题名

以述詞分析法探究多重類比對兒童電學概念改變之影響

并列篇名

Investigate the Use of Multiple Analogies Promoting Pupils' Conceptual Change of Electric Current via Predicates Analysis

DOI

10.6173/CJSE.2006.1401.03

作者

林靜雯(Jing-Wen Lin);邱美虹(Mei-Hung Chiu)

关键词

多重類比 ; 述詞分析 ; 概念改變 ; Multiple Analogies ; Predicates Analysis ; Conceptual Change

期刊名称

科學教育學刊

卷期/出版年月

14卷1期(2006 / 02 / 01)

页次

55 - 81

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

近二十年來,有越來越多科學教育的研究支持類比及多重類比對於學生學習複雜概念之成效的卓越貢獻(Chiu & Lin, 2005; Duit, 1991; Glynn, 1989; Spiro, Feltovich, Coulson, & Anderson, 1989; Venville & Treagust, 1996;邱美虹和林靜雯,2002),但論及類比對於概念改變的助益時卻顯得眾說紛紜。Dagher (1994)認為此乃因檢測類比對於概念改變的意涵時,缺乏層級及視野之定義之故。據此,本研究利用多重類比的設計,選取國小四年級中等程度學生32名,隨機、平均分配至對照組、單一類比組、相似類比組及互補類比組,以探查多重類比對電學概念學習的影響,並藉Chi (Chi, 1992; Chi, Slotta, & de Leeuw, 1994)之本體架構,以述詞分析(Slotta & Chi, 1995)為判准,釐清類比於概念改變中的定位。研究結果顯示:多重類比有助於電學概念的學習,且學生對於電流概念的本體分類經述詞分析後發現,互補性多重類比有助於兒童於電學概念學習時,由物質本體跨越至過程本體的概念改變。再者,唯物類比並非阻礙學生概念改變的主因,真正妨礙學生概念改變的是其將電流視為物質的預設。反之,只要類比的設計慮及欲教授概念的本質及預設,將有助於提供具體表徵,協助學生審視自我概念與科學概念的異同,進而造成概念改變。

