题名

影響國中自然科教師接受資訊科技融入教學之個人因素研究

并列篇名

Intrinsic Factors Influencing Secondary Science Teachers' Acceptance of Information Technology

DOI

10.6173/CJSE.2007.1505.03

作者

吳為聖(Wei-Shen Wu)；張惠博(Huey-Por Chang)；郭重吉(Chorng-Jee Guo)

关键词

科技接受模式 ； 融入自我效能 ； 適配性知覺 ； Perceived Fit ； Self-eEfficacy of Infusion ； Technology Acceptance Model

期刊名称

科學教育學刊

卷期/出版年月

15卷5期（2007 / 10 / 01）

页次

543 - 563

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

探討影響教師實施資訊科技融入教學的因素已累積豐碩的描述性成果，然而，較少研究進行相關理論的驗證。為瞭解促使教師實施資訊科技融入教學的內在動機因素，本研究根據社會認知理論(Social Cognitive Theory)和任務科技適配理論(Task-technology Fit Theory)，提出融入自我效能(Self-efficacy of Infusion)和適配性知覺(Perceived Fit)兩個外部變數擴充科技接受模式(Technology Acceptance Model)，藉以檢驗教師接受資訊科技的內在因素。透過問卷調查方式，收集中部某縣市198位國中自然科教師的有效樣本，利用結構方程模式分析模型的契合度和路徑屬性。研究結果顯示自然科教師對資訊科技融入教學的意向確實受到融入自我效能、適配性知覺、有用性知覺、易用性知覺等因素的直接或間接影響。融入自我效能扮演研究模型的外生變數，經由適配性知覺、有用性知覺和易用性知覺的中介，產生六條影響融入意向的路徑，其中有三條路徑是經由適配性知覺影響融入意向。
英文摘要

