙筆測驗方式進行資料的蒐集，樣本爲台灣地區國小高年級學童，共2612人。經共同因素分析檢驗「國小高年級分數概念量表」包含三個分數子概念：等分概念、單位量概念、等值分數概念。本研究在信度考驗方面，建立了各分量表及總量表的內部一致性信度；在效度考驗方面，建立了內容效度、構念效度。研究發現，「國小高年級分數概念量表」具有不錯之信、效度。
英文摘要

Within the elementary math curriculum, fraction is closely related to decimal, percentage, ratio, and division. And these concepts are among the important concepts that elementary students must learn. There is much domestic research on the concept of fraction for elementary students. There is, however, a lack of assessment tools with decent reliability and validity for the concept of fraction. The purpose of this research is to design an assessment to measure the understanding of the concept of fraction for 5(superscript th) and 6(superscript th) graders, namely ”The rating scale of fraction for 5(superscript th) and 6(superscript th) graders”. The sample for this study was drawn from Taiwan through multistage sampling. The sample contained a total of 2612 students from 5(superscript th) and 6(superscript th) grade. The rating scale of fraction for 5(superscript th) and 6(superscript th) graders was analyzed using common factor analysis and it includes three sub-concepts of fraction: the concept of equal dividing, the concept of unit, and equivalent fraction. The internal coherence reliability was determined for each sub rating scale and the overall rating scale. Content validity and constructive validity were also established. The results show that ”the rating scale of fraction for 5(superscript th) and 6(superscript th) graders” has satisfactory reliability and validity.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Behr, M. J.,Post, T. R.(1988).Teaching mathematics in grades K-8, 190-229.Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
  2. Bergeron, M, J.,Herscovics, H.(1987).Paper presented at the 11th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
  3. Bock, R. D.,Aitkin, M.(1981).Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: An application of an EM algorithm.Psychometrika,46,443-459.
  4. Cattell, R. B.(1966).The scree test for the number of factors.Multivariate behavioral research,1,245-276.
  5. Corwin, R. B.,Russell, S. J.,Tierney, C. C.(1990).Developed by TERC.Technical Education Research Centers, Inc..
  6. Dickson, L.,Brown, M.,Gibson, O.(1984).Children learning mathematics: A teacher`s guide to recent research.Oxford, Great Britain, England:School Council Publications.
  7. Dunteman, G. H.,M. S. Lewis-Beck (Ed.)(1994).Factor Analysis and Related Techniques.London:Sage Publication, Ltd..
  8. Figueras, O.(1989).Paper presented at the 13th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
  9. Figueras, O.,Filloy, E.,Volderuoros, M.(1987).Paper presented at the 11th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
  10. Freudenthal, H.(1983).Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical Structures.Dordecht, Holland:D. Reidel Publishing Company.
  11. Guttman, L.(1954).Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis.Psychometrika,19,149-161.
  12. Hart, K. M.,Hart, D.,Kerslake, M. L.,Brown, G.,Ruddock, D. E. Kuchemann,M. McCartney (Eds.)(1981).Children Understanding of Mathematics: 11-16.Oxford:London/Northampton.
  13. Hiebert, J.,Tonnessen, L. H.(1978).Development of the fraction concept in Two physical contexts: An Exploratory Investigation.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,9,374-378.
  14. Hunting, R. P.(1983).Alan: A case study of knowledge of units and performance With fractions.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,14(3),182-197.
  15. Kamii, C.,Clark, F. B.(1995).Equivalent Fractions: Their Difficulty and Educational Implications.Journal of Mathematical Behavior,14,365-378.
  16. Kieren, T. E.(1976).Mathematics for the Elementary School.Yale University.
  17. Kim, J. O.,Mueller, C. W.,M. S. Lewis-Beck (Ed.)(1994).Factor Analysis and Related Techniques.London, United Kingdom.:Sage Publication, Ltd..