英文摘要

For the past two decades, a growing amount of research has shown that the use of analogies and multiple analogies in science teaching and learning promotes meaningful understanding of complex scientific concepts (Spiro, Feltovich, Coulson, & Anderson, 1989; Glynn, 1989; Duit, 1991; Venville & Treagust, 1996; Chiu & Lin, 2002; 2005). However, researchers can't get a common view of how analogies promote conceptual change. Dager (1994) supposed the main reason is that the examining of analogies locks the definitions of conceptual change's levels and eyeshot. Based on their arguments, this research designed multiple analogies of electric current, selected 32 middle achievement 4(superscript th) grade students, and randomly assigned them to a control group, a single analogy group, a similar analogies group and a complementary analogies group. The researchers hoped to investigate the role of analogies in pupils' electric current understanding, and find its position in conceptual change. The results of this study show that multiple analogies are helpful to the learning of electricity concepts, and the comparisons of conceptual change via predicates analysis also indicate that complementary analogies can help pupils shift their electricity concepts from a MATTER to a PROCESS ontology. Besides, materialistic analogies are not a barrier to conceptual change; the intrinsic factor is the presupposition that students treat electric current as matter. To the contrary, when we design analogies, we should consider the nature and presupposition of the concepts we want to teach. These then, will be helpful to supply concrete representations to help students become aware of the difference between self-concepts and scientific concepts. It this happens, conceptual change will take place.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 邱美虹、林靜雯(2002)。以多重類比探究兒童電流心智模式之改變。科學教育學刊,10(2),109-134。
    連結:
  2. Arnold, M.,Millar, R.(1988).Teaching about electric circuits: a constructivist approach.School Science Review,70(251),149-151.
  3. Arnold, M.,Millar, R.(1987).Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of introductory ideas in electricity.International Journal of Science Education,9,553-563.
  4. Brown, D. E.(1992).Using examples and analogies to remediate misconceptions in physics: factors influencing conceptual change.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(1),17-34.
  5. Brown, D. E.(1993).Refocusing core intuitions: A concretizing role for analogy in conceptual change.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,30(10),1273-1290.
  6. Brown, D. E.,Clement, J.(1989).Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction.Instructional Science,18,237-261.
  7. Chi, M. T. H.(1998).Personal communication.
  8. Chi, M. T. H.(1993).Paper presented at the Fifteenth Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference.Hillsdale, NJ:
  9. Chi, M. T. H.,Bassok, M.,Lewis, M. W.,Reiman, P.,Glaser, R.(1989).Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems.Cognitive Science,13,145-182.
  10. Chi, M. T. H.,R. Giere (Ed.)(1992).Cognitive models of Science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
  11. Chi, M. T. H.,Slotta, J. D.,de Leeuw, N.(1994).From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts [special issue].Learning and Instruction,4,27-43.
  12. Chi, M. T. H.,T. B. Ward,S. M. Smith,J. Vaid (Eds.)(1997).Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and process.Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
  13. Chiu, M. H.,Lin, J. W.(2005).Promoting fourth graders` conceptual change of their understanding of electric current via multiple analogies.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(4),429-464.
  14. Clement, J.(1993).Using bridging analogies and anchoring instruction to deal with students preconceptions in physics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,30(10),1241-1251.
  15. Clement, J.(1982).Students` preconceptions in introductory mechanics.American Journal of Physics,50,66-71.
  16. Closset, J. L.(1983).Paper presented at the Research on Physics Education, La Londe les Maures.Paris, France:
  17. Cohen, R.(1984).Paper presented at the Aspects of Understanding Electricity.Ludwigsburg:
  18. Cohen, R.,Eylon, B.,Ganiel, U.(1983).Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: a study of students` concepts.American Journal of Physics,51(5),407-412.
  19. Conver, W. J.(1999).Wiley series in probability and statistics: Applied probability and statistics section.New York:Willy.
  20. Dagher, Z. R.(1994).Does the use of analogies contribute to conceptual change.Science Education,78(6),601-614.
  21. Driver, R.,Sauires, A.,Rushworth, P.,Wood-Robinson, V.(1994).Making sense of secondary science: Research into children`s ideas.London:Routledge.
  22. Duit, R.(1984).Paper presented at the Aspects of Understanding Electricity.Ludwigsburg:
