實施引導式探究教學對於國小學童學習成效之影響

Investigating Effectiveness of Implementing Guided Inquiry Teaching on Students' Science Learning in the Elementary School

10.6173/CJSE.2007.1504.05

楊秀停(Hsiu-Ting Yang)；王國華(Kuo-Hua Wang)

合作式行動研究 ； 探究式教學 ； Vee圖 ； Collaborative Action Research ； Inquiry Teaching ； Vee Diagram

科學教育學刊

15卷4期（2007 / 08 / 01）

439 - 459

繁體中文

本研究目的探討實施引導式探究教學，對於國小學童學習成效之影響。主要以合作式行動研究方式，協助一位國小自然科教師設計並實施引導式探究教學，實施的課程包含了植物、小水滴的旅行、水溶液的性質等三個單元。探究課程的教案設計經專家審核及預試修正後，落實於個案班教學，而參與本研究的個案班學生為國小五年級學生，共三十一人。為了解學生在認知、能力及態度三方面的學習成效，本研究收集多元的量化及質性資料，量化資料包含了三個單元的學習成效評量單前後測與學生知覺問卷，以及為評量學生探究能力，而參考Vee圖發展的教師評定學生探究能力檢核表)(SIAC)，及學生探究能力自評量表(SIASS)；而質性資料有課室觀察之錄影音、晤談個案教師、晤談學生等，經轉錄及開放編碼後進行歸納分析，並以多元資料之三角校正呈現研究結果。綜合量化資料的t檢定及質性資料的歸納分析發現，學生在知識的學習、能力的表現及態度的培養等方面的成效有所提昇，也發現學生自行設計實驗的能力，需要教師適度的引導才得以展現。因而建議未來有意從事探究式教學之教師，以引導式探究教學為始，逐步培養學生的探究能力。

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of implementing guided inquiry teaching on elementary school students’ science learning through a collaborative action research. The participants were one case teacher and his thirty-one 5th grade students. The researcher and the case teacher worked together on instructional design, as well as data collection and data interpretation. The lesson units encompass three topics, such as ”Plants,” ”The different types of water,” and ”The characteristics of solution.” The field note of classroom observation and the word transcriptions of classroom video and audio tape-recordings, and interviews were validated through triangulation method with multi-data-resource. The quantitative data from the pre-and post-achievement tests, and selfdeveloped instruments, such as Student Inquiry Ability Checklist (SIAC), and Student Inquiry Ability Self-assessment Scale (SIASS) were analyzed with t-test and descriptive statistics. The results show that students’ achievement, inquiry abilities, and affective components are all significant improved after implementing guided inquiry instruction. Suggestions are also provided in this paper.

1. 毛松霖、張菊秀(1997)。「探究式教學法」與「講述式教學法」對於國中學生地球科學－氣象單元學習成效之比較。科學教育學刊，5(4)，461-497。
   連結：
2. 劉宏文、張惠博(2001)。高中學生進行開放式探究活動之個案研究－問題的形成與解決。科學教育學刊，9(2)，169-196。
   連結：
3. Anderson, R. D.(2002).Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry.Journal of Science Teacher Education,13(1),1-12.
4. Bakas, C.,Mikropoulos, T. A.(2003).Design of virtual environments for comprehension of planetary phenomena based on students` ideas.International Journal of Science Education,25(8),949-967.
5. Best, J. W.,Kahn, J. V.(1998).Research in Education.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
6. Chase, C.,Gibson, H. L.(2002).Longitudinal impact of inquiry-based science program on middle school students` attitudes toward science.Science Education,86(5),693-705.
7. Crawford, B. A.(2000).Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles of science teacher.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(9),916-937.
8. Crawford, B. A.,Zembal-Saul, C.,Munford, D.,Friedrichsen, P.(2005).Confronting prospective teachers` ideas of evolution and scientific inquiry using technology and inquiry-based tasks.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(6),613-637.
9. Edwards, C. H.(1997).Promoting student inquiry.The Science Teacher,64(7),18-21.
10. Feldman, A.(1996).Enhancing the practice of physics teachers: Mechanisms for the generation and sharing of knowledge and understanding in collaborative action research.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,33(5),513-540.
11. Germann, P. J.(1991).Developing science process skills through directed inquiry.The American Biology Teacher,53(4),243-247.
12. Hinrichsen, J.,Jarrett, D.(1999).Science inquiry for die classroom.Portland, OR:Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
13. Hofstein, A.,Navon, O.,Kipnis, M.,Mamlok-Naaman, R.(2005).Developing students` ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(7),791-806.
14. Jarrett, D.(1997).Inquiry strategies for science and mathematics learning.Portland, OR:Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
15. Keys, C. W.,Bryan, L. A.(2001).Co-construction inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38(6),631-645.
16. Khishfe, R.,Abd-El-Khalick, F.(2002).Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders` views of nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39(7),551-578.
17. Mintzes, J.J.,Novak, J. D.(Eds.),J. H. Wandersee(2000).Assessing Science Understanding.San Diego:Academic Press.
18. National Research Council(1996).National science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
19. Novak, J. D.,Cowin, D. B.(1984).Leaning how to learn.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
20. Phillips, K. A.(2002).A tool for learning scientific inquiry.The American Biology Teacher,64(7),512-520.
21. Ross, J. A.,Rolheiser, C.,Hogaboam-Gray, A.(1999).Effects of collaborative action research on the knowledge of five Canadian teacher-researchers.The Elementary School Journal,99(3),255-274.
22. Sagor, R.(2002).What project LEARN reveals about collaborative action research.Education Leadship,48(6),6-10.
23. Tamir, P.,Stavy, R.,Ratner, N.(1998).Teaching science by inquiry: assessment and learning.Journal of Biological Education,33(1),27-32.
24. Trowbridge, L. W.,Bybee, R. W.(1986).Becoming a secondary school science teacher.Columbus, Ohio:Merrill.
25. Trumbull, D. J.(2005).Developing materials to promote inquiry: Lessons learned.Science Education,89,879-900.
26. Windschitl, M.(2003).Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom pratice?.Science Education,87(1),112-143.
27. Zachos, P.,Hick, T. L.,Doane, W. E. J.,Sargent, C.(2005).Setting theoretical and empirical foundation for assessing scientific inquiry and discovery in educational programs.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(9),938-962.
28. Zuckerman, G. A.,Chudinova, E. V.,Khavkin, E. E.(1998).Inquiry as a pivotal element of knowledge acquisition within the Vygotskian paradigm: Building a science curriculum for the elementary school.Cognition and Instruction,16(2),201-233.
29. 張清濱(2000)。探究教學法。師友，395，45-49。
30. 張靜儀(1995)。自然科探究教學法。屏師科學教育，1，36-45。
31. 教育部(2001)。國民教育九年一貫課程綱要：自然與生活科技學習領域。台北市:教育部。
32. 陳美如(2001)。合作探究教學觀察：多元文化觀點。教育研究資訊，9(4)，43-65。

1. 周惠柔(2018)。6E教學模式結合不同輔助學習設備融入生活科技課程對高中學生探究能力及設計能力之影響-以結構設計課程為例。臺灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系學位論文。2018。1-134。