“科學家發明了什麼？！”－解析學生對於科學新聞中的科技產物意象

"What Have Scientists Created?"-Students' Image toward Technology When They Read Science News Reports

10.6173/CJSE.2008.1604.05

黃俊儒(Chun-Ju Huang)；簡妙如(Miao-Ju Jian)

科學新聞 ； 社會性科學議題 ； 先備知識 ； 科學教育 ； Science News ； Socio-Scientific Issue ； Prior Knowledge ； Science Education

科學教育學刊

16卷4期（2008 / 08 / 01）

415 - 438

繁體中文

面對科技時代的瞬息萬變及複雜多元，科學新聞幾乎是一般學生持續接觸科學及參與社會性科學議題的重要管道。而學生如何感知科學新聞報導的內容，更直接影響到他們對於事件的詮釋及後續採取的行動。鑑此，本文所欲探索的問題包括：（一）學生對於科學新聞中之科技產物的意象為何？（二）學生如何從感知(perceive)的意象推理科學家或科技產物的目的？（三）學生對於科技產物意象之感知型態的特質為何？研究結果發現，學生在對於科學新聞報導中的科技產物進行理解時，不論在對於該科技產物的意象，或是科學家目的的評估等，均容易因為感知類型的不同，而造成對於科學新聞報導主旨認識上的偏差。造成這些偏差的原因，一方面可能肇因於閱聽者自己先備知識的限制；另一方面則是國內科學新聞產製環境的缺陷。對於廣義的科學教育工作而言，這些因素均具有重要的意義。

In this information based society, science news has become the most important channel through which students can access new scientific developments. With this essential knowledge they can confidently discuss socio-scientific issues. What the students perceive about technology while reading science news could influence their attitude towards science and could dictate the actions they will take in the future. As previously discussed, this study planned to explore three questions: 1. What is the student's conception of technology while reading science news reports? 2. How do students perceive the aims of scientists or of science? 3. What are the features of students’ perceptual patterns toward technology? The results of the survey show that students have many incorrect images when they read technological news reports. It is also clear that these images not only affect students’ understandings of the science reported, but also generates false perceptions about the aims of scientists. Two factors seem to cause these problems: the limitations of students' prior knowledge and the innate shortcomings of science news reporting in Taiwan.