Investigation on factors influencing teachers' acceptance of information technology (IT) in teaching have produced extensive findings, still, there are few empirical works validating the theoretical assumptions. In order to understand teachers' intrinsic determinants toward teaching with IT, this study added two mediating variables, self-efficacy of infusion and perceived fit, to extend the technology acceptance model. The model was tested using survey responses from 198 middle school science teachers. Data were analyzed by a structural equation modeling approach and the results showed a reasonably good fit. Findings indicated that intention to infusion was significantly influenced by self-efficacy of infusion, perceived fit, perceived usefulness and perceived ease-ofuse either directly or indirectly. There were six paths from self-efficacy to intention of infusion, including three paths via perceived fit to intention of infusion.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Ajzen, I.,Fishbein, M.(1980).Understanding attitude and predicting social behavior.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  2. Ajzen, I.,Madden, T. J.(1986).Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,22,453-474.
  3. Al-Gahtani, S. S.,King, M.(1999).Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology.Behavior and Information Technology,18(4),277-297.
  4. Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin,103,411-423.
  5. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation modes.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
  6. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
  7. Barron, A. E.,Kemker, K.,Harmes, C.,Kalaydjian, K.(2003).Large-scale research study on technology in K-12 schools: Technology integration as it relates to the national technology standards.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,35(4),489-507.
  8. Becker, H. J.(2000).Access to classroom computers.Communications of the ACM,43(6),24-25.
  9. Becker, H. J.(1994).How exemplary computing-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools.Journal of Research on Computing in Education,26(3),291-321.
  10. Bell, P.,Linn, M. C.(2000).Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE.International Journal of Science Education,22(8),797-817.
  11. Burton-Jones, A.,Hubona, G. S.(2005).Individual differences and usage behavior: revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption.The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems,36(2),58-77.
  12. Chau, P. Y. K.(2001).Influence of computer attitude and Self-Efficacy on IT usage behavior.Journal of End User Computing,13(1),26-33.
  13. Chau, P. Y. K.,Hu, P. J.(2001).Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach.Decision Science,32(4),699-719,80.
  14. Chiero, R. T.(1997).Teachers' perspectives on factors that affect computer use.Journal of Research on Computing in Education,30(2),133-145.
  15. Compeau, D.,Higgins, C. A.(1995).Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test.MIS Quarterly,19(2),189-211.
  16. Davis, F. D.(1989).Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.MIS Quarterly,September,319-340.
  17. Davis, F. D.(1986).A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results.Sloan School of Management,11-34.
  18. Davis, F. D.,Bagozzi, R.,Warshaw, P. R.(1989).User acceptance of computer technology: A Comparison of two theoretical models.Management Science,35(8),982-1003.
  19. DeSouza, S.(1994).Do science teachers intend to engage in collaborative reflective practice?.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching,Anaheim, CA.:
  20. Dishaw, M. T.,Strong, D. M.(1999).Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs.Information and Management,36,9-21.
  21. Dooley, L.,Metcalf,Martinez, A.(1999).A study of the adoption of computer technology by teachers.Educational Technology and Society,2(4),1436-4522.
  22. Edelson, D. C.(2001).Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38(3),355-385.
  23. Ertmer, P. A.(1999).Addressing first-and second-order barriers to changes: Strategies for technology integration.Educational Technology Research and Development,47(4),47-61.
  24. Fishman, B. J.,Marx, R.(2001).Design research on professional development in a systemic reform context.Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association.
  25. Fornell, C. (ed.)(1982).A second generation of multivariate analysis.New York:Praeger.
  26. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18,39-50.
  27. Gay, L. R.(1992).Educational research competencies for analysis and application.New York:Macmillan.
  28. Goodhue, D. L.(1995).Understanding user evaluations of information systems.Management Science,41(12),1827-1844.
  29. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate Data Analysis.New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
  30. Haney, J. J.,Czerniak, C. M.,Lumpe, A. T.(1996).Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,33(9),971-993.
  31. Hansan, B.(2006).Delineating the effects of general and system-specific computer self-efficacy beliefs on IS acceptance.Information and Management,43(5),565-571.
  32. Holalhan, P. J.,Aronson, Z. H, Jurkat, M. P.,Schoorman, F. D.(2004).Implementing computer technology: A multiorganizational test of Klein and Sorra's model.Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,21,31-50.
  33. Holloway, R. E.,D. H. Jonassen (Ed)(1996).Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology.New York:Macmillan.
  34. Hong, W.,Thong, J. Y. L.,Wong, W.,Tam, K. Y.(2002).Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics.Journal of Management Information Systems,18(3),97-124.
  35. Hu, P. J.,Chau, P. Y. K.,Liu Sheng, O. R.,Tam, K. Y.(1999).Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology.Journal of Management Information Systems,16(2),91-112.
  36. Hu, P. J.,Clark, T. H. K.,Ma, W. W.(2003).Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study.Information and Management,41,227-241.
  37. Igbaria, M.,Iiravi, J.(1995).The effects of Self-Efficacy on computer usage.Omega,23(6),166-175.
  38. Igbaria, M.,Zinatelli, N.,Cragg, P.,Cavaye, A.(1997).Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model.MIS Quarterly,September,279-302.
  39. Klopfer, E.,Yoon, S.,Um, T.(2005).Teaching complex dynamic systems to young students with StarLogo.Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching,24(2),157-178.
  40. Kovalik, C.(2003).Reflections on a technology integration project.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,11(1),73-90.
  41. Kozma, R. (Ed.)(2003).Technology, innovation and educational change: A global perspective.Eugene, Oregon:International Society for Technology in Education.