  23. Duit, R.(1991).On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science.Science Education,75(6),649-672.
  24. Dupin, J. J.,Johsua, S.(1989).Analogies and "modeling analogies" in teaching: some examples in basic electricity.Science Education,73(2),207-224.
  25. Dupin, J. J.,Johsua, S.(1987).Conceptions of French pupils concerning electric circuits: Structure and evolution.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,24(9),791-806.
  26. Ferrari, M.,Chi, M. T. H.(1998).The nature of naïve explanations of natural selection.International Journal of Science Education,20(10),1231-1256.
  27. Gentner, D.,Gentner, D. R.,D. Gentner,A. L. Stevens (Eds.)(1983).Mental models.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  28. Glynn S. M.,K. D. Muth (Ed.)(1989).Children`s comprehension of narrative and expository text: Research into practice.Neward, DE:International Reading Association.
  29. Harrison A. G.,Treagust D. F.(1993).Teaching with analogy: A case study in grade-10 optics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,30(10),1291-1307.
  30. Heller, P. M.,Finley, F. N.(1992).Variable uses of alternative conceptions: A case study in current electricity.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(3),259-275.
  31. Johsua, S.,Dupin, J.(1987).Taking into account student conceptions in instructional strategy: An example in physics.Cognition and Instruction,4,117-135.
  32. King, A.(1994).Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain.American Educational Research Journal,31(2),338-368.
  33. Osborne, R.(1981).Children`s ideas about electric current.New Zealand Science Teacher,29,12-19.
  34. Osborne, R.,Freyberg, P.(1985).Learning in science: the implications of children`s science.Heinemann, Auckland and London:
  35. Psillos, D.,Koumaras, P.,Tiberghien, A.(1988).Voltage presented as a primary concept on DC circuits.International Journal of Science Education,10(1),29-43.
  36. Rohr, M.,Reimann, P.,M. W. V. Someren,P. Reimann,H. P. A. Boshuizen,T. D. Jong (Eds.)(1998).Reasoning with multiple representations when acquiring the particulate model of matter.Learning with Multiple Representations,41-66.
  37. Shipstone, D. M.(1984).A study of children`s understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits.European Journal of Science Education,6(2),185-198.
  38. Shipstone, D.,R. Driver,E. Guesne,A. Tiberghien (Eds.)(1985).Children`s Ideas in Science.Milton Keynes:Open University Press.
  39. Slotta, J. D.,Chi, M. T. H.,G. W. Cottrell (Ed.)(1996).Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
  40. Slotta, J. D.,Chi, M. T. H.,Joran, E.(1995).Assessing students` misclassifications of physics concepts: An ontological basis for conceptual change.Cognition and Instruction,13(3),373-400.
  41. Spiro, R. J.,Feltovich, P. J.,Coulson, R. L.,Anderson, D. K.,S. Vosniadou,A. Ortony (Eds.)(1989).Similarity and analogical reasoning.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  42. Stavy, R.(1991).Using analogy to overcome misconceptions about conservation of matter.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,28(4),305-313.
  43. Tenny, Y. J.(1984).Paper presented at the Aspects of Understanding Electricity.Ludwigsburg:
  44. Tiberghien, A.(1983).Paper presented at the Research on Physics Education the First International Workshop. France, Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Paris:
  45. Tyson, L. M.,Venville, G. J.,Harrison, A. G.,Treagust, D. F.(1997).A multidimensional framework for interpreting conceptual change events in the classroom.Science Education,81,387-404.
  46. Venville, G. J.,Treagust, D. F.(1996).The role of analogies in promoting conceptual change in biology.Instructional Science,4,71-87.
  47. Von Rhoneck, C.(1981).Paper presented at the International Workshop on Problems concerning students` representation of physics and chemistry knowledge.Ludwigsburg:
  48. Von Rhoneck, C.(1984).Paper presented at the Aspects of Understanding Electricity.Ludwigsburg:
  49. Vosniadou, S.(1994).Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change [special issue].Learning and Instruction,4,45-69.
  50. Vosniadou, S.,Ioannides, C.(1998).From conceptual development to science education: a psychological point of view.International Journal of Science Education,20(10),1213-1230.
  51. 林靜雯(2000)。台北市,國立台灣師範大學。
  52. 邱美虹(1996)。學習策略與科學學習。科學教育月刊,191,2-15。
  53. 邱美虹(2000)。概念改變研究的省思與啟示。科學教育學刊,8(1),1-34。
  54. 高淑芬(1997)。台北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
  55. 陳恆迪(1993)。彰化市,國立彰化師範大學。
  56. 陳啟明、陳瓊森(1992)。探究高一學生對直流電路的迷思概念。科學教育,3,22-72。
  57. 陳龍川(1992)。花蓮師院學生簡單直流電路迷思概念類型及其分佈調查。花師數理教育學報,1,65-80。
  58. 陳瓊森(1993)。高一學生直流電路概念結構之研究。彰化師範大學學報,4,511-542。
  59. 楊文金(1992)。在職國小教師對基本電路之概念研究。中華民國第八屆科學教育學術研討會論文彙編,高雄市:
  60. 葉俊豪、陳瓊森(1995)。利用定性與定量測驗來探究高二學生對直流電路的知識結構。科學教育,6,156-178。
被引用次数
  1. 劉嘉茹、陳翠雯、侯依伶(2010)。不同非語詞刺激對國小學生月相概念學習之影響。科學教育學刊,18(4),361-387。