1. 周桂田(2004)。獨大的科學理性與隱沒（默）的社會理性之「對話」－在地公眾、科學專家與國家的風險文化探討。台灣社會研究季刊，56，1-63。
   連結：
2. 林樹聲(2006)。從爭議性科技議題的教學設訓設計和實踐中詮釋科學教師的角色個案研究。科學教育學刊，14(3)，237-255。
   連結：
3. 黃俊儒、簡妙如(2006)。科學新聞文本的論述層次及結構分佈：構思另個科學傳播的起點。新聞學研究，86，135-170。
   連結：
4. 靳知勤、陳文慈(2007)。臺中縣市國小自然科教師對以 STS 議題從事教學之調查研究。科學教育學刊，15(1)，25-52。
   連結：
5. 劉湘瑤、李麗菁、蔡今中(2007)。科學認識觀與社會性科學議題抉擇判斷之相關性探討。科學教育學刊，15(3)，335-356。
   連結：
6. Aikenhead, G. S.(1988).An analysis of four ways of assessing student beliefs about STS topics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,25(8),607-629.
7. Aikenhead, G. S.(1985).Collective decision making in the social context of science.Science Education,69,453-475.
8. Aikenhead, G. S.,S. P. Norris,L. M. Phillips (Eds.)(1990).Foundations of literacy policy in Canada.Calgary, Alberta, Canada:Detselig.
9. Anderson, C. W.(1999).Inscription and science learning.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,36,973-974.
10. Barman, C. R.(1999).Completing the study: high school students’ views of scientists and science.Science and Children,36(7),16-21.
11. Brossard, D.,Shanahan, J.(2006).Do they know what they read? Building a scientific literacy measurement instrument based on science media coverage.Science Communication,28(1),47-63.
12. Bucchi, M.,Mazzolini, R. G.(2003).Big science, little news: Science coverage in the Italian daily press, 1946-1997.Public Understanding of Science,12(1),7-24.
13. Catherine, G.(2003).Mastering the inverted pyramid.Writing,25(4),8-10.
14. Chambers, D. W.(1983).Stereotypic images of the scientists: the draw-a-scientist test.Science Education,67(2),255-265.
15. DeBoer, G. E.(2000).Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(6),582-601.
16. Dimopoulos, K.,Koulaidis, V.(2002).The socio-epistemic constitution of science and technology in the Greek press: An analysis of its presentation.Public Understanding of Science,11,225-241.
17. Fiske, J.(1986).Television: Polysemy and popularity.Critical Studies in Mass Communication,3(4),391-408.
18. Gregory, J.,Miller, S.(1998).Science in public: Communication, culture and credibility.Cambridge:Basic Books.
19. Gunter, B.,Kinderlerer, J.,Beyleveld, D.(1999).The media and public understanding of biotechnology.Science communication,20(4),373-394.
20. Hidi, S.(1990).Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning.Review of Educational Research,60,549-571.
21. Hisschemöler, M.,Midden, C. J. H.(1999).Improving the usability of research on the public perception of science and technology for policy-making.Public Understanding of Science,8,17-33.
22. Jensen, K. B.(1987).Qualitative audience research: Toward an integrative approach to reception.Critical Studies in Mass communication,4,21-36.
23. Kennedy, G.,Moen, D. R.,Ranly, D.(1993).Beyond the inverted pyramid: Effective writing for newspapers, magazines and specialized publications.NY:St. Martin`s Press.
24. Kerckhove, D. D.(1995).The skin of culture’ Investigating the new electronic reality.Toronto:Somerville House Pub.
25. Kolstǿ, S. D.(2006).Patterns of students` argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socio-scientific issue.International Journal of Science Education,28(14),1689-1716.
26. Kolstǿ, S. D.(2001).Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools fur dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues.Science Education,85,291-310.
27. Kolstǿ, S. D.(2000).Consensus projects: Teaching science for citizenship.International Journal of Science Education,22(6),645-664.
28. Kolstǿ, S. D.(2001).`To trust or not to trust,.. ,`-Pupils` ways` of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue.International Journal of Science Education,23(9),877-901.
29. Lowe, T.,Brown, K.,Dessai, S.,Doria, M. F.,Haynes, K.,Vincent, K.(2006).Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change.Public Understanding of Science,15,435-457.
30. Mailloux, S.,F. Len-tricchia,T. McLaughlin (Eds.)(1990).critical terms for literary study.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
31. Matthews, B.,Davies, D.(1999).Changing children's images of scientists: Can teachers make a difference?.School Science Review,80(293),79-85.
32. Mead, M.,Metraux, R.(1957).Image of the scientist among high school students.Science,126,384-390.
33. Miler, J. D.,Augenbraun, E.,Schulhof, J.,Kimmel, L. G.(2006).Adult science learning from local television newscasts.Science Communication,28(2),216-242.
34. Millar, R.,R. Levinson,J. Thomas (Eds.)(1997).Science today: Problem or crisis?.London:Routledge.
35. Miller, J. D.(1998).The measurement of civic scientific literacy.Public Understanding of Science,7,203-223.
36. Miltar, R.,Osbome, J. E.(1998).Beyond 2000: Science education/or the future.London:Kings College London.
37. National Research Council(1996).National science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
38. Nelkin, D.(1995).Selling science: How the press covers science and technology.NY:W. H. Freeman and Company.
39. Norris, S. P.,Phillips, L. M.(2003).How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy.Science Education,87,224-240.
40. Norris, S. P.,Phillips, L. M.,Korpan, C. A.(2003).University students` interpretation of media reports of science and its relationship to background knowledge, interest, and reading difficulty.Public Understanding of Science,12,123-145.
41. Norris, S. P.,Phillips. L. M.(1994).Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,31(9),947-967.
42. Osborne, R.,Wittrock, M.(1983).Learning science: A generative process.Science Education,67,489-508.
43. Phillips, L. M.,Norris, S. P.(1999).Interpreting popular reports of science: What happens when the reader`s world meets the world on paper?.International Journal of Science Education,21(3),317-327.
44. Pottker, H.(2003).News and its communicative quality: The inverted pyramid-when and why did it appear?.Journalism Studies,4(4),501-511.
45. Reis, P.,Galvao, C.(2004).The impact of socio-scientific controversies in Portuguese natural science teachers; conceptions and practices.Research in Science Education,34,153-171.
46. Ries, p.(2004).Socio-scientific controversies and students’ conceptions about scientists.International Journal of Science Education,26(13),1621-1633.
47. Roscoe, J.,Marshall, H.,Gleesson, K.(1995).The television audience: A reconsideration of the taken-for-granted theme `active`, `social` and `critical`.European Journal of Communication,10(1),87-108.
48. Rudolph, J. L.(2005).Inquiry, instrumentalistn, and the public understanding of science.Science Education,89,803-821.
49. Ryder, J.(2001).Identifying science understanding fro functional scientific literacy.Studies in Science Education,36,1-44.
50. Sadler, T. D.(2004).Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio-scientific issues.Journal of Moral Education,33(3)
51. Sadler, T. D.,Zeidlcr, D. L.(2005).Patterns of informal reasoning in the context o socio-scientific decision making.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(1),112-138.
52. Sadler, T. D.,Zeidler, D. L.(2004).The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of generic engineering dilemmas.Science Education,88,4-27.
53. Solomon, J.(1992).The classroom discussion of science-based social issues presented on television: Knowledge, attitudes and values.International Journal of Science Education,14(4),431-444.
54. Steinke, J.,Lapinski, M. K.,Crocker, N.,Zi-etsman-Thomas, A.,Williams, Y.,Kuchib-hotla, S(2007).Assessing media influences on middle school-aged children's perceptions of women in science using the Draw-A-Scientist Test (DAST).Science Communication,29(1),35-64.
55. Weigold, M. F.(2001).Communication science: A review of the literature.Science communication,23(2),164-193.
56. Wellington, J.(1991).Newspaper science, school science: Friends or enemies?.International Journal of Science Education,13,363-372.
57. Wick, R. H.,S. A. Deetz (Ed.)(1992).Schema theory and measurement in mass communication research: Theorical and methodological issues in news information processing.Communication yearbook,15,115-145.
58. Zeidler, D. L.,Walker, K. A.,Ackett, W. A.,Simmons, M. L.(2002).Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas.Science Education,86,343-367.
59. 王儷靜、方念萱(2004)。是新聞或戲劇？。中國時報，15
60. 林國明、陳東升(2005)。審議民主、科技決策與公共討論。科技、醫療與社會，3，1-50。
61. 邱昌泰(2002)。從「鄰避情結」到「迎臂效應」：台灣環保抗爭的問題與出路。政治科學論叢，17，33-56。
62. 陳恆安(2003)。科學媒體化。科學發展，369，84-85。
63. 曾韋禎(2006)。高鐵記者腦殘。自由時報，15
64. 黃俊儒、楊文金(1997)。中華民國科學教育前瞻與回顧研討會彙編。台北:台灣師範大學。
65. 鄭宇君(2003)。從社會脈絡解析科學新聞的產製－以基因新聞為例。新聞學研究，74，121-147。
66. 謝瀛春(1992)。全國科技會議新聞之分析。新聞學研究，46，131-147。
67. 韓尚平(1990)。台灣科技新聞報導的現況及問題。科學月刊，21(8)，617-620。
68. 韓尚平(1994)。第二屆中華民國傑出新聞人員研究獎：得獎人研習考察報告。台北:中華民國新聞評議會。
69. 顏若映(1993)。先前知識在閱讀理解上之認知研究。教育與心理研究，16，385-412。