  42. Legris, P.,Ingham, J.,Collerette, P.(2003).Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model.Information and Management,40,191-204.
  43. Luehmann, A. L.(2002).Powerful hidden forces affecting teachers' appraisal and adoption of innovative technology: Rich curricular supports for secondary water quality learning.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association,New Orleans, LA:
  44. Lumpe. A. T.,Chambers, E.(2001).Assessing teachers' context beliefs about technology use.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,34(1),93-107.
  45. Ma, Q.,Liu, L.(2004).The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings.Journal of Organizational and End User Computing,16(1),59-72.
  46. Marakas, G. M.,Yi, M. Y.,Johnson, R. D.(1998).The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research.Information System Research,9(2),126-163.
  47. Mathieson, K.,Peacock, E.,Chin, W. W.(2001).Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources.The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems,32(3),86-112.
  48. McFarland, D. J.,Hamilton, D.(2006).Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model.Computers in Human Behavior,22,427-447.
  49. Moore, G. C.,Benbasat, I.(1991).Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation.Information Systems Research,2(3),192-222.
  50. Mumtaz. S.(2000).Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature.Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education,9(3),319-341.
  51. National Science Council(1996).National science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  52. Newton, L. R.(2000).Data-logging in practical science: Research and reality.International Journal of Science Education,7(3),381-396.
  53. Norris, C.,Sullivan, T.,Poirot, J.,Soloway, E.(2003).No access no use, no impact: Snapshot surveys of educational technology in K-12.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,36(1),15-27.
  54. Norum, K.,Grabinger, R. S.,Duffield, J.(1999).Healing the universe is an inside job: Teachers' views on integrating technology.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,7(3),187-203.
  55. Ong, C. S.,Lai, J. Y.,Wang, Y. S.(2004).Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies.Information and Management,41,795-804.
  56. Pedersen, J. E.,Yerrick, R. K.(2000).Technology in science teacher education: Survey of current uses and desired knowledge among science educators.Journal of Science Teacher Education,11(2),131-153.
  57. Pelgrum, W. J.(2001).Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment.Computers and Education,37,163-178.
  58. Pierson, M. E.(2001).Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise.Journal of Research on Computing in Education,33(4),413-430.
  59. Roblyer, M. D.,Edwards, J.(2000).Integrating educational technology into teaching.New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
  60. Roblyer, M. D.,Knezek, G. A.(2003).New millennium research: A call for a national research agenda.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,36(1),60-71.
  61. Rocaa, J. C.,Chiub, C.,Martı''nez, F. J.(2006).Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,64(8),683-696.
  62. Rogers, E. M.(1983).Diffusion of innovations.New York:Free Press.
  63. Shroyer, M. G.,Borchers, C. A.(1996).Factors that support change to enhance the use of microcomputers in rural schools.School Science and Mathematics,96(8),419-431.
  64. Smylie, M.(1988).The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change.American Educational Research Journal,25(1),1-30.
  65. Staples, D. S.,Seddon, P.(2004).Testing the technology-to-performance chain model.Journal of Organizational and End User Computing,16(4),17-36.
  66. Szajna, B.(1996).Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model.Management Science,42(1),85-92.
  67. Taylor, S.,Todd, P.(1995).Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models.Information Systems Research,6(2),144-176.
  68. Thompson, R. L.,Higgins, C. A.,Howell, J. M.(1991).Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization.MIS Quarterly,March,125-143.
  69. Tobin, K.,B. J. Fraser (Eds.),H. J. Walberg (Eds.)(1995).Improving science education.Chicago, Illinois:National Society for the Study of Education: University of Chicago.
  70. Tornatzky, L. G.,Klein, J. K.(1982).Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,29(1),28-45.
  71. van Braak, J.(2001).Factors influencing the use of computer mediated communication by teachers in secondary schools.Computers & Education,36,41-57.
  72. Venkatesh, V.,Davis, F. D.(2000).A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies.Management Science,46(2),186-204.
  73. Venkatesh, V.,Morris, M. G.,Davis, G. B.,Davis, F. D.(2003).User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view.MIS Quarterly,27(3),425-478.
  74. Venkatesh, V.,Speier, C.,Morris, M. G.(2002).User acceptance enablers in individual decis-ion making about technology: Toward an integ-rated model.Decision Science,33(2),297-316.
  75. Wang, L.,Ertmer, P. A.,Newby, T. J.(2004).Increasing preservice teachers' Self-Efficacy beliefs for technology integration.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,36(3),231-250.
  76. Wu, H. K.,Krajcik, J. S.,Soloway, E.(2001).Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38(7),821-842.
  77. Yi, M. Y.,Jackson, J. D.,Park, J. S.,Probst, J. C.(2006).Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view.Information and Management,43,350-363.
  78. Yuen, A. H. K.,Ma. W. W. K.(2002).Gender difference in teacher computer acceptance.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,10(3),365-382.
  79. Zacharia, Z.(2003).Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry-based experiments in physics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,40(80),792-823.
  80. Zammit, S.(1992).Factors facilitating or hindering the use of computers in schools.Educational Research,34(1),57-66.
  81. Zint, M.(2002).Comparing three attitude-behavior theories for predicting science teachers' intentions.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39(9),819-844.
  82. 教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要：自然與生活科技學習領域。教育部。
被引用次数
  1. 陳儒晰(2013)。幼教人員對資訊科技接受態度之調查研究。教育心理學報，44(3)，669-690。
  2. 陳儒晰(2013)。幼教人員利用數位媒體語言教學的認知易用性與教學融入之關係：以認知有用性與使用態度為中介變項。教育傳播與科技研究，106，45-64。
  3. 陳儒晰、邱方晞(2013)。數位遊戲融入幼兒教學活動的認知因素與應用效能之影響關係。科學教育學刊，21(1)，49-73。
  4. 陳育祥(2020)。藝術教師實施新媒體藝術教學之知覺態度探究。當代教育研究季刊，28(3)，1-27。
  5. 王千倖(2010)。「資訊科技融入教學」推廣政策之敘說研究。教育實踐與研究，23(1)，31-56。
  6. 張瑞娥、洪榮昭(2018)。科技大學教師對職能融入教學政策之接受態度研究—以「產業職能基準系統」為中介環境。教育科學研究期刊，63(2)，251-284。
  7. (2009)。應用Wiki平台於大學性別通識課程之研究。教學科技與媒體，88，70-89。
print cancel