  18. Knol, D. L.,Berger, M. P. F.(1991).Empirical comparison between factor analysis and multidimensional item response models.Multivariate Behavioral Research,26,457-477.
  19. Larson, C. N.(1980).Locating Proper Fractions on Number Lines: Effect of Length and Equivalence.School Science and Mathematics,423-428.
  20. Mack, N. K.(1990).Learning fractions with understanding: building on informal knowledge.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,21(1),16-32.
  21. Mack, N. K.(1998).Building a Foundation for Understanding the Multiplication of Fraction.Teaching Children Mathematic,5(1),34-38.
  22. McDonald, R. P.,Ahlawat, K. S.(1974).Difficulty factors in binary data.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,27,82-99.
  23. Muthen, B.(1978).Contributions to factor analysis of dichotomous variables.Psychometrika,43,551-560.
  24. NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics)(1994).Grades 5-8.Va.:NCTM.
  25. Piaget, J.,Inhelder, B.,Szeminska, A.(1960).The Child`s Concept of Geometry.New York:Basic Book.
  26. Post, T. R.(1988).Teaching mathematics in grades K-8.Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
  27. Preacher, K. J.,MacCallum, R. C.(2002).Repairing Tom Swift`s electric factor analysis machine.Understanding Statistics.
  28. Saenz-Ludlow, A.(1994).Michael`s fraction schemes.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,25(1),50-85.
  29. Saenz-Ludlow, A.(1995).Ann`s fraction schemes.Educational Studies in Mathematics,28,101-132.
  30. Van de Walle, J. A.(1990).Elementary School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally.New York:Longman.
  31. Vance, J. H.(1992).Understanding equivalence: A number by any other name.School Science and Mathematics,92,263-266.
  32. Waller, N. G.(2001).MicroFact 2.0: A microcomputer factor analysis program for ordered polytomous data and mainframe size problems.U.S.A.:Assessment Systems Corporation.
  33. 吳毓瑩、王文中、呂金燮、張郁雯、張淑慧合著(2001)。教育測驗與評量－教室學習觀點。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
  34. 吳毓瑩、呂玉琴(1997)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫精簡報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫精簡報告,未出版
  35. 呂玉琴(1993)。影響分數二分之一概念的因素。國民教育，33(5, 6)，2-11。
  36. 呂玉琴(1991)。分數概念：文獻探討。台北師院學報，4，573-606。
  37. 呂玉琴(1991)。國小學生的分數概念：1/2 vs. 2/4。國民教育，31(11, 12)，10-15。
  38. 呂玉琴、鄧寶生(2002)。國科會專題研究報告國科會專題研究報告,未出版
  39. 呂玉琴、鄧寶生(2001)。國科會專題研究報告國科會專題研究報告,未出版
  40. 林碧珍(1990)。從圖形表徵與符號表徵之間的轉換探討國小學生的分數概念。省立新竹師範學院學報，4，295-347。
  41. 林福來、黃敏晃、呂玉琴(1996)。分數啓蒙的學習與教學之發展性研究。科學教育學刊，4(2)，161-169。
  42. 教育部(1993)。國民小學課程標準。台北市:教育部。
  43. 教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要數學學習領域。台北市:教育部。
  44. 郭生玉(1987)。心理與教育測驗。台北市:精華書局。
  45. 彭海燕(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所。
  46. 程毅豪(2000)。數學學習資料庫抽樣計畫。
  47. 楊壬孝(1989)。國科會專題研究計畫報告國科會專題研究計畫報告,未出版
  48. 劉世能(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台北師範學院數理教育研究所。
  49. 羅鴻翔譯(1980)。分數的數之發展。國教之友，454-455，36-41。
被引用次数
  1. (2009)。分數概念題庫之建立：跨學習階段的校準與測量。教育研究與發展期刊，5(4)，187-217。
  2. (2023)。因材網互動式學習模式融入數學學習扶助教學之研究。國際數位媒體設計學刊，15(2)，49-61。
print cancel