1. 蔡佩穎、張惠博、張文華、林雅慧(2012)。初探論證科學新聞對七年級學生生物學習之效益。中等教育，63(1)，13-37。
2. 陳美蓉、林靜雯、林錦鴻(2014)。科學新聞觀點對不同年齡階段女性健康決策之影響―以荷爾蒙療法為例。科學教育學刊，22(3)，281-306。
3. 陳映均、李松濤(2017)。社會性科學議題新聞的框架分析—以基因改造新聞為例。科學教育學刊，25(S)，439-462。
4. 洪瑞兒、林煥祥、王薪惠(2018)。臺灣公民科技素養、科學興趣及科學參與之探討。教育科學研究期刊，63(4)，229-259。
5. 黃俊儒(2015)。你讀到什麼科學？─科學新聞閱讀回憶診斷工具發展與評析。教育科學研究期刊，60(2)，139-166。
6. 潘怡如、陳雅君、林煥祥(2018)。以科學新聞融入教學提升中學生自我效能及論證能力之探討。科學教育學刊，26(1)，71-96。
7. 張卿卿(2012)。科學新聞資訊呈現形式及其對閱聽眾資訊接收的影響—以科學知識觀點與認知基模理論來探討。科學教育學刊，20(3)，193-216。
8. 張耀仁(2020)。臺灣「科學傳播」研究析論：理論詮釋與反思（1970-2019）。傳播研究與實踐，10(2)，1-32。
9. (2018)。教學與研究的雙螺旋：通識教育教學行動研究之實踐面向。教育研究月刊，286，48-61。